Talk:Brother printers causing issues with third party inks

2025-10-23T13:13:34Z

2A01:CB04:695:C700:AD7B:244C:35F4:9193: /* On purpose sabotage */ new section

== Brother refutes saying these are false claims ==

Brother claims this is false. I wonder whether they will fix firmware that confirms it's actually true? Hacker News discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43271507

[[Special:Contributions/2603:8080:2B05:C434:D554:41BD:32DF:5582|2603:8080:2B05:C434:D554:41BD:32DF:5582]]
:Whether they fix it or not this response warrants inclusion to the article in a "Brother's response" section. [[User:Kostas|Kostas]] ([[User talk:Kostas|talk]]) 08:00, 6 March 2025 (UTC)

== On purpose sabotage ==

Guys,

I've been invited by Brother in their HQs in France. Their engineers BOASTED in front of me they had decreased the minimal temperature needed for the ink to get liquid. As a result, third-party toners manufacturers' ink does not completely get liquid. This decreases the quality (you see stains) and finally breaks the printer fuser unit. This is very expensive.

I'll never ever purchase a Brother again. [[Special:Contributions/2A01:CB04:695:C700:AD7B:244C:35F4:9193|2A01:CB04:695:C700:AD7B:244C:35F4:9193]] 13:13, 23 October 2025 (UTC)

Consumer Rights Wiki - User contributions [en]

Talk:Brother printers causing issues with third party inks