Consumer Rights Wiki - User contributions [en]

Dymo

2026-02-19T10:42:25Z

SushiPasta: /* Anti-consumer practices */

{{StubNotice}}
{{CompanyCargo
|Description=
|Founded=1958
|Industry=Electronics
|Logo=Dymo logo.svg
|ParentCompany=
|Type=Subsidiary
|Website=https://www.dymo.com/
}}
[[wikipedia:Dymo_Corporation|'''Dymo Corporation''']] is an American manufacturing company of handheld label printers and thermal-transfer printing tape as accessory, embossing tape label makers, and other printers such as CD and DVD labelers and durable medical equipment. The company is a subsidiary of [https://www.newellbrands.com/ Newell Brands], a company with over 50 brands.<ref>[https://www.newellbrands.com/ Newell Brands] Retrieved 6 October 2025. ([http://web.archive.org/web/20260208080245/https://www.newellbrands.com/ Archived])</ref>

==Anti-consumer practices==

===Restriction to First party labels===
The Dymo LabelWriter 550 Turbo and other 500 series label printers have introduced a controversial feature: [[DRM]] (Digital Rights Management) via [[wikipedia:Radio-frequency_identification|RFID]] tags in their consumables.<ref>[https://appleinsider.com/articles/22/02/21/if-you-thought-printer-cartridge-drm-was-bad-dymo-is-forcing-users-to-buy-rfid-paper "If you thought printer cartridge DRM was bad, Dymo is forcing users to buy RFID paper"] - appleinsider.com - accessed 2025-02-03 ([http://web.archive.org/web/20250919024424/https://appleinsider.com/articles/22/02/21/if-you-thought-printer-cartridge-drm-was-bad-dymo-is-forcing-users-to-buy-rfid-paper Archived])</ref><ref>[https://walledculture.org/drm-on-paper-shows-why-anti-circumvention-laws-are-copyrights-biggest-blunder/ "DRM on paper shows why anti-circumvention laws are copyright’s biggest blunder"] - walledculture.org - accessed 2025-02-03 ([http://web.archive.org/web/20260131073524/https://walledculture.org/drm-on-paper-shows-why-anti-circumvention-laws-are-copyrights-biggest-blunder/ Archived])</ref> <ref group="Video References">{{Cite web |last=Rossmann |first=Louis |date=2022-02-23 |title=Dymo printers are putting DRM in the paper - YouTube |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YJs9_xELKbI |url-status=live |access-date=2025-08-20 |website=YouTube |archive-url=https://preservetube.com/watch?v=YJs9_xELKbI |archive-date=16 Feb 2026}}</ref>Affected printers come with "Automatic Label Recognition™", a marketing term that translates to DRM implementation in thermal labels. This system restricts users to purchasing only Dymo-branded labels, potentially increasing costs and limiting consumer choice.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Kingsley-Hughes |first=Adrian |date=2022-02-18 |title=Dymo causes a stir by adding DRM to printer paper {{!}} ZDNET |url=https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2022/02/worst-timeline-printer-company-putting-drm-paper-now |url-status=live |access-date=2025-08-20 |website=ZDNET |archive-url=http://web.archive.org/web/20260112110652/https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2022/02/worst-timeline-printer-company-putting-drm-paper-now |archive-date=12 Jan 2026}}</ref>

The label DRM is implemented by using RFID tags placed within the cardboard roll. If the printer does not detect the RFID tag, the software will request official labels. <ref>[https://appleinsider.com/articles/22/02/21/if-you-thought-printer-cartridge-drm-was-bad-dymo-is-forcing-users-to-buy-rfid-paper/ "If you thought printer cartridge DRM was bad, Dymo is forcing users to buy RFID paper"] - https://appleinsider.com/ - accessed 2026-01-22</ref> A partial work-around is taking the RFID tag and keeping it within proximity to the printer (such as the side), however this will only work for the amount of prints that RFID tag supports.

This move has sparked frustration among users and prompted the hacking community to develop a solution to remove the restrictions that is available via a free license on GitHub.<ref>[https://hackaday.com/2022/03/30/freedmo-gets-rid-of-dymo-label-printer-drm/ "#FreeDMO Gets Rid Of DYMO Label Printer DRM"] - hackaday.com - accessed 2025-02-03 ([http://web.archive.org/web/20251018125152/https://hackaday.com/2022/03/30/freedmo-gets-rid-of-dymo-label-printer-drm/ Archived])</ref>
<ref>[https://github.com/free-dmo/free-dmo-stm32 "FreeDMO"] - github.com - accessed 2025-02-03 ([http://web.archive.org/web/20251018102518/https://github.com/free-dmo/free-dmo-stm32 Archived])</ref><ref group="Video References">{{Cite web |last=Rossmann |first=Louis |date=2022-04-01 |title=Dymo labelwriter paper DRM HACKED - you can use your own paper now - but does it matter?? - YouTube |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lezr3kYbFvY |url-status=live |access-date=2025-08-20 |website=YouTube |archive-url=https://preservetube.com/watch?v=Lezr3kYbFvY |archive-date=16 Feb 2026}}</ref>

Dymo have further combated attempts at modifications like Labelchip, with Dymo releasing new revisions of their current LabelWriter products<ref group="Video References">Dymo LabelWriter - LabelChip modification https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sbc4xRLZRoA

Video description:

''"In 2024 LabelChip was updated to deal with memory function In 2025 LabelChip was for users not working anymore after ~200prints, counter didn’t reset anymore For the 5XL it is seen on Rev. I board (serie QG4xx) and further For the 550 it is seen on Rev. K board (serie QE4xx) and further"''</ref>, frequently adapting<ref>{{Cite web |date=2025-06-24 |title=Topic: Dymo 550 Thermal Printer DRM Hacking |url=https://www.eevblog.com/forum/reviews/dymo-550-thermal-printer-drm-hacking/225/ |url-status=live |access-date=2026-02-19 |website=EEVblog® Electronics Community Forum}}</ref> against circumvention attempts.
==Marketing==
As of 2025-08-20 Dymo continues selling the LabelWriter 550 Turbo with the exclusivity of their labels as a feature stating that it exclusively works with DYMO-branded labels saving you time, money and effort<ref name=":0">{{Cite web |date=2025-08-20 |title=DYMO LabelWriter 550 Turbo Label Printer {{!}} Dymo |url=https://www.dymo.com/label-makers-printers/labelwriter-label-printers/dymo-labelwriter-550-turbo-label-printer/SAP_2112553.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240530215450/https://www.dymo.com/label-makers-printers/labelwriter-label-printers/dymo-labelwriter-550-turbo-label-printer/SAP_2112553.html |archive-date=2024-05-30 |access-date=2025-08-20 |website=Dymo}}</ref>.

When comparing their archived product page from 2024<ref name=":0" /> to today's 2025-08-20<ref name=":0" /> product page and those previous to it, the current product page lists the above quote at the top of the feature list compared to previous iterations where the feature of "Automatic Label Recognition™" was listed at the top with the exclusivity disclosure listed further down the list. One could surmise that the more recent revision to the listings order could be due to pressure from consumers who bought the device without realizing it would only accept first party labels. This subtle listing order may have impacted consumers negatively by leveraging marketing tactics which affect the reader's decision making.<ref name=":1">{{Cite web |date=2025-08-20 |title=Examples of Order Effects in Decision-Making and Marketing |url=https://examplesweb.net/order-effects/ |url-status=live |access-date=2025-08-20 |website=ExamplesWeb |archive-url=http://web.archive.org/web/20250909125058/https://examplesweb.net/order-effects/ |archive-date=9 Sep 2025}}</ref>

Features listed higher in the list for example in this case "Automatic Label Recognition™" being listed first in the 2024 version of the site. Readers will see "Automatic Label Recognition™ first marketing research shows that items at the beginning of a list attract the attention and are more likely to be remembered when considering a purchase. While in the later revision of the site as seen on 2025-08-20 the order has changed where the seemingly least-desirable feature of label exclusivity is listed first which would allow the consumer to make a more informed decision before purchasing the label printer. <ref name=":1" />

==Business Tactics==
This DRM locked consumable type of business tactic is not unfamiliar among different industries or variances in product. It can be found in the refrigerator industry in the form of water filters, power tool industry in the form of batteries, automotive industry in the form of parts or diagnostic software, or most commonly known in the printing industry.

In some cases, it can be that a standard for the consumable hasn't been agreed upon or the technology is proprietary to the company, but in most cases it's a form of greed locking the consumer into a product that they are then required to purchase in many cases at a significantly inflated price. For example, a printer company might sell a printer at next to or less than the cost to build it as a loss leader, but<ref>{{Cite web |date=2020-01-29 |title=Maximizing Sales Withy Loss Leader Pricing - Conjointly |url=https://conjointly.com/blog/loss-leader-pricing-strategy/ |url-status=live |access-date=2025-08-20 |website=conjointly |archive-url=http://web.archive.org/web/20251106035933/https://conjointly.com/blog/loss-leader-pricing-strategy/ |archive-date=6 Nov 2025}}</ref> now that the consumer has bought into their product line, they are obliged through marketing, embedded DRM, or necessity to purchase the consumables for the product from the original manufacturer.

==References==
<references />

==Video References==
<references group="Video References" responsive="0" />
[[Category:Dymo Corporation]]

Dymo

2026-02-19T10:41:37Z

SushiPasta: /* Anti-consumer practices */ added source for frequent changes

{{StubNotice}}
{{CompanyCargo
|Description=
|Founded=1958
|Industry=Electronics
|Logo=Dymo logo.svg
|ParentCompany=
|Type=Subsidiary
|Website=https://www.dymo.com/
}}
[[wikipedia:Dymo_Corporation|'''Dymo Corporation''']] is an American manufacturing company of handheld label printers and thermal-transfer printing tape as accessory, embossing tape label makers, and other printers such as CD and DVD labelers and durable medical equipment. The company is a subsidiary of [https://www.newellbrands.com/ Newell Brands], a company with over 50 brands.<ref>[https://www.newellbrands.com/ Newell Brands] Retrieved 6 October 2025. ([http://web.archive.org/web/20260208080245/https://www.newellbrands.com/ Archived])</ref>

==Anti-consumer practices==

===Restriction to First party labels===
The Dymo LabelWriter 550 Turbo and other 500 series label printers have introduced a controversial feature: [[DRM]] (Digital Rights Management) via [[wikipedia:Radio-frequency_identification|RFID]] tags in their consumables.<ref>[https://appleinsider.com/articles/22/02/21/if-you-thought-printer-cartridge-drm-was-bad-dymo-is-forcing-users-to-buy-rfid-paper "If you thought printer cartridge DRM was bad, Dymo is forcing users to buy RFID paper"] - appleinsider.com - accessed 2025-02-03 ([http://web.archive.org/web/20250919024424/https://appleinsider.com/articles/22/02/21/if-you-thought-printer-cartridge-drm-was-bad-dymo-is-forcing-users-to-buy-rfid-paper Archived])</ref><ref>[https://walledculture.org/drm-on-paper-shows-why-anti-circumvention-laws-are-copyrights-biggest-blunder/ "DRM on paper shows why anti-circumvention laws are copyright’s biggest blunder"] - walledculture.org - accessed 2025-02-03 ([http://web.archive.org/web/20260131073524/https://walledculture.org/drm-on-paper-shows-why-anti-circumvention-laws-are-copyrights-biggest-blunder/ Archived])</ref> <ref group="Video References">{{Cite web |last=Rossmann |first=Louis |date=2022-02-23 |title=Dymo printers are putting DRM in the paper - YouTube |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YJs9_xELKbI |url-status=live |access-date=2025-08-20 |website=YouTube |archive-url=https://preservetube.com/watch?v=YJs9_xELKbI |archive-date=16 Feb 2026}}</ref>Affected printers come with "Automatic Label Recognition™", a marketing term that translates to DRM implementation in thermal labels. This system restricts users to purchasing only Dymo-branded labels, potentially increasing costs and limiting consumer choice.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Kingsley-Hughes |first=Adrian |date=2022-02-18 |title=Dymo causes a stir by adding DRM to printer paper {{!}} ZDNET |url=https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2022/02/worst-timeline-printer-company-putting-drm-paper-now |url-status=live |access-date=2025-08-20 |website=ZDNET |archive-url=http://web.archive.org/web/20260112110652/https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2022/02/worst-timeline-printer-company-putting-drm-paper-now |archive-date=12 Jan 2026}}</ref>

The label DRM is implemented by using RFID tags placed within the cardboard roll. If the printer does not detect the RFID tag, the software will request official labels. <ref>[https://appleinsider.com/articles/22/02/21/if-you-thought-printer-cartridge-drm-was-bad-dymo-is-forcing-users-to-buy-rfid-paper/ "If you thought printer cartridge DRM was bad, Dymo is forcing users to buy RFID paper"] - https://appleinsider.com/ - accessed 2026-01-22</ref> A partial work-around is taking the RFID tag and keeping it within proximity to the printer (such as the side), however this will only work for the amount of prints that RFID tag supports.

This move has sparked frustration among users and prompted the hacking community to develop a solution to remove the restrictions that is available via a free license on GitHub.<ref>[https://hackaday.com/2022/03/30/freedmo-gets-rid-of-dymo-label-printer-drm/ "#FreeDMO Gets Rid Of DYMO Label Printer DRM"] - hackaday.com - accessed 2025-02-03 ([http://web.archive.org/web/20251018125152/https://hackaday.com/2022/03/30/freedmo-gets-rid-of-dymo-label-printer-drm/ Archived])</ref>
<ref>[https://github.com/free-dmo/free-dmo-stm32 "FreeDMO"] - github.com - accessed 2025-02-03 ([http://web.archive.org/web/20251018102518/https://github.com/free-dmo/free-dmo-stm32 Archived])</ref><ref group="Video References">{{Cite web |last=Rossmann |first=Louis |date=2022-04-01 |title=Dymo labelwriter paper DRM HACKED - you can use your own paper now - but does it matter?? - YouTube |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lezr3kYbFvY |url-status=live |access-date=2025-08-20 |website=YouTube |archive-url=https://preservetube.com/watch?v=Lezr3kYbFvY |archive-date=16 Feb 2026}}</ref>

Dymo have further combated attempts at modifications like Labelchip, with Dymo releasing new revisions of their current LabelWriter products, frequently adapting<ref>{{Cite web |date=2025-06-24 |title=Topic: Dymo 550 Thermal Printer DRM Hacking |url=https://www.eevblog.com/forum/reviews/dymo-550-thermal-printer-drm-hacking/225/ |url-status=live |access-date=2026-02-19 |website=EEVblog® Electronics Community Forum}}</ref> against circumvention attempts.<ref group="Video References">Dymo LabelWriter - LabelChip modification https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sbc4xRLZRoA

Video description:

''"In 2024 LabelChip was updated to deal with memory function In 2025 LabelChip was for users not working anymore after ~200prints, counter didn’t reset anymore For the 5XL it is seen on Rev. I board (serie QG4xx) and further For the 550 it is seen on Rev. K board (serie QE4xx) and further"''</ref>
==Marketing==
As of 2025-08-20 Dymo continues selling the LabelWriter 550 Turbo with the exclusivity of their labels as a feature stating that it exclusively works with DYMO-branded labels saving you time, money and effort<ref name=":0">{{Cite web |date=2025-08-20 |title=DYMO LabelWriter 550 Turbo Label Printer {{!}} Dymo |url=https://www.dymo.com/label-makers-printers/labelwriter-label-printers/dymo-labelwriter-550-turbo-label-printer/SAP_2112553.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240530215450/https://www.dymo.com/label-makers-printers/labelwriter-label-printers/dymo-labelwriter-550-turbo-label-printer/SAP_2112553.html |archive-date=2024-05-30 |access-date=2025-08-20 |website=Dymo}}</ref>.

When comparing their archived product page from 2024<ref name=":0" /> to today's 2025-08-20<ref name=":0" /> product page and those previous to it, the current product page lists the above quote at the top of the feature list compared to previous iterations where the feature of "Automatic Label Recognition™" was listed at the top with the exclusivity disclosure listed further down the list. One could surmise that the more recent revision to the listings order could be due to pressure from consumers who bought the device without realizing it would only accept first party labels. This subtle listing order may have impacted consumers negatively by leveraging marketing tactics which affect the reader's decision making.<ref name=":1">{{Cite web |date=2025-08-20 |title=Examples of Order Effects in Decision-Making and Marketing |url=https://examplesweb.net/order-effects/ |url-status=live |access-date=2025-08-20 |website=ExamplesWeb |archive-url=http://web.archive.org/web/20250909125058/https://examplesweb.net/order-effects/ |archive-date=9 Sep 2025}}</ref>

Features listed higher in the list for example in this case "Automatic Label Recognition™" being listed first in the 2024 version of the site. Readers will see "Automatic Label Recognition™ first marketing research shows that items at the beginning of a list attract the attention and are more likely to be remembered when considering a purchase. While in the later revision of the site as seen on 2025-08-20 the order has changed where the seemingly least-desirable feature of label exclusivity is listed first which would allow the consumer to make a more informed decision before purchasing the label printer. <ref name=":1" />

==Business Tactics==
This DRM locked consumable type of business tactic is not unfamiliar among different industries or variances in product. It can be found in the refrigerator industry in the form of water filters, power tool industry in the form of batteries, automotive industry in the form of parts or diagnostic software, or most commonly known in the printing industry.

In some cases, it can be that a standard for the consumable hasn't been agreed upon or the technology is proprietary to the company, but in most cases it's a form of greed locking the consumer into a product that they are then required to purchase in many cases at a significantly inflated price. For example, a printer company might sell a printer at next to or less than the cost to build it as a loss leader, but<ref>{{Cite web |date=2020-01-29 |title=Maximizing Sales Withy Loss Leader Pricing - Conjointly |url=https://conjointly.com/blog/loss-leader-pricing-strategy/ |url-status=live |access-date=2025-08-20 |website=conjointly |archive-url=http://web.archive.org/web/20251106035933/https://conjointly.com/blog/loss-leader-pricing-strategy/ |archive-date=6 Nov 2025}}</ref> now that the consumer has bought into their product line, they are obliged through marketing, embedded DRM, or necessity to purchase the consumables for the product from the original manufacturer.

==References==
<references />

==Video References==
<references group="Video References" responsive="0" />
[[Category:Dymo Corporation]]

Dymo

2026-02-19T10:12:26Z

SushiPasta: /* Anti-consumer practices */ added notes

{{StubNotice}}
{{CompanyCargo
|Description=
|Founded=1958
|Industry=Electronics
|Logo=Dymo logo.svg
|ParentCompany=
|Type=Subsidiary
|Website=https://www.dymo.com/
}}
[[wikipedia:Dymo_Corporation|'''Dymo Corporation''']] is an American manufacturing company of handheld label printers and thermal-transfer printing tape as accessory, embossing tape label makers, and other printers such as CD and DVD labelers and durable medical equipment. The company is a subsidiary of [https://www.newellbrands.com/ Newell Brands], a company with over 50 brands.<ref>[https://www.newellbrands.com/ Newell Brands] Retrieved 6 October 2025. ([http://web.archive.org/web/20260208080245/https://www.newellbrands.com/ Archived])</ref>

==Anti-consumer practices==

===Restriction to First party labels===
The Dymo LabelWriter 550 Turbo and other 500 series label printers have introduced a controversial feature: [[DRM]] (Digital Rights Management) via [[wikipedia:Radio-frequency_identification|RFID]] tags in their consumables.<ref>[https://appleinsider.com/articles/22/02/21/if-you-thought-printer-cartridge-drm-was-bad-dymo-is-forcing-users-to-buy-rfid-paper "If you thought printer cartridge DRM was bad, Dymo is forcing users to buy RFID paper"] - appleinsider.com - accessed 2025-02-03 ([http://web.archive.org/web/20250919024424/https://appleinsider.com/articles/22/02/21/if-you-thought-printer-cartridge-drm-was-bad-dymo-is-forcing-users-to-buy-rfid-paper Archived])</ref><ref>[https://walledculture.org/drm-on-paper-shows-why-anti-circumvention-laws-are-copyrights-biggest-blunder/ "DRM on paper shows why anti-circumvention laws are copyright’s biggest blunder"] - walledculture.org - accessed 2025-02-03 ([http://web.archive.org/web/20260131073524/https://walledculture.org/drm-on-paper-shows-why-anti-circumvention-laws-are-copyrights-biggest-blunder/ Archived])</ref> <ref group="Video References">{{Cite web |last=Rossmann |first=Louis |date=2022-02-23 |title=Dymo printers are putting DRM in the paper - YouTube |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YJs9_xELKbI |url-status=live |access-date=2025-08-20 |website=YouTube |archive-url=https://preservetube.com/watch?v=YJs9_xELKbI |archive-date=16 Feb 2026}}</ref>Affected printers come with "Automatic Label Recognition™", a marketing term that translates to DRM implementation in thermal labels. This system restricts users to purchasing only Dymo-branded labels, potentially increasing costs and limiting consumer choice.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Kingsley-Hughes |first=Adrian |date=2022-02-18 |title=Dymo causes a stir by adding DRM to printer paper {{!}} ZDNET |url=https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2022/02/worst-timeline-printer-company-putting-drm-paper-now |url-status=live |access-date=2025-08-20 |website=ZDNET |archive-url=http://web.archive.org/web/20260112110652/https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2022/02/worst-timeline-printer-company-putting-drm-paper-now |archive-date=12 Jan 2026}}</ref>

The label DRM is implemented by using RFID tags placed within the cardboard roll. If the printer does not detect the RFID tag, the software will request official labels. <ref>[https://appleinsider.com/articles/22/02/21/if-you-thought-printer-cartridge-drm-was-bad-dymo-is-forcing-users-to-buy-rfid-paper/ "If you thought printer cartridge DRM was bad, Dymo is forcing users to buy RFID paper"] - https://appleinsider.com/ - accessed 2026-01-22</ref> A partial work-around is taking the RFID tag and keeping it within proximity to the printer (such as the side), however this will only work for the amount of prints that RFID tag supports.

This move has sparked frustration among users and prompted the hacking community to develop a solution to remove the restrictions that is available via a free license on GitHub.<ref>[https://hackaday.com/2022/03/30/freedmo-gets-rid-of-dymo-label-printer-drm/ "#FreeDMO Gets Rid Of DYMO Label Printer DRM"] - hackaday.com - accessed 2025-02-03 ([http://web.archive.org/web/20251018125152/https://hackaday.com/2022/03/30/freedmo-gets-rid-of-dymo-label-printer-drm/ Archived])</ref>
<ref>[https://github.com/free-dmo/free-dmo-stm32 "FreeDMO"] - github.com - accessed 2025-02-03 ([http://web.archive.org/web/20251018102518/https://github.com/free-dmo/free-dmo-stm32 Archived])</ref><ref group="Video References">{{Cite web |last=Rossmann |first=Louis |date=2022-04-01 |title=Dymo labelwriter paper DRM HACKED - you can use your own paper now - but does it matter?? - YouTube |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lezr3kYbFvY |url-status=live |access-date=2025-08-20 |website=YouTube |archive-url=https://preservetube.com/watch?v=Lezr3kYbFvY |archive-date=16 Feb 2026}}</ref>

Dymo have further combated attempts at modifications like Labelchip, with Dymo releasing new revisions of their current LabelWriter products, frequently adapting against circumvention attempts.<ref group="Video References">Dymo LabelWriter - LabelChip modification https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sbc4xRLZRoA

Video description:

''"In 2024 LabelChip was updated to deal with memory function In 2025 LabelChip was for users not working anymore after ~200prints, counter didn’t reset anymore For the 5XL it is seen on Rev. I board (serie QG4xx) and further For the 550 it is seen on Rev. K board (serie QE4xx) and further"''</ref>
==Marketing==
As of 2025-08-20 Dymo continues selling the LabelWriter 550 Turbo with the exclusivity of their labels as a feature stating that it exclusively works with DYMO-branded labels saving you time, money and effort<ref name=":0">{{Cite web |date=2025-08-20 |title=DYMO LabelWriter 550 Turbo Label Printer {{!}} Dymo |url=https://www.dymo.com/label-makers-printers/labelwriter-label-printers/dymo-labelwriter-550-turbo-label-printer/SAP_2112553.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240530215450/https://www.dymo.com/label-makers-printers/labelwriter-label-printers/dymo-labelwriter-550-turbo-label-printer/SAP_2112553.html |archive-date=2024-05-30 |access-date=2025-08-20 |website=Dymo}}</ref>.

When comparing their archived product page from 2024<ref name=":0" /> to today's 2025-08-20<ref name=":0" /> product page and those previous to it, the current product page lists the above quote at the top of the feature list compared to previous iterations where the feature of "Automatic Label Recognition™" was listed at the top with the exclusivity disclosure listed further down the list. One could surmise that the more recent revision to the listings order could be due to pressure from consumers who bought the device without realizing it would only accept first party labels. This subtle listing order may have impacted consumers negatively by leveraging marketing tactics which affect the reader's decision making.<ref name=":1">{{Cite web |date=2025-08-20 |title=Examples of Order Effects in Decision-Making and Marketing |url=https://examplesweb.net/order-effects/ |url-status=live |access-date=2025-08-20 |website=ExamplesWeb |archive-url=http://web.archive.org/web/20250909125058/https://examplesweb.net/order-effects/ |archive-date=9 Sep 2025}}</ref>

Features listed higher in the list for example in this case "Automatic Label Recognition™" being listed first in the 2024 version of the site. Readers will see "Automatic Label Recognition™ first marketing research shows that items at the beginning of a list attract the attention and are more likely to be remembered when considering a purchase. While in the later revision of the site as seen on 2025-08-20 the order has changed where the seemingly least-desirable feature of label exclusivity is listed first which would allow the consumer to make a more informed decision before purchasing the label printer. <ref name=":1" />

==Business Tactics==
This DRM locked consumable type of business tactic is not unfamiliar among different industries or variances in product. It can be found in the refrigerator industry in the form of water filters, power tool industry in the form of batteries, automotive industry in the form of parts or diagnostic software, or most commonly known in the printing industry.

In some cases, it can be that a standard for the consumable hasn't been agreed upon or the technology is proprietary to the company, but in most cases it's a form of greed locking the consumer into a product that they are then required to purchase in many cases at a significantly inflated price. For example, a printer company might sell a printer at next to or less than the cost to build it as a loss leader, but<ref>{{Cite web |date=2020-01-29 |title=Maximizing Sales Withy Loss Leader Pricing - Conjointly |url=https://conjointly.com/blog/loss-leader-pricing-strategy/ |url-status=live |access-date=2025-08-20 |website=conjointly |archive-url=http://web.archive.org/web/20251106035933/https://conjointly.com/blog/loss-leader-pricing-strategy/ |archive-date=6 Nov 2025}}</ref> now that the consumer has bought into their product line, they are obliged through marketing, embedded DRM, or necessity to purchase the consumables for the product from the original manufacturer.

==References==
<references />

==Video References==
<references group="Video References" responsive="0" />
[[Category:Dymo Corporation]]

Dymo

2026-02-19T10:07:51Z

SushiPasta: /* Anti-consumer practices */ Dymo are actively working against mods to bypass DRM

{{StubNotice}}
{{CompanyCargo
|Description=
|Founded=1958
|Industry=Electronics
|Logo=Dymo logo.svg
|ParentCompany=
|Type=Subsidiary
|Website=https://www.dymo.com/
}}
[[wikipedia:Dymo_Corporation|'''Dymo Corporation''']] is an American manufacturing company of handheld label printers and thermal-transfer printing tape as accessory, embossing tape label makers, and other printers such as CD and DVD labelers and durable medical equipment. The company is a subsidiary of [https://www.newellbrands.com/ Newell Brands], a company with over 50 brands.<ref>[https://www.newellbrands.com/ Newell Brands] Retrieved 6 October 2025. ([http://web.archive.org/web/20260208080245/https://www.newellbrands.com/ Archived])</ref>

==Anti-consumer practices==

===Restriction to First party labels===
The Dymo LabelWriter 550 Turbo and other 500 series label printers have introduced a controversial feature: [[DRM]] (Digital Rights Management) via [[wikipedia:Radio-frequency_identification|RFID]] tags in their consumables.<ref>[https://appleinsider.com/articles/22/02/21/if-you-thought-printer-cartridge-drm-was-bad-dymo-is-forcing-users-to-buy-rfid-paper "If you thought printer cartridge DRM was bad, Dymo is forcing users to buy RFID paper"] - appleinsider.com - accessed 2025-02-03 ([http://web.archive.org/web/20250919024424/https://appleinsider.com/articles/22/02/21/if-you-thought-printer-cartridge-drm-was-bad-dymo-is-forcing-users-to-buy-rfid-paper Archived])</ref><ref>[https://walledculture.org/drm-on-paper-shows-why-anti-circumvention-laws-are-copyrights-biggest-blunder/ "DRM on paper shows why anti-circumvention laws are copyright’s biggest blunder"] - walledculture.org - accessed 2025-02-03 ([http://web.archive.org/web/20260131073524/https://walledculture.org/drm-on-paper-shows-why-anti-circumvention-laws-are-copyrights-biggest-blunder/ Archived])</ref> <ref group="Video References">{{Cite web |last=Rossmann |first=Louis |date=2022-02-23 |title=Dymo printers are putting DRM in the paper - YouTube |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YJs9_xELKbI |url-status=live |access-date=2025-08-20 |website=YouTube |archive-url=https://preservetube.com/watch?v=YJs9_xELKbI |archive-date=16 Feb 2026}}</ref>Affected printers come with "Automatic Label Recognition™", a marketing term that translates to DRM implementation in thermal labels. This system restricts users to purchasing only Dymo-branded labels, potentially increasing costs and limiting consumer choice.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Kingsley-Hughes |first=Adrian |date=2022-02-18 |title=Dymo causes a stir by adding DRM to printer paper {{!}} ZDNET |url=https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2022/02/worst-timeline-printer-company-putting-drm-paper-now |url-status=live |access-date=2025-08-20 |website=ZDNET |archive-url=http://web.archive.org/web/20260112110652/https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2022/02/worst-timeline-printer-company-putting-drm-paper-now |archive-date=12 Jan 2026}}</ref>

The label DRM is implemented by using RFID tags placed within the cardboard roll. If the printer does not detect the RFID tag, the software will request official labels. <ref>[https://appleinsider.com/articles/22/02/21/if-you-thought-printer-cartridge-drm-was-bad-dymo-is-forcing-users-to-buy-rfid-paper/ "If you thought printer cartridge DRM was bad, Dymo is forcing users to buy RFID paper"] - https://appleinsider.com/ - accessed 2026-01-22</ref> A partial work-around is taking the RFID tag and keeping it within proximity to the printer (such as the side), however this will only work for the amount of prints that RFID tag supports.

This move has sparked frustration among users and prompted the hacking community to develop a solution to remove the restrictions that is available via a free license on GitHub.<ref>[https://hackaday.com/2022/03/30/freedmo-gets-rid-of-dymo-label-printer-drm/ "#FreeDMO Gets Rid Of DYMO Label Printer DRM"] - hackaday.com - accessed 2025-02-03 ([http://web.archive.org/web/20251018125152/https://hackaday.com/2022/03/30/freedmo-gets-rid-of-dymo-label-printer-drm/ Archived])</ref>
<ref>[https://github.com/free-dmo/free-dmo-stm32 "FreeDMO"] - github.com - accessed 2025-02-03 ([http://web.archive.org/web/20251018102518/https://github.com/free-dmo/free-dmo-stm32 Archived])</ref><ref group="Video References">{{Cite web |last=Rossmann |first=Louis |date=2022-04-01 |title=Dymo labelwriter paper DRM HACKED - you can use your own paper now - but does it matter?? - YouTube |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lezr3kYbFvY |url-status=live |access-date=2025-08-20 |website=YouTube |archive-url=https://preservetube.com/watch?v=Lezr3kYbFvY |archive-date=16 Feb 2026}}</ref>

Dymo have further combated attempts at modifications like Labelchip, with Dymo releasing new revisions of their current LabelWriter products, frequently adapting against circumvention attempts.<ref>Dymo LabelWriter - LabelChip modification https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sbc4xRLZRoA</ref>
==Marketing==
As of 2025-08-20 Dymo continues selling the LabelWriter 550 Turbo with the exclusivity of their labels as a feature stating that it exclusively works with DYMO-branded labels saving you time, money and effort<ref name=":0">{{Cite web |date=2025-08-20 |title=DYMO LabelWriter 550 Turbo Label Printer {{!}} Dymo |url=https://www.dymo.com/label-makers-printers/labelwriter-label-printers/dymo-labelwriter-550-turbo-label-printer/SAP_2112553.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240530215450/https://www.dymo.com/label-makers-printers/labelwriter-label-printers/dymo-labelwriter-550-turbo-label-printer/SAP_2112553.html |archive-date=2024-05-30 |access-date=2025-08-20 |website=Dymo}}</ref>.

When comparing their archived product page from 2024<ref name=":0" /> to today's 2025-08-20<ref name=":0" /> product page and those previous to it, the current product page lists the above quote at the top of the feature list compared to previous iterations where the feature of "Automatic Label Recognition™" was listed at the top with the exclusivity disclosure listed further down the list. One could surmise that the more recent revision to the listings order could be due to pressure from consumers who bought the device without realizing it would only accept first party labels. This subtle listing order may have impacted consumers negatively by leveraging marketing tactics which affect the reader's decision making.<ref name=":1">{{Cite web |date=2025-08-20 |title=Examples of Order Effects in Decision-Making and Marketing |url=https://examplesweb.net/order-effects/ |url-status=live |access-date=2025-08-20 |website=ExamplesWeb |archive-url=http://web.archive.org/web/20250909125058/https://examplesweb.net/order-effects/ |archive-date=9 Sep 2025}}</ref>

Features listed higher in the list for example in this case "Automatic Label Recognition™" being listed first in the 2024 version of the site. Readers will see "Automatic Label Recognition™ first marketing research shows that items at the beginning of a list attract the attention and are more likely to be remembered when considering a purchase. While in the later revision of the site as seen on 2025-08-20 the order has changed where the seemingly least-desirable feature of label exclusivity is listed first which would allow the consumer to make a more informed decision before purchasing the label printer. <ref name=":1" />

==Business Tactics==
This DRM locked consumable type of business tactic is not unfamiliar among different industries or variances in product. It can be found in the refrigerator industry in the form of water filters, power tool industry in the form of batteries, automotive industry in the form of parts or diagnostic software, or most commonly known in the printing industry.

In some cases, it can be that a standard for the consumable hasn't been agreed upon or the technology is proprietary to the company, but in most cases it's a form of greed locking the consumer into a product that they are then required to purchase in many cases at a significantly inflated price. For example, a printer company might sell a printer at next to or less than the cost to build it as a loss leader, but<ref>{{Cite web |date=2020-01-29 |title=Maximizing Sales Withy Loss Leader Pricing - Conjointly |url=https://conjointly.com/blog/loss-leader-pricing-strategy/ |url-status=live |access-date=2025-08-20 |website=conjointly |archive-url=http://web.archive.org/web/20251106035933/https://conjointly.com/blog/loss-leader-pricing-strategy/ |archive-date=6 Nov 2025}}</ref> now that the consumer has bought into their product line, they are obliged through marketing, embedded DRM, or necessity to purchase the consumables for the product from the original manufacturer.

==References==
<references />

==Video References==
<references group="Video References" responsive="0" />
[[Category:Dymo Corporation]]

Microsoft Copilot's recall feature

2025-10-18T10:47:25Z

SushiPasta: /* Background */ revised to be clearer maybe

{{IncidentCargo
|Company=Microsoft
|StartDate=2024-06
|Status=Active
|Product=Microsoft Copilot
|ArticleType=Service
|Type=Privacy
|Description=Microsoft Recall collects screenshots of the user's computer every few seconds to be used by Copilot, Microsoft's AI.
}}{{Stub}}
Recall is a feature of [[Windows 11]] that records the user's activity using snapshots and allows users to retrace their previous activity., using [[Microsoft copilot|Copilot]], [[Microsoft]]'s [[Artificial intelligence]](AI) assistant. It takes screenshots of the user's desktop every few seconds to be used by Copilot. It was initially impossible to remove from your computer and its screenshots were unencrypted.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Warren |first=Tom |date=2024-09-27 |title=Microsoft’s more secure Windows Recall feature can also be uninstalled by users |url=https://www.theverge.com/2024/9/27/24255721/microsoft-windows-recall-ai-security-improvements-overhaul-uninstall |url-status=live |website=The Verge}}</ref><ref name=":0">{{Cite web |title=Retrace your steps with Recall - Microsoft Support |url=https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/retrace-your-steps-with-recall-aa03f8a0-a78b-4b3e-b0a1-2eb8ac48701c |access-date=2025-08-23}}</ref>

==Background==
In 2024, Microsoft unveiled Recall for Copilot+ PCs,<ref>{{Cite web |date=2002-01-25 |title=Competitive Processes, Anticompetitive Practices And Consumer Harm In The Software Industry: An Analysis Of The Inadequacies Of The Microsoft-Department Of Justice Proposed Final Judgment |url=https://www.justice.gov/atr/competitive-processes-anticompetitive-practices-and-consumer-harm-software-industry-analysis |url-status=live |website=DOJ}}</ref> marketed as a way for users to search through what they have done on their computer by recording their screen. This sparked controversy,<ref>{{Cite web |last=Allan |first=Darren |date=2024-05-23 |title=Microsoft’s controversial Recall feature for Windows 11 could already be in legal hot water |url=https://www.techradar.com/computing/windows/microsofts-controversial-recall-feature-for-windows-11-could-already-be-in-legal-hot-water |url-status=live |website=Techradar}}</ref> especially among security experts<ref>{{Cite web |last=Hassan |first=Nilhad |title=Privacy and security risks surrounding Microsoft Recall |url=https://www.techtarget.com/searchenterpriseai/feature/Privacy-and-security-risks-surrounding-Microsoft-Recall |url-status=live}}</ref> who worried about the security of screenshots, since it could easily document private information like social-security numbers, bank-account information, and passwords, as well as user browsing behavior. A massive security oversight was the '''initial''' version of Microsoft Recall gathering information into a '''plain text database'''<ref>{{Cite web |last=Beaumont |first=Kevin |date=2024 |title=Stealing everything you’ve ever typed or viewed on your own Windows PC is now possible with two lines of code — inside the Copilot+ Recall disaster |url=https://doublepulsar.com/recall-stealing-everything-youve-ever-typed-or-viewed-on-your-own-windows-pc-is-now-possible-da3e12e9465e |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20250128195155/https://doublepulsar.com/recall-stealing-everything-youve-ever-typed-or-viewed-on-your-own-windows-pc-is-now-possible-da3e12e9465e?gi=e57abd81f3e3 |archive-date=2025-01-28 |access-date=2025-10-18 |website=Medium}}</ref>. Later versions of Recall subsequently encrypt the database.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Warren |first=Tom |date=2024-09-28 |title=Microsoft’s more secure Windows Recall feature can also be uninstalled by users |url=https://www.theverge.com/2024/9/27/24255721/microsoft-windows-recall-ai-security-improvements-overhaul-uninstall |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240927170451/https://www.theverge.com/2024/9/27/24255721/microsoft-windows-recall-ai-security-improvements-overhaul-uninstall |archive-date=2024-09-27 |access-date=2025-10-18 |work=[[The Verge]]}}</ref>

===System requirements for Recall:===

*A Copilot+ PC that meets Microsoft's Secure-core standard
*40 TOPS NPU
*16 GB of RAM
*256 GB of storage capacity with 50 GB of free storage
*Device Encryption or Bitlocker needs to be enabled
*Users need to enroll into Windows Hello Sign-in Security with at least one biometric sign-in option enabled<ref name=":0" />

==References==
{{reflist}}
[[Category:Microsoft]]

Microsoft Copilot's recall feature

2025-10-18T10:44:24Z

SushiPasta: /* Background */

{{IncidentCargo
|Company=Microsoft
|StartDate=2024-06
|Status=Active
|Product=Microsoft Copilot
|ArticleType=Service
|Type=Privacy
|Description=Microsoft Recall collects screenshots of the user's computer every few seconds to be used by Copilot, Microsoft's AI.
}}{{Stub}}
Recall is a feature of [[Windows 11]] that records the user's activity using snapshots and allows users to retrace their previous activity., using [[Microsoft copilot|Copilot]], [[Microsoft]]'s [[Artificial intelligence]](AI) assistant. It takes screenshots of the user's desktop every few seconds to be used by Copilot. It was initially impossible to remove from your computer and its screenshots were unencrypted.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Warren |first=Tom |date=2024-09-27 |title=Microsoft’s more secure Windows Recall feature can also be uninstalled by users |url=https://www.theverge.com/2024/9/27/24255721/microsoft-windows-recall-ai-security-improvements-overhaul-uninstall |url-status=live |website=The Verge}}</ref><ref name=":0">{{Cite web |title=Retrace your steps with Recall - Microsoft Support |url=https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/retrace-your-steps-with-recall-aa03f8a0-a78b-4b3e-b0a1-2eb8ac48701c |access-date=2025-08-23}}</ref>

==Background==
In 2024, Microsoft unveiled Recall for Copilot+ PCs,<ref>{{Cite web |date=2002-01-25 |title=Competitive Processes, Anticompetitive Practices And Consumer Harm In The Software Industry: An Analysis Of The Inadequacies Of The Microsoft-Department Of Justice Proposed Final Judgment |url=https://www.justice.gov/atr/competitive-processes-anticompetitive-practices-and-consumer-harm-software-industry-analysis |url-status=live |website=DOJ}}</ref> marketed as a way for users to search through what they have done on their computer by recording their screen. This sparked controversy,<ref>{{Cite web |last=Allan |first=Darren |date=2024-05-23 |title=Microsoft’s controversial Recall feature for Windows 11 could already be in legal hot water |url=https://www.techradar.com/computing/windows/microsofts-controversial-recall-feature-for-windows-11-could-already-be-in-legal-hot-water |url-status=live |website=Techradar}}</ref> especially among security experts<ref>{{Cite web |last=Hassan |first=Nilhad |title=Privacy and security risks surrounding Microsoft Recall |url=https://www.techtarget.com/searchenterpriseai/feature/Privacy-and-security-risks-surrounding-Microsoft-Recall |url-status=live}}</ref> who worried about the security of screenshots, since it could easily document private information like social-security numbers, bank-account information, and passwords, as well as user browsing behavior. The '''initial''' version of Microsoft Recall gathered information into a '''plain text database'''<ref>{{Cite web |last=Beaumont |first=Kevin |date=2024 |title=Stealing everything you’ve ever typed or viewed on your own Windows PC is now possible with two lines of code — inside the Copilot+ Recall disaster |url=https://doublepulsar.com/recall-stealing-everything-youve-ever-typed-or-viewed-on-your-own-windows-pc-is-now-possible-da3e12e9465e |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20250128195155/https://doublepulsar.com/recall-stealing-everything-youve-ever-typed-or-viewed-on-your-own-windows-pc-is-now-possible-da3e12e9465e?gi=e57abd81f3e3 |archive-date=2025-01-28 |access-date=2025-10-18 |website=Medium}}</ref>, later versions of Recall subsequently encrypt the database.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Warren |first=Tom |date=2024-09-28 |title=Microsoft’s more secure Windows Recall feature can also be uninstalled by users |url=https://www.theverge.com/2024/9/27/24255721/microsoft-windows-recall-ai-security-improvements-overhaul-uninstall |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240927170451/https://www.theverge.com/2024/9/27/24255721/microsoft-windows-recall-ai-security-improvements-overhaul-uninstall |archive-date=2024-09-27 |access-date=2025-10-18 |work=[[The Verge]]}}</ref>

===System requirements for Recall:===

*A Copilot+ PC that meets Microsoft's Secure-core standard
*40 TOPS NPU
*16 GB of RAM
*256 GB of storage capacity with 50 GB of free storage
*Device Encryption or Bitlocker needs to be enabled
*Users need to enroll into Windows Hello Sign-in Security with at least one biometric sign-in option enabled<ref name=":0" />

==References==
{{reflist}}
[[Category:Microsoft]]

Microsoft Copilot's recall feature

2025-10-18T10:42:47Z

SushiPasta: /* Background */ Added information about (initially) unencrypted database and the correction after the fact

{{IncidentCargo
|Company=Microsoft
|StartDate=2024-06
|Status=Active
|Product=Microsoft Copilot
|ArticleType=Service
|Type=Privacy
|Description=Microsoft Recall collects screenshots of the user's computer every few seconds to be used by Copilot, Microsoft's AI.
}}{{Stub}}
Recall is a feature of [[Windows 11]] that records the user's activity using snapshots and allows users to retrace their previous activity., using [[Microsoft copilot|Copilot]], [[Microsoft]]'s [[Artificial intelligence]](AI) assistant. It takes screenshots of the user's desktop every few seconds to be used by Copilot. It was initially impossible to remove from your computer and its screenshots were unencrypted.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Warren |first=Tom |date=2024-09-27 |title=Microsoft’s more secure Windows Recall feature can also be uninstalled by users |url=https://www.theverge.com/2024/9/27/24255721/microsoft-windows-recall-ai-security-improvements-overhaul-uninstall |url-status=live |website=The Verge}}</ref><ref name=":0">{{Cite web |title=Retrace your steps with Recall - Microsoft Support |url=https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/retrace-your-steps-with-recall-aa03f8a0-a78b-4b3e-b0a1-2eb8ac48701c |access-date=2025-08-23}}</ref>

==Background==
In 2024, Microsoft unveiled Recall for Copilot+ PCs,<ref>{{Cite web |date=2002-01-25 |title=Competitive Processes, Anticompetitive Practices And Consumer Harm In The Software Industry: An Analysis Of The Inadequacies Of The Microsoft-Department Of Justice Proposed Final Judgment |url=https://www.justice.gov/atr/competitive-processes-anticompetitive-practices-and-consumer-harm-software-industry-analysis |url-status=live |website=DOJ}}</ref> marketed as a way for users to search through what they have done on their computer by recording their screen. This sparked controversy,<ref>{{Cite web |last=Allan |first=Darren |date=2024-05-23 |title=Microsoft’s controversial Recall feature for Windows 11 could already be in legal hot water |url=https://www.techradar.com/computing/windows/microsofts-controversial-recall-feature-for-windows-11-could-already-be-in-legal-hot-water |url-status=live |website=Techradar}}</ref> especially among security experts<ref>{{Cite web |last=Hassan |first=Nilhad |title=Privacy and security risks surrounding Microsoft Recall |url=https://www.techtarget.com/searchenterpriseai/feature/Privacy-and-security-risks-surrounding-Microsoft-Recall |url-status=live}}</ref> who worried about the security of screenshots, since it could easily document private information like social-security numbers, bank-account information, and passwords, as well as user browsing behavior. The initial version of Microsoft Recall gathered information into a '''plain text database'''<ref>{{Cite web |last=Beaumont |first=Kevin |date=2024 |title=Stealing everything you’ve ever typed or viewed on your own Windows PC is now possible with two lines of code — inside the Copilot+ Recall disaster |url=https://doublepulsar.com/recall-stealing-everything-youve-ever-typed-or-viewed-on-your-own-windows-pc-is-now-possible-da3e12e9465e |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20250128195155/https://doublepulsar.com/recall-stealing-everything-youve-ever-typed-or-viewed-on-your-own-windows-pc-is-now-possible-da3e12e9465e?gi=e57abd81f3e3 |archive-date=2025-01-28 |access-date=2025-10-18 |website=Medium}}</ref>, later versions of Recall subsequently encrypt the database.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Warren |first=Tom |date=2024-09-28 |title=Microsoft’s more secure Windows Recall feature can also be uninstalled by users |url=https://www.theverge.com/2024/9/27/24255721/microsoft-windows-recall-ai-security-improvements-overhaul-uninstall |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240927170451/https://www.theverge.com/2024/9/27/24255721/microsoft-windows-recall-ai-security-improvements-overhaul-uninstall |archive-date=2024-09-27 |access-date=2025-10-18 |work=[[The Verge]]}}</ref>

===System requirements for Recall:===

*A Copilot+ PC that meets Microsoft's Secure-core standard
*40 TOPS NPU
*16 GB of RAM
*256 GB of storage capacity with 50 GB of free storage
*Device Encryption or Bitlocker needs to be enabled
*Users need to enroll into Windows Hello Sign-in Security with at least one biometric sign-in option enabled<ref name=":0" />

==References==
{{reflist}}
[[Category:Microsoft]]