<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://mirror.consumerrights.wiki/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Hauke</id>
	<title>Consumer Rights Wiki - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://mirror.consumerrights.wiki/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Hauke"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://mirror.consumerrights.wiki/w/Special:Contributions/Hauke"/>
	<updated>2026-05-20T00:55:18Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.44.0</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://mirror.consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=Brother_printers_causing_issues_with_third_party_inks&amp;diff=12432</id>
		<title>Brother printers causing issues with third party inks</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://mirror.consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=Brother_printers_causing_issues_with_third_party_inks&amp;diff=12432"/>
		<updated>2025-04-02T13:36:20Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Hauke: Add print samples.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Brother Industries Ltd.|Brother]] used to be known for allowing third-party toner use &amp;amp; being less consumer hostile than companies such as [[HP]]. In recent years, they&#039;ve implemented &#039;&#039;&#039;firmware updates that deliberately degrade print quality when using non-OEM toner&#039;&#039;&#039;. These updates disable color registration &amp;amp; other features which coerces consumers into buying expensive genuine Brother toner.(citation needed)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Exploitative practices==&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Post-Sale Function Removal&#039;&#039;&#039; – Firmware updates retroactively remove previously available features, such as automatic color registration, for users using non-OEM toner.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;reddit&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[https://www.reddit.com/r/printers/comments/s9b2eg Brother MFC firmware update - non-genuine toner now disables critical features.]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;reddit-2&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[https://www.reddit.com/r/printers/comments/w60687/brother_mfcl3370cdw_firmware_downgrade_needed/ Brother MFC-L3370CDW Firmware Downgrade needed]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Vendor lock-in via DRM&#039;&#039;&#039; – Printers continue to function with third-party toner but print at degraded quality unless OEM toner is installed.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Anti-consumer software practices&#039;&#039;&#039; – Firmware updates cannot be easily rolled back, preventing consumers from restoring lost functionality.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;github-fwupd&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[https://github.com/sedrubal/brother_printer_fwupd/issues/9 Brother printer firmware downgrade discussion.]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Deceptive practices&#039;&#039;&#039; – Printers do not outright reject third-party toner but instead &#039;&#039;&#039;engineer a failure&#039;&#039;&#039;, misleading users into thinking their toner is defective.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hackernews&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31860131 Tell HN: Brother printers now locking out non-OEM paraphernalia.]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;reddit-2&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==How it works==&lt;br /&gt;
1. Consumers purchase a &#039;&#039;&#039;Brother laser printer&#039;&#039;&#039; that previously accepted third-party toner.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. A &#039;&#039;&#039;firmware update (e.g., W1.56)&#039;&#039;&#039; is pushed, which does not notify users of any major functional changes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. After updating, users notice that:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Color registration &#039;&#039;&#039;fails automatically&#039;&#039;&#039;, misaligning prints.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;cups&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/CUPS/Printer-specific_problems#Updating_the_firmware ArchWiki - Printer-specific problems with Brother.]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Brother support &#039;&#039;&#039;admits&#039;&#039;&#039; that installing OEM toner will resolve the issue instantly.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hackernews&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Older firmware versions are removed from Brother’s servers&#039;&#039;&#039;, preventing downgrades.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;github-ohbrother&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[https://github.com/CauldronDevelopmentLLC/oh-brother/issues/30 Discussion on firmware rollback for Brother printers.]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Real-world impact==&lt;br /&gt;
*Customers who used to save money buying third-party toner are now &#039;&#039;&#039;forced into expensive OEM purchases&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
*Brother’s &#039;&#039;&#039;positive reputation&#039;&#039;&#039; for allowing third-party toner is tarnished.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;No prior warning&#039;&#039;&#039; was given to consumers before these updates were installed.&lt;br /&gt;
*Workarounds involve &#039;&#039;&#039;blocking firmware updates&#039;&#039;&#039; or attempting &#039;&#039;&#039;risky firmware downgrades&#039;&#039;&#039;, both of which Brother actively discourages.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Brother&#039;s response==&lt;br /&gt;
On March 5th 2025, following the publication of a video on the Louis Rossmann youtube channel, Brother addressed the issue, in a response given to Ars Technica, stating the following &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ars-response&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2025/03/brother-denies-using-firmware-updates-to-brick-printers-with-third-party-ink/ Brother denies using firmware updates to brick printers with third-party ink]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
We are aware of the recent false claims suggesting that a Brother firmware update may have restricted the use of third-party ink cartridges. Please be assured that Brother firmware updates do not block the use of third-party ink in our machines.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
They also detailed that&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Brother printers do not intentionally degrade print quality based on whether a Brother Genuine or non-genuine ink/ toner cartridge is used. Brother cannot verify the quality of printing that will result when using a third-party compatible with a Brother printer.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Finally they attributed the confusion from consumers to&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Brother encourages the use of Brother Genuine ink and toner for optimal performance and reliability, and it is standard practice that we perform a Brother [G]enuine check when troubleshooting a Brother printer. Compatible supplies may range in quality, and in order to verify that a printer is working properly, we like to troubleshoot with Brother Genuine supplies. We believe this check in the process may have led to a misunderstanding[,] but as we confirmed, the firmware update would not be responsible for the degradation of quality or removal of printer features.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==User evidence &amp;amp; reports==&lt;br /&gt;
===Hacker News Discussion (2022)===&lt;br /&gt;
*Users noticed that &#039;&#039;&#039;Brother printers accepted third-party toner but deliberately degraded print quality&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
*One user stated:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;Brother seems to be apparently accepting the ink, but then purposefully making the print quality poorer.&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hackernews&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Reddit reports (r/printers)===&lt;br /&gt;
*A &#039;&#039;&#039;firmware update on the Brother MFC-3750&#039;&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;&#039;disabled automatic color registration&#039;&#039;&#039; when third-party toner was detected.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;reddit&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*A Brother support agent confirmed that installing OEM toner would &amp;quot;fix&amp;quot; the issue instantly, proving that the printer was being artificially restricted.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===GitHub developer investigation===&lt;br /&gt;
*A project analyzing &#039;&#039;&#039;Brother firmware updates&#039;&#039;&#039; discovered that &#039;&#039;&#039;older firmware versions were removed from Brother’s servers&#039;&#039;&#039;, making it impossible for users to roll back to a working version.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;github-fwupd&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Another github discussion showed that &#039;&#039;&#039;Brother firmware updates increasingly lock out more non-Brother toner cartridges with each new update!&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;github-ohbrother&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*This is similar to [[HP Dynamic Security]] which block non-OEM cartridges.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Quality Example ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Brother HL-L9310CDW 1.69 1.32 before registration deleted.png|alt=Brother HL-L9310CDW 1.69 1.32, before deletion of colour registration.|none|thumb|800x800px|&#039;&#039;&#039;Brother HL-L9310CDW 1.69 1.32, before deletion of colour registration.&#039;&#039;&#039;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Comparison to other industry abuses==&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!Company!!Tactic Used&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;HP&#039;&#039;&#039;||&amp;quot;Dynamic Security&amp;quot; firmware updates blocking non-OEM ink&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Epson&#039;&#039;&#039;||Ink expiration DRM, even when cartridges are full&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Canon&#039;&#039;&#039;||Firmware updates that disable scanning when ink is low&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Brother&#039;&#039;&#039;||Print degradation for non-OEM toner users&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Potential legal implications==&lt;br /&gt;
Deliberate function removal &#039;&#039;&#039;after purchase&#039;&#039;&#039; may qualify as &#039;&#039;&#039;deceptive trade practices&#039;&#039;&#039; in multiple jurisdictions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Mitigations available to users==&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Avoid Firmware Updates&#039;&#039;&#039; – Disable auto-updates to prevent forced function removal. This may, however, lead to security risks.&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Try to downgrade&#039;&#039;&#039; – Some users have managed to roll back firmware, though this is increasingly difficult.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;github-ohbrother&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;HL-L9310CDW (with firmware main 1.69, sub 1.31):&#039;&#039;&#039; On the menu of the printer, delete the colour registration to improve quality by reducing the misalignment of the individual colours. However, the best solution is to have a configuration option to set the offset individual (X, Y) for each colour with the smallest possible increment, perhaps through an external (CUPS) printer driver.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Cargo data==&lt;br /&gt;
{{Hatnote|Testing extension to add metadata to pages}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{IncidentCargo|Companies=Brother Industries Ltd.|Categories=Digital restrictions,Firmware lockout|DateOfIncident=2025}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Brother]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Digital Restrictions]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Vendor Lock-in]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Post-Sale Firmware Lockouts]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Hauke</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://mirror.consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=File:Brother_HL-L9310CDW_1.69_1.32_before_registration_deleted.png&amp;diff=12431</id>
		<title>File:Brother HL-L9310CDW 1.69 1.32 before registration deleted.png</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://mirror.consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=File:Brother_HL-L9310CDW_1.69_1.32_before_registration_deleted.png&amp;diff=12431"/>
		<updated>2025-04-02T13:31:47Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Hauke: HL-L9310CDW (with firmware main 1.69, sub 1.31), scanned two identical printouts for comparison. The print has been made before deleting the colour registration. Colours do have a fixed misalignment occurring identically on every page. (I release the file as &amp;quot;public domain&amp;quot;)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Summary ==&lt;br /&gt;
HL-L9310CDW (with firmware main 1.69, sub 1.31), scanned two identical printouts for comparison. The print has been made before deleting the colour registration. Colours do have a fixed misalignment occurring identically on every page. (I release the file as &amp;quot;public domain&amp;quot;)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Hauke</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://mirror.consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=Brother_printers_causing_issues_with_third_party_inks&amp;diff=12430</id>
		<title>Brother printers causing issues with third party inks</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://mirror.consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=Brother_printers_causing_issues_with_third_party_inks&amp;diff=12430"/>
		<updated>2025-04-02T13:24:31Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Hauke: Add hint to delete &amp;quot;registration&amp;quot; to reduce misalignment of colours.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Brother Industries Ltd.|Brother]] used to be known for allowing third-party toner use &amp;amp; being less consumer hostile than companies such as [[HP]]. In recent years, they&#039;ve implemented &#039;&#039;&#039;firmware updates that deliberately degrade print quality when using non-OEM toner&#039;&#039;&#039;. These updates disable color registration &amp;amp; other features which coerces consumers into buying expensive genuine Brother toner.(citation needed)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Exploitative practices==&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Post-Sale Function Removal&#039;&#039;&#039; – Firmware updates retroactively remove previously available features, such as automatic color registration, for users using non-OEM toner.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;reddit&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[https://www.reddit.com/r/printers/comments/s9b2eg Brother MFC firmware update - non-genuine toner now disables critical features.]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;reddit-2&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[https://www.reddit.com/r/printers/comments/w60687/brother_mfcl3370cdw_firmware_downgrade_needed/ Brother MFC-L3370CDW Firmware Downgrade needed]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Vendor lock-in via DRM&#039;&#039;&#039; – Printers continue to function with third-party toner but print at degraded quality unless OEM toner is installed.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Anti-consumer software practices&#039;&#039;&#039; – Firmware updates cannot be easily rolled back, preventing consumers from restoring lost functionality.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;github-fwupd&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[https://github.com/sedrubal/brother_printer_fwupd/issues/9 Brother printer firmware downgrade discussion.]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Deceptive practices&#039;&#039;&#039; – Printers do not outright reject third-party toner but instead &#039;&#039;&#039;engineer a failure&#039;&#039;&#039;, misleading users into thinking their toner is defective.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hackernews&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31860131 Tell HN: Brother printers now locking out non-OEM paraphernalia.]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;reddit-2&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==How it works==&lt;br /&gt;
1. Consumers purchase a &#039;&#039;&#039;Brother laser printer&#039;&#039;&#039; that previously accepted third-party toner.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. A &#039;&#039;&#039;firmware update (e.g., W1.56)&#039;&#039;&#039; is pushed, which does not notify users of any major functional changes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. After updating, users notice that:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Color registration &#039;&#039;&#039;fails automatically&#039;&#039;&#039;, misaligning prints.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;cups&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/CUPS/Printer-specific_problems#Updating_the_firmware ArchWiki - Printer-specific problems with Brother.]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Brother support &#039;&#039;&#039;admits&#039;&#039;&#039; that installing OEM toner will resolve the issue instantly.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hackernews&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Older firmware versions are removed from Brother’s servers&#039;&#039;&#039;, preventing downgrades.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;github-ohbrother&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[https://github.com/CauldronDevelopmentLLC/oh-brother/issues/30 Discussion on firmware rollback for Brother printers.]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Real-world impact==&lt;br /&gt;
*Customers who used to save money buying third-party toner are now &#039;&#039;&#039;forced into expensive OEM purchases&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
*Brother’s &#039;&#039;&#039;positive reputation&#039;&#039;&#039; for allowing third-party toner is tarnished.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;No prior warning&#039;&#039;&#039; was given to consumers before these updates were installed.&lt;br /&gt;
*Workarounds involve &#039;&#039;&#039;blocking firmware updates&#039;&#039;&#039; or attempting &#039;&#039;&#039;risky firmware downgrades&#039;&#039;&#039;, both of which Brother actively discourages.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Brother&#039;s response==&lt;br /&gt;
On March 5th 2025, following the publication of a video on the Louis Rossmann youtube channel, Brother addressed the issue, in a response given to Ars Technica, stating the following &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ars-response&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2025/03/brother-denies-using-firmware-updates-to-brick-printers-with-third-party-ink/ Brother denies using firmware updates to brick printers with third-party ink]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
We are aware of the recent false claims suggesting that a Brother firmware update may have restricted the use of third-party ink cartridges. Please be assured that Brother firmware updates do not block the use of third-party ink in our machines.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
They also detailed that&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Brother printers do not intentionally degrade print quality based on whether a Brother Genuine or non-genuine ink/ toner cartridge is used. Brother cannot verify the quality of printing that will result when using a third-party compatible with a Brother printer.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Finally they attributed the confusion from consumers to&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Brother encourages the use of Brother Genuine ink and toner for optimal performance and reliability, and it is standard practice that we perform a Brother [G]enuine check when troubleshooting a Brother printer. Compatible supplies may range in quality, and in order to verify that a printer is working properly, we like to troubleshoot with Brother Genuine supplies. We believe this check in the process may have led to a misunderstanding[,] but as we confirmed, the firmware update would not be responsible for the degradation of quality or removal of printer features.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==User evidence &amp;amp; reports==&lt;br /&gt;
===Hacker News Discussion (2022)===&lt;br /&gt;
*Users noticed that &#039;&#039;&#039;Brother printers accepted third-party toner but deliberately degraded print quality&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
*One user stated:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;Brother seems to be apparently accepting the ink, but then purposefully making the print quality poorer.&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hackernews&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Reddit reports (r/printers)===&lt;br /&gt;
*A &#039;&#039;&#039;firmware update on the Brother MFC-3750&#039;&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;&#039;disabled automatic color registration&#039;&#039;&#039; when third-party toner was detected.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;reddit&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*A Brother support agent confirmed that installing OEM toner would &amp;quot;fix&amp;quot; the issue instantly, proving that the printer was being artificially restricted.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===GitHub developer investigation===&lt;br /&gt;
*A project analyzing &#039;&#039;&#039;Brother firmware updates&#039;&#039;&#039; discovered that &#039;&#039;&#039;older firmware versions were removed from Brother’s servers&#039;&#039;&#039;, making it impossible for users to roll back to a working version.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;github-fwupd&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Another github discussion showed that &#039;&#039;&#039;Brother firmware updates increasingly lock out more non-Brother toner cartridges with each new update!&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;github-ohbrother&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*This is similar to [[HP Dynamic Security]] which block non-OEM cartridges.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Comparison to other industry abuses==&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!Company!!Tactic Used&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;HP&#039;&#039;&#039;||&amp;quot;Dynamic Security&amp;quot; firmware updates blocking non-OEM ink&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Epson&#039;&#039;&#039;||Ink expiration DRM, even when cartridges are full&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Canon&#039;&#039;&#039;||Firmware updates that disable scanning when ink is low&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Brother&#039;&#039;&#039;||Print degradation for non-OEM toner users&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Potential legal implications==&lt;br /&gt;
Deliberate function removal &#039;&#039;&#039;after purchase&#039;&#039;&#039; may qualify as &#039;&#039;&#039;deceptive trade practices&#039;&#039;&#039; in multiple jurisdictions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Mitigations available to users==&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Avoid Firmware Updates&#039;&#039;&#039; – Disable auto-updates to prevent forced function removal. This may, however, lead to security risks.&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Try to downgrade&#039;&#039;&#039; – Some users have managed to roll back firmware, though this is increasingly difficult.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;github-ohbrother&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;HL-L9310CDW (with firmware main 1.69, sub 1.31):&#039;&#039;&#039; On the menu of the printer, delete the colour registration to improve quality by reducing the misalignment of the individual colours. However, the best solution is to have a configuration option to set the offset individual (X, Y) for each colour with the smallest possible increment, perhaps through an external (CUPS) printer driver.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Cargo data==&lt;br /&gt;
{{Hatnote|Testing extension to add metadata to pages}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{IncidentCargo|Companies=Brother Industries Ltd.|Categories=Digital restrictions,Firmware lockout|DateOfIncident=2025}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Brother]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Digital Restrictions]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Vendor Lock-in]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Post-Sale Firmware Lockouts]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Hauke</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>