Consumer Rights Wiki - User contributions [en]

Talk:Bambu Lab Authorization Control System

2025-01-20T17:48:59Z

2A02:908:1873:E920:78B9:1F19:9DBC:6AC7: Recent statement

I am not a bambu labs customer. I planned to be. But I spoke on their official facebook forum about a problem with a sunlu printer asking if anyone on there may know because the sunlu paths to help were fruitless. Immediately, people were crying that I had mentioned another printer brand and how that was irrelevant but I was pleading to the experts for a bit of help. Moments later, Bambu Lab staff banned me from the group. I binned the plan to become a customer right there. Some of the customer base and indeed the company, are toxic. Now I see this plan to own their customer base and I sure this is illegal with not logical reason - remember an airgapped network has only it's own security issues, one way traffic is a thing - except a poor excuse. Good luck in changing them. I dare say they will refuse all the way.

I am a year long anycubic customer and I feel vibes over there of ignorance and wonder what they plan on doing in the future.<small>—''The preceding [[Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages|unsigned]] comment was added by'' [[User:81.78.58.48|81.78.58.48]] ([[User talk:81.78.58.48|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/81.78.58.48|contribs]]) 18:07, 19 January 2025 (UTC)</small>
----

A few things that should be added to the article:
* Bambu Lab published a press release from January 18, 2025 after all the heat they got from [https://blog.bambulab.com/firmware-update-introducing-new-authorization-control-system-2/ the initial blog post] https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/11wl_DqAbSLPVMLZ_8jhlz4lGPLGFQPcp
* And here's a Mastodon user saying that this auth control system is a "DMCA trap", he also mentions precedents in the 3D printing market of ChiTu and Stratasys https://mas.to/@zzt/113848144602929391

The ChiTu/Chirtubox issue seems to be referring to this https://3dprintingindustry.com/news/chitu-systems-and-chitubox-a-lesson-in-fighting-open-source-3d-printing-194783/

Stratatsys may be this event https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2024/08/stratasys-sues-bambu-lab-over-patents-used-widely-by-consumer-3d-printers/ — [[User:Lomanic|Lomanic]] ([[User talk:Lomanic|talk]]) 20:56, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

----

Not sure if its worth adding here but a draft complaint letter to the EU highlighting the consumer protection laws Bambu are likely violating has been posted here: https://old.reddit.com/r/3Dprinting/comments/1i5lp86/eu_bambulab_customers_let_your_reps_deal_with_this/

----
== RE: Citations ==

Some of the citations in here seem off, specifically with regard to the claims Bambu is making regarding the cyber attacks which prompted these changes. One article is about an attack on Anycubic printers exclusively , and the other is from 2018, several years before Bambu even released their first printer. I appreciate the desire to highlight bad business practices, but how is this relevant at all to Bambu?

: These articles were the ones Bambu themselves have linked in their bog post as examples of attacks they aim to prevent with this update. [[User:Kostas|Kostas]] ([[User talk:Kostas|talk]]) 14:08, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

----
== January 20, 2025 statement ==

Bambu Lab's recent statement [1] as of January 20, 2025 seems like a half-hearted attempt to address the concerns of their customers, but it ultimately falls short in several key areas. The key issue remains that Bambu Lab wants to decide what use of the printer is "authorized" or which software/accessories are "legitimate".

The company has announced a "Developer Mode" that supposedly restores some of the functionality that was lost in the recent changes, but they've labeled it as "unsupported." This raises questions about whether this mode will be sufficient to allow customers to return their devices if they're not functioning properly, and whether it might break or degrade at any point in the future.

The statement only mentions Developer Mode for a few specific models, without confirming whether it will be available for all future models. This omission is significant, as it leaves customers wondering whether they'll be able to access this feature if they purchase a newer model.

Another issue is the lack of clarity around print farm software support. While Bambu Lab claims to be working with developers to implement proper authorization controls, they haven't specified whether there are any requirements or fees involved, or whether this option is open to open-source solutions.

The company's claims about their collaboration with Orca Slicer also seem misleading. The developer behind Orca Slicer has stated that they were negotiating for an authorization key to allow their software to communicate with Bambu Lab's devices, but were told that this wouldn't be supported. Instead, users would have to use Bambu Lab's own slicer or go through their Bambu Connect application. As @fever_soft on Twitter noted, "'Working with' is sort of misleading, and I’m growing tired of being used in the PR game now." [2] In an earlier statement, the developer wrote "I was negotiating for an authorization key to allow OrcaSlicer to communicate with their device like BambuStudio does, but today I was told they won't support this. Only their slicer can send prints directly; others must use their Bambu Connect" [3]

Bambu Lab's Terms of Service also contradict their claims about user control over firmware updates. The terms state that printers may refuse service without updates and that firmware may update itself, which directly contradicts the company's assertion that users are in control. As stated in their Terms of Service, "Your Bambu Lab product will automatically search for and download new update packages (...) Due to the importance of these updates, your product may block new print job before the updates is installed" [4]

The need for the proprietary Bambu Connect application in LAN mode is also a concern. This application contains a key with an expiration date, which raises questions about what will happen to air-gapped machines once the key expires. Bambu Lab hasn't explained how users will be able to keep their printers functional without having to update Bambu Connect constantly.

The implementation of Bambu Connect has also added inconvenience for users of third-party software, which is acknowledged in the statement but downplayed as a minor issue. However, this change has made it more cumbersome for users to use third-party software, without adding any real security benefits.

There's also no clear commitment to long-term support for Bambu Connect across all operating systems and versions, which is crucial for the longevity of the printers. The private key contained in the application has an expiration date, which means that a new version of Bambu Connect (and possibly the printer firmware) will be necessary at some point.

Bambu Lab's statement also fails to address the root causes of user concerns, instead trying to downplay the backlash as a "mix of valuable feedback and unfortunate misinformation." The company hasn't clarified whether they'll try to charge customers for subscriptions or additional fees after the sale of the device, which is a major concern for users. In fact, their Bambu Farm Manager Service Agreement states "BAMBU LAB MAY OFFER THE SERVICES AND SOFTWARE WITHOUT CHARGE, FOR A FEE, OR MAY CHARGE A FEE TO CERTAIN USERS OR FOR CERTAIN USES (E.G. COMMERCIAL USES). BAMBU LAB RESERVES THE RIGHT TO AND MAY CHANGE THE LICENSE AND FEE STRUCTURE, CONDITIONS, AND WHICH USERS OR USES REQUIRE A FEE" [5]

The situation with the Panda Touch accessory remains unresolved. Bambu Lab's changes have locked down devices, making it harder for users to install third-party upgrades, and the company hasn't addressed the concerns of existing customers who have purchased this accessory. As the manufacturer BigTreeTech noted on Twitter, "At this point we are still waiting to hear back from Bambu Lab regarding our request for the Panda Touch to be able to retain full functionality after the new firmware updates are installed." [6]

References:

[1] https://blog.bambulab.com/updates-and-third-party-integration-with-bambu-connect/

[2] https://x.com/fever_soft/status/1881240944680603806

[3] https://x.com/fever_soft/status/1880630570809795034

[4] https://bambulab.com/en/policies/terms (Last updated as of 24 April, 2024)

[5] https://bambulab.com/fr/policies/bambu-farm-manager-service-agreement (Last updated: 3 Jan, 2025)

[6] https://x.com/BigTreeTech/status/1881261442948898941

To regain the trust of their customers, Bambu Lab could

* Remove the need for the proprietary Bambu Connect application and its questionable "security by obscurity" scheme altogether in LAN mode, and allow any kind of software to directly control the devices as it has been before the changes
* Commit to Developer Mode a supported feature (as in: if it ceases to work properly, then it is a bug that will get fixed)
* Promise that Developer Mode allowing unfettered access to all functions of the devices will be and remain a supported feature for all current and future models and versions
* Clarify that they will not try to charge money from companies making third-party aftermarket hardware upgrades nor from software developers developing e.g., print farm software
* Give a clear commitment that all features of their current and future devices can be controlled by third-party and open source software without the need for any kind of "agreements" or "partnerships" with Bambu Lab, and especially without any form of NDAs or payments
* Allow the end user to perform firmware installations, including firmware downgrades and installing third-party firmware, without requiring the manufacturer's signatures or permissions
* Provide clear instructions on how to install third-party firmware on all components of the system

Talk:Bambu Lab Authorization Control System

2025-01-20T17:47:40Z

2A02:908:1873:E920:78B9:1F19:9DBC:6AC7: Recent statement

I am not a bambu labs customer. I planned to be. But I spoke on their official facebook forum about a problem with a sunlu printer asking if anyone on there may know because the sunlu paths to help were fruitless. Immediately, people were crying that I had mentioned another printer brand and how that was irrelevant but I was pleading to the experts for a bit of help. Moments later, Bambu Lab staff banned me from the group. I binned the plan to become a customer right there. Some of the customer base and indeed the company, are toxic. Now I see this plan to own their customer base and I sure this is illegal with not logical reason - remember an airgapped network has only it's own security issues, one way traffic is a thing - except a poor excuse. Good luck in changing them. I dare say they will refuse all the way.

I am a year long anycubic customer and I feel vibes over there of ignorance and wonder what they plan on doing in the future.<small>—''The preceding [[Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages|unsigned]] comment was added by'' [[User:81.78.58.48|81.78.58.48]] ([[User talk:81.78.58.48|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/81.78.58.48|contribs]]) 18:07, 19 January 2025 (UTC)</small>
----

A few things that should be added to the article:
* Bambu Lab published a press release from January 18, 2025 after all the heat they got from [https://blog.bambulab.com/firmware-update-introducing-new-authorization-control-system-2/ the initial blog post] https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/11wl_DqAbSLPVMLZ_8jhlz4lGPLGFQPcp
* And here's a Mastodon user saying that this auth control system is a "DMCA trap", he also mentions precedents in the 3D printing market of ChiTu and Stratasys https://mas.to/@zzt/113848144602929391

The ChiTu/Chirtubox issue seems to be referring to this https://3dprintingindustry.com/news/chitu-systems-and-chitubox-a-lesson-in-fighting-open-source-3d-printing-194783/

Stratatsys may be this event https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2024/08/stratasys-sues-bambu-lab-over-patents-used-widely-by-consumer-3d-printers/ — [[User:Lomanic|Lomanic]] ([[User talk:Lomanic|talk]]) 20:56, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

----

Not sure if its worth adding here but a draft complaint letter to the EU highlighting the consumer protection laws Bambu are likely violating has been posted here: https://old.reddit.com/r/3Dprinting/comments/1i5lp86/eu_bambulab_customers_let_your_reps_deal_with_this/

----
== RE: Citations ==

Some of the citations in here seem off, specifically with regard to the claims Bambu is making regarding the cyber attacks which prompted these changes. One article is about an attack on Anycubic printers exclusively , and the other is from 2018, several years before Bambu even released their first printer. I appreciate the desire to highlight bad business practices, but how is this relevant at all to Bambu?

: These articles were the ones Bambu themselves have linked in their bog post as examples of attacks they aim to prevent with this update. [[User:Kostas|Kostas]] ([[User talk:Kostas|talk]]) 14:08, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

----

Bambu Lab's recent statement [1] as of January 20, 2025 seems like a half-hearted attempt to address the concerns of their customers, but it ultimately falls short in several key areas. The key issue remains that Bambu Lab wants to decide what use of the printer is "authorized" or which software/accessories are "legitimate".

The company has announced a "Developer Mode" that supposedly restores some of the functionality that was lost in the recent changes, but they've labeled it as "unsupported." This raises questions about whether this mode will be sufficient to allow customers to return their devices if they're not functioning properly, and whether it might break or degrade at any point in the future.

The statement only mentions Developer Mode for a few specific models, without confirming whether it will be available for all future models. This omission is significant, as it leaves customers wondering whether they'll be able to access this feature if they purchase a newer model.

Another issue is the lack of clarity around print farm software support. While Bambu Lab claims to be working with developers to implement proper authorization controls, they haven't specified whether there are any requirements or fees involved, or whether this option is open to open-source solutions.

The company's claims about their collaboration with Orca Slicer also seem misleading. The developer behind Orca Slicer has stated that they were negotiating for an authorization key to allow their software to communicate with Bambu Lab's devices, but were told that this wouldn't be supported. Instead, users would have to use Bambu Lab's own slicer or go through their Bambu Connect application. As @fever_soft on Twitter noted, "'Working with' is sort of misleading, and I’m growing tired of being used in the PR game now." [2] In an earlier statement, the developer wrote "I was negotiating for an authorization key to allow OrcaSlicer to communicate with their device like BambuStudio does, but today I was told they won't support this. Only their slicer can send prints directly; others must use their Bambu Connect" [3]

Bambu Lab's Terms of Service also contradict their claims about user control over firmware updates. The terms state that printers may refuse service without updates and that firmware may update itself, which directly contradicts the company's assertion that users are in control. As stated in their Terms of Service, "Your Bambu Lab product will automatically search for and download new update packages (...) Due to the importance of these updates, your product may block new print job before the updates is installed" [4]

The need for the proprietary Bambu Connect application in LAN mode is also a concern. This application contains a key with an expiration date, which raises questions about what will happen to air-gapped machines once the key expires. Bambu Lab hasn't explained how users will be able to keep their printers functional without having to update Bambu Connect constantly.

The implementation of Bambu Connect has also added inconvenience for users of third-party software, which is acknowledged in the statement but downplayed as a minor issue. However, this change has made it more cumbersome for users to use third-party software, without adding any real security benefits.

There's also no clear commitment to long-term support for Bambu Connect across all operating systems and versions, which is crucial for the longevity of the printers. The private key contained in the application has an expiration date, which means that a new version of Bambu Connect (and possibly the printer firmware) will be necessary at some point.

Bambu Lab's statement also fails to address the root causes of user concerns, instead trying to downplay the backlash as a "mix of valuable feedback and unfortunate misinformation." The company hasn't clarified whether they'll try to charge customers for subscriptions or additional fees after the sale of the device, which is a major concern for users. In fact, their Bambu Farm Manager Service Agreement states "BAMBU LAB MAY OFFER THE SERVICES AND SOFTWARE WITHOUT CHARGE, FOR A FEE, OR MAY CHARGE A FEE TO CERTAIN USERS OR FOR CERTAIN USES (E.G. COMMERCIAL USES). BAMBU LAB RESERVES THE RIGHT TO AND MAY CHANGE THE LICENSE AND FEE STRUCTURE, CONDITIONS, AND WHICH USERS OR USES REQUIRE A FEE" [5]

The situation with the Panda Touch accessory remains unresolved. Bambu Lab's changes have locked down devices, making it harder for users to install third-party upgrades, and the company hasn't addressed the concerns of existing customers who have purchased this accessory. As the manufacturer BigTreeTech noted on Twitter, "At this point we are still waiting to hear back from Bambu Lab regarding our request for the Panda Touch to be able to retain full functionality after the new firmware updates are installed." [6]

References:
[1] https://blog.bambulab.com/updates-and-third-party-integration-with-bambu-connect/
[2] https://x.com/fever_soft/status/1881240944680603806
[3] https://x.com/fever_soft/status/1880630570809795034
[4] https://bambulab.com/en/policies/terms (Last updated as of 24 April, 2024)
[5] https://bambulab.com/fr/policies/bambu-farm-manager-service-agreement (Last updated: 3 Jan, 2025)
[6] https://x.com/BigTreeTech/status/1881261442948898941

To regain the trust of their customers, Bambu Lab could
* Remove the need for the proprietary Bambu Connect application and its questionable "security by obscurity" scheme altogether in LAN mode, and allow any kind of software to directly control the devices as it has been before the changes
* Commit to Developer Mode a supported feature (as in: if it ceases to work properly, then it is a bug that will get fixed)
* Promise that Developer Mode allowing unfettered access to all functions of the devices will be and remain a supported feature for all current and future models and versions
* Clarify that they will not try to charge money from companies making third-party aftermarket hardware upgrades nor from software developers developing e.g., print farm software
* Give a clear commitment that all features of their current and future devices can be controlled by third-party and open source software without the need for any kind of "agreements" or "partnerships" with Bambu Lab, and especially without any form of NDAs or payments
* Allow the end user to perform firmware installations, including firmware downgrades and installing third-party firmware, without requiring the manufacturer's signatures or permissions
* Provide clear instructions on how to install third-party firmware on all components of the system

Dymo

2025-01-20T01:11:44Z

2A02:908:1873:E920:78B9:1F19:9DBC:6AC7: Louis Rossmann videos

Dymo LabelWriter 550 Turbo and other 500 series label printers have introduced a controversial feature: DRM (Digital Rights Management) via RFID tags in their consumables. This move has sparked frustration among users and prompted the hacking community to develop workarounds. Affected printers come with "Automatic Label Recognition™," a marketing term that translates to DRM implementation in thermal stickers. This system restricts users to purchasing only Dymo-branded labels, potentially increasing costs and limiting consumer choice.

In response to this an open source solution to remove the restrictions has been developed.

https://hackaday.com/2022/03/30/freedmo-gets-rid-of-dymo-label-printer-drm/

https://www.eevblog.com/forum/reviews/dymo-550-thermal-printer-drm-hacking/

https://github.com/free-dmo/free-dmo-stm32

Louis Rossmann: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YJs9_xELKbI Dymo printers are putting DRM in the paper - YouTube]

Louis Rossmann: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lezr3kYbFvY Dymo labelwriter paper DRM HACKED - you can use your own paper now - but does it matter?? - YouTube]

Dymo

2025-01-20T01:01:59Z

2A02:908:1873:E920:78B9:1F19:9DBC:6AC7: Dymo LabelWriter 550 Turbo

Bambu Farm Manager

2025-01-20T00:48:50Z

2A02:908:1873:E920:78B9:1F19:9DBC:6AC7:

It appears that Bambu Lab is trying to charge additional money after the sale of a 3D printer if you want to use it e.g., in a 3D printing farm.
<nowiki>https://bambulab.com/fr/policies/bambu-farm-manager-service-agreement</nowiki><blockquote>Access to and use of the Service requires two software components: the Bambu Farm Server application and the Bambu Farm client application (collectively referred to as “Bambu Farm Manager,” or the “Software").

(...)

BAMBU LAB MAY OFFER THE SERVICES AND SOFTWARE WITHOUT CHARGE, '''FOR A FEE, OR MAY CHARGE A FEE TO CERTAIN USERS OR FOR CERTAIN USES (E.G. COMMERCIAL USES)'''. BAMBU LAB RESERVES THE RIGHT TO AND '''MAY CHANGE THE LICENSE AND FEE STRUCTURE, CONDITIONS, AND WHICH USERS OR USES REQUIRE A FEE'''. WE WILL GIVE YOU REASONABLE ADVANCE NOTICE IF WE IMPLEMENT OR CHANGE ANY FEES PAYABLE FOR THE LICENSE TO THE SOFTWARE OR CONNECTED SERVICES.</blockquote>Additional evidence:

https://www.reddit.com/r/BambuLab/comments/1i5aply/for_those_of_you_who_dont_think_they_will_go/

Bambu Farm Manager

2025-01-19T22:17:14Z

2A02:908:1873:E920:78B9:1F19:9DBC:6AC7: Created page with "It appears that Bambu Lab is trying to charge additional money after the sale of a 3D printer if you want to use it e.g., in a 3D printing farm. <nowiki>https://bambulab.com/fr/policies/bambu-farm-manager-service-agreement</nowiki><blockquote>Access to and use of the Service requires two software components: the Bambu Farm Server application and the Bambu Farm client application (collectively referred to as “Bambu Farm Manager,” or the “Software"). (...) BAMBU LA..."

Bambu Lab Authorization Control System

2025-01-19T16:14:24Z

2A02:908:1873:E920:78B9:1F19:9DBC:6AC7: Customer ratings on sites like Trustpilot

On 2025-01-16, the 3D printer manufacturer [[:wikipedia:Bambu Lab|Bambu Lab]] announced that future firmwares for their 3D printers would introduce an authorization and authentication protection mechanism for their connection and control, in the name of security. Bambu has stated the following:<blockquote>''"This change is mitigating any risk of remote hacks or printer exposure issues that have happened in the past and also lower the risk of abnormal traffic or attacks."''<ref>https://blog.bambulab.com/firmware-update-introducing-new-authorization-control-system-2/</ref><ref>https://all3dp.com/4/bambu-lab-limits-third-party-printer-control-with-new-security-update/</ref></blockquote>

== Controversy Regarding Firmware Updates ==
[[File:Bambu tos screenshot.png|alt=bambu terms stating print jobs may not function properly if update is not performed to new firmware which is highly limiting. |thumb|Bambu terms regarding printer functionality & potential for disrupted print jobs if users do not update to a new firmware that radically restricts the autonomy of the owner of the printer]]

=== Potential for Remote Disabling of Printers ===
A significant concern raised by the community revolves around the wording in Bambu Lab's Terms of Service & firmware update announcements. Critics & users argue that the phrasing leaves open the possibility for the manufacturer to remotely disable printers that are not updated to the latest firmware. Specifically, Bambu Lab's Terms of Service<ref>https://bambulab.com/en-us/policies/terms</ref> states that printers may block "new print jobs" if updates are not applied, which some users interpret as a potential pathway for forced obsolescence <ref>https://blog.bambulab.com/firmware-update-introducing-new-authorization-control-system-2/</ref>. However the announcement specifically mentions - "'''What happens if I never upgrade to this firmware?''' ''You may continue using an older firmware version that does not include the new security updates; however, this means the printers may miss out on important security fixes or bug patches included in newer versions.''"<ref>https://blog.bambulab.com/firmware-update-introducing-new-authorization-control-system-2/</ref>

Defenders of Bambu Lab point out that offline modes such as SD card printing & LAN-only setups would remain functional, others point out that the Terms of Service do not explicitly limit this restriction to cloud-based printing. This ambiguity has led to speculation that Bambu Lab could enforce broader limitations, effectively rendering printers inoperable for users who choose not to update<ref>https://old.reddit.com/r/BambuLab/comments/1i45iy2/bambu_lab_reserves_the_right_to_brick_your/</ref>.

=== Debate Over "Bricking" Terminology ===
The debate has also extended to the definition of "bricking." Some community members assert that if a printer is unable to accept new print jobs without an update, it effectively becomes non-functional and qualifies as being "bricked." Others counter that as long as certain offline functionalities remain—such as SD card printing—the term does not accurately apply<ref>https://old.reddit.com/r/BambuLab/comments/1i45iy2/bambu_lab_reserves_the_right_to_brick_your/m7sezlg/</ref>.

=== Community Strategies to Deal with Risks ===
Users have discussed strategies to avoid possible disruptions, including:
* Operating printers exclusively in offline modes.
* Utilizing LAN connections or VPN setups, this requires access key from the printer (previously, you could use your cloud credentials over LAN).
* Exploring alternative firmware or third-party scripts to restore full functionality<ref>https://old.reddit.com/r/BambuLab/comments/1i45iy2/bambu_lab_reserves_the_right_to_brick_your/m7t8i7r/</ref>.

== Bambu Lab's Justification and Rebuttal ==
Bambu Lab has stated that the authorization system is in place in order to protect against "remote hacks," "printer exposure," and "abnormal traffic or attacks." However, there are several ways to mitigate these risks without the loss of user control that their system causes:

* '''The "remote hacks" that were cited as an example in the article seem to be a direct result of the 3D printer vendor not responding properly to a reported security vulnerability in their product<ref>[https://www.bitdefender.com/en-au/blog/hotforsecurity/someone-is-hacking-3d-printers-to-warn-owners-of-a-security-flaw?ref=blog.bambulab.com https://www.bitdefender.com/en-au/blog/hotforsecurity/someone-is-hacking-3d-printers-to-warn-owners-of-a-security-flaw]</ref>. Therefore, in order to get attention, the researcher decided to infect machines and display a harmless message to spread publicity.''' Properly responding to security vulnerabilities, working to patch them quickly, and working with the security community (who would be more than happy to help secure products) would be some ways to prevent this.
* In the article cited about printer exposure, it was done largely due to misconfiguration on the part of users<ref>[https://www.csoonline.com/article/566223/over-3700-exposed-3d-printers-open-to-remote-attackers.html?ref=blog.bambulab.com https://www.csoonline.com/article/566223/over-3700-exposed-3d-printers-open-to-remote-attackers.html]</ref>. Printer exposure can be mitigated by offering more convenient ways to securely expose printers to the internet, so users are not tempted to allow unauthenticated access over the network.
* The "abnormal traffic" can be mitigated by steps Bambu has already put in place, as detailed in their own article on the matter<ref>[https://wiki.bambulab.com/en/security-incidents-cloud-traffic?ref=blog.bambulab.com https://wiki.bambulab.com/en/security-incidents-cloud-traffic]</ref>.

== Issues with LAN Mode Requiring Authorization ==

Bambu Lab printers have the ability to be controlled over both cloud and LAN. This allowed users to integrate their printers into private networks & maintain full control without having to rely on the manufacturer's server while also allowing cloud access. The new authorization system mandates that even LAN-based operations go through an authentication process using Bambu Connect<ref>https://wiki.bambulab.com/en/software/bambu-connect</ref> to retain full control. Full local access is still possible and unchanged for those not using the cloud.

This change has drawn criticism for many reasons:
* '''Privacy Concerns''': Requiring authentication for LAN mode raises concerns about data being unnecessarily exposed to Bambu Lab's servers, even for local-only operations, though previously, the printer was also connected and could be controlled by the cloud even when sending prints locally.
* '''Loss of Offline Independence while also using cloud''': Before, users could have hybrid offline setups. The requirement for authentication removes this option unless users revert to older firmware versions, which Bambu does not allow people to do once they have updated to the firmware using the new scheme.
* '''Increased Complexity''': The added authentication layer complicates workflows for users who built custom setups or relied on third-party integrations for LAN control while retaining cloud functionality<ref>https://forum.bambulab.com/t/full-non-cloud-based-network-option-needed/3643</ref>.

=== Precedents and Comparisons ===
Critics have likened this potential functionality to similar cases in other industries where manufacturers remotely restrict product features. Notable examples include HP's printer firmware updates that rendered third-party ink cartridges unusable and Tesla's software locks on second-hand vehicles. These parallels suggest a broader trend of manufacturers leveraging software to control hardware capabilities post-purchase<ref>https://www.classaction.org/hp-printer-lawsuit</ref><ref>https://www.wired.com/story/tesla-remote-disable-used-car-features/</ref>.

== Implementation Timeline and Requirements ==

The authorization system will be rolled out in phases, starting with the X1 series printers. A beta firmware (version 01.08.03.00) was released on January 17th, 2025, with the full release scheduled for January 23rd, 2025. The P & A series printers will get similar updates at an unspecified future date.

To use printers with the new authorization system, users must update multiple pieces of software:
* Bambu Studio must be updated to version 01.10.02.64 or higher
* Bambu Handy mobile app must be updated to version 2.17.0 or higher
* The new Bambu Connect application must be installed for using third-party slicers

These software updates are mandatory for users who update their firmware - failing to update all components simultaneously will result in certain printer controls becoming unusable. Users who choose to maintain third-party software compatibility can continue using older firmware versions, though this will not be an option for new printers which will ship with the authorization system pre-installed.

Bambu Lab states these coordinated updates are necessary because the new authorization system fundamentally changes how the printer validates & accepts commands. The older versions of Bambu Studio & Bambu Handy lack the authentication mechanisms required to interact with printers running the new firmware. The Bambu Connect application was created specifically to provide a controlled interface for third-party software, replacing the previous direct access through network plugins<ref>https://blog.bambulab.com/firmware-update-introducing-new-authorization-control-system-2/</ref>.

== Impact on Third-Party Integration and User Choice ==

=== Changes to Third-Party Access ===
The new authorization system replaces direct network API access with a more limited URL-based interface through Bambu Connect. Third-party software can only interact with the printer by sending specific URL commands to Bambu Connect<ref>https://wiki.bambulab.com/en/software/bambu-connect</ref>. The interface requires three parameters:

* <code>path</code>: The absolute file system path to the 3MF file (e.g., /tmp/cube.gcode.3mf)
* <code>name</code>: The name of the file (e.g., Cube)
* <code>version</code>: A fixed value of 1.0.0 for compatibility

A complete command must be formatted as:<blockquote><syntaxhighlight lang="text">
bambu-connect://import-file?path=%2Ftmp%2Fcube.gcode.3mf&name=Cube&version=1.0.0
</syntaxhighlight></blockquote>This interface only allows basic file transfer and print initiation - all other printer control functions previously available to third-party software are now exclusive to Bambu's own applications. The path and name parameters must be URL-encoded using encodeURIComponent or equivalent functions<ref>https://wiki.bambulab.com/en/software/bambu-connect</ref>.

=== Reduced Home Automation Capabilities ===
While basic status monitoring remains available (e.g., print progress updates in Home Assistant), the new firmware removes the ability for home automation systems to control printer functions. Users can no longer:
* Start or stop prints remotely via Home Assistant or BTT Panda Touch <ref name=":0">https://www.facebook.com/BIGTREETECH/posts/pfbid0SNZGxvf7NRdmyVgHf6y9yNedNbU2RrCfdT8gugTSD4AYfr5BHneNF9H1EbwyYiJEl</ref> or other third party accessories and/or software interfaces
* Control printer temperatures or cooling
* Automate printer behaviors based on sensor data or events
* Access camera feeds through third-party applications<ref>https://forum.bambulab.com/t/this-new-auth-system-will-make-me-sell-my-printers/135400/9</ref>

=== Permanent Nature of the Update ===
Once a printer is updated to the new firmware, users cannot revert to previous versions that allows full control of the printer using LAN mode access key while signed into the cloud<ref>https://blog.bambulab.com/firmware-update-introducing-new-authorization-control-system-2/</ref>. Option still exists to disable the cloud service.

The manufacturer states this change is required for security, but community members note that many of the security vulnerabilities being addressed stem from Bambu's own cloud-centric design choices rather than inherent risks of local network control<ref>https://forum.bambulab.com/t/bambu-studio-1-10-2-public-beta/134549/12</ref>. The update forces users into using Bambu Connect middleware if they want to retain cloud functionality.

This can be characterised as a significant post-purchase reduction in functionality for existing owners who bought their printers with the understanding they could use third-party software & home automation tools, but also only affects users actively choosing to use Bambu Cloud at the same time. The inability to revert these changes, combined with the mandatory nature of the update for new printers, is used to demonstrate how manufacturers can use software updates to unilaterally modify the capabilities of hardware products after purchase, although in this case the changes affect only people already choosing to use the cloud service<ref>https://forum.bambulab.com/t/full-non-cloud-based-network-option-needed/3643/9</ref>.

For users that would want to use a third-party slicer while using their cloud service, Bambu would require those users to download and install Bambu Connect in order to send gcode wirelessly over LAN or over the cloud. While Bambu claims that they were in contact with SoftFever, the developer of OrcaSlicer, as of writing, SoftFever still does not have any keys for Bambu Connect and the new firmware is only available as opt-in beta at the moment.<ref name=":1">https://x.com/fever_soft/status/1880630570809795034?t=qJyh4SGFZFllcYrqexGW-Q&s=19</ref>

== Impact on Functionality ==
While some functionality remains unauthenticated like in previous firmware versions (sending status information from the printer over the network, starting a print job using SD cards), the most important features now require authentication through a new closed-source client called Bambu Connect<ref>https://wiki.bambulab.com/en/software/bambu-connect</ref>. These restricted features include:

* Initializing prints via LAN or cloud mode
* Remote video access to monitor prints
* Controlling motion system, temperature, fans
* AMS settings and calibrations
* Home automation integration beyond basic status monitoring

Previously, third-party software such as OrcaSlicer<ref>https://github.com/SoftFever/OrcaSlicer/issues/8063</ref> could interact with Bambu Lab printers via the open-source Bambu Studio and proprietary network plug-ins. While Bambu Connect provides a limited URL-based API to initiate prints, most functionality previously openly available is now restricted to Bambu's ecosystem<ref>https://forum.bambulab.com/t/this-new-auth-system-will-make-me-sell-my-printers/135400/9</ref>.

Previously, third-party accessories such as Panda Touch would allow users to control their printers with a standalone device. Panda Touch was especially popular amongst P series printer owners since P series printers contain a monochromatic screen with a D-pad by default for printer control whereas Panda Touch is a full-color touch screen that had a small battery so that way users could reposition and detach their Panda Touch off their printers if needed. Users would be able to queue up jobs, jog printer motors, and connect to multiple printers at once in order to monitor print jobs. According to Big Tree Tech (BTT), the manufacturer of the Panda Touch, they urge users of Panda Touch not to update firmware any further since doing so would foreseeably permanently break compatibility with users' printers and their Panda Touch. <ref name=":0" />

== Communication with Panda Touch Developers ==

As of writing, no formal communication has happened between Big Tree Tech (BTT), the manufacturer and developer of Panda Touch, and Bambu Labs. Based on their Facebook announcement, BTT stated that they have reached out to Bambu and will update if Bambu responds to their correspondence. <ref name=":0" />

== Communication with OrcaSlicer Developers ==

Before the official announcement of the new authorization & authentication, Bambu Lab engaged with the OrcaSlicer development team regarding the changes. This communication has sparked significant discussion within the 3D printing community, particularly regarding its timing, tone, and implications.

=== Pre-Announcement Contact ===
Reports from OrcaSlicer demonstrate that Bambu Lab provided limited advance notice of the changes that would render their software incompatible with Bambu printers running the new firmware. The communication emphasized:
* The introduction of Bambu Connect as the only supported method for interacting with third-party slicers.
* The discontinuation of the network plugin API that OrcaSlicer and other tools relied on for printer control.<ref>https://github.com/SoftFever/OrcaSlicer/issues/8063</ref>
* An invitation for OrcaSlicer developers to adapt their software to integrate with the Bambu Connect URL scheme.

The communication lacked the detailed technical documentation that would be necessary for developers to be able to work with the new requirements.

=== How Community Viewed These Actions ===
This approach has been interpreted by many as a calculated move by Bambu Lab to enforce tighter control over its ecosystem. Primary criticisms of Bambu were:
* '''Lack of Transparency''': The limited warning to OrcaSlicer devs suggests that Bambu Lab prioritized internal rollout schedules over community engagement with existing customers. Point to the contrary: The new firmware is in beta and Bambu Connect middleware contains temporary compomises to allow third party slicers to work as before.
* '''Lack of Follow-Through:''' As of writing, SoftFever, OrcaSlicer's lead developer, still does not have API keys for Bambu Connect, a necessary layer of Bambu software that would need to be integrated into OrcaSlicer. Bambu's original announcement prominently mentioned OrcaSlicer and gave the impression that Bambu is actively providing the necessary assets so that SoftFever would be able to implement the new software architecture so that OrcaSlicer users are able to still use OrcaSlicer to send gcode to their printers without needing Bambu Connect to be installed as a separate program. The lack of active cooperation does not reflect favorably upon Bambu as it seems like their announcement used OrcaSlicer's name to try to make it seem like Bambu is trying its best to make sure that developers have what they need, but in reality, their inaction seems to show that Bambu is not making a sincere attempt to ensure that OrcaSlicer remains supported. <ref name=":1" />
* '''Disregard for Open-Source Collaboration''': OrcaSlicer is widely used in the community; it is an open-source effort to improve the 3D printing experience for all customers. By abruptly altering the compatibility landscape, Bambu Lab is seen as undermining good-faith initiatives to improve the ecosystem for everyone. The decision to restrict network APIs in favor of proprietary systems such as Bambu Connect represents a broader industry trend of closing off ecosystems that were once open, removing customer choice, privacy, & freedom.
* '''Token Support for Third-Party Tools''': While Bambu Connect provides a workaround for third-party slicer use, it significantly restricts functionality & complicates workflows, leading many to question the sincerity of Bambu's stated support for open-source tools.<ref>https://wiki.bambulab.com/en/software/bambu-connect</ref>
* '''Power Imbalance''': As the hardware manufacturer, Bambu Lab has the ability to dictate how its products can be used; often to the detriment of third-party devs & users.
== Community-Driven Workarounds and Technical Alternatives ==

The 3D printing community has begun exploring potential workarounds to restore functionality and user autonomy. These efforts focus on bypassing or mitigating the limitations imposed by the firmware update.

=== Custom Firmware Development ===
Discussions within the community highlight interest in developing custom firmware as an alternative to Bambu's official updates. One prominent project mentioned in forums is the development of custom firmware for the X1-series printers, such as the "X1Plus Custom Firmware."<ref>https://forum.bambulab.com/t/bambu-studio-1-10-2-public-beta/134549/12</ref> This firmware aims to:
* Restore direct network control and third-party slicer compatibility.
* Re-enable previously available features such as motion system adjustments, temperature control, and AMS settings without requiring proprietary software.
* Provide users with greater flexibility in integrating printers with home automation systems and workflows.

However, custom firmware development faces significant challenges, including:
* Limited documentation and proprietary hardware components, which complicate reverse engineering efforts.
* The potential voiding of warranties and risks of bricking devices.
* Legal concerns regarding intellectual property and bypassing manufacturer-imposed restrictions.

== Lan mode and blocked internet access ==
This is a guide made by the user Tzeny15

https://www.reddit.com/r/BambuLab/comments/1i4vp5i/comment/this/

== Community Tools and Scripts ==
In addition to firmware alternatives, some users have come up with custom scripts & software tools to interface with Bambu Lab printers indirectly. These tools often rely on:
* Reverse-engineering the URL-based commands required by Bambu Connect to enable partial functionality with third-party slicers like OrcaSlicer.
* Creating local server emulations to replicate the network API previously available before the update.

While these tools provide temporary solutions, they don't fully replace the open ecosystem that existed prior to the authorization update.

=== Re-engineering Printer Control Electronics ===
ChazLayyd's Bambu Lab Klipper Conversion project is currently in an incomplete stage. <ref>https://github.com/ChazLayyd/Bambu-Lab-Klipper-Conversion</ref> <ref>DhazLayyd's Discord Community

https://discord.gg/W6B5mBejuC</ref> While it was not made in response to Bambu's announcement, there has been a wave of new public interest in this specific project. ChazLayyd's documentation instructs P1S owners to non-destructively remove the old control electronics that run Bambu's proprietary software and instructs P1S owners to install off-the-shelf control components so that the existing motor connectors and other critical electronics can communicate with the newly-installed off-the-shelf control components.

=== Advocacy for Open Ecosystem Support ===
Community members have also organized to advocate for open-source support and rollback options. Suggestions include:
* Allowing an opt-out option for existing users who prefer local network control without cloud dependency.
** It should be pointed out that this has always been possible and past firmware updates made signing into the cloud at any point completely unnecessary. This information continues to be ignored by some.
* Providing an official API for third-party slicers under specific licensing agreements that allow secure authorized usage.<ref>https://github.com/SoftFever/OrcaSlicer/issues/8063</ref>
== Bambu Corporate Strategy vs Maker Community Values==

=== Impact on Professional Users and Print Farms ===
The restrictions imposed by the new authorization system create significant operational challenges for professional users who kept their printers signed into the cloud:

* Print farms can no longer use custom automation systems to manage multiple printers
* Workflows built around third-party software have to be completely redesigned
* The requirement to manually export & import files through Bambu Connect creates additional labor
* Integration with existing business systems & workflows becomes more difficult or impossible
* Professional users with more than 20 printers report the new workflow as "an absolute nightmare"<ref>https://forum.bambulab.com/t/this-new-auth-system-will-make-me-sell-my-printers/135400/4</ref>
The solution to the above is not to sign the printer into the cloud. Keeping the printer signed in would be a security oversight in this use case on the part of the print farm.

=== Privacy & Data Collection Concerns ===

The shift toward mandatory use of Bambu's software ecosystem raises several privacy and data collection concerns:

* All printer operations must now pass through Bambu's cloud infrastructure when using cloud mode
* User print data, including file names and print settings, becomes visible to Bambu when cloud is used
* Camera feeds and operational data are processed through Bambu's servers while on a different network
* Users have limited visibility into how their data is collected, stored, and used in the cloud
* The system creates dependence on Bambu's cloud services availability for basic printer functionality<ref>https://forum.bambulab.com/t/full-non-cloud-based-network-option-needed/3643/9</ref>

While Bambu Lab maintains that cloud processing is necessary for security and functionality, community members argue this represents unnecessary data collection that could be handled locally<ref>https://forum.bambulab.com/t/bambu-studio-1-10-2-public-beta/134549/12</ref>. The company's cloud infrastructure costs are significant, leading some users to speculate that future monetization of the cloud services may be planned<ref>https://forum.bambulab.com/t/full-non-cloud-based-network-option-needed/3643/5</ref>. Therefore, people should assess if their use case mandates the use of the cloud service and disable it when it doesn't.

This shift from local control to cloud-dependent operation is part of a broader trend in consumer devices, where manufacturers use security concerns to justify increased data collection & reduced customer control over devices they bought & paid for. Privacy-conscious users should operate their printers in LAN-only mode to avoid cloud connectivity.

== Customer Reactions ==

Customer reactions have been overwhelmingly negative<ref>https://forum.bambulab.com/t/bambu-studio-1-10-2-public-beta/134549/4</ref><ref>https://old.reddit.com/r/BambuLab/comments/1i2psvz/firmware_update_introducing_new_authorization/</ref>. Bambu Lab has historically pushed cloud-based printer interaction while offering limited LAN mode functionality<ref>https://forum.bambulab.com/t/full-non-cloud-based-network-option-needed/3643/9</ref>. Many customers argue that the security issues this locked-down firmware claims to address are actually consequences of the company's cloud-based design choices rather than inherent risks of local network control<ref>https://forum.bambulab.com/t/bambu-studio-1-10-2-public-beta/134549/12</ref>, which continues to infuriate users who are now told that security is the justification for a loss of freedom. As a result of the announcement of the shift, customer ratings on sites like Trustpilot rapidly dropped<ref>https://www.trustpilot.com/review/bambulab.com?sort=recency</ref> with many reviews citing the restrictions as the reason for the bad reviews.

The shift raises privacy concerns as user print data, including file names, print settings, and camera feeds, must now pass through Bambu's cloud infrastructure.

Many community members & customers ask whether the significant costs of maintaining & deploying this cloud infrastructure might lead to future monetization of these now-mandatory services<ref>https://forum.bambulab.com/t/full-non-cloud-based-network-option-needed/3643/5</ref>, with subscriptions required for features that once worked with local access.

It should be noted, however, that so far '''no changes have been made or indicated for those not using the cloud service'''. Past firmware updates made it possible to avoid using the cloud service completely by allowing pairing the slicer via IP address and access key and doing offline firmware updates without having to sign the printer into the service, not even temporarily, keeping local functionality unchanged.

== Comparisons to Similar Practices by Other Companies ==

Bambu Lab's new authorization & authentication requirements have been compared to a number of practices by traditional printer manufacturers, such as HP or Epson, who have also faced backlash around their handling of digital rights management (DRM){{Citation needed}}. These comparisons address:
* '''Forced Updates''': Firmware updates have rendered third-party ink cartridges incompatible, forcing users to purchase proprietary consumables.
* '''Restricted Features''': Scanner/printer combos that will not scan if the ink is empty."
* '''Consumer Backlash''': Users criticized these updates as anti-consumer, with some pursuing class-action lawsuits for deceptive practices.<ref>https://www.classaction.org/hp-printer-lawsuit</ref>

Like 2D printers, Bambu Lab's update restricts functionality previously available to users and pushes them toward proprietary software and cloud-based control.

== References ==

<references/><ref name=":1" />
[[Category:Bambu Lab]]

Dyson

2025-01-16T09:21:09Z

2A02:908:1873:E920:78B9:1F19:9DBC:6AC7: Arduino, not Pi

Dyson is a manufacturer of vacuum cleaners.

== Battery packs lacking cell balancing, featuring self-bricking firmware ==

Dyson battery packs contain a Battery Management System (BMS) with a chip that would be capable of balancing the individual cells. However, the manufacturer has decided to leave away a few inexpensive but essential resistors, resulting in no balancing to take effect. As a result, the battery pack wears out much quicker than necessary.

After just a few years, spare battery packs are "out of stock" (e.g., the Dyson V8 SV10 Battery being currently unavailable in Germany), effectively suggesting that the device should be thrown away.

Even if one charges (using a third-party charger) and balances, or even replaces the individual cells, the Battery Management System will still not allow you to charge the battery because its firmware writes 2 bytes into the configuration memory of the microcontroller that essentially bricks the battery pack. However, third-party open source firmware has been written to replace the proprietary firmware for some models, and for some models it has been found out which configuration bits need to be changed in order to un-brick the battery pack<ref>https://github.com/tinfever/FU-Dyson-BMS</ref><ref>https://github.com/davidmpye/V10_Dyson_BMS</ref>. This has been covered in the (specialist) media<ref>https://hackaday.com/2022/05/23/fighting-back-against-dodgy-dyson-batteries/</ref>.

This anti-consumer and anti-repair pattern can be observed across multiple models and product iterations, and appears to be fully intentional.

Open source software has been written to un-brick the battery pack by overwriting the configuration bits for some models using a 3.3V Arduino board<ref>https://github.com/kumdzio/PIC16LF1847arduino-programmer/tree/main/Dyson_original_firmware_unlocker_with_eeprom_check</ref>.

== Harder to repair buttons ==
[[File:Dyson-glued-button.jpg|thumb|Glued PCB, preventing an easy repair<ref name=":0">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KF0nNOAFnRQ</ref>]]
There have been reports of vacuum trigger button being harder to self-repair for a consumer due to the use of glue on the PCB, prompting the user to replace the whole housing.<ref name=":0" /><ref>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cUqfrIk-FhM; [[Louis Rossmann - Video Directory#2022|Dyson's repair procedures suck, unlike their vacuums#2022]]</ref>

== References ==
<references />

Sonos

2025-01-15T20:37:11Z

2A02:908:1873:E920:78B9:1F19:9DBC:6AC7: Created page with "Sonos is a maufacturer of audio devices. == "Recycle mode" == In 2019, Sonos rendered formerly perfectly working devices into paperweights by disabling them altogether, just because those devices were no longer receiving software updates. Customers were offered a 30 percent discount on a new Sonos device if they accepted Sonos to intentionally remotely brick their existing device. Once a device is in Sonos "Recycle Mode", it can no longer be used [1], [2]. Sonos later..."

Sonos is a maufacturer of audio devices.

== "Recycle mode" ==

In 2019, Sonos rendered formerly perfectly working devices into paperweights by disabling them altogether, just because those devices were no longer receiving software updates. Customers were offered a 30 percent discount on a new Sonos device if they accepted Sonos to intentionally remotely brick their existing device. Once a device is in Sonos "Recycle Mode", it can no longer be used [1], [2]. Sonos later ended this highly controversial and environmentally unfriendly program, but the damage was already done to otherwise still working hardware [3].

However, since 2023 there is an open source project to recover devices that Sonos has put into "Recycle Mode" [4].

== References ==

* [1] https://support.sonos.com/en-us/article/unable-to-set-up-a-sonos-product-in-recycle-mode
* [2] https://www.engadget.com/2019-12-31-sonos-recycle-mode-explanation-falls-flat.html?guccounter=1
* [3] https://www.theverge.com/2020/3/5/21166777/sonos-ending-recycle-mode-trade-up-program-sustainability
* [4] https://github.com/dbmaxpayne/Sonos-DSP

Dyson

2025-01-15T20:22:53Z

2A02:908:1873:E920:78B9:1F19:9DBC:6AC7: Created page with "Dyson is a manufacturer of (expensive) vacuum cleaners. == Battery packs lacking cell balancing, featuring self-bricking firmware == Dyson battery packs contain a Battery Management System (BMS) with a chip that would be capable of balancing the individual cells. However, the manufacturer has decided to leave away a few inexpensive but essential resistors, resulting in no balancing to take effect. As a result, the battery pack wears out much quicker than necessary. A..."

Dyson is a manufacturer of (expensive) vacuum cleaners.

== Battery packs lacking cell balancing, featuring self-bricking firmware ==

Dyson battery packs contain a Battery Management System (BMS) with a chip that would be capable of balancing the individual cells. However, the manufacturer has decided to leave away a few inexpensive but essential resistors, resulting in no balancing to take effect. As a result, the battery pack wears out much quicker than necessary.

After just a few years, spare battery packs are "out of stock" (e.g., Dyson V8 SV10 Battery currently not available in Germany), effectively suggesting that the device should be thrown away.

Even if one charges (using a third-party charger) and balances, or even replaces, the individual cells, the Battery Management System will still not allow you to charge the battery because its firmware writes 2 bytes into the configuration memory of the microcontroller that essentially render the battery pack into a brick. However, third-party open source firmware has been written to replace the proprietary firmware for some models, and for some models it has been found out which configuration bits need to be changed in order to un-brick the battery pack [1], [2]. This has been covered in the (specialist) media [3].

This anti-consumer, anti-repair pattern can be observed across multiple models and product iterations, and appears to be fully intentional.

Open source software has been written to un-brick the battery pack by overwriting the configuration bits for some models using a 3.3V Raspberry Pi board[4].

== Unfixable buttons ==

There have been reports of buttons being "unfixable" due to the use of glue [5].

== References ==

* [1] https://github.com/tinfever/FU-Dyson-BMS
* [2] https://github.com/davidmpye/V10_Dyson_BMS/
* [3] https://hackaday.com/2022/05/23/fighting-back-against-dodgy-dyson-batteries/
* [4] https://github.com/kumdzio/PIC16LF1847arduino-programmer/tree/main/Dyson_original_firmware_unlocker_with_eeprom_check
* [5] [Dyson's repair procedures suck, unlike their vacuums](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cUqfrIk-FhM)