<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://mirror.consumerrights.wiki/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=TasmanianRex</id>
	<title>Consumer Rights Wiki - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://mirror.consumerrights.wiki/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=TasmanianRex"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://mirror.consumerrights.wiki/w/Special:Contributions/TasmanianRex"/>
	<updated>2026-05-19T23:05:07Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.44.0</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://mirror.consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=User:TasmanianRex&amp;diff=42982</id>
		<title>User:TasmanianRex</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://mirror.consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=User:TasmanianRex&amp;diff=42982"/>
		<updated>2026-03-13T03:24:27Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TasmanianRex: Blanked the page&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TasmanianRex</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://mirror.consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=Battery_Health_Assistance&amp;diff=14287</id>
		<title>Battery Health Assistance</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://mirror.consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=Battery_Health_Assistance&amp;diff=14287"/>
		<updated>2025-05-12T08:54:43Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TasmanianRex: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The [[Google Pixel|&#039;&#039;&#039;Google Pixel&#039;&#039;&#039;]] 9a is an Android smartphone designed, developed and marketed by [[Google]]. The planned release date is April 10 in US, Canada and UK.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{Cite web |last=Brecher |first=Hannes |last2=Fisher |first2=Jacob |date=2 Apr 2025 |title=Google Pixel 9a comes with new feature that weakens the battery after just 200 charging cycles |url=https://www.notebookcheck.net/Google-Pixel-9a-comes-with-new-feature-that-weakens-the-battery-after-just-200-charging-cycles.991310.0.html |url-status=live |access-date=2 Apr 2025 |website=Notebookcheck}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; On March 31, 2025, Google announced its Battery Health Assistance&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:1&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{Cite web |date=1 Apr 2025 |title=Understand your Pixel battery |url=https://support.google.com/pixelphone/answer/15738128 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20250404092737/https://support.google.com/pixelphone/answer/15738128 |archive-date=4 Apr 2025 |access-date=4 Apr 2025 |website=[[Google]]}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; to users:&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;For Pixel 9a:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lithium-ion batteries are consumable components that eventually require replacement. Your Pixel 9a will receive a &#039;&#039;&#039;software update&#039;&#039;&#039; that automatically helps manage the long term health and performance of its battery as it ages. This software will &#039;&#039;&#039;adjust the battery’s maximum voltage&#039;&#039;&#039; in stages that start at 200 charge cycles and continue gradually until 1000 charge cycles to help stabilize battery performance and aging.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You may notice small decreases in your battery’s runtime as your battery ages. Battery health assistance will also &#039;&#039;&#039;tune the phone’s charging speed&#039;&#039;&#039; based &#039;&#039;&#039;on adjusted capacity&#039;&#039;&#039;. You may notice a slight change in battery charging performance. Battery health assistance settings on Pixel 9a &#039;&#039;&#039;aren’t customizable by the user.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Background==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Pixel 4a Battery Performance Program&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |date=6 Jan 2025 |title=Pixel 4a Battery Performance Program |url=https://support.google.com/pixelphone/answer/15701861 |url-status=deviated |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20250107002112/https://support.google.com/pixelphone/answer/15701861 |archive-date=7 Jan 2025 |access-date=25 Mar 2025 |website=[[Google]]}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;===&lt;br /&gt;
{{Main|Pixel 4a Battery Performance Program}}&lt;br /&gt;
Google is known for reducing the charging voltage of Pixel 4a from 4.4V to 3.95V via a software update, resulting in a 44% drop in theoretical usable charge.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:2&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{Cite web |last=Wojciechowska |first=Kamila |date=5 Feb 2025 |title=There is even more to the Google Pixel 4a&#039;s horrific battery update than we thought |url=https://www.androidauthority.com/pixel-4a-battery-update-explained-3522417/ |url-status=live |access-date=4 Apr 2025 |website=AndroidAuthority}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Pixel 4a users report much higher real-world runtime loss.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Potential effects of software update==&lt;br /&gt;
Google has not provided detailed technical explanations for the update. The adjusted battery&#039;s maximum voltage and charging speed are yet to be disclosed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Battery Performance issues===&lt;br /&gt;
Charging the battery at a lower voltage will not fully charge it. A partly charged battery exhibit shorter runtime. Lowering the charging voltage by 0.1V lowers the capacity by about 10%.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{Cite web |date=25 Oct 2021 |title=BU-409: Charging Lithium-ion |url=https://batteryuniversity.com/article/bu-409-charging-lithium-ion |url-status=live |access-date=4 Apr 2025 |website=Battery University}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Charging the battery at a lower current will increase the charging time.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Google claimed that on Pixel 8a and later, the battery &amp;quot;should retain up to 80% capacity for about 1000 charge cycles&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:1&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; However, Google also said that &amp;quot;your battery’s actual lifespan depends on usage patterns and other factors&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:1&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; The &amp;quot;Battery Health Assistance&amp;quot;, being a &amp;quot;factor&amp;quot;, potentially causing battery lifespan to be considerably worse than advertised after the first thousand charging cycles.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Analysis====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Charging the battery in shorter capacity periods leads to less runtime.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:2&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:3&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Charging the battery at lower percentages slows down battery aging.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:4&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Both factors lead to two possible outcomes that need to be differentiated very clearly to prevent misunderstanding, improve battery usage and identify anti-consumer practices:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*When the user recharges the battery to a lower percentage frequently &#039;&#039;(only charging to 100% when necessary)&#039;&#039;, the battery is aged less, which ultimately result in better battery health and longer runtime should the user need 100% capacity, compared to always fully charging.&lt;br /&gt;
*The manufacturer blocked part of the available capacity &#039;&#039;after&#039;&#039; a certain amount of charging cycles. Meaning that after the user has degraded a certain amount of the battery, the manufacturer artificially limits its capabilities by further removing a second portion of the battery.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Possible technical rationale==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Prolonging battery life claim===&lt;br /&gt;
Charging the battery at a lower percentage slows down battery degradation,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:4&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Xu, Bolun &amp;amp; Oudalov, Alexandre &amp;amp; Ulbig, Andreas &amp;amp; Andersson, Göran. (2016). Modeling of Lithium-Ion Battery Degradation for Cell Life Assessment. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid. 99. 1-1. 10.1109/TSG.2016.2578950. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; However, there are some key differences between &amp;quot;Charging Optimization&amp;quot; and the future &amp;quot;Battery Health Assistance&amp;quot;:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Charging Optimization&#039;&#039;&#039; has two options, Adaptive Charging and Limit to 80%.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |title=Get the most life from your Pixel phone battery |url=https://support.google.com/pixelphone/answer/6090612 |url-status=live |access-date=4 Apr 2025 |website=Pixel Phone Help}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Adaptive Charging can prolong the life of the battery by fully charging it just before the user unplugs, reducing the time spend at high charge levels. The user can select Limit to 80% option to help extend the lifespan of the battery with a drawback of a reduced runtime. The smart phone can always resume maximum available capacity should the user deselect the limit and charge it to 100%. Pixel users can &#039;&#039;&#039;enable and disable the feature at will&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Battery Health Assistance&#039;&#039;&#039; lowers the battery&#039;s maximum voltage and charging current in stages, from 200 cycles to 1000 cycles.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:1&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; This is irreversible as the &#039;&#039;&#039;only way to use the full voltage of the battery again is to replace the battery itself.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; This reduces runtime further as &#039;&#039;&#039;only part of the remaining battery capacity is available&#039;&#039;&#039;, defeating the purpose of preserving battery health.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Google claimed that this Battery Health Assistance will be &#039;&#039;&#039;voluntary&#039;&#039;&#039; for &#039;&#039;&#039;previously&#039;&#039;&#039; launched devices.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |last=Li |first=Abner |date=31 Mar 2025 |title=Google Pixel adding ‘Battery health assistance’ for long-term use, starting with Pixel 9a |url=https://9to5google.com/2025/03/31/pixel-battery-health-assistance/ |url-status=live |access-date=4 Apr 2025 |website=9to5Google}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; It is unclear whether some or all Pixel devices released in the future will be impacted by this program.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Safety consideration===&lt;br /&gt;
Concerns arise over the delayed launch date of Pixel 9a over an &amp;quot;an unnamed component issue&amp;quot;, suspecting that the issue could be the battery.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |last=Mundy |first=Jon |date=20 Mar 2025 |title=Pixel 9a flaw uncovered before it even hits shops |url=https://www.techadvisor.com/article/2643405/google-pixel-9a-delayed-due-to-component-issue.html |url-status=live |access-date=4 Apr 2025 |website=Tech Advisor}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; If the battery of the Pixel 9a is found to be defective, it might no longer be safe to charge at full voltage after 200 cycles.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Consumer reaction==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Current and former Pixel users condemn this program and compared it with Apple&#039;s &amp;quot;batterygate&amp;quot; and the Pixel 4a Battery Performance Program, saying that Battery Health Assistance is &amp;quot;worse&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |title=This is worse than Apple |url=https://old.reddit.com/r/GooglePixel/comments/1jp883q/google_will_gradually_reduce_pixel_9a_battery/ml6m0y7/?context=3 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20250405011000/https://old.reddit.com/r/GooglePixel/comments/1jp883q/google_will_gradually_reduce_pixel_9a_battery/ml6m0y7/?context=3 |archive-date=5 Apr 2025 |access-date=5 Apr 2025 |website=[[Reddit]]}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and the Pixel 4a incident is a &amp;quot;preview&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |date=2 Apr 2025 |title=Pixel 9a will have battery &amp;quot;optimised&amp;quot; after 200 cycles |url=https://www.reddit.com/r/Pixel4a/comments/1jpk1db/pixel_9a_will_have_battery_optimised_after_200/ |url-status=live |access-date=3 Apr 2025 |website=[[Reddit]]}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Users also find the wording of the support article on Google&#039;s website vague and lack of self-consistency,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |date=1 Apr 2024 |title=So they want to reduce the wear out of the battery by... doing exactly the same? What&#039;s logic behind this? |url=https://www.reddit.com/r/GooglePixel/comments/1jp883q/comment/mkzu6lc/ |url-status=live |access-date=2 Apr 2025 |website=[[Reddit]]}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; saying the Google will &amp;quot;cause the thing they are supposedly trying to prevent&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |date=2 Apr 2025 |title=Deliberate weakening after only 200 charging cycles: Google Pixel 9a limits battery voltage according to a planned schedule |url=https://www.notebookchat.com/index.php?topic=225600.msg645716#msg645716 |url-status=live |access-date=5 Apr 2025 |website=NotebookCHECK - Notebook Forum}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Google Pixel 9a]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TasmanianRex</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://mirror.consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=Windows_installation_USB_drives&amp;diff=12350</id>
		<title>Windows installation USB drives</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://mirror.consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=Windows_installation_USB_drives&amp;diff=12350"/>
		<updated>2025-03-31T08:06:42Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TasmanianRex: /* An untrustworthy solution */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{InfoboxProductLine&lt;br /&gt;
| Title = {{PAGENAME}}&lt;br /&gt;
| Release Year =2015 &lt;br /&gt;
| Product Type =Hardware and software &lt;br /&gt;
| In Production =Yes &lt;br /&gt;
| Official Website =https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/d/windows-11-home/dg7gmgf0krt0 &lt;br /&gt;
| Logo =Windows1122h2.jpeg &lt;br /&gt;
}}Since the release of [[Windows]] 10, &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Microsoft]]&#039;&#039;&#039; has sold usb drives with an installer preloaded.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |last=Shilov |first=Anton |date=5 Sep 2015 |title=Microsoft begins to sell Windows 10 on USB flash drives |url=https://www.kitguru.net/gaming/operating-systems/anton-shilov/microsoft-begins-to-sell-windows-10-on-usb-flash-drives/ |url-status=live |access-date=27 Mar 2025 |website=KitGuru}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; They are deeply write protected, and have no official way to be formatted and reused for anything other than the manufacturing year’s Windows installer. (The installers inevitably become outdated.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Controversy==&lt;br /&gt;
These drives are artificially unwritable, preventing expected reuse from a USB flash drive. There is no indication on the &#039;&#039;&#039;Windows 11 22H2 USB drive box exterior&#039;&#039;&#039; that it is not rewritable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Microsoft has undoubtedly sold millions of non-rewritable Windows USB drives, creating needless e-waste.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Diskpart.png|thumb|Normal tools like Windows command prompt diskpart can’t remove the write protection and it highlights how the current read only state is not under its control]]&lt;br /&gt;
Shortly after purchasing these drives, people turned to forums seeking help, unable to write to them no matter what they tried.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |last=Weisshar |first=Keith |date=8 Aug 2015 |title=Windows 10 Retail USB Drive |url=https://www.tenforums.com/installation-upgrade/14315-windows-10-retail-usb-drive.html |url-status=live |access-date=27 Mar 2025 |website=Windows Ten Forums}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==An untrustworthy solution== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By late 2016,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.techunboxed.com/2016/09/how-to-disable-write-protection-on-dell.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; equally locked down oem windows recovery usb drives were noted to be using Phison controllers which a proprietary program for Windows called Phison MPALL can low level format into a writeable state. Same goes for the retail installer drives (subject to change. An incompatibly new Phison part can be made and put in the drives or a different manufacturer’s drives can be used.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since &#039;&#039;&#039;Phison’s website does not distribute nor mention the program at all&#039;&#039;&#039; there’s no way to know for sure that an unofficially redistributed version doesn’t have malware packed in or even if Phison made the software. Try to be very careful using MPALL at your own risk on a device with no sensitive data, and no passwords saved including Microsoft accounts (fresh install with a local account workaround) and fresh install windows again / wipe the main drive when finished with MPALL because some malware scan sites claim it installs a driver.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://any.run/report/9670e21a30a78af57e5c4b4a702da1e8e8bf587cbc66a837b9e172f3b1a1182b/3fee59f4-c6ab-4cd1-88cc-bf433869f4b5&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It’s unofficial nature’s trust concerns aside Phison MPALL can brick the usb drive if GetInfo.exe’s (should be included with MPALL’s unofficial redistributions) part data doesn’t match what’s inputted into the low level formatting settings but it can also stall and fail for no apparent reason of user error (sometimes recoverable by un and re plugging the drive and pressing the update button to refresh the drive list before trying again with the same settings.) Each attempt can take more than an hour and a half. Don’t close MPALL or power off windows (be sure the windows idle power settings allow such a wait) during the low level formatting.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://youtube.com/watch?v=VmyAHmCvILA&amp;amp;t=187 This YouTube video appears to be the best guide on how to use Phison MPALL.] Ignore their use of chipgenius and skip to 3 minutes and 7 seconds in as it’s been known for nearly 9 years that these are Phison drives so the included GetInfo.exe should be all that’s needed to get the correct part number and usb type to input.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:{{PAGENAME}}]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Microsoft]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TasmanianRex</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://mirror.consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=Adobe_Digital_Editions%27_ebook_DRM&amp;diff=12349</id>
		<title>Adobe Digital Editions&#039; ebook DRM</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://mirror.consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=Adobe_Digital_Editions%27_ebook_DRM&amp;diff=12349"/>
		<updated>2025-03-31T08:05:15Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TasmanianRex: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Modern-day ebook publishers have been utilizing various forms of [[Digital rights management|digital-rights management]] (DRM) to protect the books they sell to make sure that &amp;quot;copyright laws are respected and that authors and publishers are fairly compensated&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:1&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{Cite web |title=DRM for NOOK Content |url=https://help.barnesandnoble.com/hc/en-us/articles/5445106302107-DRM-for-NOOK-Content |url-status=live |access-date=29 Mar 2025 |website=Barnes &amp;amp; Noble}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; However, the end user who purchases the content legally ends up being restricted in what they are able to do with the ebook once they have purchased it. One of Adobe&#039;s version of this DRM is called &amp;quot;Adobe Digital Editions&amp;quot; which is the client the user uses to read their ebooks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Background==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Adobe]] eBook Platform&#039;&#039;&#039; is a platform for publishers to leverage when selling ebooks. This includes the following software suite: Adobe InDesign® CC software, Adobe Content Server software, the Adobe Reader® Mobile Software Development Kit (SDK), and Adobe Digital Editions.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[https://www.adobe.com/content/dam/cc/us/en/solutions/ebook/adobe_ebook_platform_whitepaper.pdf Adobe® eBook Platform: Authoring and delivering eBooks across devices]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; A summary of each of the software is outlined below at a high level (mostly extracted from the Adobe white paper on the platform):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Adobe Content Server - &amp;quot;Adobe Content Server allows publishers, retailers, distributors, and libraries to host and manage eBook distribution. This server software encrypts PDF and EPUB eBook files and allows publishers and retailers to manage the rights on the eBook files they distribute.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
*Adobe Reader Mobile SDK - The SDK &amp;quot; allows e-reader device manufacturers and eBook application developers to support EPUB and PDF files protected by Content Server in their products. It enables tethered and over-the-air downloads so that consumers can order eBooks directly through their devices or “side-load” them by copying files from their desktops to their mobile devices&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Adobe InDesign - InDesign allows the publishers to export EPUB and EPUB3 files from print layouts. This also allows publishers to export ebooks to hardware such as the &amp;quot;Sony Reader, the Barnes &amp;amp; Noble nook, and smartphones, as well as personal computers using Microsoft® Windows® or Mac OS&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Adobe Digital Editions (ADE) - &amp;quot;Adobe Digital Editions is a free, lightweight desktop reading application for PC and Mac that allows eBook consumers to easily download and organize their eBooks easily. Consumers can read their eBooks online and offline, transfer copy-protected eBooks from their personal computers to other devices, organize eBooks into a custom library, and annotate page&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All these solutions come together to give publishers control over their ebook content. The main product discussed on this page is Adobe Digital Editions (ADE). ADE allows for the following benefits:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |title=Optimize your reading experience with the best eBook reader across formats. |url=https://www.adobe.com/solutions/ebook/digital-editions.html |url-status=live |access-date=29 Mar 2025 |website=[[Adobe]]}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Download and transfer of books between devices&lt;br /&gt;
*EPUB3 support&lt;br /&gt;
*Keyword search across ebooks&lt;br /&gt;
*Voiceover accessibility&lt;br /&gt;
*Multi-language support&lt;br /&gt;
*Bookmarking, highlighting, and note support&lt;br /&gt;
*Support for borrowing ebooks from libraries&lt;br /&gt;
*ebook printing (publishers decide whether they opt-in for allowing printing or not)&lt;br /&gt;
*EPUB, EPUB3 and PDF support&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
ADE also has system requirements, as it is an application running on your system:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |title=System requirements |url=https://www.adobe.com/solutions/ebook/digital-editions/tech-specs.html |url-status=live |access-date=29 Mar 2025 |website=[[Adobe]]}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Windows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Intel® Pentium® 4 processor or later&lt;br /&gt;
*Windows® 7 (32 or 64 bit running in 32-bit mode) or later&lt;br /&gt;
*512MB of RAM (1GB recommended)&lt;br /&gt;
*40MB of available hard-disk space&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mac OS:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Intel Core™ Duo or faster processor&lt;br /&gt;
*Mac OS X v10.8 or later&lt;br /&gt;
*Compatible with Apple Retina Display&lt;br /&gt;
*512MB of RAM (1GB recommended)&lt;br /&gt;
*75MB of available hard-disk space&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
iOS:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Minimum requirement 9.0 or later.&lt;br /&gt;
*Compatible with iPhone and iPad.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Android:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Minimum requirement 4.4 or later.&lt;br /&gt;
*Compatible with the Mobile and Tablet.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Adobe Digital Edition&#039;s Consumer Effects==&lt;br /&gt;
With the release of the platform and specifically the Adobe Digital Edition application, consumers have been restricted on what they are allowed to do with ebooks that they have purchased. Although unlimited downloads are mentioned by publishers and ebook sites, those are tied to an account.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:1&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; This means that if access to an account is lost, then the access to those ebooks is lost as well. eBooks.com is one of the various e-bookstores that sells both non-DRM and DRM books leveraging ADE. When purchasing an ebook from them, you get a .acsm file. This format only works with the Adobe Digital Editions application. The user needs to create an Adobe account (after already creating an ebooks.com account) in order to add the book to their account. ADE (pertaining to purchases from ebooks.com) allows for authorization of up to 10 devices with a single Adobe ID, but only one computer.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:2&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{Cite web |last=Turvey |first=Alex |title=What is DRM? (DRM FAQs) |url=https://support.ebooks.com/hc/en-gb/articles/360000726656-What-is-DRM-DRM-FAQs |url-status=live |access-date=29 Mar 2025 |website=eBooks.com}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The end user would not be able to read a book on a home computer and then later on a laptop simultaneously due to this limitation. Barnes and Noble uses ADE as well for their ebooks, with their limitations being a bit different in comparison to ebooks.com&#039;s. They have 4 versions of DRM types they leverage for the books sold on their site:&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:1&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#Consumer DRM (eBook)&lt;br /&gt;
##Unlimited downloads&lt;br /&gt;
##Up to six (6) devices/computers&lt;br /&gt;
##No copying and printing&lt;br /&gt;
#Business DRM (eBook)&lt;br /&gt;
##One (1) download&lt;br /&gt;
##Up to one (1) device/computer&lt;br /&gt;
##No copying and printing&lt;br /&gt;
#Education DRM (eTextbook)&lt;br /&gt;
##Two (2) downloads&lt;br /&gt;
##Up to two (2) devices/computers&lt;br /&gt;
##Limited copying and printing&lt;br /&gt;
#Hard DRM&lt;br /&gt;
##Six (6) downloads&lt;br /&gt;
##Up to six (6) devices/computers&lt;br /&gt;
##Used for Case Studies made available by professors and specific courses&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In both cases, the user is limited to only a certain number of devices and has to constantly authorize and un-authorize readers in order to be in compliance. This leads to a lack of autonomy for the user who has purchased the book. In addition, with the Barnes and Noble &amp;quot;Consumer DRM&amp;quot; section, a user is not able to print the ebook they have purchased either. Going back to the ebooks.com example, ebooks.com has a bit more control on the consumer stating that due to DRM: &amp;quot;the amount of printing or copying and pasting you can do may be restricted, or prevented entirely. It will also determine whether the read aloud functionality is enabled for the ebook or not&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:2&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With ADE, a consumer will always need to download the application to access books that they have purchased. This is under the assumption that the user is able to have the technical know-how to do all the ADE overhead in order to finally read the book they have purchased. In addition, individuals who do not have access to the most modern technology, thus not being able to download ADE on their system, are also then prevented from reading ebooks they have purchased.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If a user were to be able to remove DRM from a ebook purchased from an e-bookstore leveraging ADE, they would then be breaching the compliance with an end-user license agreement or a customer license. On ebook.com&#039;s customer license page, they mention the following: &amp;quot;You promise to keep any eBook in the form in which it was supplied to you. We may include other information (including information identifying the author, the copyright owner, or the terms upon which the eBook is supplied) to any eBook supplied to you. You promise not to circumvent any measures that we have taken to protect the rights in the eBook that we have supplied, including removing this information or otherwise facilitating an infringement of copyright&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |title=Customer License |url=https://www.ebooks.com/en-us/information/customerlicense/ |url-status=live |access-date=29 Mar 2025 |website=eBooks.com}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Although no lawsuits have been found being documented (as of writing this article), the door for this kind of consumer abuse is still present.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2014, the Electronic Frontier Foundation had published an article regarding how Adobe Digital Edition was tracking its end users by logging what the end-user reads and what happens to those files.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |last=McSherry |first=Corynne |date=7 Oct 2014 |title=Adobe Spyware Reveals (Again) the Price of DRM: Your Privacy and Security |url=https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2014/10/adobe-spyware-reveals-again-price-drm-your-privacy-and-security |url-status=live |access-date=29 Mar 2025 |website=EFF}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This data was also being sent in plain-text undermining the privacy of the users.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Consumer response==&lt;br /&gt;
On Reddit, consumers are constantly inquiring about steps to remove the Adobe DRM, as it is obstructing the end-users method of being able to comfortably read the ebooks they have purchased.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |title=Adobe Digital Editions &amp;amp; DRM |url=https://www.reddit.com/r/DataHoarder/comments/xvct89/adobe_digital_editions_drm/ |url-status=live |access-date=29 Mar 2025 |website=[[Reddit]]}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Adobe Ebook DRM Removal==&lt;br /&gt;
In the Abbey House Media v. Apple Inc ruling on an ebookstore notifying users of how to remove ebook DRM, a judge has ruled that telling users to remove DRM from books they have legally purchased is &amp;quot;not contributory copyright infringement&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |date=21 Nov 2014 |title=Abbey House Media v. Apple Inc |url=https://www.eff.org/document/abbey-house-media-v-apple-inc |url-status=live |access-date=29 Mar 2025 |website=EFF}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{Cite web |last=Higgins |first=Parker |date=10 Dec 2014 |title=Pointing Users to DRM-Stripping Software Isn&#039;t Copyright Infringement, Judge Rules |url=https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2014/12/pointing-users-drm-stripping-software-isnt-copyright-infringement-judge-rules?language=en |url-status=live |access-date=29 Mar 2025 |website=EFF}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The summary of this case being that the removal of DRM protection on books in non-infringing cases of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) does not necessarily lead to the piracy of digital books.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:3&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An online persona known as ApprenticeAlf, has also gone ahead to create a tool to remove DRM as well from multiple forms of ebook DRM, not only Adobe&#039;s.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |last= |first= |date=10 Sep 2012 |title=DRM Removal Tools for eBooks |url=https://apprenticealf.wordpress.com/2012/09/10/drm-removal-tools-for-ebooks/ |url-status=live |access-date=29 Mar 2025 |website=Apprentice Alf&#039;s Blog}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There&#039;s also an external guide on removing Adobe ebook DRM on a Debian-based system, and serves as a complete walk-through to set up a system to remove the Adobe ebook DRM leveraging multiple publicly available tools.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |last=Qazi |first=Haris |title=Adobe DRM Removal (Linux) |url=https://www.harisqazi.com/configurations/digital-books/#adobe-drm-removal-linux |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20250209023155/https://www.harisqazi.com/configurations/digital-books/#adobe-drm-removal-linux |archive-date=9 Feb 2025 |access-date=29 Mar 2025 |website=Haris Qazi Blog}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Digital rights management]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Adobe]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TasmanianRex</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://mirror.consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=Generative_artificial_intelligence&amp;diff=12348</id>
		<title>Generative artificial intelligence</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://mirror.consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=Generative_artificial_intelligence&amp;diff=12348"/>
		<updated>2025-03-31T08:01:30Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TasmanianRex: /* Specific controversies involving generative AI */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{StubNotice}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- ADMIN COMMENT: This article is fine as a collection of consumer-facing GenAI issues and incidents, however we need to avoid straying into territory relating to workers rights, the ethics of web-scraping for training data, or other similar concerns. This wiki is to be strictly focussed on consumer affairs! If a company changes the terms of a contract to force users into letting their private data be used for AI training, that is relevant. If a company has laid off 500 workers to replace them with a chatbot, the treatment of those workers is not relevant to this wiki (although consumer-facing issues caused by the use of the chatbot might be!).--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Generative AI&#039;&#039;&#039;, also referred to as GenAI or simply AI, is a program whose existence is to generate pieces of media based on a simple prompt (e.g. &amp;quot;How long do I heat popcorn for in the microwave?&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;bowl of buttery popcorn, realistic, artstation, pretty&amp;quot;) with various and random results. GenAI over its currently short existence being accessible to the public has garnered large amounts of concern across the various fields it has been applied to. &amp;lt;!-- I used to help operate a Kialo discussion covering Generative AI, that discussion may be beneficial for reference as a way to further flesh this page out. Just please take note that most claims are a few years old and may not be accurate, so please fact-check any statements from there before mentioning anything anti-consumer here&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://www.kialo.com/is-ai-art-theft-60905 --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==General controversies surrounding generative AI==&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+&lt;br /&gt;
!Controversy&lt;br /&gt;
!Brief Description&lt;br /&gt;
!Related Article(s)/Section(s)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Training data collected without consent&lt;br /&gt;
|Various platforms have scraped data ranging within the petabytes concerning content created by users and potentially owned by companies, without first obtaining an adequate license to use this data. This has gone so far as to not even request consent or even notifying users in advance that their content was used to train AI-powered tools.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Replacing skilled workers with AI&lt;br /&gt;
|Due to its generalized nature, jobs across fields from digital art to writing and programming have had experienced staff replaced by lesser-paid (and often lesser-experienced) employees who would be tasked to use generative tools to do their work. To remain relevant to the wiki&#039;s purpose, the usage leads to the detriment of product quality for consumers, such as representatives replaced with chatbots, or products being sold by companies use poorly-generated content that may harm the consumer.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |last=Grady |first=Constance |date=29 Apr 2024 |title=The AI grift that can literally poison you |url=https://www.vox.com/24141648/ai-ebook-grift-mushroom-foraging-mycological-society |url-status=live |access-date=31 Mar 2025 |website=Vox}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;!-- Reference included more to represent what is intended --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Specific controversies involving generative AI==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Reddit - Training AI on user-generated content===&lt;br /&gt;
In late 2024, [[Reddit]] announced the release of &#039;Reddit Answers,&#039; a large language model (LLM) that was publicly stated&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |title=Reddit Answers (Currently in Beta) |url=https://support.reddithelp.com/hc/en-us/articles/32026729424916-Reddit-Answers-Currently-in-Beta |url-status=live |access-date=31 Mar 2025 |website=[[Reddit]]}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; to use content created by users to train the tool, without requiring prior consent or prior public notice. &amp;lt;!-- Needs further coverage here --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===DeviantArt - DreamUp&amp;lt;!-- Considering the over 2 year long history that continues to have new drama stir from this, we should look into eventually making a dedicated article focused on DreamUp --&amp;gt;===&lt;br /&gt;
While more speculative, it is reasonable for users to assume&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |title=What I think about DeviantArt&#039;s AI Choices |url=https://www.reddit.com/r/AI_Generator_Guide/comments/167sbit/what_i_think_about_deviantarts_ai_choices/ |url-status=live |access-date=31 Mar 2025 |website=[[Reddit]]}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; that when [[DeviantArt]] initially automatically opted all users into allowing their work to be training data for generative AI,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |date=11 Nov 2022 |title=deviantart&#039;s AI art program (and how to opt out) |url=https://www.deviantart.com/izzy-paw/journal/deviantart-s-AI-art-program-and-how-to-opt-out-936581886 |url-status=live |access-date=31 Mar 2025 |website=Deviant Art}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |last=Erdine |first=Önder |date=16 Nov 2022 |title=DeviantArt DreamUp is the latest contender for the AI art crown |url=https://en.digitalreport.com.tr/deviantart-dreamup-how-to-use-ai-opt-out/ |url-status=live |access-date=31 Mar 2025 |website=Digital Report}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; that all content uploaded to DeviantArt was used as training data for their DreamUp tool, however according to statements from DeviantArt CEO Moti Levy,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |last=Robertston |first=Adi |date=15 Nov 2022 |title=How DeviantArt is navigating the AI art minefield |url=https://www.theverge.com/2022/11/15/23449036/deviantart-ai-art-dreamup-training-data-controversy |url-status=live |access-date=31 Mar 2025 |website=The Verge}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; DeviantArt did not plan or intend to train their tool based on user-generated works and that any user-generated works that were used in their model, were introduced by StabilityAI. Regardless, the introduction of DreamUp to the art sharing platform has both stirred controversy on the platform,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |last=Edwards |first=Benj |date=11 Nov 2022 |title=DeviantArt upsets artists with its new AI art generator, DreamUp [Updated] |url=https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2022/11/deviantart-upsets-artists-with-its-new-ai-art-generator-dreamup/ |url-status=live |access-date=31 Mar 2025 |website=[[ArsTechnica]]}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and also fractured the platform into 2 parties,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |last=Duchess Celestia |date=13 Nov 2022 |title=DeviantART Just Betrayed Its Whole Community. (DreamUp AI Controversy) {{!}}{{!}} SPEEDPAINT + COMMENTARY |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IGj_3OhMrAU |url-status=live |access-date=31 Mar 2025 |website=[[YouTube]]}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; those for generative AI (typically those who hold newer accounts) and those against (typically users who have existed on the platform for far longer.) Due to the introduction of DreamUp, the platform has been cluttered by AI generated images, and staff have historically, frequently, and intentionally featured multiple users who exclusively upload GenAI content&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |date=22 Jul 2024 |title=DeviantArt Seller: StygianAI |url=https://www.deviantart.com/team/art/DeviantArt-Seller-StygianAI-1077776294 |access-date=31 Mar 2025 |website=Deviant Art}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |date=9 Oct 2024 |title=Create on DeviantArt: VeilAI |url=https://www.deviantart.com/team/art/Create-on-DeviantArt-VeilAI-1108146133 |url-status=live |access-date=31 Mar 2025 |website=Deviant Art}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |date=15 Jul 2024 |title=DeviantArt Seller: ExeFelix |url=https://www.deviantart.com/team/art/DeviantArt-Seller-ExeFelix-1075192370 |url-status=live |access-date=31 Mar 2025 |website=Deviant Art}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; or post content that uses generative content as a base,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |date=9 Oct 2024 |title=Create on DeviantArt: AKoukis |url=https://www.deviantart.com/team/art/Create-on-DeviantArt-AKoukis-1108151629 |url-status=live |access-date=31 Mar 2025 |website=Deviant Art}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; with a majority of featured creators being ones who nearly or exclusively upload AI generated content.&amp;lt;!-- I was scrolling through their gallery and most featured artist posts were about AI creators, I stopped my search when I reached posts that released before the generative AI controversies on the platform occurred, which had a rough stopping point of around Q4 2022.&lt;br /&gt;
https://www.deviantart.com/team/gallery --&amp;gt;&amp;lt;!-- Due to my close familiarity with the situation, yes, I developed this section a lot more than initially planned. --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===LAION-5b training database===&lt;br /&gt;
Many users have had their content scraped by LAION to power their training database, and the only way they can opt out is via a third party&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://haveibeentrained.com/ Have I Been Trained?]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;StackOverflow - Overflow AI training data based on user generated content&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;====&lt;br /&gt;
In Late July, 2023, [[Overflow AI]] was released by [[StackOverflow]]. The content used to train this AI was built off of questions and answers left by the StackOverflow community.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite news |last=StackOverflow |date=Jul 27, 2023 |title=Announcing OverflowAI |url=https://stackoverflow.blog/2023/07/27/announcing-overflowai/ |access-date=Mar 30, 2025 |work=StackOverflow blog}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This action essentially subverts an existing policy from [[StackOverflow]], where users cannot generate AI responses for answers.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |last=StackOverflow |title=Generative AI Policy |url=https://stackoverflow.com/help/gen-ai-policy |access-date=Mar 30, 2025 |website=StackOverflow help center}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The only way users currently have the capability of not having their content scraped for Overflow AI is to manually delete all posts and topics before deleting your account, however the effectiveness is questionable considering their [[Get Out Clause]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |last=StackOverflow |title=How do I delete all my contributions? |url=https://stackoverflow.com/help/delete-content |access-date=Mar 30, 2025 |website=StackOverflow help center}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; which allows them to retrieve content that was deleted.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Microsoft - GitHub CoPilot trained on free user repositories===&lt;br /&gt;
Labeled on the FAQ for [[GitHub CoPilot]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |last=CoPilot |title=FAQ |url=https://copilot.github.trust.page/faq?s=v2qe7voltpwtv2usl4ikhs#ip-and-open-source |access-date=Mar 30, 2025 |website=github}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; users who pay for either a &#039;&#039;Pro&#039;&#039; or &#039;&#039;Enterprise&#039;&#039; tier plan do not have their repositories (&#039;&#039;repos&#039;&#039;) scanned for the purposes of training CoPilot. This can be considered a form of [[racketeering]], as consumers are forced into paying if they wish to not have their content be indirectly profited off of by [[Microsoft: Family 365 subscripcion forced upsell|Microsoft]]. There are theories that private repos may not be used for training purposes,{{Citation needed}}&amp;lt;!-- Mentioned in previous version of this section --&amp;gt; but it is unable to be verified at this time. Users on this platform have shown some backlash since this has eroded trust in [[GitHub]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |last=Dlindmark |date=Feb 23, 2025 |title=Does GitHub Copilot use any code from individual users to train GitHub&#039;s model (or any successor model)? #152229 |url=https://github.com/orgs/community/discussions/152229 |access-date=Mar 30, 2025 |website=GitHub}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;!-- Possibly move this topic into a main page as forms of racketeering is pretty serious --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TasmanianRex</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://mirror.consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=Generative_artificial_intelligence&amp;diff=12346</id>
		<title>Generative artificial intelligence</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://mirror.consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=Generative_artificial_intelligence&amp;diff=12346"/>
		<updated>2025-03-31T07:59:48Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TasmanianRex: /* General controversies surrounding generative AI */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{StubNotice}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- ADMIN COMMENT: This article is fine as a collection of consumer-facing GenAI issues and incidents, however we need to avoid straying into territory relating to workers rights, the ethics of web-scraping for training data, or other similar concerns. This wiki is to be strictly focussed on consumer affairs! If a company changes the terms of a contract to force users into letting their private data be used for AI training, that is relevant. If a company has laid off 500 workers to replace them with a chatbot, the treatment of those workers is not relevant to this wiki (although consumer-facing issues caused by the use of the chatbot might be!).--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Generative AI&#039;&#039;&#039;, also referred to as GenAI or simply AI, is a program whose existence is to generate pieces of media based on a simple prompt (e.g. &amp;quot;How long do I heat popcorn for in the microwave?&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;bowl of buttery popcorn, realistic, artstation, pretty&amp;quot;) with various and random results. GenAI over its currently short existence being accessible to the public has garnered large amounts of concern across the various fields it has been applied to. &amp;lt;!-- I used to help operate a Kialo discussion covering Generative AI, that discussion may be beneficial for reference as a way to further flesh this page out. Just please take note that most claims are a few years old and may not be accurate, so please fact-check any statements from there before mentioning anything anti-consumer here&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://www.kialo.com/is-ai-art-theft-60905 --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==General controversies surrounding generative AI==&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+&lt;br /&gt;
!Controversy&lt;br /&gt;
!Brief Description&lt;br /&gt;
!Related Article(s)/Section(s)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Training data collected without consent&lt;br /&gt;
|Various platforms have scraped data ranging within the petabytes concerning content created by users and potentially owned by companies, without first obtaining an adequate license to use this data. This has gone so far as to not even request consent or even notifying users in advance that their content was used to train AI-powered tools.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Replacing skilled workers with AI&lt;br /&gt;
|Due to its generalized nature, jobs across fields from digital art to writing and programming have had experienced staff replaced by lesser-paid (and often lesser-experienced) employees who would be tasked to use generative tools to do their work. To remain relevant to the wiki&#039;s purpose, the usage leads to the detriment of product quality for consumers, such as representatives replaced with chatbots, or products being sold by companies use poorly-generated content that may harm the consumer.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |last=Grady |first=Constance |date=29 Apr 2024 |title=The AI grift that can literally poison you |url=https://www.vox.com/24141648/ai-ebook-grift-mushroom-foraging-mycological-society |url-status=live |access-date=31 Mar 2025 |website=Vox}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;!-- Reference included more to represent what is intended --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Specific controversies involving generative AI==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Reddit - Training AI on user-generated content===&lt;br /&gt;
In late 2024, [[Reddit]] announced the release of &#039;Reddit Answers,&#039; a large language model (LLM) that was publicly stated&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |title=Reddit Answers (Currently in Beta) |url=https://support.reddithelp.com/hc/en-us/articles/32026729424916-Reddit-Answers-Currently-in-Beta |url-status=live |access-date=31 Mar 2025 |website=[[Reddit]]}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; to use content created by users to train the tool, without requiring prior consent or prior public notice. &amp;lt;!-- Needs further coverage here --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===DeviantArt - DreamUp&amp;lt;!-- Considering the over 2 year long history that continues to have new drama stir from this, we should look into eventually making a dedicated article focused on DreamUp --&amp;gt;===&lt;br /&gt;
While more speculative, it is reasonable for users to assume&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |title=What I think about DeviantArt&#039;s AI Choices |url=https://www.reddit.com/r/AI_Generator_Guide/comments/167sbit/what_i_think_about_deviantarts_ai_choices/ |url-status=live |access-date=31 Mar 2025 |website=[[Reddit]]}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; that when [[DeviantArt]] initially automatically opted all users into allowing their work to be training data for generative AI&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |date=11 Nov 2022 |title=deviantart&#039;s AI art program (and how to opt out) |url=https://www.deviantart.com/izzy-paw/journal/deviantart-s-AI-art-program-and-how-to-opt-out-936581886 |url-status=live |access-date=31 Mar 2025 |website=Deviant Art}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |last=Erdine |first=Önder |date=16 Nov 2022 |title=DeviantArt DreamUp is the latest contender for the AI art crown |url=https://en.digitalreport.com.tr/deviantart-dreamup-how-to-use-ai-opt-out/ |url-status=live |access-date=31 Mar 2025 |website=Digital Report}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, that all content uploaded to DeviantArt was used as training data for their DreamUp tool, however according to statements from DeviantArt CEO Moti Levy&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |last=Robertston |first=Adi |date=15 Nov 2022 |title=How DeviantArt is navigating the AI art minefield |url=https://www.theverge.com/2022/11/15/23449036/deviantart-ai-art-dreamup-training-data-controversy |url-status=live |access-date=31 Mar 2025 |website=The Verge}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, DeviantArt did not plan or intend to train their tool based on user-generated works and that any user-generated works that were used in their model, were introduced by StabilityAI. Regardless, the introduction of DreamUp to the art sharing platform has both stirred controversy on the platform&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |last=Edwards |first=Benj |date=11 Nov 2022 |title=DeviantArt upsets artists with its new AI art generator, DreamUp [Updated] |url=https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2022/11/deviantart-upsets-artists-with-its-new-ai-art-generator-dreamup/ |url-status=live |access-date=31 Mar 2025 |website=[[ArsTechnica]]}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, and also fractured the platform into 2 parties&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |last=Duchess Celestia |date=13 Nov 2022 |title=DeviantART Just Betrayed Its Whole Community. (DreamUp AI Controversy) {{!}}{{!}} SPEEDPAINT + COMMENTARY |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IGj_3OhMrAU |url-status=live |access-date=31 Mar 2025 |website=[[YouTube]]}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, those for generative AI (typically those who hold newer accounts) and those against (typically users who have existed on the platform for far longer.) Due to the introduction of DreamUp, the platform has been cluttered by AI generated images, and staff have historically, frequently, and intentionally featured multiple users who exclusively upload GenAI content&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |date=22 Jul 2024 |title=DeviantArt Seller: StygianAI |url=https://www.deviantart.com/team/art/DeviantArt-Seller-StygianAI-1077776294 |access-date=31 Mar 2025 |website=Deviant Art}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |date=9 Oct 2024 |title=Create on DeviantArt: VeilAI |url=https://www.deviantart.com/team/art/Create-on-DeviantArt-VeilAI-1108146133 |url-status=live |access-date=31 Mar 2025 |website=Deviant Art}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |date=15 Jul 2024 |title=DeviantArt Seller: ExeFelix |url=https://www.deviantart.com/team/art/DeviantArt-Seller-ExeFelix-1075192370 |url-status=live |access-date=31 Mar 2025 |website=Deviant Art}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; or post content that uses generative content as a base&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |date=9 Oct 2024 |title=Create on DeviantArt: AKoukis |url=https://www.deviantart.com/team/art/Create-on-DeviantArt-AKoukis-1108151629 |url-status=live |access-date=31 Mar 2025 |website=Deviant Art}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, with a majority of featured creators being ones who nearly or exclusively upload AI generated content.&amp;lt;!-- I was scrolling through their gallery and most featured artist posts were about AI creators, I stopped my search when I reached posts that released before the generative AI controversies on the platform occurred, which had a rough stopping point of around Q4 2022.&lt;br /&gt;
https://www.deviantart.com/team/gallery --&amp;gt;&amp;lt;!-- Due to my close familiarity with the situation, yes, I developed this section a lot more than initially planned. --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===LAION-5b training database===&lt;br /&gt;
Many users have had their content scraped by LAION to power their training database, and the only way they can opt out is via a third party&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://haveibeentrained.com/ Have I Been Trained?]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;StackOverflow - Overflow AI training data based on user generated content&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;====&lt;br /&gt;
In Late July, 2023, [[Overflow AI]] was released by [[StackOverflow]]. The content used to train this AI was built off of questions and answers left by the StackOverflow community.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite news |last=StackOverflow |date=Jul 27, 2023 |title=Announcing OverflowAI |url=https://stackoverflow.blog/2023/07/27/announcing-overflowai/ |access-date=Mar 30, 2025 |work=StackOverflow blog}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This action essentially subverts an existing policy from [[StackOverflow]], where users cannot generate AI responses for answers.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |last=StackOverflow |title=Generative AI Policy |url=https://stackoverflow.com/help/gen-ai-policy |access-date=Mar 30, 2025 |website=StackOverflow help center}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The only way users currently have the capability of not having their content scraped for Overflow AI is to manually delete all posts and topics before deleting your account, however the effectiveness is questionable considering their [[Get Out Clause]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |last=StackOverflow |title=How do I delete all my contributions? |url=https://stackoverflow.com/help/delete-content |access-date=Mar 30, 2025 |website=StackOverflow help center}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; which allows them to retrieve content that was deleted.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Microsoft - GitHub CoPilot trained on free user repositories===&lt;br /&gt;
Labeled on the FAQ for [[GitHub CoPilot]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |last=CoPilot |title=FAQ |url=https://copilot.github.trust.page/faq?s=v2qe7voltpwtv2usl4ikhs#ip-and-open-source |access-date=Mar 30, 2025 |website=github}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; users who pay for either a &#039;&#039;Pro&#039;&#039; or &#039;&#039;Enterprise&#039;&#039; tier plan do not have their repositories (&#039;&#039;repos&#039;&#039;) scanned for the purposes of training CoPilot. This can be considered a form of [[racketeering]], as consumers are forced into paying if they wish to not have their content be indirectly profited off of by [[Microsoft: Family 365 subscripcion forced upsell|Microsoft]]. There are theories that private repos may not be used for training purposes,{{Citation needed}}&amp;lt;!-- Mentioned in previous version of this section --&amp;gt; but it is unable to be verified at this time. Users on this platform have shown some backlash since this has eroded trust in [[GitHub]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |last=Dlindmark |date=Feb 23, 2025 |title=Does GitHub Copilot use any code from individual users to train GitHub&#039;s model (or any successor model)? #152229 |url=https://github.com/orgs/community/discussions/152229 |access-date=Mar 30, 2025 |website=GitHub}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;!-- Possibly move this topic into a main page as forms of racketeering is pretty serious --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TasmanianRex</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://mirror.consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=User:TasmanianRex&amp;diff=12345</id>
		<title>User:TasmanianRex</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://mirror.consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=User:TasmanianRex&amp;diff=12345"/>
		<updated>2025-03-31T07:57:29Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TasmanianRex: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== About Me ==&lt;br /&gt;
* Former administrator in Eternal Joke Towers wiki.&lt;br /&gt;
* Former discussion moderator in Eternal&#039;s Towers of Hell wiki.&lt;br /&gt;
* Co-founder and former bureaucrat in Caleb&#039;s Soul Crushing Domain wiki.&lt;br /&gt;
* Founder of JToH&#039;s Tower Developers Wiki (defuncted).&lt;br /&gt;
* Yes, I am a Roblox player whose plays Eternal&#039;s Towers of Hell.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Contacts ==&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Discord:&#039;&#039;&#039; @tasmanianrex&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Matrix:&#039;&#039;&#039; @tasmanianrex:matrix.org&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TasmanianRex</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://mirror.consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=User:TasmanianRex&amp;diff=12344</id>
		<title>User:TasmanianRex</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://mirror.consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=User:TasmanianRex&amp;diff=12344"/>
		<updated>2025-03-31T07:54:16Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TasmanianRex: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== About Me ==&lt;br /&gt;
* Former administrator in Eternal Joke Towers wiki.&lt;br /&gt;
* Former discussion moderator in Eternal&#039;s Towers of Hell wiki.&lt;br /&gt;
* Co-founder and former bureaucrat in Caleb&#039;s Soul Crushing Domain wiki.&lt;br /&gt;
* Yes, I am a Roblox player whose plays Eternal&#039;s Towers of Hell.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Contacts ==&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Discord:&#039;&#039;&#039; @tasmanianrex&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Matrix:&#039;&#039;&#039; @tasmanianrex:matrix.org&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TasmanianRex</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://mirror.consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=Meta&amp;diff=12285</id>
		<title>Meta</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://mirror.consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=Meta&amp;diff=12285"/>
		<updated>2025-03-29T06:22:01Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TasmanianRex: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{InfoboxCompany&lt;br /&gt;
| Name = Meta&lt;br /&gt;
| Type = Public&lt;br /&gt;
| Founded = 2004&lt;br /&gt;
| Industry = Technology&lt;br /&gt;
| Official Website = https://meta.com/&lt;br /&gt;
| Logo = Meta.webp&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[wikipedia:Meta_Platforms|&#039;&#039;&#039;Meta Platforms, Inc.&#039;&#039;&#039;]], formerly known as Facebook, is a multinational technology conglomerate primarily known for its social media platforms, including [[Facebook]], [[Instagram]], [[WhatsApp]], and [[Messenger]]. Founded in 2004 by Mark Zuckerberg, Facebook quickly grew into one of the largest social networks in the world. Over the years, the company has expanded its business model, incorporating advertising, data collection, and virtual reality products, with a focus on connecting users globally.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2021, Facebook rebranded itself as Meta, signaling its shift toward a broader vision focused on the &amp;quot;metaverse&amp;quot; – a virtual-reality, interconnected digital world. Meta has faced ongoing scrutiny over issues related to consumer privacy, data security, content moderation, and its role in spreading misinformation. The company has been involved in several high-profile regulatory and legal challenges, particularly regarding its handling of user data and its impact on user well-being.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Anti-consumer practices==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Facebook&amp;lt;!-- Wow, we got a lot to list here... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Facebook#Criticisms_and_controversies --&amp;gt;===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====The Linux Ban====&lt;br /&gt;
On January 19th 2025, Meta updated their internal policies to recognize the [[free and open source software]] and operating system Linux as a &amp;quot;cybersecurity threat&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:1&amp;quot;&amp;gt;https://distrowatch.com/weekly.php?issue=20250127#sitenews&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.tomshardware.com/software/linux/facebook-flags-linux-topics-as-cybersecurity-threats-posts-and-users-being-blocked&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; As part of this, many Facebook users had their accounts either locked or muted for merely mentioning Linux, most notably the Linux distribution tracking site, DistroWatch. DistroWatch claims they appealed the decision the next day and had it affirmed to them that &amp;quot;Linux-related material is staying on the cybersecurity filter&amp;quot; alongside the personal account the appeal was sent from being locked.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:1&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; This quickly gained media attention with many calling this out as irony given Meta&#039;s infrastructure mostly runs on Linux.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.theregister.com/2025/01/28/facebook_blocks_distrowatch/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
9 days later on January 28th, PCMAG posted A comment to them by Meta directly confirming this was an error following Distrowatch&#039;s account being reinstated and the blocking of any Linux related content being lifted.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.pcmag.com/news/facebook-accidentally-blocks-users-from-posting-about-linux&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Tracking pixel====&lt;br /&gt;
The Meta tracking pixel can be added to websites to track user behavior.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |title=Meta Pixel |url=https://www.facebook.com/business/tools/meta-pixel/ |website=Meta}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The tracking tool has faced several lawsuits for violations of privacy laws. The lawsuits range from websites failing to disclose the use of the tracking tool Meta pixel to outright declaring the tool illegal. In 2023, the Austrian DSB decided the technology is illegal, as it cannot guarantee data is not shared back to data centers located in US from the EU.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |date=16 Mar 2023 |title=Austrian DSB: Meta Tracking Tools Illegal |url=https://noyb.eu/en/austrian-dsb-meta-tracking-tools-illegal |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230316064216/https://noyb.eu/en/austrian-dsb-meta-tracking-tools-illegal |archive-date=16 Mar 2023 |access-date=8 Mar 2025 |website=NOYB – European Center for Digital Rights}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |last=Brunoli |first=Joseph |date=17 Mar 2023 |title=Austrian regulators declare Meta tracking tools are illegal |url=https://www.techzine.eu/news/privacy-compliance/103329/austrian-regulators-declare-meta-tracking-tools-are-illegal/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230320095247/https://www.techzine.eu/news/privacy-compliance/103329/austrian-regulators-declare-meta-tracking-tools-are-illegal/ |archive-date=20 Mar 2023 |access-date=8 Mar 2025 |website=Techzine Europe}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; At that time there was legal uncertainty regarding these data transfers, as the privacy framework for EU-US data transfers was annulled in 2020. This legal grey area was entered again in 2025, as [[The US undermines the Transatlantic Data Privacy Framework with the EU by firing PCLOB staff|the current privacy framework with the US faces uncertainty]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Artificial permission requirements in Android App====&lt;br /&gt;
The Facebook Android App summarily requests a lot of permissions. Most of those can be denied if unwanted. However, when the unlimited permission to access all media files on the user&#039;s phone is not granted, it is not possible to share images from the app. This is a completely bogus requirement, technically this permission is not needed to share images &#039;&#039;out&#039;&#039; of an app. The app will guide the user into enabling that permission when they [first] try to share an image out of Facebook to a different app, e.g. a messenger. Notably, even granting limited access will trigger the &amp;quot;more permissions required&amp;quot; guidance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a crude workaround, one can take screenshots of images in the app instead of using its sharing functionality. Since that yields images in screen resolution, this workaround may not be suitable in all cases.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;[Anecdote follows, is there a better place for information like this?]&#039;&#039; This seems especially concerning since the app recently suggested that I post a &amp;quot;story&amp;quot;, by putting together its suggestion of one. In that story suggestion, it used a picture I have in my camera roll - interestingly, a picture that is years old, that actually shows me, and I&#039;m only partially dressed - it&#039;s a picture I took in a fitting booth that did not have good mirrors available. Possibly complete coincidence, but since only a very small percentage of pictures in my camera roll actually show me, it strongly suggests some algorithmic stuff going on. Which leaves the question, does that algorithm really run completely locally on the phone, or are images uploaded to Meta that the user never OK&#039;d for this?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In my opinion, Android [or an Open Source fork of it] could strongly use a sandbox model that would allow me to &amp;quot;grant&amp;quot; that permission to the app, without actually allowing it to access anything outside of a dedicated container that the user has complete control over.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Useless notifications to boost engagement and facilitate tracking&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;!-- Maybe this warrants its own explanation, seeing that it has since become a commonly used dark pattern --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Initially, notifications on the site were used to inform the user of events that warranted their attention, such as a new post to their wall, a direct message or interactions with their posts. Clicking the notification icon would clear its state. However, at some point Facebook started to trigger notifications when the user was inactive for too long in order to get them to engage with the platform more, which would then in turn indirectly increase their ad exposure. It was also no longer possible to fully clear the notifications because new ones would appear instantly. E-Mail notifications with the clear intent of getting the user to go to the platform rather than informing the user of something relevant are also sent on a regular basis.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This creates a constant sense of the user having unfinished business and missing out on something potentially important on the platform even though this is clearly not the case.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This was exacerbated when mobile platforms became more relevant because they allow app vendors to display notifications on the home screen of the device as well as red badges with notification counts or exclamation marks overlaid over the app icon. Incoming notifications also allow mobile apps to be woken from suspended energy saving state and do active processing in the foreground, which makes it easier for Facebook to do background tracking and transmit information back more often. This practice was also adopted by Instagram when Meta (then called Facebook) took over the platform.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Meta Oculus VR===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Oculus VR Facebook account requirement====&lt;br /&gt;
In 2014, Meta acquired Oculus VR for approximately $2 billion, which was known for developing the Oculus Rift and other virtual-reality (VR) products. Before the acquisition, users could create and use Oculus accounts to access their VR content. This allowed users more control over their privacy and data, without needing to use Facebook. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After Oculus VR was purchased by Meta in October 2020, Oculus Quest and Rift S users were required to sign in with a Facebook account in order to continue to use their purchased VR headsets.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.theverge.com/2020/8/19/21375118/oculus-facebook-account-login-data-privacy-controversy-developers-competition &amp;quot;Facebook is making Oculus’ worst feature unavoidable&amp;quot;] - theverge.com - 20 Aug 2020&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This forced integration of Facebook accounts with Oculus devices created several issues for users, particularly those who preferred to keep their VR experience separate from social media.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because Oculus headsets were now tied to Facebook accounts, users who had their Facebook profiles suspended for any reason found themselves unable to access their purchased content, including games and apps, and unable to use their devices.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.theverge.com/2020/10/15/21518194/oculus-quest-2-headset-facebook-account-suspension-problems &amp;quot;Facebook is accidentally locking some users out of their new Oculus headsets&amp;quot;] - theverge.com - 16 Oct 2020&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Meta offered no options for Oculus VR users aside from going through Facebook&#039;s moderation process to attempt to regain access to their accounts.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Additionally, Oculus account holders who did not want to link to Facebook risked losing access to their purchases entirely.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.reddit.com/r/OculusQuest/comments/zr0rl8/facebook_is_purging_oculus_accounts_in_january/ &amp;quot;Facebook is purging Oculus accounts in January and any data you might have on it, including access to the headset&amp;quot;] - reddit.com/r/OculusQuest - 21 Dec 2022&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; If they did not migrate to a Facebook account, they would no longer be able to use their Oculus headsets or access any content they had purchased from the Oculus Store.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In August 2022, following public backlash, Meta reversed the policy, allowing users to sign in with a new &amp;quot;Meta account&amp;quot; instead of a Facebook account.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.pcgamer.com/finally-the-quest-2-no-longer-requires-a-facebook-login/ &amp;quot;Finally, the Quest 2 no longer requires a Facebook login&amp;quot;] - pcgamer.com - 24 Aug 2022&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This, however, did not prevent several original Oculus accounts from being deleted or suspended, with Facebook users being locked out of their headsets for two years.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Additionally to all of this the headsets are not usable at all without connecting them to the Internet and logging them into a Meta/Facebook account when the owner wants to use it for the first time after purchase. This creates the risk that the headsets will be indefinitely unusable, or at least not to be able to be set up after a reset of the software, if Meta theoretically decides to shutdown the authentication or login servers. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====&#039;&#039;Echo VR&#039;&#039; shutdown and Ready At Dawn====&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Echo VR&#039;&#039; was a VR e-sports title centered around zero-gravity physics, developed by Ready At Dawn Studios.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.meta.com/experiences/echo-vr/2215004568539258/ &amp;quot;Echo VR - About Page&amp;quot;] - meta.com&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The game released on July 20, 2017, on the Oculus Rift store, before being ported over to the Meta Quest platform (formerly the Oculus Quest platform) on May 5, 2020. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ready At Dawn Studios was a game developer most notably known for creating the original &#039;&#039;God of War&#039;&#039; series and &#039;&#039;Daxter&#039;&#039;. They were acquired by Oculus Studios, an umbrella organization of Meta, in June 2020.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.meta.com/en-gb/blog/quest/welcoming-ready-at-dawn-to-facebook/ &amp;quot;Welcoming Ready At Dawn to Facebook&amp;quot;] - meta.com - 23 Jun 2020&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On January 31, 2023, Ready At Dawn announced that &#039;&#039;Echo VR&#039;&#039; would be shut down on August 1 of that year. They claimed in a blog post that the reason was them &amp;quot;consolidating studio support&amp;quot; to work on their next project, as well as confirming that players who had spent money on in-game currency would not be able to receive a refund.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://medium.com/@EchoGames/an-update-on-the-future-of-echo-vr-7f074dca1ed1 &amp;quot;An Update on the Future of Echo VR&amp;quot;] - medium.com - 1 Feb 2023&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Meta&#039;s CTO, Andrew Bosworth, answered questions regarding the shutdown in an Instagram AMA, explaining that it would be &amp;quot;even less cost effective&amp;quot; to open-source or sell the game.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.uploadvr.com/meta-cto-john-carmack-echo-vr/ &amp;quot;Meta CTO: John Carmack Would Not Have Shut Down Echo VR&amp;quot;] - uploadvr.com - 2 Feb 2023&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fans of &#039;&#039;Echo VR&#039;&#039; protested against the game&#039;s shutdown, going so far as to fly a banner over Meta&#039;s headquarters asking to reverse the decision.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://vrscout.com/news/the-vr-esports-community-rallies-to-save-echo-vr/ &amp;quot;The VR Esports Community Rallies To Save Echo VR&amp;quot;] - vrscout.com - 2 Mar 2023&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Despite this, the game&#039;s servers did shut down on the given date. &#039;&#039;Echo VR&#039;&#039; itself was still able to be downloaded and opened, meaning the contents of the game were still available, but a player would not be able to progress after a shutdown notice pop-up.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.reddit.com/r/OculusQuest/comments/15fisnk/echo_vr_has_shut_down/ &amp;quot;Echo VR Has Shut Down&amp;quot;] - reddit.com/r/OculusQuest - 2 Aug 2023&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Despite Ready At Dawn&#039;s claims, there have been no other project released following the shutdown. The studio proceeded to suffer major layoffs and, in August 2024, Meta shut down Ready At Dawn Studios itself, blaming Oculus Studios&#039; budgetary constraints.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.androidcentral.com/gaming/virtual-reality/ready-at-dawn-studios-closing &amp;quot;Exclusive: Meta is closing a beloved first-party Quest studio&amp;quot;] - androidcentral.com - 8 Aug 2024 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====&#039;&#039;&#039;Attempts to block other OpenXR runtimes (third party or other brands) from working with games&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:2&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;quot;[https://mbucchia.github.io/OpenXR-Toolkit/ovrplugin.html Meta’s OVRPlugin]&amp;quot; - mbucchia.github.io&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;=====&lt;br /&gt;
Both Unity and Unreal Engine allow various OpenXR vendor plugins to be used, one of which is Meta&#039;s Oculus XR Plugin internally called the OVRPlugin. The OVRPlugin is a unified plugin that allows developers a single unified implementation for their Quest devices and OpenXR compatible devices for the PC. This sounds like an easy solution to target all current popular high-end VR headsets in one implementation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Under the hood Meta has taken steps to lock down this plugin to only work with their own devices. This is done by checking the name of the runtime, the presence of the nonstandard XR_META_headset_id, and the lack of legacy OVR support.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:2&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It would be understandable that Meta locks down their own vendor plugin if it were incompatible with other OpenXR devices, in which case the engine could fall back to another implementation. However this is not the case as Meta makes it deliberately difficult to implement such fallbacks. For example in Unity if the generic OpenXR support is enabled while the OVRPlugin is enabled it will claim incompatibility and revert this selection to just OVRPlugin.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:2&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Workarounds have been applied that trick the OVRPlugin into thinking it is interacting with a compliant runtime after which both third party runtimes and other headset brands are known to work without issues. This demonstrates that the vendor gated checks are to broadly implemented and unnecessary for OpenXR functionality.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:2&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Meta if willing could have resolved the issue by removing the checks for functions present in the OpenXR spec, or allowing automatic fallbacks to the generic implementation if their implementation is incompatible with the used runtime.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As the result of their actions Meta&#039;s users are now locked in Meta&#039;s own runtime and remote streaming solution if no workarounds are applied either in the game or in the runtimes of third party&#039;s. This makes it seem like only Meta&#039;s runtime is stable and compatible with the latest games. Likewise, this forces all other headset vendors to implement similar workarounds for their devices.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Game developers are advised to avoid the OVRPlugin where possible and rely on generic OpenXR implementations that support the standard correctly. Affected users can try the Meta Plugin Compatibility option in their SteamVR settings. The latest version of Virtual Desktop should also have the workarounds implemented. Players of Unreal Engine games report that launching the game with -hmd=openxr can bypass the plugin.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Lawsuits&amp;lt;!-- I feel like this should follow the table format that I established with the Valve page --&amp;gt;==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===&#039;&#039;United States of America v. Facebook&#039;&#039;===&lt;br /&gt;
In July 2019, Facebook agreed to pay $5 billion USD and implement corrective measures after it was sued by the Department of Justice and Federal Trade Commission (FTC) for &amp;quot;misleading users about the extent to which third-party application developers could access users&#039; personal information.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/facebook-agrees-pay-5-billion-and-implement-robust-new-protections-user-information &amp;quot;Facebook Agrees to Pay $5 Billion and Implement Robust New Protections of User Information in Settlement of Data-Privacy Claims&amp;quot;] - justice.gov - 24 Jul 2019&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Controversy over default privacy settings (2010–2018)====&lt;br /&gt;
Facebook&#039;s default settings allowed third-party app developers to access not only the data of users who installed their apps, but also the data of those users&#039; friends. While users could opt out of this data sharing, the setting was located separately from the main privacy settings page, making it difficult to find and adjust.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;quot;[https://www.justice.gov/opa/press-release/file/1186506/dl United States of America v. Facebook, Inc., Case No. 19-cv-2184, Complaint for civil penalities, injunction, and other relief&amp;quot;] PDF - justice.gov - 24 Jul 2019&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After settling with the FTC in 2012 over deceptive privacy practices, Facebook initially added a privacy disclaimer about friend data sharing but removed it four months later. This occurred while continuing the same data-sharing practices that prompted the original FTC investigation, violating the order&#039;s prohibition against misrepresenting users&#039; privacy control.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While Facebook publicly announced in 2014 that it would stop allowing third-party developers to collect data about users&#039; friends, it privately maintained agreements with dozens of &amp;quot;whitelisted developers&amp;quot; who continued to have this access until June 2018.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Deceptive two-factor authentication (2015–2018)====&lt;br /&gt;
Facebook requested users&#039; phone numbers for security purposes, including two-factor authentication, without effectively disclosing that this information would also be used for advertising purposes.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Misleading implementation of facial recognition====&lt;br /&gt;
In 2018, Facebook&#039;s updated data policy implied that facial recognition technology was opt-in, while tens of millions of users with older versions of the technology actually had to opt out to disable it.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===GDPR violations===&lt;br /&gt;
In July 2020, the Irish Data Protection Authority submitted an inquiry into Meta&#039;s Facebook service for transferring its users&#039; personal data to the U.S.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.edpb.europa.eu/news/news/2023/12-billion-euro-fine-facebook-result-edpb-binding-decision_en &amp;quot;1.2 billion euro fine for Facebook as a result of EDPB binding decision&amp;quot;] - edpb.europa.eu - 22 May 2023 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; which failed to comply with a 2020 decision&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.nytimes.com/2020/07/16/business/eu-data-transfer-pact-rejected.html &amp;quot;E.U. Court Strikes Down Trans-Atlantic Data Transfer Pact&amp;quot;] - nytimes.com - 16 July 2020&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; that the company&#039;s data was not secure enough. In May 2023, the European Data Protection Board (EDPB) enforced the $1.2 billion euro fine on Meta and an order to cease the &amp;quot;unlawful processing, including storage, in the U.S. of personal data of European users transferred in violation of the GDPR.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In September 2022, the Irish Data Protection Commission (DPC) fined Meta 405 million euros and imposed several &amp;quot;corrective measures&amp;quot; on Meta for its illegal handling of children&#039;s Instagram profile data.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.edpb.europa.eu/our-work-tools/our-documents/binding-decision-board-art-65/binding-decision-22022-dispute-arisen_en Binding Decision 2/2022 on the dispute arisen on the draft decision of the Irish Supervisory Authority regarding Meta Platforms Ireland Limited (Instagram) under Article 65(1)(a) GDPR] - edpb.europa.eu - 15 Sep 2022&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Before corrective measures were imposed upon Meta, their Instagram platform publicly disclosed email address and phone numbers of children who used the business account feature. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===&#039;&#039;The State of Texas Court v. Meta Platforms&#039;&#039;===&lt;br /&gt;
In February 2022, Attorney General Paxton sued Meta for the illegal collection of Texas citizens&#039; biometric data, such as retina scans, fingerprints, voiceprints, and face geometry, without their informed consent from 2010 to 2021.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://texasattorneygeneral.gov/news/releases/paxton-sues-facebook-using-unauthorized-biometric-data &amp;quot;Pax­ton Sues Face­book for Using Unau­tho­rized Bio­met­ric Data&amp;quot;] - texasattorneygeneral.gov - 14 Feb 2022 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Meta would share it with third parties and would not delete this data despite promising to do so, which violated Texas&#039; Capture or Use of Biometric Identifier (CUBI) Act and the Deceptive Trade Practices Act (DTPA).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In July 2024, Meta agreed to pay Texas $1.4 Billion in a settlement with the attorney general&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/sites/default/files/images/press/Final%20State%20of%20Texas%20v%20Meta%20Order%202024.pdf &amp;quot;The State of Texas v Meta Order 2020]&amp;quot; PDF - texasattorneygeneral.gov - 30 Jul 2024 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; which consisted of a $25,000 USD fine for each CUBI violation and $10,000 USD for each DTPA violation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===&amp;quot;Pay or consent&amp;quot; model===&lt;br /&gt;
As of early 2024, Meta is being investigated for violating the EU&#039;s [[Digital Markets Act]] (DMA) by using a &amp;quot;pay or consent&amp;quot; model to its Facebook and Instagram platforms, forcing users to pay a monthly subscription for an ad-free version or to accept versions with personalized advertisements.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_24_3582 &amp;quot;Commission sends preliminary findings to Meta over its “Pay or Consent” model for breach of the Digital Markets Act&amp;quot;] - ec.europa.eu - 1 Jul 2024 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Launched in late 2023, Meta&#039;s model offered European users two options: pay approximately €13 monthly for ad-free access to Facebook and Instagram, or continue using free accounts with personalized advertising.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Commission determined that this binary choice violates DMA regulations, which require &amp;quot;gatekeeper&amp;quot; platforms to offer equivalent alternatives for users who decline personal data collection. The DMA mandates that large tech companies must obtain explicit consent before combining users&#039; personal data across services, and cannot make service access conditional upon such consent.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.forbes.com/sites/roberthart/2024/07/01/metas-ad-free-subscriptions-for-instagram-and-facebook-break-europes-tech-rules-possibly-drawing-billions-in-fines-eu-says/ &amp;quot;Meta’s Ad-Free Subscriptions For Instagram And Facebook Break Europe’s Tech Rules—Possibly Drawing Billions In Fines, EU Says&amp;quot;] - forbes.com - 1 Jul 2024&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Meta]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TasmanianRex</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://mirror.consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=Google_Pixel&amp;diff=12232</id>
		<title>Google Pixel</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://mirror.consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=Google_Pixel&amp;diff=12232"/>
		<updated>2025-03-27T05:32:20Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TasmanianRex: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{InfoboxProductLine&lt;br /&gt;
| Title = {{PAGENAME}}&lt;br /&gt;
| Release Year = 2013&lt;br /&gt;
| Product Type = Smartphone&lt;br /&gt;
| In Production = Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| Official Website = [https://pixel.google.com/ pixel.google.com]&lt;br /&gt;
| Logo = Google Pixel logo.svg&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;{{PAGENAME}}&#039;&#039;&#039; is a consumer electronic device that Google develops and equips with specialized versions of Android or ChromeOS.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Consumer impact summary==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A battery-limiting update was pushed automatically without user consent, and users cannot opt-out through normal means. Google removed access to previous firmware versions, effectively limiting users&#039; ability to restore their devices to full functionality.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To receive compensation for the issue, users have to share sensitive personal information, including social security numbers and bank details, with Payoneer, a third-party payment processor. This forces users to choose between their privacy and receiving compensation for their degraded device.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The compensation options favor users choosing to remain within the Google ecosystem ($100 store credit for new Pixel phones, or $50 through Payoneer with fees and privacy concerns).&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;https://support.google.com/pixelphone/answer/15701861&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mirror, via the Wayback Machine: https://web.archive.org/web/20250107002112/https://support.google.com/pixelphone/answer/15701861&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other mirror via archive.ph https://archive.ph/zoooR&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |title=Request a repair, payment, or future discount code |url=https://support.google.com/pixelphone/workflow/15642495 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20250107002104/https://support.google.com/pixelphone/workflow/15642495 |archive-date=7 Jan 2025 |access-date=25 Mar 2025 |website=[[Google]]}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:1&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{Cite web |last=Davis |first=Wes |date=8 Jan 2025 |title=Google’s new Pixel 4A update is going to lower battery life for some owners |url=https://www.theverge.com/2025/1/7/24338566/google-pixel-4a-battery-stability-replacement-reduced-capacity |url-status=live |access-date=25 Mar 2025 |website=The Verge}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |title=Annual account fee |url=https://payoneer.custhelp.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/43738/~/annual-account-fee |url-status=live |access-date=25 Mar 2025 |website=[[Payoneer]]}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:2&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{Cite web |title=I have replaced battery in a local shop not supported by Google |url=https://www.reddit.com/r/Pixel4a/comments/1i1e4ds/i_have_replaced_battery_in_a_local_shop_not/ |url-status=live |access-date=25 Mar 2025 |website=[[Reddit]]}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Google&#039;s support team claimed that certain repairs were unsuccessful because they were performed outside of authorized service centers.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |title=Replaced the battery, but still the warning. |url=https://www.reddit.com/r/Pixel4a/comments/1i19hxf/replaced_the_battery_but_still_the_warning/ |url-status=live |access-date=25 Mar 2025 |website=[[Reddit]]}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:22&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{Cite web |title=I have replaced battery in a local shop not supported by Google |url=https://www.reddit.com/r/Pixel4a/comments/1i1e4ds/i_have_replaced_battery_in_a_local_shop_not/ |url-status=live |access-date=25 Mar 2025 |website=[[Reddit]]}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Incidents==&lt;br /&gt;
This is a list of all consumer protection incidents related to this product line. Any incidents not mentioned here can be found in the [[:Category:{{PAGENAME}}|{{PAGENAME}} category]].&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--*&#039;&#039;[[Example incident one]]&#039;&#039; (&#039;&#039;date&#039;&#039;): &#039;&#039;Short summary of the incident (could be the same as the summary preceding the article).&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;[[Example incident two]]&#039;&#039; (&#039;&#039;date&#039;&#039;):--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Incidents affecting all of the company&#039;s products can be found in the company article: [[Google]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Products==&lt;br /&gt;
This is a list of the products with articles on this wiki.&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Pixel 4a]] (2020-08-03): An update was pushed, without users&#039; consent, to limit the device&#039;s battery capacity and charging speed in an attempt to &amp;quot;improve the stability of their battery&#039;s performance&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Link to relevant theme articles or product lines with similar incidents.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Google Pixel Smartphones]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TasmanianRex</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://mirror.consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=Netgate&amp;diff=12173</id>
		<title>Netgate</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://mirror.consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=Netgate&amp;diff=12173"/>
		<updated>2025-03-25T09:56:56Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TasmanianRex: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{InfoboxCompany&lt;br /&gt;
| Name = Netgate, Rubicon Communications (LLC)&lt;br /&gt;
| Type = Private&lt;br /&gt;
| Founded = 2004&lt;br /&gt;
| Industry = Computer Hardware, Computer Software, Networking Equipment, Firewalls&lt;br /&gt;
| Official Website = https://www.netgate.com&lt;br /&gt;
| Logo = NetgateColorLogoRegisteredRGB.webp&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Netgate&#039;&#039;&#039;, officially Rubicon Communications (LLC), is an American technology company based in Austin, Texas. It is the owner and developer of the &#039;&#039;&#039;[[wikipedia:PfSense|pfSense]]&#039;&#039;&#039; firewall project and other networking products.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Consumer impact summary==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Relationship with the Open-Source Community===&lt;br /&gt;
While Netgate has contributed to BSD, the operating system on which its firewall &#039;&#039;&#039;pfSense&#039;&#039;&#039; is based on, the company has been criticized in recent years for its stance toward the open-source community. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Consumer and Licensing Changes====&lt;br /&gt;
In a controversial decision, Netgate discontinued free access to pfSense Home+ Lab,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |date=26 Oct 2023 |title=Addressing Changes to pfSense Plus Home+Lab |url=https://www.netgate.com/blog/addressing-changes-to-pfsense-plus-homelab |url-status=live |access-date=22 Mar 2025 |website=[[Netgate]]}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; a version previously available at no cost, requiring users to migrate to CE or a paid model. This change was made without prior notice, leading to criticism from the community.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Security Concerns with WireGuard Implementation====&lt;br /&gt;
In 2021, Jason Donenfeld, the creator of WireGuard, reviewed pfSense’s WireGuard implementation and identified multiple security flaws.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |last=Thompson |first=Jim |date=18 Mar 2021 |title=WireGuard Removed from pfSense® CE and pfSense® Plus Software |url=https://www.netgate.com/blog/wireguard-removed-from-pfsense-ce-and-pfsense-plus-software |url-status=live |access-date=22 Mar 2025 |website=[[Netgate]]}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; His review was highly critical, highlighting serious vulnerabilities that raised concerns about the security of Netgate&#039;s implementation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Targeting other projects====&lt;br /&gt;
Netgate&#039;s co-founder has publicly criticized competing projects, including OPNsense, a fork of pfSense. OPNsense, which is endorsed by the developers of m0n0wall (the project from which pfSense originated), was also the target of a parody website.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |title=OPNSense |url=http://www.opnsense.com/ |url-status=usurped |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160314132836/http://www.opnsense.com/ |archive-date=14 Mar 2016 |access-date=22 Mar 2025 |website=}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; allegedly created by Netgate. OPNsense had to file a complaint with the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) to gain control of the disputed domain.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |date=24 Nov 2017 |title=Netgate / pfSense acts in bad faith |url=https://opnsense.org/opnsense-com/ |url-status=live |access-date=22 Mar 2025 |website=[[OPNSense]]}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Incidents==&lt;br /&gt;
{{Incomplete section}}&lt;br /&gt;
If the company page is short enough and/or the incident is not deserving of it own page, add incidents below in sub-sections (including the points outlined in [[Consumer_Action_Taskforce:Sample/Incident/Help]]) and delete the list at the end of this section.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If the company has various incidents listed and/or this page is getting too long, do not add sub-sections, and instead complete the following list:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is a list of all consumer protection incidents this company is involved in. Any incidents not mentioned here can be found in the [[:Category:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|{{PAGENAME}} category]].&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Example incident one]] (date):Short summary of the incident (could be the same as the summary preceding the article).&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Example incident two]] (date):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Products==&lt;br /&gt;
{{Incomplete section}}&lt;br /&gt;
This is a list of the company&#039;s product lines with articles on this wiki.&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Example product line one]] (release date): Short summary of the product&#039;s incidents.&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Example product line two]] (release date):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
{{Incomplete section}}&lt;br /&gt;
Link to relevant theme articles or companies with similar incidents.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:{{PAGENAME}}]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TasmanianRex</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://mirror.consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=Bosch_Cloud_Dishwasher_Incident&amp;diff=12172</id>
		<title>Bosch Cloud Dishwasher Incident</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://mirror.consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=Bosch_Cloud_Dishwasher_Incident&amp;diff=12172"/>
		<updated>2025-03-25T09:53:25Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TasmanianRex: combined all the references into a single reference, as they contain the same source&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Category:Cloud-Dependent Appliances]]&lt;br /&gt;
Home Connect Frustration is what can result from the cloud-based control system implemented in select Bosch dishwashers, notably the Bosch 500 series. This system mandates that users connect their dishwasher to Wi‑Fi and register for a Home Connect account in order to access essential functions—such as rinse cycles, eco mode, and delay start—that were previously available directly via physical controls.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;jeff_geerling&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[https://www.jeffgeerling.com/blog/2025/i-wont-connect-my-dishwasher-your-stupid-cloud I won&#039;t connect my dishwasher to your stupid cloud]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Background==&lt;br /&gt;
After the premature failure of his GE Amana dishwasher—an example of planned obsolescence marked by recurring power issues and deteriorating components—tech blogger Jeff Geerling was forced to replace it. Acting on Consumer Reports&#039; recommendations and local availability, he purchased a Bosch 500 series dishwasher. The installation was generally straightforward; the design featured a plastic base for smooth positioning and improved routing for hoses and wiring. However, the new unit also introduced an unexpected drawback: many of its advanced functions are locked behind a mandatory cloud service.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Feature Restrictions and Cloud Dependency==&lt;br /&gt;
With the Bosch 500 series dishwasher, several key functions are accessible only through the Home Connect app:&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Advanced Wash Settings&#039;&#039;&#039;: Functions such as rinse, machine care (self-cleaning), half-load, eco mode, and delay start are not available on the built-in control panel but require activation via the Home Connect app.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Touch Sensor Controls&#039;&#039;&#039;: Replacing the tactile buttons of older models, the new touch sensors often require multiple resets and a longer boot-up period.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Mandatory Wi‑Fi Connectivity&#039;&#039;&#039;: To utilize these features, users must connect the appliance to Wi‑Fi and set up a cloud account, thus permitting remote control and access over the Internet.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;jeff_geerling&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Criticism and Controversy==&lt;br /&gt;
The dependence on cloud connectivity for core dishwasher functions has drawn widespread criticism:&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Loss of Direct Control&#039;&#039;&#039;: Essential operations that were once managed via physical buttons now require navigation through an app.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Planned Obsolescence Concerns&#039;&#039;&#039;: The integration of cloud-based controls suggests a future where support for these services might be discontinued or shifted to a subscription model, potentially shortening the appliance’s effective lifespan.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Privacy and Security Risks&#039;&#039;&#039;: Forcing an Internet connection onto a household appliance expands the attack surface of home networks, raising concerns about data security.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;User Experience Frustrations&#039;&#039;&#039;: The extra steps needed to activate everyday functions—such as running a simple rinse cycle—have been described as unnecessarily complicated and counterintuitive.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Community Response and Workarounds==&lt;br /&gt;
In light of the frustration over Home Connect&#039;s limitations, users have explored several alternatives:&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Bypassing Cloud Features&#039;&#039;&#039;: Some consumers choose to ignore the app-based functionalities, operating the dishwasher solely via its limited native controls despite sacrificing advanced functions.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Network Segregation&#039;&#039;&#039;: Technically adept users have attempted to mitigate security risks by isolating the dishwasher on a dedicated IoT VLAN, although this is not a viable solution for most.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Third-Party Solutions&#039;&#039;&#039;: Early efforts have been made to reverse engineer the Home Connect API (such as through projects like HCPY), yet these methods require significant technical know-how and lack official support.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Conclusion==&lt;br /&gt;
The controversy surrounding the Bosch Home Connect system highlights a broader debate about the role of cloud connectivity in everyday appliances. Critics argue that essential functions should remain accessible locally, with cloud services offered only as an optional convenience. Jeff Geerling’s vocal disapproval encapsulates a consumer-first sentiment that demands robust, offline functionality and transparency from appliance manufacturers.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;jeff_geerling&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Bosch Appliances]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Internet of Things]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Discontinued or Controversial Features]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Articles based on blog posts]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TasmanianRex</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://mirror.consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=Nixplay&amp;diff=12074</id>
		<title>Nixplay</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://mirror.consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=Nixplay&amp;diff=12074"/>
		<updated>2025-03-22T10:51:24Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TasmanianRex: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{InfoboxCompany&lt;br /&gt;
| Name = {{PAGENAME}}&lt;br /&gt;
| Type = Private&lt;br /&gt;
| Founded = 2017&lt;br /&gt;
| Industry = Digital picture frame&lt;br /&gt;
| Official Website = https://www.nixplay.com/&lt;br /&gt;
| Logo = Nixplay.svg&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Nixplay&#039;&#039;&#039; is a digital picture frame brand founded in 2017 by Mark Palfreeman.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web|url=https://www.nixplay.com/pages/about-us|title=What Is Nixplay?|work=Nixplay|access-date=2025-03-21|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20241210222455/https://www.nixplay.com/pages/about-us|archive-date=2024-12-10|url-status=live}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2025, Nixplay customers lost access to features of their digital picture frame that were advertised as unlimited upon purchase.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.nixplay.com/blogs/faq/whats-included-in-the-new-nixplay-memberships&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This type of [[Post-purchase EULA modification]] is a form of [[:Category:Feature Ransom|feature ransom]] where Nixplay retains control over their devices post-sale, rather than the customer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The Nixplay picture frame==&lt;br /&gt;
====Cloud dependency====&lt;br /&gt;
Nixplay picture frames depend on cloud services run by nixplay, for:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*uploading photos&lt;br /&gt;
*connecting to Google Photos&lt;br /&gt;
*sharing albums&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These features won&#039;t work without a Nixplay account &amp;amp; internet access.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Changing the terms of the sale, after the sale====&lt;br /&gt;
At first, Nixplay was a one-time purchase product. They transitioned to a tiered subscription model. Features once included with device purchases were reclassified as premium features &amp;amp; gated behind new Nixplay Lite &amp;amp; Nixplay Plus plans.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web|url=https://www.nixplay.com/blogs/faq/whats-included-in-the-new-nixplay-memberships|title=What&#039;s Included in the New Nixplay Memberships?|access-date=2025-03-21}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Market control====&lt;br /&gt;
Frames cannot be used offline or without cloud registration. There is no option for customers to self-host their media or access full functionality outside Nixplay&#039;s ecosystem. The company also removed previously included lifetime warranty coverage, converting it into a paid yearly add-on.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web|url=https://www.nixplay.com/blogs/faq/whats-included-in-the-new-nixplay-memberships|title=What&#039;s Included in the New Nixplay Memberships?|access-date=2025-03-21}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Nixplay Terms of Service change (March 2025)==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Email to customers announcing new terms===&lt;br /&gt;
As of March 21st, 2025, Nixplay still sells their products on Amazon with &#039;&#039;&amp;quot;unlimited&amp;quot;&#039;&#039; storage listed as a feature.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:1&amp;quot;&amp;gt;https://www.amazon.ca/Nixplay-Screen-Digital-Picture-Instantly/dp/B096DQF21Z?crid=3L7KJ43GOUQ7L&amp;amp;sprefix=nixplay%2Bdigital%2Btouch%2Bscreen%2Bpicture%2Bframe%2Bwith%2Bwifi%2B-%2B10%2B1%2Bphoto%2Bframe%2C%2Bconnecting%2Bfamilies%2B%26%2Bfriends%2Bblack%2Fgold%2B%2Caps%2C138&amp;amp;sr=8-4&amp;amp;th=1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; However, on March 13, 2025, Nixplay sent the following email to customers announcing changes to their Terms of Service changing &#039;&#039;&amp;quot;unlimited&amp;quot;&#039;&#039; to 500 MB:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.nixplay.ca/pages/compare-plans&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;{{Quote|&lt;br /&gt;
Dear [CUSTOMER],&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We&#039;re writing to inform you of updates to Nixplay&#039;s [[Terms of Service]], effective &#039;&#039;&#039;April 21st, 2025&#039;&#039;&#039;. These updates reflect important changes to our services and provide more clarity on our offerings.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Summary of key changes ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Subscription plans ====&lt;br /&gt;
Rising storage, bandwidth costs, and compliance requirements have made it challenging to sustain our platform under the existing pricing model. To ensure continued innovation and value, we&#039;ve updated our subscription plans:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Nixplay Basic (free)&#039;&#039;&#039;: A new plan offering essential functionality for managing frames, content, and basic sharing.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Nixplay Standard&#039;&#039;&#039;: This plan is being retired, and existing users will be moved to Nixplay Basic on April 21st, 2025.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Nixplay Lite ($24.99 / year)*&#039;&#039;&#039;: Reductions to photo storage and other limits are being introduced. Most subscribers will not be impacted.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Nixplay Plus ($39.99 / year)*&#039;&#039;&#039;: Lifetime warranty will no longer be included by default, reducing costs significantly. Subscribers who want a lifetime warranty can purchase it as an add-on. The combined cost will not exceed the current Nixplay Plus pricing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Content limits ====&lt;br /&gt;
While content limits have always existed, enforcement was previously relaxed. Starting April 21st, 2025:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Locked Content&#039;&#039;&#039;: Content exceeding your plan limits will become unavailable to share or view on your frame. This content is still safe, and accessible to you, but will not display on your frame until adjusted or upgraded.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;No Deletion&#039;&#039;&#039;: We will not remove or delete your content—it remains secure and accessible.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Extended warranty ====&lt;br /&gt;
To reduce costs for all users, extended warranty coverage has been removed as a standard Nixplay Plus feature. However, it remains available as an add-on with defined eligibility terms:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Eligibility&#039;&#039;&#039;: Available for Nixplay Plus subscribers with Nixplay frames less than 1 year old.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Continuous renewal&#039;&#039;&#039;: Your Nixplay Plus subscription and extended warranty must remain uninterrupted to maintain eligibility for claims.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Inactive accounts ====&lt;br /&gt;
Expanded clarity for accounts inactive for 6 months:&lt;br /&gt;
* Content will be archived for secure storage.&lt;br /&gt;
* Archived content can be retrieved by reactivating your account.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Content management ====&lt;br /&gt;
We&#039;ve enhanced clarity on:&lt;br /&gt;
* Your ownership of uploaded content.&lt;br /&gt;
* User control over shared content.&lt;br /&gt;
* Rights granted to Nixplay to provide services.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== DMCA compliance (Digital Millennium Copyright Act) ====&lt;br /&gt;
We&#039;ve expanded details on:&lt;br /&gt;
* Reporting copyright infringements.&lt;br /&gt;
* The process for addressing DMCA violations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you have questions or concerns, our support team is ready to assist at support@nixplay.com.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thank you for your continued trust in Nixplay.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;*Prices are shown in CAD$. Pricing may vary based on location, local taxes, and exchange rates. Pricing in app stores (Google Play and Apple App Store) may differ due to regional adjustments and currency conversion rates.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===What was disabled===&lt;br /&gt;
*Google Photos integration was disabled unless users upgraded to a paid plan.&lt;br /&gt;
*Unlimited cloud storage was revoked, free users are capped at 500 MB of photos and videos.&lt;br /&gt;
*Whatever customers had above the quota was locked and couldn&#039;t be accessed.&lt;br /&gt;
*Lifetime warranty previously included in Nixplay Plus was removed &amp;amp;converted to a $14.99/year add-on&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.nixplay.com/blogs/faq/whats-included-in-the-new-nixplay-memberships&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These changes affected all users, including those who had purchased frames under the expectation of unlimited storage and free cloud features. Archived product listings on Amazon and the official website confirm that these features were clearly advertised at time of sale.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web|url=https://www.amazon.ca/dp/B096DQF21Z|title=Nixplay Digital Picture Frame Product Page|access-date=2025-03-21|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231130015427/https://www.nixplay.co.uk/products/nixplay-10-inch-touch-screen-photo-frame|archive-date=2023-11-30}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==False advertising on Amazon==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Nixplay false advertising- sells &amp;quot;unlimited&amp;quot; after creating limits.png|alt=Nixplay advertising picture frame with &amp;quot;unlimited&amp;quot; storage even after limiting customers to 500 MB. Screenshot taken from amazon.ca product page of Nixplay product as seen on March 21st, 5:53 PM Central time|thumb|Nixplay advertising picture frame with &#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;quot;unlimited&amp;quot;&#039;&#039;&#039; storage even after limiting customers to 500 MB. Screenshot taken from amazon.ca product page of Nixplay product as seen on March 21st, 5:53 PM Central time&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[:File:LOUIS VIEW OF SITE AS OF 03-21-2025 Nixplay Digital Touch Screen Picture Frame with WiFi - 10.1” Photo Frame, Connecting Families &amp;amp; Friends (Black Gold) Amazon.ca Electronics.pdf]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; ]]&lt;br /&gt;
As of March 21st, 2025, one week after Nixplay changed their TOS, their products are still for sale on Amazon being advertised with &#039;&#039;&amp;quot;unlimited&amp;quot;&#039;&#039; storage.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[:File:LOUIS VIEW OF SITE AS OF 03-21-2025 Nixplay Digital Touch Screen Picture Frame with WiFi - 10.1” Photo Frame, Connecting Families &amp;amp; Friends (Black Gold) Amazon.ca Electronics.pdf]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:1&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A Reddit post documenting the change received over 2,000 upvotes, with hundreds of users expressing frustration over the bait-and-switch nature of the update.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web|url=https://old.reddit.com/r/assholedesign/comments/1jeso4h/my_digital_frame_just_removed_the_ability_to/|title=My digital frame just removed the ability to connect to Google Photos|work=Reddit|access-date=2025-03-21}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; UK customers filed formal complaints, citing violations of the Consumer Rights Act 2015 for altering a key advertised product feature post-sale.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web|url=https://old.reddit.com/r/nixplay/comments/1je3b6b/uk_legal_notice_for_nixplay/|title=UK Legal Notice for Nixplay|work=Reddit|access-date=2025-03-21}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Products==&lt;br /&gt;
*W10K&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;products&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{Cite web|url=https://www.nixplay.com/collections/nixplay-smart-photo-frames|title=Smart Digital Photo Frames|work=Nixplay|access-date=2025-03-21|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20250225090343/https://www.nixplay.com/collections/nixplay-smart-photo-frames|archive-date=2025-02-25}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*W10P&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;products&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*W15P&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;products&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*W08F&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;products&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*W10G&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;products&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*W08G&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;products&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{Reflist}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TasmanianRex</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://mirror.consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=NZXT&amp;diff=12035</id>
		<title>NZXT</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://mirror.consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=NZXT&amp;diff=12035"/>
		<updated>2025-03-21T12:37:11Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TasmanianRex: /* Hardware Warranty coverage issues */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{StubNotice}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{InfoboxCompany&lt;br /&gt;
|Name=NZXT, Inc.|Type=Private|Founded=2004|Industry=Computer hardware|Official Website=http://nzxt.com/|Logo=Nzxt.svg}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;[[wikipedia:NZXT|NZXT, Inc.]]&#039;&#039;&#039; is an American computer-hardware manufacturer founded in 2004 and based in Los Angeles, California. The company manufactures computer cases, components, and accessories for the PC-gaming market. Products are designed in Los Angeles and manufactured in Shenzhen.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |last=Burke |first=Steve |date=27 May 2016 |title=NZXT Factory Tour in China – Start-to-Finish Case Manufacturing |url=http://www.gamersnexus.net/guides/2450-nzxt-factory-tour-in-china-how-cases-are-made |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170523124157/http://www.gamersnexus.net/guides/2450-nzxt-factory-tour-in-china-how-cases-are-made |archive-date=23 May 2017 |access-date=18 Mar 2025 |website=GamersNexus}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Controversies==&lt;br /&gt;
{{Main|NZXT Flex}}&lt;br /&gt;
NZXT&#039;s Gaming PC rental program called Flex: [[Gamers Nexus Investigates NZXT&#039;s &amp;quot;Flex&amp;quot; Computer Rental Program]], followed by [[NZXT&#039;s Response To Gamers Nexus&#039; Investigation]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Hardware Warranty coverage issues===&lt;br /&gt;
Serval reports of excessively difficult or denied Warranty coverage issues on their 6-year Kraken aio coolers. One user reports being instructed to live stream&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{Cite web |last=@aaradorn |date=3 Nov 2019 |title=NZXT warranty is a bit of a pain in the ass. Kraken x62 |url=https://linustechtips.com/topic/1120097-nzxt-warranty-is-a-bit-of-a-pain-in-the-ass-kraken-x62/ |url-status=live |access-date=18 Mar 2025 |website=Linus Tech Tips Forum}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; their warranty issue in their RMA process.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |title=NZXT Customer Support is Refusing to Honor Warranty on Defective Part |url=https://www.reddit.com/r/NZXT/comments/lde8z6/nzxt_customer_support_is_refusing_to_honor/ |url-status=live |access-date=18 Mar 2025 |website=[[Reddit]]}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |date=5 Dec 2024 |title=NZXT Controversy Discussion |url=https://forums.pcgamer.com/threads/nzxt-controversy-discussion.146859/ |url-status=live |archive-url= |access-date=18 Mar 2025 |website=PCGamer}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |title=NZXT Gaming PCs - Warranty Claim and RMA FAQ |url=https://support.nzxt.com/hc/en-us/articles/360023082054-NZXT-Gaming-PCs-Warranty-Claim-and-RMA-FAQ |url-status=live |access-date=18 Mar 2025 |website=[[NZXT]]}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:NZXT]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TasmanianRex</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://mirror.consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=Amazon_Echo_changes_terms_of_voice_usage&amp;diff=12034</id>
		<title>Amazon Echo changes terms of voice usage</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://mirror.consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=Amazon_Echo_changes_terms_of_voice_usage&amp;diff=12034"/>
		<updated>2025-03-21T12:35:23Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TasmanianRex: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Amazon Echo]] is a series of client devices for the [[Amazon Alexa]] voice control platform for connected smart homes. Echo products have long offered the option to disable cloud voice analysis and perform processing on-device, in addition to a separate option that theoretically prevents the company from saving voice recordings. However, in March of 2025, the company sent an email to users with this option on that disables the first option and only leaves the second, [https://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/2025/03/17/amazon-echo-alexa-reporting-privacy/82503576007/ citing the need to train generative AI].&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{Cite web |last=Robledo |first=Anthony |date=2025-03-17 |title=Amazon is removing an Echo privacy setting that keeps Alexa recordings from the company |url=https://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/2025/03/17/amazon-echo-alexa-reporting-privacy/82503576007/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20250319001811/https://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/2025/03/17/amazon-echo-alexa-reporting-privacy/82503576007/ |archive-date=2025-03-19 |access-date=2025-03-20 |website=USA Today}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Background==&lt;br /&gt;
Alexa as a service is based around an edge client + cloud service model where a physical device acts as a conduit between voice and the cloud. This raises substantial privacy concerns as it is, because the lack of open source means that no one actually knows whether privacy settings are respected. However, much like Apple, Amazon assured customers through its settings interface that enabling the &amp;quot;Do Not Send Voice Recordings&amp;quot; setting would utilize exclusively local processing, sending your data to the cloud only &amp;quot;for features that require the transmission of audio, such as when you make a call or send a message or announcement via Alexa.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:1&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{Cite web |title=Turn on Do Not Send Voice Recordings |url=https://www.amazon.com/gp/help/customer/display.html?nodeId=GQXLLWHBCVL6L5QD |access-date=2025-03-20 |website=Amazon Customer Support}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Local processing was available as a server on the Echo (4th Gen), Echo Show 10, and Echo Show 15, and could be utilized by lower power or older devices as clients.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:1&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From archival analysis of the [https://www.amazon.com/gp/help/customer/display.html?nodeId=201602230 Alexa FAQ] page, it can be estimated that this feature was introduced in early to mid 2022, given the first available archived copy of the page was in September 2022. As of writing, this page still includes this feature despite its imminent removal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |title=Alexa and Alexa Device FAQs |url=https://www.amazon.com/gp/help/customer/display.html?nodeId=201602230 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220901001441/https://www.amazon.com/gp/help/customer/display.html?nodeId=201602230 |archive-date=2022-09-01 |access-date=2025-03-20 |website=Amazon Customer Support}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This likely means that the Echo (4th Gen) was not launched with this feature, as it was launched 10/22/2020&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |last=Gartenberg |first=Chaim |date=2020-09-24 |title=Amazon redesigns the Echo with a new spherical design and a custom machine learning processor |url=https://www.theverge.com/2020/9/24/21452347/amazon-echo-4th-generation-features-price-release-date-alexa |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20241212183356/https://www.theverge.com/2020/9/24/21452347/amazon-echo-4th-generation-features-price-release-date-alexa |archive-date=2024-12-12 |access-date=2025-03-20 |website=The Verge}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; with the Echo Show 10 following not long after on 2/25/2021.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |last=Seifert |first=Dan |date=2021-02-24 |title=Amazon Echo Show 10 review: Alexa’s next move |url=https://www.theverge.com/22297810/amazon-echo-show-10-2021-review |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20250317152944/https://www.theverge.com/22297810/amazon-echo-show-10-2021-review |archive-date=2025-03-17 |access-date=2025-03-20 |website=The Verge}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; However, the Echo Show 15 (2023) and Echo Show 15 (2024) were both launched since, as implied by their names, and even the former was announced after this feature was unveiled.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |last=Tuohy |first=Jennifer Pattison |date=2022-12-16 |title=Amazon Echo Show 15 review: Alexa’s on your wall |url=https://www.theverge.com/22839220/amazon-echo-show-15-review-wall-mounted-alexa-tablet-kitchen-tv |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20250307173006/https://www.theverge.com/22839220/amazon-echo-show-15-review-wall-mounted-alexa-tablet-kitchen-tv |archive-date=2025-03-07 |access-date=2025-03-20 |website=The Verge}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Upcoming change to your Alexa Settings.png|alt=This image is a screenshot of the email sent by Amazon to customers using the Do Not Send Voice Recordings feature on Echo devices. It indicates that on March 28, 2025, this feature will be disabled and voice recordings will recorded as they &amp;quot;expand Alexa’s capabilities with generative AI features.&amp;quot;|thumb|Email from Amazon, 2025-03-14]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Removal of the Do Not Send Voice Feature==&lt;br /&gt;
On March 14, 2025 (unknown if this notice rolled out over multiple days), Amazon sent an email with the subject &amp;quot;Upcoming change to your Alexa Settings&amp;quot; to customers which had enabled the Do Not Send Voice feature. The email cites coming improvements to Alexa, including the addition of generative AI features. No alternative is given other than the already-existing &amp;quot;Don&#039;t save recordings&amp;quot; feature, which merely prohibits Amazon from keeping copies of the recordings.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Amazon claims in the email that &amp;quot;[t]he Alexa experience is designed to protect your privacy and keep your data secure.&amp;quot; However, they do not appear to elaborate on this further than redirecting customers to the Alexa Privacy Hub, which cites features like the microphone toggle button and the ability to go back through already saved recordings and delete them.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |title=Alexa Privacy Hub |url=https://www.amazon.com/b/?node=19149155011 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20250220192838/https://www.amazon.com/Alexa-Privacy-Hub/b?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;node=19149155011 |archive-date=2025-02-20 |access-date=2025-03-20 |website=Amazon.com}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is worth noting that other companies like Apple that admit to sending some voice/speech data for processing at least claim to use confidential computing ([[wikipedia:Confidential_computing|read more on Wikipedia]]) techniques like [https://security.apple.com/blog/private-cloud-compute/ Private Cloud Compute]. While these are not fully open-source solutions, these privacy-preserving technologies are audited externally and claim to be inaccessible to employees. Amazon has, in the past, admitted some recordings &amp;quot;undergo anonymized human review,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |last=Scarcella |first=Mike |date=2024-10-31 |title=Amazon denies duping US consumers over Alexa’s recording practices |url=https://www.reuters.com/legal/transactional/amazon-denies-duping-us-consumers-over-alexas-recording-practices-2024-10-31/ |url-status=live |access-date=2025-03-20 |website=Reuters}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot; so it is evident these recordings are not fully autonomously processed in such a way.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Consumer response==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The response to this issue has been varied--some consumers, such as many in [https://www.reddit.com/r/privacy/comments/1jb8qwx/psa_amazon_alexa_discontinuing_do_not_send_voice/ this Reddit thread], are quite displeased with the removal of the feature, with comments like &amp;quot;Great opportunity to discontinue Amazon Alexa!&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;We will spy on you and you will like it.&amp;quot; However, media outlets have circulated a claim by Amazon that only 0.03% of users used the feature,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |date=2025-03-19 |title=Amazon ends little-used privacy feature that let Echo users opt out of sending recordings to company |url=https://apnews.com/article/amazon-privacy-echo-7fb3c19fa7f664bde5c5be259f8b23ee |url-status=live |access-date=2025-03-20 |website=The Associated Press}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; so it is likely that this will go broadly unnoticed whether it is positive or negative. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Placeholder box|[[mw:Help:VisualEditor/User_guide#Editing_categories|Add a category]] with the same name as the product, service, website, software, product line or company that this article is about.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;quot;Incidents&amp;quot; category is not needed.}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TasmanianRex</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://mirror.consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=Mark_Zuckerberg&amp;diff=11995</id>
		<title>Mark Zuckerberg</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://mirror.consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=Mark_Zuckerberg&amp;diff=11995"/>
		<updated>2025-03-19T12:30:17Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TasmanianRex: /* Stance on Privacy */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Incomplete}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Mark Zuckerberg&#039;&#039;&#039; born May 14, 1984 is co-founder, chairman and CEO of social media platform Facebook and its parent company Meta Platforms Inc..&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Professional Background==&lt;br /&gt;
===Facebook===&lt;br /&gt;
Mark Zuckerberg began development on Facebook whilst attending Harvard in 2004.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.businessinsider.com/the-true-story-of-how-mark-zuckerberg-founded-facebook-2016-2 &amp;quot;This is the true story of how Mark Zuckerberg founded Facebook, and it wasn&#039;t to find girls.&amp;quot;] - businessinsider.com - accessed 2025-02-03&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Stance on Consumer Rights==&lt;br /&gt;
This section is incomplete. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Major Consumer Protection Incidents==&lt;br /&gt;
===Cambridge Analytica Data Scandal===&lt;br /&gt;
Former Cambridge Analytica employee, Christopher Wylie, leaked internal documents to journalists demonstrating uninformed consent of personal data collection of up to 87 million Facebook profiles for political advertising purposes through Facebook&#039;s Open Graph Platform and Facebook Application &amp;quot;This is Your Digital Life&amp;quot; developed by data scientist Aleksandr Kogan at Global Science Research.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.cnbc.com/2018/04/10/facebook-cambridge-analytica-a-timeline-of-the-data-hijacking-scandal.html &amp;quot;Facebook-Cambridge Analytica: A timeline of the data hijacking scandal&amp;quot;] - cnbc.com - accessed 2025-02-03&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The appropriated Personal Data was used in the US 2016 Presidency for Ted Cruz&#039;s and Donald Trump&#039;s campaigns.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.businessinsider.com/cambridge-analytica-facebook-scandal-trump-cruz-operatives-2018-3 &amp;quot;There&#039;s an open secret about Cambridge Analytica in the political world: It doesn&#039;t have the &#039;secret sauce&#039; it claims&amp;quot;] - businessinsider.com - accessed 2025-02-03 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Deceptive Marketing&#039;&#039;&#039;: Incomplete. &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Ref&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Data Collection&#039;&#039;&#039;: Incomplete. &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Ref&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Stance on Privacy===&lt;br /&gt;
This section is incomplete. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A leaked messenger conversation from the early days of Facebook in Harvard exemplifies his disregard for the privacy of others:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |last=Wong |first=Julia Carrie |date=2018-09-01 |title=I was one of Facebook&#039;s first users. I shouldn&#039;t have trusted Mark Zuckerberg |url=https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/apr/17/facebook-people-first-ever-mark-zuckerberg-harvard |access-date=2025-03-08 |website=The Guardian}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;ZUCK: yea so if you ever need info about anyone at harvard&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
ZUCK: just ask&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
ZUCK: i have over 4000 emails, pictures, addresses, sns&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
FRIEND: what!? how’d you manage that one?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
ZUCK: people just submitted it&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
ZUCK: i don’t know why&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
ZUCK: they “trust me”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
ZUCK: dumb f***&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;(expletive edited because this Wiki software&#039;s spam protection does not seem to approve of his way of expression)&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A photo of Zuckerberg revealed in 2016 that he keeps his own laptop camera covered with tape.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |date=2016-06-22 |title=Mark Zuckerberg Puts Tape Over His Webcam |url=https://abcnews.go.com/Technology/mark-zuckerberg-puts-tape-webcam/story?id=40040340 |access-date=2025-03-18 |website=abc News}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Regulatory Response==&lt;br /&gt;
This section is incomplete. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Current Status==&lt;br /&gt;
This section is incomplete. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Impact on Consumer Protection==&lt;br /&gt;
This section is incomplete. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Individuals]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TasmanianRex</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://mirror.consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=NZXT_Flex&amp;diff=11994</id>
		<title>NZXT Flex</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://mirror.consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=NZXT_Flex&amp;diff=11994"/>
		<updated>2025-03-19T12:28:35Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TasmanianRex: /* Follow-up by NZXT */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{StubNotice}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{InfoboxProductLine&lt;br /&gt;
| Title = NZXT Flex&lt;br /&gt;
| Release Year = 2024&lt;br /&gt;
| Product Type = Rental Service&lt;br /&gt;
| In Production = Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| Official Website = https://nzxt.com/collection/flex&lt;br /&gt;
| Logo = Nzxt.svg&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;NZXT Flex&#039;&#039;&#039; is a rental service launched in 2024 by [[NZXT]]  in partnership with [[Fragile]] (a Software company that provides &amp;quot;layered financing&amp;quot; and services on top of hardware subscriptions,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |title=Fragile company profile |url=https://tracxn.com/d/companies/fragile/__IHcXfD8Mcy-IkjmKTBsCtGr0PzSjZve_Y147UR110MA |url-status=live |access-date=18 Mar 2025 |website=Tracxn}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{Cite web |title=Subscription Agreement |url=https://fragile.co/legal/subscription-agreement |url-status=live |access-date=18 Mar 2025 |website=Fragile}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;) for its prebuilt, gaming-focused desktop computers.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:1&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{Cite web |date=31 Jul 2024 |title=NZXT Announces NZXT Flex a PC Gaming Subscription Service |url=https://nzxt.com/news/flex |url-status=live |access-date=18 Mar 2025 |website=[[NZXT]]}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Customers can choose to rent a pre-built gaming computer from three monthly plans, based on their performance needs and budget, with three main tiers that each also offer a &amp;quot;Prime&amp;quot; upgrade option that includes higher spec components for an additional monthly upcharge. NZXT guarantees PC upgrades every two years and full warranty support.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |title=Flex: Two Subscription PC |url=https://nzxt.com/flex/flex-two |url-status=live |access-date=18 Mar 2025 |website=[[NZXT]]}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Nzxt flex store page.png|alt=Nzxt flex store page|thumb|NZXT Flex store page]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Vague Terms of Service==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Excessive fees===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Referencing shipping policy&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
 &amp;quot;If Operator is unable to collect funds owed to Operator from Subscriber, the Operator shall be entitled to charge Subscriber five-percent (5%) of the outstanding balance owed, or $20.00, whichever is greater, every thirty (30) days, until Subscriber has paid the entire balance owed. Operator may, at Operator’s sole discretion, waive these fees, provided Subscriber promptly returns all Rental Devices received as part of this Subscription.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &amp;quot;If Subscriber initiates a payment reversal or chargeback of any kind on a charge that was validly made under this Agreement, Subscriber will be assessed a fifty-dollar ($50.00) reversal fee, irrespective of any determination made by a bank, credit card issuer, or payment processor on the validity of the charge. If the payment is reversed, and refunded to the Subscriber, the Subscriber shall continue to be liable under this Agreement for payment to Operator for such amount.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*No ownership when you exceed rented items value&lt;br /&gt;
*Unclear semi annual upgrade guarantee&lt;br /&gt;
*Difficulty of canceling rental service.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Predatory Pricing==&lt;br /&gt;
NZXT FLEX rental cost was calculated by investigative journalist and youtube creator Steve Bruke of Gamers Nexus compared to competitors and illegal predatory payday loans. these numbers where based of a credit apr of 22% over a 2 year period and compared against a hypothetical, 103% apr, illegal payday loan.    &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Gamers nexus nzxt price comparison chart .png|alt=NZXT FLEX rental cost based on APR compared to competitors and illegal predatory payday loans|center|thumb|800x800px|NZXT FLEX rental cost based on APR  compared to competitors and illegal predatory payday loans ]]&lt;br /&gt;
The first month of the rental service is &amp;quot;on us&amp;quot;, which implies it&#039;s of no cost, however many fees including an unlisted &amp;quot;Setup fee&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;  as well as any applicable One-time fees&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; will apply. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Use of false and predatory advertising.==&lt;br /&gt;
Despite NZXT stating in their &#039;&#039;December 4, 2024 [https://nzxt.com/news/nzxt-update-addressing-your-concerns-about-the-flex-subscription-program press release]&#039;&#039; that:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;We are extending the dispute charges window from 60 days to 2 years and will comply with any regulations that provide longer dispute windows.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:2&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{Cite web |date=4 Dec 2024 |title=NZXT Update: Addressing Your Concerns About the Flex Subscription Program |url=https://nzxt.com/news/nzxt-update-addressing-your-concerns-about-the-flex-subscription-program |url-status=live |access-date=18 Mar 2025 |website=[[NZXT]]}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
their agreement still states as of January 28th 2025, more than 55 days after the [https://nzxt.com/news/nzxt-update-addressing-your-concerns-about-the-flex-subscription-program press release] was last updated&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;If Subscriber accrues an unpaid balance for more than sixty (60) calendar days, Operator may use all legal methods and remedies available to collect such unpaid balance including, but not limited to, civil litigation and selling such balance to third-party collection companies. Subscriber shall be liable for any and all collection costs incurred by Operator, Operator’s affiliates, or third parties involved in the collection of Subscriber’s unpaid balance, including attorneys fees, filing costs, and collection agency fees. Subscriber will, on the first of each month, be assessed an eight-percent (8%) monthly interest rate on any remaining unpaid balance and unpaid fees or interest assessed. &amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Therefore, makes their 2 year window statement &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;clearly false and misleading&#039;&#039;&#039;.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Inconsistent and misleading product specifications&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |last=@GamersNexus |date=1 Dec 2024 |title=Do Not Buy NZXT {{!}} Predatory, Evil Rental Computer Scam Investigated |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0pomC1CfpC0 |url-status=live |access-date=18 Mar 2025 |website=[[YouTube]]}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |last=@GamersNexus |date=7 Dec 2024 |title=NZXT Says We&#039;re &amp;quot;Confused&amp;quot; |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DAANNGvMANM |url-status=live |access-date=18 Mar 2025 |website=[[YouTube]]}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Inconsistencies between bought and rental PC&#039;s====&lt;br /&gt;
NZXT has an option to either buy a prebuilt gaming PC, or rent one (Flex). NZXT listed the estimated FPS in various games as the same between the bought and rented PC&#039;s, despite swapping out hardware. For example, a bought &amp;quot;Player: Three Prime&amp;quot; model would come with an RTX 4090, while the rental version only comes with a 4080 SUPER.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |last=Powell Jr. |first=Brian |date=30 Nov 2024 |title=Gamers Nexus Calls Out NZXT |url=https://beefsuplex.com/news/gamers-nexus-calls-out-nzxt/ |url-status=live |access-date=18 Mar 2025 |website=Beef Suplex Gaming}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{Cite web |last=Roth |first=Emma |date=1 Dec 2024 |title=Gamers Nexus claims NZXT’s Flex PC rental program is a ‘scam’ |url=https://www.theverge.com/2024/12/1/24310181/nzxt-pc-rental-program-gamers-nexus-investigation |url-status=live |access-date=18 Mar 2025 |website=[[The Verge]]}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |last=Benfell |first=Grace |date=2 Dec 2024 |title=New Video Claims NZXT PC Rental Program Is &amp;quot;A Scam,&amp;quot; Company Says It&#039;s Looking Into It |url=https://www.gamespot.com/articles/new-video-claims-nzxt-pc-rental-program-is-a-scam-company-says-its-looking-into-it/1100-6528179/ |url-status=live |access-date=18 Mar 2025 |website=GameSpot}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; These two GPUs have vastly different performance, with the 4090 having an average of +25% over the 4080 SUPER.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |last=@areej |date=26 Apr 2024 |title=NVIDIA RTX 4080 vs 4080 Super vs 4090: 34 Benchmark Comparisons |url=https://hardwaretimes.com/nvidia-rtx-4080-vs-4080-super-vs-4090/ |url-status=live |access-date=18 Mar 2025 |website=HardwareTimes}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Changing the terms of the sale==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Nzxt changes it&#039;s advertisng language.png|alt=Nzxt changes it&#039;s advertisng language|center|thumb|800x800px|Nzxt changes it&#039;s advertising language]]&lt;br /&gt;
NZXT publicly stated many policy, website &amp;amp; marketing changes in response to the controversy and community backlash.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |title=NZXT |url=https://nzxt.com/ |url-status=live |access-date=18 Mar 2025}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:1&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:2&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; &amp;lt;!-- Which ones? Don&#039;t use ref as a &amp;quot;read more here&amp;quot;, always list them and then add refs to what you list... --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Day-to-day switching of specifications and pricing===&lt;br /&gt;
The specs and price listings have been reported to change constantly, with very similar setups reported to have varying prices, and vice versa, with different builds being reported to be similar in specs.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:3&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Follow-up by NZXT==&lt;br /&gt;
The company has addressed various concerns as of early December of 2024, the statements released attempt to apologize and address future plans,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |last=Fox |first=Jacob |date=5 Dec 2024 |title=&#039;I want to acknowledge that we messed up&#039;: NZXT addresses concerns about its controversial Flex gaming PC rental program and commits to taking action |url=https://www.pcgamer.com/hardware/gaming-pcs/i-want-to-acknowledge-that-we-messed-up-nzxt-addresses-concerns-about-its-controversial-flex-gaming-pc-rental-program-and-commits-to-taking-action/ |url-status=live |access-date=18 Mar 2025 |website=PCGamer}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; while also clarifying various alleged misconceptions users may have about the program. Among the stated clarifications is the fact that users do not actually own the computers acquired through the program.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:2&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; The company also released a video about the subject on their official channel.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |last=NZXT |date=5 Dec 2024 |title=Addressing Your NZXT Flex Subscription Concerns |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FSp5B--HKL4 |url-status=live |access-date=18 Mar 2025 |website=[[YouTube]]}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TasmanianRex</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://mirror.consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=Instagram&amp;diff=11993</id>
		<title>Instagram</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://mirror.consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=Instagram&amp;diff=11993"/>
		<updated>2025-03-19T12:27:28Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TasmanianRex: /* New iOS Camera Activity Indicator shows camera activity at unexpected moments (2020–2022) */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{InfoboxCompany&lt;br /&gt;
| Name = Instagram&lt;br /&gt;
| Type = Subsidiary&lt;br /&gt;
| Founded = 2010&lt;br /&gt;
| Industry = Social Media&lt;br /&gt;
| Official Website = https://www.instagram.com/&lt;br /&gt;
| Logo = Instagram.png&lt;br /&gt;
}}&#039;&#039;&#039;[[wikipedia:Instagram|Instagram]]&#039;&#039;&#039; is a global social-media platform and subsidiary of [[Meta]] since 2012.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |date=9 Apr 2012 |title=Facebook to Acquire Instagram |url=https://about.fb.com/news/2012/04/facebook-to-acquire-instagram/ |url-status=live |access-date=17 Mar 2025 |website=[[Meta]]}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Founded in 2010 by Kevin Systrom and Mike Krieger, Instagram focuses on sharing photos and videos. This content can take the form of a &amp;quot;reel&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;post&amp;quot;, or a &amp;quot;story&amp;quot;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reels: Short videos similar to the format popularized by TikTok. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Posts: A collection of images or videos.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Stories: A temporary post that allows photos, videos, and text.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Moreover, Instagram has a direct messaging service and a live streaming service built in.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Instagram has been scrutinized for many consumer violations revolving around the extent of its data collection&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |last=Cuthberson |first=Anthony |date=18 Mar 2021 |title=Instagram is ‘most invasive app’, new study shows |url=https://www.the-independent.com/tech/instagram-invasive-app-privacy-facebook-b1818453.html |url-status=live |access-date=17 Mar 2025 |website=[[Independent]]}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and the use of said data.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Consumer-protection profile==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Privacy===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*On signup, Instagram collects details such as the user&#039;s name, email, phone number, and profile information.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[https://help.instagram.com/155833707900388?utm_source=chatgpt.com Privacy Policy]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Through the use of the app, Instagram collects the following:&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
**Interactions including, likes, comments, posts, and direct messages.&lt;br /&gt;
**Location Data.&lt;br /&gt;
**Device Information.&lt;br /&gt;
**Usage Data.&lt;br /&gt;
**Content Data including metadata from photos and videos.&lt;br /&gt;
**Information from messages including the people the user interacts with the types of messages the user sends.&lt;br /&gt;
*Instagram shares data to 3rd parties including advertisers directly and through Meta.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Instagram will share data with law enforcement if legally compelled.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Instagram will analyze messages for the purpose of detecting spam, harassment, or abusive content.&lt;br /&gt;
*Instagram uses user data to serve targeted advertisements to the user.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Transparency===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The Instagram privacy policy states how most user data is collected and stored.&lt;br /&gt;
*Instagram allows users to download a copy of their Data through their front-ends.&lt;br /&gt;
*It is unclear how much information is collected from user to user messages.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Freedom===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Instagram messages are not end-to-end encrypted.&lt;br /&gt;
*Instagram, as part of Meta, has a forced arbitration clause in its terms of service.&lt;br /&gt;
*Instagram has the ability to remove content without citing a reason.&lt;br /&gt;
*Instagram is granted a license to use, distribute, modify, run, copy, display, and create derivative works of uploaded content.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:1&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[https://help.instagram.com/581066165581870/ Terms of Service]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Consumer-protection incidents==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Instagram shows gore and violence videos to select users (Feb. 2025)===&lt;br /&gt;
In what Instagram calls an &amp;quot;error&amp;quot;, some users were shown videos of graphic death scenes and animal abuse in their Reels feed for about a day.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |last=Milmo |first=Dan |date=2025-02-28 |title=Meta apologises over flood of gore, violence and dead bodies on Instagram |url=https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2025/feb/28/meta-apologises-over-flood-of-gore-violence-and-dead-bodies-on-instagram |access-date=2025-03-06 |website=The Guardian}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This also serves as an example for the kind of content Meta staff has to review when flagged and raises questions about the mental health impact watching this type of content all day has on the workers tasked with content moderation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Instagram allows AI to be trained on user data (Mar. 2023)===&lt;br /&gt;
In March 2023, Instagram updated it&#039;s Terms of Service to allow them to use collected data to train artificial intelligence.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:1&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; This data includes uploaded photos and videos and the creators were not given compensation. This new TOS was mandatory to accept to continue using the platform.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== New iOS Camera Activity Indicator shows camera activity at unexpected moments (2020–2022) ===&lt;br /&gt;
Some users reported their camera being accessed while they were not using a feature of the app that ordinarily involves taking pictures or video. This was revealed by a new indicator in iOS 14 and the same thing was repeated in when Android 12 introduced a similar indicator.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |title= |url=https://www.reddit.com/r/AndroidQuestions/comments/s85mv2/why_does_instagram_use_my_camera_whenever_i_exit/ |access-date=2025-03-19 |website=Reddit}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |title= |url=https://www.reddit.com/r/Instagram/comments/qiyofe/why_is_instagram_accessing_my_camera_at/ |access-date=2025-03-19}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |title= |url=https://www.reddit.com/r/Instagram/comments/ssqeyi/instagram_weirdly_accessing_camera_more_in_first/ |access-date=2025-03-19}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a separate incident &#039;&#039;&#039;[I think November 2022]&#039;&#039;&#039;, users reported suddenly seeing their camera feed behind the Instragram interface when scrolling their feed or interacting with posts &#039;&#039;&#039;[SOURCES NEEDED – very difficult to find the reports on this].&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Instagram claimed that nothing was recorded in these instances. Their responses never addressed concerns that the camera feed might be used for things like analysing the face for emotional reaction to ads, recording location information or similar.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |last=Becker |first=Leo |date=2020-07-27 |title=Unerwünschter iPhone-Kamerazugriff: Instagram verweist auf Bug |url=https://www.heise.de/news/Unerwuenschter-iPhone-Kamerazugriff-Instagram-verweist-auf-Bug-4855850.html |access-date=2025-03-18 |website=Heise Online [German]}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Instagram uses personal data for advertisements without proper consent (Nov. 2020)===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Controversy regarding the data privacy of minors (Mar. 2019)===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Meta shares personal data from millions without consent. (Mar. 2018)===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Instagram]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TasmanianRex</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://mirror.consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=Intel_CPUs_stability_issue&amp;diff=11970</id>
		<title>Intel CPUs stability issue</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://mirror.consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=Intel_CPUs_stability_issue&amp;diff=11970"/>
		<updated>2025-03-18T09:57:00Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TasmanianRex: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!-- Creator&#039;s note: This is my first article, it needs work for sure, contact me if it needs revision. --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
This article discusses the stability issues related to &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Intel]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;nowiki/&amp;gt;&#039;s 13th and 14th generation desktop processors, and how the company has handled the situation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The problem==&lt;br /&gt;
Some users have reported system crashes, freezes, and instability during intensive workloads, particularly in applications that require high CPU usage. At first, the exact causes of this problem were unclear, prompting Intel to investigate and release official statements.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Intel&#039;s response==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===First statement===&lt;br /&gt;
While the root cause of the problem was still unknown, part of it seemed to be caused by CPUs operating beyond recommended voltage, frequency, and thermal limits. According to Intel, most of the reports involve unlocked motherboards with BIOS settings that disable safeguards like &#039;&#039;&#039;Current Excursion Protection (CEP)&#039;&#039;&#039; and &#039;&#039;&#039;Thermal Velocity Boost (TVB)&#039;&#039;&#039;. Some motherboard manufacturers were also modifying the &#039;&#039;&#039;CPU load line&#039;&#039;&#039; configuration settings by default, optimizing it in order to make the processors run cooler.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Official statement (April 27, 2024)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |last=Wallossek |first=Igor |date=27 Apr 2024 |title=Intel releases the “13th and 14th Generation K SKU Processor Instability Issue Update” |url=https://www.igorslab.de/en/intel-releases-the-13th-and-14th-generation-k-sku-processor-instability-issue-update/ |url-status=live |access-date=15 Mar 2025 |website=Igor&#039;s LAB}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;====&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;Intel® has observed that this issue may be related to out of specification operating conditions resulting in sustained high voltage and frequency during periods of elevated heat.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Analysis of affected processors shows some parts experience shifts in minimum operating voltages which may be related to operation outside of Intel® specified operating conditions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*While the root cause has not yet been identified, Intel® has observed the majority of reports of this issue are from users with unlocked/overclock capable motherboards.&lt;br /&gt;
*Intel® has observed 600/700 Series chipset boards often set BIOS defaults to disable thermal and power delivery safeguards designed to limit processor exposure to sustained periods of high voltage and frequency, for example: – Disabling Current Excursion Protection (CEP) – Enabling the IccMax Unlimited bit – Disabling Thermal Velocity Boost (TVB) and/or Enhanced Thermal Velocity Boost (eTVB) – Additional settings which may increase the risk of system instability: – Disabling C-states – Using Windows Ultimate Performance mode – Increasing PL1 and PL2 beyond Intel® recommended limits&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Intel® requests system and motherboard manufacturers to provide end users with a default BIOS profile that matches Intel® recommended settings.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Intel® strongly recommends customer’s default BIOS settings should ensure operation within Intel’s recommended settings.&lt;br /&gt;
*In addition, Intel® strongly recommends motherboard manufacturers to implement warnings for end users alerting them to any unlocked or overclocking feature usage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Intel® is continuing to actively investigate this issue to determine the root cause and will provide additional updates as relevant information becomes available.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Intel® will be publishing a public statement regarding issue status and Intel® recommended BIOS setting recommendations targeted for May 2024.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Second statement===&lt;br /&gt;
After conducting analysis on the returned chips, Intel has determined that instability issues were caused by elevated operating voltage, stemming from a microcode algorithm that generated incorrect voltage requests. Customer support was organized as follows: users who purchased systems from OEMs or system integrators were directed to contact their vendor, those with boxed processors were advised to reach out to Intel Support, and tray processor users were instructed to contact their place of purchase.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Official statement (July 22, 2024)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |last=Hannaford |first=Thomas |date=22 Jul 2024 |title=July 2024 Update on Instability Reports on Intel Core 13th and 14th Gen Desktop Processors |url=https://community.intel.com/t5/Processors/July-2024-Update-on-Instability-Reports-on-Intel-Core-13th-and/m-p/1617113 |url-status=live |access-date=15 Mar 2025 |website=[[Intel]] |ref=Hannaford-1}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;====&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;Based on extensive analysis of Intel Core 13th/14th Gen desktop processors returned to us due to instability issues, we have determined that elevated operating voltage is causing instability issues in some 13th/14th Gen desktop processors. Our analysis of returned processors confirms that the elevated operating voltage is stemming from a microcode algorithm resulting in incorrect voltage requests to the processor.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Intel is delivering a microcode patch which addresses the root cause of exposure to elevated voltages. We are continuing validation to ensure that scenarios of instability reported to Intel regarding its Core 13th/14th Gen desktop processors are addressed. Intel is currently targeting mid-August for patch release to partners following full validation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Intel is committed to making sure all customers who have or are currently experiencing instability symptoms on their 13th and/or 14th Gen desktop processors are supported in the exchange process.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To help streamline the support process, Intel&#039;s guidance is as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;For users who purchased 13th/14th Gen-powered desktop systems from OEM/System Integrator -&#039;&#039;&#039; please reach out to your system vendor&#039;s customer support team for further assistance.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;For users who purchased boxed 13th/14th Gen desktop processors -&#039;&#039;&#039; please reach out to Intel Customer Support for further assistance.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;For users who purchased tray 13th/14th Gen desktop processors&#039;&#039;&#039; - please reach out to your place of purchase for further assistance.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Statement update&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |date=15 Mar 2025 |title=Questions about manufacturing or Via Oxidation as reported by Tech outlets |url=https://www.reddit.com/r/intel/comments/1e9mf04/intel_core_13th14th_gen_desktop_processors/ |url-status=live |website=[[Reddit]]}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;====&lt;br /&gt;
The PR department subsequently updated the statement on [[Reddit]], integrating crucial details. A via oxidation manufacturing issue affected some early 13th Gen desktop processors, and it was resolved with improvements and screens in 2023. Analysis of instability reports seemed to indicate that a small percentage of cases were linked to this defect. It has also been confirmed that mobile 13th and 14th generation processors are not affected by any of these issues.&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;So that you don&#039;t have to hun down the answer -&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;&#039;Questions about manufacturing or Via Oxidation as reported by Tech outlets:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Short answer:&#039;&#039;&#039; We can confirm there was a via Oxidation manufacturing issue (addressed back in 2023) and that only a small number of instability reports can be connected to the manufacturing issue.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Long answer:&#039;&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;We can confirm that the via Oxidation manufacturing issue affected some early Intel Core 13th Gen desktop processors. However, the issue was root caused and addressed with manufacturing improvements and screens in 2023. We have also looked at it from the instability reports on Intel Core 13th Gen desktop processors and the analysis to-date has determined that only a small number of instability reports can be connected to the manufacturing issue.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;For the Instability issue, we are delivering a microcode patch which addresses exposure to elevated voltages which is a key element of the Instability issue. We are currently validating the microcode patch to ensure the instability issues for 13th/14th Gen are addressed.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Question about Mobile 13th/14th Gen Stability issues&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;So, from what we have seen on our analysis of the reported Intel Core 13th/14th mobile products we have seen that mobile products are not exposed to the same issue. The symptoms being reported on 13th/14th Gen mobile systems – including system hangs and crashes – are symptoms stemming from a broad range of potential software and hardware issues.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;As always, if you are experiencing issues with their Intel-powered laptops we encourage them to reach out to the system manufacturer for further help.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I&#039;ll be on the thread for the next couple of hours trying to address any questions you folks might have. Please keep in mind that I won&#039;t be able to answer every question but I&#039;ll do my best to address most of them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lex H. - Intel&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Edits:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Added answers to Oxidation questions and questions about Mobile Processors&lt;br /&gt;
*Clarified short answer on Oxidation &#039;&#039;&#039;to&#039;&#039;&#039; that &#039;&#039;&amp;quot;there is a small number of instability reports connected to the manufacturing issue,&amp;quot;&#039;&#039;  &#039;&#039;&#039;from&#039;&#039;&#039; &amp;quot;&#039;&#039;but it is not related to the instability issue.&amp;quot;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
*Link to Robeytech removed as this is not Intel&#039;s official guidance to test for the instability issue Intel Core 13th/14th Gen desktop processor instability issues. Intel is investigating options to easily identify affected processors on end user systems,&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Third statement===&lt;br /&gt;
The issues mentioned above have led to some CPUs becoming irreversibly damaged, resulting in the &#039;&#039;&#039;Vmin shift&#039;&#039;&#039;. High operating temperatures cause the silicon in the processor to degrade, requiring a higher minimum voltage to operate stably. This, in turn, leads to even higher temperatures, creating a vicious cycle that ultimately results in the CPU failing. Intel has identified four key issues contributing to the instability. For the explanation of each issue, refer to the full statement below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Official statement (September 25, 2024)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |last=Hannaford |first=Thomas |date=25 Sep 2024 |title=Intel Core 13th and 14th Gen Desktop Instability Root Cause Update |url=https://community.intel.com/t5/Blogs/Tech-Innovation/Client/Intel-Core-13th-and-14th-Gen-Desktop-Instability-Root-Cause/post/1633446#M40 |url-status=live |access-date=15 Mar 2025 |website=[[Intel]] |ref=Hannaford-2}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;====&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;Following extensive investigation of the Intel® Core™ 13th and 14th Gen desktop processor Vmin Shift Instability issue, Intel can now confirm the root cause diagnosis for the issue. This post will cover Intel’s understanding of the root cause, as well as additional mitigations and next steps for Intel® Core™ 13th and 14th Gen desktop users.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Vmin Shift Instability Root Cause&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Intel® has localized the Vmin Shift Instability issue to a clock tree circuit within the IA core which is particularly vulnerable to reliability aging under elevated voltage and temperature. Intel has observed these conditions can lead to a duty cycle shift of the clocks and observed system instability.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Intel® has identified four (4) operating scenarios that can lead to Vmin shift in affected processors:&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#Motherboard power delivery settings exceeding Intel power guidance.  &#039;&#039;&#039;a.  Mitigation:&#039;&#039;&#039; Intel® Default Settings recommendations for Intel® Core™ 13th and 14th Gen desktop processors.  &lt;br /&gt;
#eTVB Microcode algorithm which was allowing Intel® Core™ 13th and 14th Gen i9 desktop processors to operate at higher performance states even at high temperatures.  &#039;&#039;&#039;a.  Mitigation:&#039;&#039;&#039; microcode 0x125 (June 2024) addresses eTVB algorithm issue.  &lt;br /&gt;
#Microcode SVID algorithm requesting high voltages at a frequency and duration which can cause Vmin shift.  &#039;&#039;&#039;a.  Mitigation:&#039;&#039;&#039; microcode 0x129 (August 2024) addresses high voltages requested by the processor.  &lt;br /&gt;
#Microcode and BIOS code requesting elevated core voltages which can cause Vmin shift especially during periods of idle and/or light activity.  &#039;&#039;&#039;a.  Mitigation:&#039;&#039;&#039; Intel® is releasing microcode 0x12B, which encompasses 0x125 and 0x129 microcode updates, and addresses elevated voltage requests by the processor during idle and/or light activity periods.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Regarding the 0x12B update, Intel® is working with its partners to roll out the relevant BIOS update to the public.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Intel’s internal testing comparing 0x12B microcode to 0x125 microcode – on Intel® Core™ i9-14900K with DDR5 5200MT/s memory1  - indicates performance impact is within run-to-run variation (ie. Cinebench* R23, Speedometer*, WebXPRT4*, Crossmark*). For gaming workloads on Intel® Core™ i9-14900K with DDR5 5600MT/s memory2, performance is also within run-to-run variation (ie. Shadow of the Tomb Raider*, Cyberpunk* 2077, Hitman 3: Dartmoor*, Total War: Warhammer III – Mirrors of Madness*). However, system performance is dependent on configuration and several other factors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Intel® reaffirms that both Intel® Core™ 13th and 14th Gen mobile processors and future client product families – including the codename Lunar Lake and Arrow Lake families - are unaffected by the Vmin Shift Instability issue. We appreciate our customers’ patience throughout the investigation, as well as our partners’ support in the analysis and relevant mitigations. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Next Steps&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;For all Intel® Core™ 13th/14th Gen desktop processor users:&#039;&#039;&#039; the 0x12B microcode update must be loaded via BIOS update and has been distributed to system and motherboard manufacturers to incorporate into their BIOS. Intel is working with its partners to encourage timely validation and rollout of the BIOS update for systems currently in service.  This process may take several weeks. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Users can check their system/motherboard manufacturer’s website and/or the Intel® Product Compatibility Tool to see the latest BIOS versions for their Intel® Core™ 13th and/or 14th Gen-powered desktop systems: &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://compatibleproducts.intel.com/&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#Processor: Intel® Core™ i9-14900K, Motherboard: Intel Raptor Lake Reference Board (M40919), Memory: 64GB DDR5 at  5200MT/s, Storage: ADATA* SU360, Graphics: Intel® UHD Graphics 770, Graphics Driver Version: 32.0.101.5768, Display Resolution: 1280x800, Operating System: Windows 11 Pro (version 26100.712).&lt;br /&gt;
#Processor: Intel® Core™ i9-14900K, Motherboard: Intel Raptor Lake Reference Board (RVP SR19), Memory: 32GB DDR5 at  5600MT/s, Storage: Samsung* 990 Pro 1TB, Graphics: MSI* RTX 4090 Suprim X, Graphics Driver Version: NVIDIA* v555.99, Resolution: 1920x1080, Operating System: Windows 11 (version 22631.4169)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Solutions==&lt;br /&gt;
Here’s a summary of what owners of affected 13th and 14th Gen Intel CPUs can do:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Update BIOS&#039;&#039;&#039;: Ensure the motherboard BIOS is updated to the latest version, incorporating Intel’s recommended default settings.&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Apply Microcode Updates&#039;&#039;&#039;: Install the latest microcode updates (0x125, 0x129, and 0x12B) to address voltage and performance state issues.&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Monitor Temperatures&#039;&#039;&#039;: Use adequate cooling solutions to prevent high operating temperatures, which can exacerbate instability.&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Avoid Overclocking&#039;&#039;&#039;: Stick to Intel’s recommended power and voltage limits to avoid stressing the CPU.&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Contact Support&#039;&#039;&#039;: If experiencing instability, reach out to customer support for assistance or potential replacements.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These steps can help mitigate instability and prolong the lifespan of the processor.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Broader implications==&lt;br /&gt;
Over the past few years, Intel has faced numerous challenges, including competition from [[AMD]], delays in its manufacturing process nodes, and a decline in its market share in key segments.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Immagine 2025-01-28 101045.png|thumb|Intel&#039;s 10-K for the years 2021, 2022 and 2023]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Revenue decline===&lt;br /&gt;
Looking at the 10-K&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.intc.com/filings-reports/annual-reports/content/0000050863-24-000010/0000050863-24-000010.pdf Intel&#039;s 10-K]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; reports from recent years, a clear decline in net revenue, net income, and its percentage can be observed. The most alarming trend is the sharp drop in net income percentage, which plummeted from 25.1% in 2021 to just 3.1% in 2023.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Instability issues have further damaged the company image for reliability, potentially leading to higher costs and contributing to the already negative revenue trend.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Increased competition and loss of market share===&lt;br /&gt;
According to reports from Mercury Research,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |last=Shilov |first=Anton |date=8 Nov 2024 |title=AMD&#039;s desktop PC market share skyrockets amid Intel&#039;s Raptor Lake CPU crashing scandal — AMD makes biggest leap in recent history |url=https://www.tomshardware.com/pc-components/cpus/amds-desktop-pc-market-share-skyrockets-amid-intels-raptor-lake-crashing-scandal-amd-makes-biggest-leap-in-recent-history |url-status=live |access-date=15 Mar 2025 |website=Tom&#039;s Hardware}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; AMD&#039;s market share for desktop CPUs in Q3 2024 was 9.6% higher compared to Q3 of the prior year. This growth could lead to a shift in market dynamics, potentially putting the competition at risk. Competition is essential for consumers because it drives companies to deliver better performance, efficiency, and value.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Intel&#039;s loss in market share highlights the importance of competition for innovation. However, with only two major CPU manufacturers, Intel and AMD, a significant imbalance in market share could limit consumer choice and innovation in the long run. Ensuring healthy competition between both players remains crucial for a balanced and thriving market.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Incidents]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Articles based on videos]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Intel]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TasmanianRex</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://mirror.consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=Uniform_Commercial_Code&amp;diff=11914</id>
		<title>Uniform Commercial Code</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://mirror.consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=Uniform_Commercial_Code&amp;diff=11914"/>
		<updated>2025-03-17T12:11:20Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TasmanianRex: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The &#039;&#039;&#039;[[wikipedia:Uniform_Commercial_Code|Uniform Commercial Code]]&#039;&#039;&#039;(UCC) established harmonized laws regarding sales and other commercial transactions to almost every state across the United States.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Summary==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Article 2: Sales===&lt;br /&gt;
Adopted in every state except Louisiana,&amp;lt;ref group=&amp;quot;footnotes&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Equivalent sections are covered by Louisiana state law, specifically the Civil Codes of Louisiana under Title VII. Sale (Art. 2438 - 2659)&amp;quot; (1995) , [https://lcco.law.lsu.edu/?uid=95&amp;amp;ver=en#95 Chapter 10] and [https://lcco.law.lsu.edu/?uid=98&amp;amp;ver=en#98 Chapter 13]. Notable are the Obligations of the buyer under [https://legis.la.gov/legis/Law.aspx?d=109601 Art. 2549.],  Buyer&#039;s right of inspection under [https://legis.la.gov/legis/Law.aspx?p=y&amp;amp;d=109662 Art. 2604.] which includes after delivery to inspect before accepting and Rejection of nonconforming things by the buyer under [https://legis.la.gov/legis/Law.aspx?d=109663 Art. 2605.] .&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; this article gives consumers rights regarding the sale of goods, like the right to inspect before accepting and paying for it.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web|url=https://www.sos.la.gov/BusinessServices/UniformCommercialCode/WhatIsUniformCommercialCode/Pages/default.aspx|title=What is Uniform Commercial Code?|author=Louisiana Secretary of State Nancy Landry|access-date=23 Feb 2025|publisher=Louisiana Department of State}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====§ 2-513: Buyer&#039;s Right to Inspection of Goods&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web|url=https://www.law.cornell.edu/ucc/2/2-513|publisher=Legal Information Institute|title=§ 2-513. Buyer&#039;s Right to Inspection of Goods.}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;====&lt;br /&gt;
The consumer has the right to inspect before payment or acceptance, the inspection is explicitly states as &amp;quot;in any reasonable manner&amp;quot;. That also means that the consumer can inspect for goods that are delivered, it is the preliminary step before accepting. Terms must be available before acceptance, the customers must have seen all the terms before they can accept the good, else even when a payment has occurred it is not considered accepted as the reasonable inspection is not over yet.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web|url=https://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/buyers-performance-under-the-ucc.html|publisher=Nolo|title=What Is the Buyer&#039;s Performance Under the UCC?|date=17 May 2023|author1=David M. Steingold|author2=Amanda Hayes|access-date=23 Feb 2025}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====§ 2-606: What Constitutes Acceptance of Goods&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web|url=https://www.law.cornell.edu/ucc/2/2-606|publisher=Legal Information Institute|title=§ 2-606. What Constitutes Acceptance of Goods.}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;====&lt;br /&gt;
This section makes that part explicit in § 2-606-1b as &amp;quot;such acceptance does not occur until the buyer has had a reasonable opportunity to inspect them&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====§ 2-607: Effect of Acceptance&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web|url=https://www.law.cornell.edu/ucc/2/2-607|title=§ 2-607. Effect of Acceptance; Notice of Breach; Burden of Establishing Breach After Acceptance; Notice of Claim or Litigation to Person Answerable Over.|publisher=Legal Information Institute}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;====&lt;br /&gt;
Once this reasonable inspection did take place, then the buyer can decide to accept it, which comes with the obligation to pay.&lt;br /&gt;
==Notes==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references group=&amp;quot;footnotes&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Common terms]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Legislation]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:US legislation]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TasmanianRex</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://mirror.consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=Apple_App_Store&amp;diff=11902</id>
		<title>Apple App Store</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://mirror.consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=Apple_App_Store&amp;diff=11902"/>
		<updated>2025-03-17T05:46:20Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TasmanianRex: /* JIT */ I am not sure whether this is appropriate, but anyway converted a link into a reference.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[File:App Store (iOS).svg|thumb|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Apple]]&#039;&#039;&#039; uses several technical measures to protect their App Store ecosystem and prevent consumer choice. They are good at obscuring their intentions with technical roadblocks, while typically citing security reasons for them - assuming the public even recognizes what is going on. This actively hurts the ability for lawmakers to have an accurate understanding, so they can consider applying legislative pressure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A never-ending demand for a cut of every sale of a digital product, ranging from game currency, to supporting content creators,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;patreon&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{Cite web |last=Roth |first=Emma |date=12 Aug 2024 |title=Patreon: adding Apple’s 30 percent tax is the price of staying in the App Store |url=https://www.theverge.com/2024/8/12/24218629/patreon-membership-ios-30-percent-apple-tax |url-status=live |access-date=16 Mar 2025 |website=[[The Verge]]}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; to booking a Zoom call with a local business,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;facebook&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{Cite web |last=Paul |first=Katie |last2=Nellis |first2=Stephen |date=28 Aug 2020 |title=Exclusive: Facebook says Apple rejected its attempt to tell users about App Store fees |url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-facebook-apple-exclusive/exclusive-facebook-says-apple-rejected-its-attempt-to-tell-users-about-app-store-fees-idUSKBN25O042/ |url-status=live |access-date=16 Mar 2025 |website=[[Reuters]]}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; hurts the ability for app developers to innovate. These developers, working hard and pulling countless hours to build a quality app, always need to take Apple&#039;s (and [[Google]]&#039;s) demands into account - specifically, between 15% and 30% of their revenue. This is revenue that can be reinvested into the app, but instead must be earmarked for the platform they are &#039;&#039;&#039;required&#039;&#039;&#039; to use to reach their customers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because this is a clear problem, several governments, including South Korea,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |date=8 Mar 2022 |title=South Korea approves rules on app store law targeting Apple, Google |url=https://www.reuters.com/technology/skorea-approves-rules-app-store-law-targeting-apple-google-2022-03-08/ |url-status=live |access-date=16 Mar 2025 |website=[[Reuters]]}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Japan,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |last=Sharwood |first=Simon |date=13 Jun 2024 |title=Japan forces Apple and Google to allow third-party app stores and payments |url=https://www.theregister.com/2024/06/13/japan_smartphone_software_law/ |url-status=live |access-date=16 Mar 2025 |website=[[The Register]]}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; the European Union,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[wikipedia:Digital Markets Act|Digital Markets Act]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; the United Kingdom,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |last=Competition and Markets Authority |date=4 Mar 2021 |title=Investigation into Apple AppStore |url=https://www.gov.uk/cma-cases/investigation-into-apple-appstore |url-status=live |access-date=16 Mar 2025 |website=[[gov.uk]]}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Australia,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |date=28 Apr 2021 |title=Dominance of Apple and Google&#039;s app stores impacting competition and consumers |url=https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/dominance-of-apple-and-googles-app-stores-impacting-competition-and-consumers |url-status=live |access-date=16 Mar 2025 |website=[[ACCC]]}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; as well as the US and a handful of states,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[wikipedia:Open App Markets Act|Open App Markets Act]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |date=20 Nov 2024 |title=S.5364 - App Store Accountability Act |url=https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/senate-bill/5364/text/is |url-status=live |access-date=16 Mar 2025 |website=[[congress.gov]]}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;doj&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{Cite web |last=Balsamo |first=Mike |last2=Liedtke |first2=Mike |last3=Whitehurst |first3=Lindsay |last4=Bajak |first4=Frank |date=21 Mar 2024 |title=Justice Department sues Apple, alleging it illegally monopolized the smartphone market |url=https://apnews.com/article/apple-antitrust-monopoly-app-store-justice-department-822d7e8f5cf53a2636795fcc33ee1fc3 |url-status=live |access-date=16 Mar 2025 |website=[[APNews]]}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |date=19 Feb 2021 |title=It’s time to free ourselves from ‘Big Tech’ monopoly |url=https://azcapitoltimes.com/news/2021/02/19/its-time-to-free-ourselves-from-big-tech-monopoly/ |url-status=live |access-date=16 Mar 2025 |website=[[Arizona Capitol Times]]}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; have opened investigations into anti-competitive practices, or considered or already passed legislation to force &amp;quot;gatekeeper platforms&amp;quot; such as Apple to be more reasonable with third-party developers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This being a major threat to Apple&#039;s revenue stream (interestingly, one they claim to be unsure is profitable&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |last=Lovejoy |first=Ben |date=17 Apr 2024 |title=Schiller doesn’t know whether the App Store is profitable; there are no minutes of meetings |url=https://9to5mac.com/2024/04/17/app-store-is-profitable-apple-notes/ |url-status=live |access-date=16 Mar 2025 |website=[[9to5Mac]]}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |last=Lovejoy |first=Ben |date=17 Jan 2025 |title=Apple denies App Store profit margin is 75% – claims to have no clue |url=https://9to5mac.com/2025/01/17/apple-denies-app-store-profit-margin-is-75-claims-to-have-no-clue/ |url-status=live |access-date=16 Mar 2025 |website=[[9t05Mac]]}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;), they have responded with practices such as geoblocking certain operating system functionality based on physical location,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |title=Eligibility |url=https://theapplewiki.com/wiki/Eligibility |url-status=live |access-date=16 Mar 2025 |website=[[TheAppleWiki]]}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; misrepresenting/overstating risks, and using existing, trusted terms to describe unreasonably difficult to use systems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Background info==&lt;br /&gt;
Important terms you&#039;ll run into in this article:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;[[wikipedia:Sandbox (computer security)|Sandbox]]&#039;&#039;&#039;: Reduces exposure of the user&#039;s device/data to security risks, by reducing what an app is allowed to do.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://theapplewiki.com/wiki/Entitlements Entitlements]&#039;&#039;&#039;: Apple&#039;s method of &amp;quot;poking holes&amp;quot; in the sandbox, to give the app more permissions. Some are available to developers, while many are only available to Apple.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;[[wikipedia:Digital Markets Act|Digital Markets Act]]&#039;&#039;&#039;: The European Union&#039;s fairly sweeping recent regulations against forcing companies they classify as &amp;quot;gatekeepers&amp;quot; to play nice, giving smaller businesses access to software/hardware features they&#039;ve historically reserved for their own use.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==In-app purchases==&lt;br /&gt;
Apple has been collecting users&#039; credit card numbers since opening the iTunes Store in 2004. The opening of the App Store in 2008, followed by the introduction of in-app purchases (IAPs) in 2009, gave iPhone app developers the opportunity to sell app features to users. The IAP system is provided as a developer framework named [https://developer.apple.com/storekit/ StoreKit]. Apps and their in-app purchases are managed through a dashboard named [https://developer.apple.com/app-store-connect/ App Store Connect]. App sales have eclipsed iTunes Store sales, and are now a primary focus of Apple&#039;s Media Services division.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Apple requires every purchase of a digital good or service in an app to use their in-app purchase system. This may seem reasonable, because the customer may inevitably call Apple support, demanding a refund for an app they have issues with. Apple would rather give that refund and leave the customer with a positive support experience, than to provide a messy process involving contacting a third-party, whose customer service is likely nowhere near the same experience.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
App Store purchase fees are between 15% and 30%. In September 2016, Apple expanded subscriptions to be available to any type of app, also introducing a 15% discount incentive when the user has already subscribed for a year.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |last=Goode |first=Lauren |date=2 Sep 2016 |title=Apple’s new subscription offerings are now available to App Store developers |url=https://www.theverge.com/2016/9/2/12774758/apple-developers-app-store-new-subscription-rules |url-status=live |access-date=16 Mar 2025 |website=[[The Verge]]}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In November 2020, Apple introduced a reduced 15% fee for app developers with revenue below $1 million per year, with exceptions such as for games.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |last=Centers |first=Josh |date=18 Nov 2020 |title=Apple Drops App Store Commission to 15% for Small Developers |url=https://tidbits.com/2020/11/18/apple-drops-app-store-commission-to-15-for-small-developers/ |access-date=16 Mar 2025 |website=[[TidBITS]]}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Otherwise, the fee is 30%. In the 2008 announcement of the App Store, Apple considered this a reasonable, industry-standard fee. However, the way we use apps has significantly evolved since 2009 - the world has shifted to heavily rely on mobile apps, which have also evolved into more complex and sustainable business models than a simple one-time purchase.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[wikipedia:Stripe, Inc.|Stripe]], a very popular platform used for payments on the web, uses a base fee of 2.9% plus a fixed $0.30 in the United States.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |title=Pricing |url=https://stripe.com/it/pricing |url-status=live |access-date=16 Mar 2025 |website=[[Stripe]]}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; With add-on services, before considering volume discounts, a Stripe transaction may rather have a cost of 6.4% + $1.10.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Calculated from base fee (2.9% + $0.30) + international card (1.5%) + adaptive pricing (2%) + international payment methods ($0.80), as of January 2025&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Competing payments services have fees close or identical to this. &#039;&#039;&#039;The in-app purchase system does not provide sufficient value to justify considerably higher fees than alternative payment platforms.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The App Store system poorly handles secondary marketplaces of digital services that exist within the primary App Store marketplace, such as Patreon. Apple, however, still requires companies in the business of selling digital services to use this inadequate system. This requires the app to account for Apple&#039;s fee, which is significant enough to often warrant increasing prices, and to follow rules even if they do not make sense for the nature of service they are providing. Apple has frequently been found in disputes with such apps. This injects extra complication at no benefit to the marketplace, the creator, or the customer - only to Apple, who has little to no involvement after delivering the initial app download to the user&#039;s phone. The significant fee also often drives app developers to consider building their app around an advertising model instead, creating privacy concerns.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Additionally, the 15% small businesses fee discount is judged based on the app&#039;s overall turnover, and is not based on individual creators in the app&#039;s marketplace. An app that turns over $1 million per year by providing services to creators that individually make less than $1 million per year does not have the opportunity to use the discount.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Apple, often together with Google, use lobbying efforts in the United States and other countries in an attempt to minimize the issues. &amp;quot;ACT | The App Association&amp;quot;, pitched as an association of independent small business app developers, is at least 50% funded by Apple, and does not list its claimed 2,000 members.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |date=1 Oct 2021 |title=Not a class ACT: the so-called App Association is simply an Apple Association and does NOT represent app developers&#039; interests in fair distribution terms |url=http://www.fosspatents.com/2021/10/not-class-act-so-called-app-association.html |url-status=live |access-date=16 Mar 2025 |website=[[FOSS Patents]]}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |date=19 Sep 2022 |title=Vast majority of ACT {{!}} The App Association&#039;s funding comes from Apple, former employees tell Bloomberg: astroturfing against app developers&#039; interests |url=http://www.fosspatents.com/2022/09/vast-majority-of-act-app-associations.html |url-status=live |access-date=16 Mar 2025 |website=[[FOSS Patents]]}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In March 2024, the United States Department of Justice along with 16 state attorneys-general filed a lawsuit against Apple, including an accusation that the company &amp;quot;extracts more money from consumers, developers, content creators, artists, publishers, small businesses, and merchants, among others&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;doj&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; The future of this lawsuit is unclear as of January 2025.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Despite criticism of Apple forcing their fee into transactions with small businesses and creators on [[#Patreon|Patreon]], [[#Facebook online events|Facebook]], and similar platforms, on 23 January 2025, Apple announced the Advanced Commerce API. It &amp;quot;support[s] developers&#039; evolving business models - such as exceptionally large content catalogs, creator experiences, and subscriptions with optional add-ons&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |date=23 Jan 2025 |title=Introducing the Advanced Commerce API |url=https://developer.apple.com/news/?id=yxy958ya |url-status=live |access-date=16 Mar 2025 |website=[[Apple Developer]]}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; While positioned as a way for such businesses to save development time and avoid ongoing costs by building on top of Apple&#039;s mature payments platform, its use is in fact necessary for these businesses to work within the App Store guidelines, as seen in cases outlined below. The feature requires submitting the app&#039;s business model to Apple for approval. This continues a trend of requiring Apple&#039;s consent to conduct business in a place users have been trained to expect it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Given Apple&#039;s strong incentives, and a ticking clock as legal pressure builds, it is not hard to find stories from app developers regarding poor experiences with Apple&#039;s app review process.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;This list is extremely incomplete. Please add examples if you know of any.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Facebook online events===&lt;br /&gt;
In August 2020, in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, Facebook introduced the ability for small businesses to accept an entrance fee for events. Previously, Facebook would only act as a way to RSVP for the event - the organizer must use a third-party event ticketing system to collect fees. The company pledged to not collect any fee on event sales &amp;quot;until 2023&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |date=14 Aug 2020 |title=Paid Online Events for Small Business Recovery |url=https://about.fb.com/news/2020/08/paid-online-events/ |url-status=live |access-date=16 Mar 2025 |website=[[Meta]]}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Apple disagreed, requiring the feature to use the in-app purchases system. This introduced Apple&#039;s 30% fee. As this increases the price the user pays, with no benefit to the small business the user intended to support, the fee was displayed as a line item in checkout. Apple did not accept this disclosure of the fee, referring to it as &amp;quot;irrelevant&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;facebook&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; Facebook was allowed to compromise on displaying the fee, but &#039;&#039;without&#039;&#039; indicating that it is specifically an App Store fee.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===HEY===&lt;br /&gt;
HEY.com is a paid webmail provider launched in June 2020 by long-time software company [[wikipedia:37signals|37signals]], specializing in inbox organization tools.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After successfully launching the initial version of the app on the App Store, the company announced that an update was rejected due to a complaint about the business model. The app did not intend to support in-app purchases - instead, the user is expected to already have an account with the service. Apple did not like this arrangement, and demanded the company build an in-app subscription option. The company argued that they are being held to a different set of rules than apps such as [[Netflix]], whose app does not provide any way to purchase a subscription.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |last=Kastrenakes |first=Jacob |date=17 Jun 2020 |title=Hey.com exec says Apple is acting like ‘gangsters,’ rejecting App Store updates and demanding cut of sales |url=https://www.theverge.com/2020/6/16/21293419/hey-apple-rejection-ios-app-store-dhh-gangsters-antitrust |url-status=live |access-date=16 Mar 2025 |website=[[The Verge]]}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; After a suggestion from Apple executive Phil Schiller in the media, HEY introduced a 14 day free trial mode, which was approved.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.hey.com/apple/path/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://techcrunch.com/2020/06/18/interview-apples-schiller-says-position-on-hey-app-is-unchanged-and-no-rules-changes-are-imminent/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Patreon===&lt;br /&gt;
In August 2024, [[Patreon]] announced a change in arrangement with Apple for its App Store app. From November 2024, subscriptions started from the iOS app would be required to use the in-app purchase system, bypassing Patreon&#039;s own long-standing payments practices.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |date=12 Aug 2024 |title=Apple’s requirements are about to hit creators and fans on Patreon. Here’s what you need to know. |url=https://news.patreon.com/articles/understanding-apple-requirements-for-patreon |url-status=live |access-date=16 Mar 2025 |website=[[Patreon]]}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;patreon&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; This change does not affect the Android app.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By forcing Patreon out of the payments pipeline, certain payment models are no longer available to users of Patreon&#039;s iOS app. Creators who rely on the &amp;quot;per-creation&amp;quot; payment model, as opposed to the standard &amp;quot;per-month&amp;quot;, can no longer be subscribed to from the app. The app is also not able to support the &amp;quot;first-of-the-month&amp;quot; model, where payments from all subscribers are collected on the first day of the month, rather than every 30 days since each member&#039;s day of subscription. The price must also be rounded to a price tier supported by Apple.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Patreon provides creators with the choice to increase their prices by 30% in the iOS app, or to keep the same prices but forfeit 30% to Apple. Creators frequently remind potential supporters to not use the Patreon iOS app, adding extra inconvenience to those wanting to support the work of small creators.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;gallery mode=&amp;quot;packed&amp;quot; heights=&amp;quot;500px&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
File:Patreon iOS app pricing options - fee on top.png|&amp;quot;Maintain earnings and cover Apple&#039;s fee by increasing prices in iOS app&amp;quot; (Recommended)&lt;br /&gt;
File:Patreon iOS app pricing options - absorb fee.png|&amp;quot;Keep prices in the iOS app the same and cover Apple&#039;s fee yourself&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/gallery&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A similar case occurred with the app Fanhouse in 2021.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |last=@jasminericegirl |date=9 Jun 2021 |title=#fuckapple, a thread&lt;br /&gt;
I cofounded @fanhouseapp&lt;br /&gt;
 8 months ago to empower creators to monetize their content. We pay creators 90% of earnings. Now, Apple is threatening to remove Fanhouse from the app store unless we give them 30% of creator earnings. This is theft and exploitation. |url=https://x.com/jasminericegirl/status/1402691047940100100 |access-date=16 Mar 2025 |website=[[X]]}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Twitter===&lt;br /&gt;
In August 2021, [[Twitter]] introduced a feature named Super Follows (now Subscriptions), in which a user can pay a subscription fee to access more of a creator&#039;s content. For each user who enables Subscriptions, Twitter must submit a new in-app purchase SKU to the App Store, which will become available with the next update to the app.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |last=@wongmjane |date=2 Sep 2021 |title=Each Super Follow is an In-App Purchase on the App Store, but because there are too many IAPs for the Twitter app, the App Store only shows 10 instead of the full list |url=https://x.com/wongmjane/status/1433372120080261120 |url-status=live |access-date=16 Mar 2025 |website=[[X]]}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This, of course, is subject to the 30% fee. At the time of writing in January 2025, viewing the App Store listing reveals Elon Musk&#039;s $4.00 subscription as the fourth most popular IAP item.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Notarization==&lt;br /&gt;
Since 2015, Apple expects all Mac apps to be &amp;quot;notarized&amp;quot;. This is a preliminary, automated malware check, which upon passing, provides a notary certificate that gets &amp;quot;stapled&amp;quot; to the app. Apple&#039;s explanation:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Notarization of macOS software is not App Review. The Apple notary service is an automated system that scans your software for malicious content, checks for code-signing issues, and returns the results to you quickly. If there are no issues, the notary service generates a ticket for you to staple to your software; the notary service also publishes that ticket online where Gatekeeper can find it.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |title=Notarizing macOS software before distribution |url=https://developer.apple.com/documentation/security/notarizing-macos-software-before-distribution |url-status=live |access-date=16 Mar 2025 |website=[[Apple Developer]]}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Whether this is actually a better approach than used by Windows antivirus, where they find out about new malware samples only when they end up on a user&#039;s computer, is a separate topic.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To comply with the DMA&#039;s regulations on app marketplaces, Apple created a new channel of releasing apps outside of the iOS App Store. Apps go through a notarization process. But the process is definitely &#039;&#039;not&#039;&#039; notarization. The name is intentionally being abused, by contrast to notarization on macOS, to make you believe it is something other than the existing App Review system. Despite the pain some developers and users have with it, notarization on macOS has always been considered a net positive. It made sense to take advantage of its reputation for the entirely different &amp;quot;notarization&amp;quot; on iOS.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See for yourself - view the [https://developer.apple.com/app-store/review/guidelines/ App Review Guidelines] and tick &amp;quot;Show Notarization Review Guidelines Only&amp;quot;. While most rules are knocked out by this, a good number of them are still in place. These apps are still reviewed and tested by the App Review team, must have a full product listing in App Store Connect, and can be outright rejected - all in the same way as an App Store app.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By contrast, all that is required for notarization on macOS is for your app to not be malware. You submit it to an automated system that approves it within minutes. &#039;&#039;&#039;You don&#039;t need to convince Apple your app is worthy of existing on their platform.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The point of macOS notarization is that Apple has a record of all binaries that are intended for wide distribution on macOS, and can review them both in advance and on a regular basis for known malware/common malware patterns. Say a malware app manages to initially get through, when Apple finds out, they can go back in the notary records and find every sample of that malware to analyze and block. This is purely a technical process, managed by skilled security researchers, while iOS app review and &amp;quot;notarization&amp;quot; is a business process, managed by workers who have been given a checklist of violations to look for.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Apple is retaining complete control over what&#039;s allowed to run on iOS. On macOS, you can choose to run apps that have not been notarized (even though the process to bypass the warning is intentionally difficult). On iOS, you never get even that option. What Apple created is the App Store but with more steps. It still goes on the App Store, just hidden so it can only be installed by the third-party store it&#039;s tied to.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Mysk: &amp;quot;iOS should enable alternative marketplaces to add their own links when users share their apps. Links still point to the App Store and if the app is not available there, this happens.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |last=@mysk_co |date=28 Jun 2024 |title=iOS should enable alternative marketplaces to add their own links when users share their apps. Links still point to the App Store and if the app is not available there, this happens: |url=https://x.com/mysk_co/status/1806638308455256242 |url-status=live |access-date=16 Mar 2025 |website=[[X]]}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==JIT==&lt;br /&gt;
Safari is allowed to [[wikipedia:Just-in-time compilation|just-in-time]] compile code worldwide. The super short version of what that means: it can run JavaScript code &#039;&#039;really fast&#039;&#039;. All browsers, and other runtimes like Microsoft .NET, Java, Lua use this. Ok, fine, it&#039;s the system web browser, it&#039;s very carefully written to be secure, and it&#039;s important to the platform to be doing well in performance benchmarks and all that.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Apple&#039;s [https://apps.apple.com/app/swift-playgrounds/id908519492 Playgrounds] app on iPad is also allowed to JIT. It bundles Apple&#039;s [[wikipedia:Swift (programming language)|Swift]] compiler, and shares backend code with the version of Playgrounds found in [[wikipedia:Xcode|Xcode]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Competing apps like Pythonista (a Python IDE), emulators like Delta and UTM, and terminal environments like iSH, are not allowed to JIT. As such, they need to rely on inferior performance, potentially from an entirely separate implementation of their compiler/interpreter that may be less proven, because the JIT-less implementation doesn&#039;t need to exist on any other platform.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Likely the most clear example is UTM SE. UTM is a port of the [[wikipedia:QEMU|QEMU]] emulator to iOS, allowing you to run desktop OSes (Linux, Windows 98, XP, classic Mac OS, etc). iPhone hardware is very capable these days and it runs impressively well, &#039;&#039;if&#039;&#039; you use a hack to enable JIT (which Apple has now patched). &amp;quot;SE&amp;quot; stands for &amp;quot;slow edition&amp;quot; - yes, really. If you compare the true version of UTM to the App Store UTM SE app, you &#039;&#039;will&#039;&#039; feel the loss in performance. It&#039;s impressive UTM even got to be on the App Store at all, and the DMA is to thank for it. But Apple is still holding the line on allowing JIT to apps that require that performance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While UTM SE releasing at all might seem like a pathway to getting Firefox and Chrome &amp;quot;slow editions&amp;quot; on the App Store, browser engines other than the built-in Apple WebKit/JavaScriptCore are still outlawed.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |title=App Review Guidelines |url=https://developer.apple.com/app-store/review/guidelines/#2.5.6 |url-status=live |access-date=16 Mar 2025 |website=[[Apple Developer]]}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In the EU, Apple has blessed web browser JavaScript engines with the option to use JIT. The app must be approved for an entitlement, and then must work within APIs provided by Apple for it. As of January 2025, no browsers have been released using this. We were all anticipating proper competition around web browsers on iOS, but almost a year later, we have nothing.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |title=Mozilla says Apple’s new browser rules are ‘as painful as possible’ for Firefox&lt;br /&gt;
 |url=https://www.theverge.com/2024/1/26/24052067/mozilla-apple-ios-browser-rules-firefox |url-status=live |access-date=16 Mar 2025 |website=[[The Verge]]}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Sandbox==&lt;br /&gt;
You might not like app sandboxing, but it&#039;s a powerful security feature used on all modern platforms. The reality is very few apps need more than a few basic permissions. [[wikipedia:Flatpak|Flatpak]] on Linux also sandboxes apps, and it seems to work great! Still, it&#039;s completely fair that there should be processes for doing things beyond what the sandbox allows. You see some of this with permission prompts - does a flashlight app &#039;&#039;really&#039;&#039; need access to your contacts? (Apple has been burned by apps abusing user data before the current permission system was built out.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |last=Bohn |first=Dleter |date=15 Feb 2012 |title=iOS apps and the address book: who has your data, and how they’re getting it |url=https://www.theverge.com/2012/2/14/2798008/ios-apps-and-the-address-book-what-you-need-to-know |url-status=live |access-date=16 Mar 2025 |website=[[The Verge]]}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It can go further than this. As we established in previous sections, an app can be given more access to features of the system using entitlements. These come in a few flavors:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Completely safe&#039;&#039;&#039;: Entitlements any developer can opt into, with little to no risk.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Approval required&#039;&#039;&#039;: Entitlements that might be more of a security risk to allow, e.g. giving considerably wider access to the system, or that Apple simply doesn&#039;t want to hand out to just &#039;&#039;anyone&#039;&#039; for competitive reasons. The developer must submit a request to Apple with evidence of why they need the entitlement.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Private&#039;&#039;&#039;: Entitlements that are never allowed for any app developer to use. Many of these are reasonably fenced off because they handle user data that is very risky, or bypasses permission prompts, etc, but can just as well also be guarding features Apple wants to keep to itself.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There have been [https://gizmodo.com/researchers-uber-s-ios-app-had-secret-permissions-that-1819177235 exceptions] where Apple quietly gave a company access to private entitlements anyway, raising eyebrows.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On iOS, you also can&#039;t be &#039;&#039;more&#039;&#039; secure than the default sandbox. That might seem crazy if you&#039;re not a developer, but it&#039;s pretty important for security in a variety of situations. On macOS, there are several entitlements you must declare to decide whether you&#039;re allowed to access certain types of user data at all. Android used this design from the very start - you can&#039;t even do fundamental things like access the internet without declaring it in your manifest. It makes it very explicit what the app&#039;s intentions are.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
iOS has one sandbox used by all App Store apps. System apps, and App Store apps developed by Apple, are allowed to expand or reduce their sandbox permissions as needed. Third-party apps do not get the right to expand or reduce their sandbox permissions at all. This is clearly less secure. To take the example of Playgrounds again, while it&#039;s allowed to run your code from a separate process executing in an ultra locked down sandbox with very few permissions, competing apps such as Pythonista must run your code in the same sandbox and address space as the main app process. The Python interpreter crashing would therefore crash the entire app, possibly losing work. In the worst case, a vulnerability in third-party code could give access to all data stored by/accessible to the app. For example, it would be a nightmare if you can tap the wrong link in Safari and have a hacker easily steal your cookies from other websites. If that third-party code could run in its own limited sandbox, the risk is significantly reduced.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The only known workaround is to execute the code via JavaScript, as Apple&#039;s JavaScriptCore engine runs in a heavily sandboxed process. This requires you to port the code to JS, which may be a lot of work, or just not viable. You wouldn&#039;t want to run the Python interpreter inside JavaScript - the performance would be terrible!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==In-app browsers==&lt;br /&gt;
Safari&#039;s in-app browser, that is the minimal version you get when tapping a link from social media, uses an entirely separate data store for each app. The in-app browser isn&#039;t aware of cookies in the &amp;quot;full&amp;quot; Safari app, or any other app, and doesn&#039;t support Safari extensions. Apple claimed this was to protect malicious apps from stealing or setting cookies in Safari without your knowledge, which is a fair argument, but it&#039;s hard to not notice that it makes web browsing inconvenient, encouraging users to install native apps, where they can make transactions through Apple.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |last=@whitehatguy |date=12 Jun 2017 |title=Impact of iOS 11 no longer providing shared cookies between Safari, Safari View Controller instances |url=https://github.com/openid/AppAuth-iOS/issues/120 |url-status=live |access-date=16 Mar 2025 |website=[[GitHub]]}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This also means your browsing in the in-app browser is just forgotten - there&#039;s no history menu, and it doesn&#039;t get logged to the history in the full Safari app either. Good luck recalling that article you read a few weeks ago.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://theapplewiki.com/wiki/Eligibility Eligibility]&lt;br /&gt;
*Posts written by an author of this article:&lt;br /&gt;
**[https://adamdemasi.com/2024/04/19/app-marketplace-experience.html The iOS 17.4 app marketplace flow is a disaster]&lt;br /&gt;
**[https://adamdemasi.com/2024/04/20/ios-eligibility.html How I tricked iOS into giving me EU DMA features]&lt;br /&gt;
**[https://adamdemasi.com/2024/04/23/ios-eligibility-features.html Features controlled by iOS 17.4&#039;s eligibility system]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Apple App Store]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TasmanianRex</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://mirror.consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=Amazon_Kindle&amp;diff=11892</id>
		<title>Amazon Kindle</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://mirror.consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=Amazon_Kindle&amp;diff=11892"/>
		<updated>2025-03-16T22:18:50Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TasmanianRex: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{InfoboxProductLine&lt;br /&gt;
| Title = Amazon Kindle&lt;br /&gt;
| Release Year = 2007&lt;br /&gt;
| Product Type = E-reader&lt;br /&gt;
| In Production = Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| Official Website = https://amazon.com/kindle&lt;br /&gt;
| Logo = Amazon kindle logo.png&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Amazon Kindle&#039;&#039;&#039; is a product line of e-readers made by &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Amazon]]&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Controversies==&lt;br /&gt;
While EPUB has been the widely adopted format for digital books,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |title=EPUB 3.3 |url=https://www.w3.org/TR/epub-33/ |url-status=live |access-date=16 Mar 2025 |website=[[w3.org]]}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; the Kindle e-readers do not support this format natively. That means that it is not possible to load these files directly to the e-reader (which is called sideloading), but have to be converted first to one of the proprietary formats the Kindle uses. Books directly purchased through Amazon come with [[DRM]] restrictions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Around 2022 it was announced that there would be an option to read these files,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |last=Schroeder |first=Stan |date=3 May 2022 |title=Amazon&#039;s Kindle will finally support epub files |url=https://mashable.com/article/amazon-kindle-epub |url-status=live |access-date=16 Mar 2022 |website=[[Mashable]]}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; which was not through native support but via their e-mail service or dedicated app for the Kindle. Both send the file to the Kindle Cloud Library, and process the file on Amazon servers to the proprietary format. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As for the sideloading itself, newer firmware versions of Kindle e-readers only work with [[wikipedia:Media_Transfer_Protocol|MTP]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |first=Natan |date=20 Oct 2024 |title=Amazon Removed Download and Transfer Option for New Kindles |url=https://blog.the-ebook-reader.com/2024/10/20/amazon-removed-download-and-transfer-option-for-new-kindles/ |url-status=live |access-date=16 Mar 2025 |website=[[The Ebook Reader]]}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; which led to controversy among power users as it disrupted existing workflow, which is to be expected. Book management software like Calibre&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://calibre-ebook.com/ Calibre]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; addresses this issue, and can do the conversion of file formats locally. The recent firmware updates have caused other issues, like faster battery drain than before and a slower user experience.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |last=Kozlowski |first=Micheal |date=20 Aug 2024 |title=The Amazon Kindle is in a state of decline |url=https://goodereader.com/blog/kindle/the-amazon-kindle-is-in-a-state-of-decline |url-status=live |access-date=16 Mar 2025 |website=[[Good EReader]]}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Anti-repair and anti-ownership practices===&lt;br /&gt;
Kindle devices regularly receive bad scores in repair reviews.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{Cite web |last=Frauenheim |first=Carsten |title=Kindle 11 Repair |url=https://it.ifixit.com/Device/Kindle_11 |url-status=live |access-date=16 Mar 2025 |website=[[iFixit]]}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:1&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{Cite web |last=Rodriguez |first=Kris |title=Kindle Paperwhite 5 (11th Generation) Repair |url=https://it.ifixit.com/Device/Kindle_Paperwhite_11th_Generation |url-status=live |access-date=16 Mar 2025 |website=[[iFixit]]}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The baseline model has a replaceable battery, but provides no official replacement parts or repair instructions, and solders the power button and usb-c port to the motherboard.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:2&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[https://www.ifixit.com/repairability/e-reader-repairability-scores e-reader repairability scores]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The paperwhite model uses excessive amounts of adhesive for the battery and motherboard, which make it harder to replace the battery.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:1&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:2&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; Most of the components of the device, most importantly the e-ink screen, are not available to the general market. Any stock for e-ink displays for these devices can rarely be found, and they usually approach the cost of the device itself, making repair uneconomical.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kindle devices run a Linux distribution, however the bootloader is locked down and hackers have had trouble accessing debug ports on newer hardware. Amazon builds largely on proprietary software and drivers that mean even if the device was unlocked, porting a standard mainline Linux kernel to it is made difficult by inaccessibility of drivers for the integrated screen and touch IC. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Amazon Kindle removes download feature of purchased books]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Amazon Kindle]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TasmanianRex</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://mirror.consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=DCS_sues_small_YouTuber_for_accurate_product_review_showing_battery_issues_%26_misleading_warranty&amp;diff=11704</id>
		<title>DCS sues small YouTuber for accurate product review showing battery issues &amp; misleading warranty</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://mirror.consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=DCS_sues_small_YouTuber_for_accurate_product_review_showing_battery_issues_%26_misleading_warranty&amp;diff=11704"/>
		<updated>2025-03-13T22:25:26Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TasmanianRex: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;A recent defamation lawsuit by Australian battery manufacturer [[Deep Cycle Systems]] (DCS) against AllOffroad 4×4 Adventures TV created debate across online forums &amp;amp; within the independent review community. The case centers on an honest, in‐depth review by the YouTube channel that highlighted concerning battery degradation, misleading warranty practices, &amp;amp; poor performance in government testing. The lawsuit was ultimately dismissed; but the reviewer privated his videos as the case was in progress, which demonstrates how corporate defamation claims can be used as a tool to suppress negative product reviews on YouTube.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Background==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Deep Cycle Systems===&lt;br /&gt;
Founded in Australia and known for its range of lithium batteries, DCS has built its reputation on claims of advanced battery technology and robust performance. The company claims that its products are engineered for longevity and are backed by warranty terms that guarantee quality. However, DCS’s legal action &amp;amp; aggressive responses to negative reviews suggest that the company is willing to use litigation as a tool to protect its image &amp;amp; suppress unfavorable feedback.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.carexpert.com.au/opinion/dcs-batteries-suing-youtuber-for-honest-review-sets-scary-precedent&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===AllOffroad 4×4 Adventures TV===&lt;br /&gt;
Stefan Fischer, the creator behind AllOffroad 4×4 Adventures TV, has long been a trusted voice among off-road enthusiasts. With a modest but dedicated following, Fischer performed several  reviews of DCS batteries after receiving them for testing. His videos documented the performance &amp;amp; issues with capacity fade, as well as discrepancies in the product warranty. Fischer’s review was straightforward and based on extensive, real-world testing—qualities that earned him support from his audience and notable figures in the independent review community.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.reddit.com/r/australia/comments/1eauntj/dcs_sues_small_youtuber_for_accurate_product/?rdt=34116&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===DCS review===&lt;br /&gt;
Fischer’s videos, which form the crux of the lawsuit, detail several key points:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Battery Degradation:&#039;&#039;&#039; Despite an initial satisfactory performance, the batteries exhibited a rate of capacity loss that many felt exceeded what DCS’s warranty would promise. Independent tests showed that, in some cases, the batteries were underperforming in critical applications such as off-road and camping scenarios.&lt;br /&gt;
*[[File:DCS warranty policy archive march 2023.png|alt=Screenshot of DCS warranty policy website from March 2023, which says battery will be replaced within warranty period if it falls below 80% capacity in warranty period.|thumb|Screenshot of DCS warranty policy website from March 2023, which says battery will be replaced within warranty period if it falls below 80% capacity in warranty period.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |title= |url=https://webarchive.nla.gov.au/awa/20231107111343/https://www.deepcyclesystems.com.au/shipping-return-policy/}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]][[File:DCS warranty policy archive november 2023.png|alt=Screenshot of DCS warranty policy website from November 2023, which says battery will be replaced within warranty period if it falls below 70% capacity in warranty period if it is used a certain way. This text was NOT included in prior warranty policies. However, the page still says &amp;quot;Policy last updated 14th JUNE 2021.&amp;quot; , which misleads customers into believing their warranty at the point of sale claimed 70% was considered defective even if it was 80% at the time of the customer&#039;s purchase.|thumb|Screenshot of DCS warranty policy website from November 2023, which says battery will be replaced within warranty period if it falls below 70% capacity in warranty period if it is used a certain way. This text was NOT included in prior warranty policies. However, the page still says &amp;quot;Policy last updated 14th JUNE 2021.&amp;quot; , which misleads customers into believing their warranty at the point of sale claimed 70% was considered defective even if it was 80% at the time of the customer&#039;s purchase.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |title= |url=https://webarchive.nla.gov.au/awa/20231107111343/https://www.deepcyclesystems.com.au/shipping-return-policy/}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&#039;&#039;&#039;Misleading Warranty Terms:&#039;&#039;&#039; Fischer pointed out discrepancies between the warranty claims posted on DCS’s website and the apparent changes in policy. While the company falsely stated that their policy had not changed since 14 June 2021, archived versions of their website from March 2023 and November 2023 reveal otherwise.&lt;br /&gt;
  - The March 2023 policy states: &amp;quot;The battery will be determined to be defective if it fails to deliver less than 80% of its rated capacity during the warranty period.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://webarchive.nla.gov.au/awa/20230309064156/https://www.deepcyclesystems.com.au/shipping-return-policy/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  - The November 2023 policy had changed: &amp;quot;The battery will be determined to be defective if it fails to deliver less than 80% of its rated capacity during the warranty period for normal installations. The battery will be determined to be defective if it fails to deliver less than 70% of its rated capacity during the warranty period when installed inside engine bays or engine compartments.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://webarchive.nla.gov.au/awa/20231107111343/https://www.deepcyclesystems.com.au/shipping-return-policy/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  - This change effectively weakened consumer protections while falsely maintaining that the warranty terms had remained unchanged.&lt;br /&gt;
*[[File:Horrible dcs battery.png|alt=DCS battery capacity vs. other brands: DCS ranks worst by large margin, reiterating Stefan&#039;s skepticism about the quality of the products DCS provides with regards to longevity &amp;amp; capacity. |thumb|DCS battery capacity vs. other brands: DCS ranks worst by large margin, reiterating Stefan&#039;s skepticism about the quality of the products DCS provides with regards to longevity &amp;amp; capacity.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |title= |url=https://arena.gov.au/assets/2018/05/lithium-ion-battery-testing-public-report-12.pdf}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&#039;&#039;&#039;Australian Government Testing:&#039;&#039;&#039; Independent government testing conducted by Australia’s Renewable Energy Agency (ARENA) found that DCS’s battery performed worse than every other battery tested by a large margin.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://arena.gov.au/assets/2018/05/lithium-ion-battery-testing-public-report-12.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The Phase 3 Capacity Test Results (Section 6.3, page 28) revealed that this battery performed worse than every battery in the test, validating Fischer’s concerns about the battery’s real-world reliability.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Overall Product Suitability:&#039;&#039;&#039; Beyond the numbers, Fischer’s honest account questioned whether the batteries were truly fit for the demanding conditions they were marketed for—raising concerns that if these issues went unchallenged, consumers might face unexpected failures &amp;amp; financial loss.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Lawsuit==&lt;br /&gt;
In May of 2024, DCS filed a defamation lawsuit in the District Court of Queensland. The lawsuit alleged that Fischer’s reviews were not only defamatory but also malicious, claiming that the negative publicity had cost the company significant losses. DCS sought compensatory damages, interest, and legal costs, although the precise sum remained undisclosed.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.carexpert.com.au/opinion/dcs-batteries-suing-youtuber-for-honest-review-sets-scary-precedent&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Possible implications===&lt;br /&gt;
The legal threat was concerning to YouTube content creators &amp;amp; reviewers. Many feared that if a company could successfully sue a small, independent reviewer for presenting genuine, factual criticism, it would have a chilling effect on honest product reviews. Industry observers and fellow creators—including prominent right-to-repair advocate Louis Rossmann—criticized DCS’s approach. Rossmann’s own commentary on the issue drew sharp responses, with him labeling DCS’s tactics as &amp;quot;scumbags&amp;quot; and emphasizing that &amp;quot;it’s not defamation if it’s true.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Outcome=== &lt;br /&gt;
On March 11, 2025, the District Court of Queensland dismissed DCS&#039;s defamation claim against Stefan Fischer.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |title= |url=https://wiki.rossmanngroup.com/wiki/File:Deep_Cycle_Systems_Pty_Ltd_v_Fischer_-2025-_QDC_25.pdf}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The court ruled that DCS is not an &amp;quot;excluded corporation&amp;quot; under Queensland law, meaning they lack standing to sue for defamation.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |last=Fischer |first=Stefan |date=11 Mar 2025 |title=Help Fight for Truth in YouTube Reviews Fundraiser Update 7 |url=https://www.gofundme.com/f/help-fight-for-truth-in-youtube-reviews |url-status=live |access-date=13 Mar 2025 |website=gofundme}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The court found that:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- DCS had more than 10 employees and was an associated entity of another corporation, making them ineligible to bring a defamation lawsuit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- DCS&#039;s sole director, Marek Tomolowicz, was found to have made multiple misleading statements regarding company operations and finances.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- There was financial intermingling between DCS and another company, Energy Tech Electronics. The court determined that both companies operated under the same financial structure, sharing a business credit card, assets, and cross-company loans.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Tomolowicz admitted to using fake employee names in email communications, including an AI-generated employee named &amp;quot;Michelle&amp;quot; to correspond with customers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- The court deemed Tomolowicz’s testimony unreliable, citing instances where he was caught making false statements under oath, including prior claims that DCS had a factory stake in China.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Payroll records, financial documents, and employee arrangements suggested that DCS had more than five full-time employees, with additional staff likely being compensated through research and development (R&amp;amp;D) expenditures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- The court also noted loans and shared financial resources between DCS and Energy Tech, further solidifying their classification as associated entities under corporate law.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a result of the lawsuit being dismissed, Fischer must now file separate court proceedings to recover legal costs. Both parties have been ordered to submit written submissions on the matter, with deadlines set between March and April 2025.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |title= |url=https://wiki.rossmanngroup.com/wiki/File:Deep_Cycle_Systems_Pty_Ltd_v_Fischer_-2025-_QDC_25.pdf}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Community and Industry Response==&lt;br /&gt;
The backlash against DCS was swift and widespread. Across Reddit threads, forums, and social media platforms, supporters of independent reviewers rallied behind Fischer. Many contributed to fundraising campaigns aimed at offsetting the legal costs he faced, and several influential voices argued that such lawsuits could ultimately silence free and honest feedback, replacing it with sanitized, sponsor-approved content.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Critics argued that this legal action was less about protecting the company’s reputation and more about stifling consumer information. They warned that if manufacturers were allowed to target independent reviewers with expensive litigation, the entire ecosystem of user-generated product insights could be compromised—leaving consumers with fewer reliable options when making purchase decisions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Effect on Independent Reviewers==&lt;br /&gt;
This case serves as a reminder of the vulnerability small content creators find themselves in when reviewing products with scarce resources. With most independent reviewers operating on tight budgets and limited legal resources, the mere threat of litigation can force them into self-censorship or compel them to settle out of court—even when their findings are substantiated by facts and supported by the community.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When faced with unfavorable reviews, some companies may choose to resort to legal intimidation rather than addressing the underlying product issues. Such actions not only undermine consumer trust but also weaken the overall integrity of product reviews.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Lawsuits]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Deep Cycle Systems]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TasmanianRex</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://mirror.consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=Dyson_battery_lifespan_reduced_by_design_and_difficult_to_repair&amp;diff=11643</id>
		<title>Dyson battery lifespan reduced by design and difficult to repair</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://mirror.consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=Dyson_battery_lifespan_reduced_by_design_and_difficult_to_repair&amp;diff=11643"/>
		<updated>2025-03-13T12:27:30Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TasmanianRex: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Incident==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Dyson]] battery packs include a Battery Management System (BMS) equipped with a chip capable of balancing the individual cells. However, the manufacturer has chosen to omit a few inexpensive but essential resistors, preventing the balancing function from working as intended. As a result, the battery pack degrades much faster than it should.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://hackaday.com/2022/05/23/fighting-back-against-dodgy-dyson-batteries/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battery_management_system#Balancing&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even if a user attempts to charge and balance the individual cells using a third-party charger, or replaces the cells entirely, the BMS will still prevent the battery from charging. This is because the BMS firmware writes two bytes into the microcontroller&#039;s configuration memory, effectively rendering the battery pack unusable.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:2&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;!-- Lacking reference that confirms this information. --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Impact on consumers==&lt;br /&gt;
This issue significantly reduces the lifespan of Dyson battery packs, causing them to wear out much faster than they otherwise would. As a result, customers are forced to replace their battery packs more frequently.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Affected product lines==&lt;br /&gt;
*V6 and V7 models.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://github.com/tinfever/FU-Dyson-BMS?tab=readme-ov-file#compatible-vacuumsbatteries&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.eevblog.com/forum/reviews/dyson-v7-trigger-cordless-vacuum-teardown-of-battery-pack/ &amp;quot;Dyson v7 Trigger cordless vacuum - TEARDOWN of battery pack&amp;quot;] - eevblog.com - 22 Jan 2020&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*V10 and V11 models.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://github.com/davidmpye/V10_Dyson_BMS&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Potentially, all product lines newer than V6 are affected by this issue, although more information is required to confirm this.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Workarounds==&lt;br /&gt;
Open-source firmware has been developed to un-brick the battery pack by overwriting the board firmware on some models using a 3.3V Arduino board.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:2&amp;quot;&amp;gt;https://github.com/tinfever/FU-Dyson-BMS&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://github.com/davidmpye/V10_Dyson_BMS&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://github.com/kumdzio/PIC16LF1847arduino-programmer&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Warranty==&lt;br /&gt;
All &amp;quot;cordless vacuums&amp;quot; are covered by a 2-year warranty, which explicitly does not cover &amp;quot;normal wear and tear&amp;quot; on batteries.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://web.archive.org/web/*/https://www.dyson.com/inside-dyson/terms/the-dyson-warranty* &amp;quot;The Dyson warranty&amp;quot;] - dyson.com&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; New replacement batteries come with a 1-year warranty.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[https://web.archive.org/web/20250118201437/https://www.dyson.com/support/journey/tools/969352-03 &amp;quot;Replacement battery for your Dyson Cyclone V10 cordless vacuum&amp;quot;] - dyson.com - 18 Jan 2025&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dyson also advertises their &amp;quot;batteries undergo over 2,000 hours of rigorous testing, to strike the delicate balance between energy density, power density and lifespan.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:1&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[https://web.archive.org/web/20250118201707/https://www.dyson.com/support/vacuum-cleaners/cordless/battery-care &amp;quot;Vacuum battery care&amp;quot;] - dyson.com - 18 Jan 2025&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This may have the implication they are rated for 2,000 hours of runtime, which, if used for 1 hour per day, is 5.48 years of use.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Replacement batteries====&lt;br /&gt;
Batteries generally are around $95 - $130 USD and can be a significant percentage of a new or refurbished unit. For example, a replacement battery for a Dyson Cyclone V10 cordless vacuum is $129.99.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; A Dyson-refurbished unit can be purchased at $219.99&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://web.archive.org/web/20250118201541/https://www.dyson.com/outlet/refurbished-vacuum-cleaners/cordless/v10-animal-plus-purple-iron &amp;quot;Refurbished Dyson V10 Animal+ (Purple) vacuum] - dyson.com - 18 Jan 2025&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and a new unit at $499.99.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://web.archive.org/web/20250118201336/https://www.amazon.com/Dyson-Cyclone-Animal-Cordless-Cleaner/dp/B0BTDXZBFL &amp;quot;Dyson Cyclone V10 Animal Cordless Vacuum Cleaner&amp;quot;] (New) - amazon.com - 4 Dec 2024&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; A replacement battery&#039;s price ranges from 26.0% to 46.4% the price of an entirely functional unit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Third-party batteries====&lt;br /&gt;
Dyson states that &amp;quot;Only by using a genuine Dyson battery are you ensuring that your machine continues to work as intended, and that your warranty remains intact.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:1&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; and &amp;quot;Dyson does not warrant the use of any third-party batteries or parts and assumes no liability for any such use of third-party parts or the injuries or damages caused by their use.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://web.archive.org/web/20250118202722/https://www.dyson.com/vacuum-cleaners/replacement-battery &amp;quot;Genuine Dyson replacement batteries for your cordless vacuum&amp;quot;] - dyson.com - 18 Jan 2025&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Dyson]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Incidents]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Right to repair]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TasmanianRex</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://mirror.consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=Disney&amp;diff=11642</id>
		<title>Disney</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://mirror.consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=Disney&amp;diff=11642"/>
		<updated>2025-03-13T12:26:22Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TasmanianRex: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{StubNotice}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{InfoboxCompany&lt;br /&gt;
| Name = Disney&lt;br /&gt;
| Type = Public&lt;br /&gt;
| Founded = 1923&lt;br /&gt;
| Industry = Media&lt;br /&gt;
| Official Website = https://disney.com/&lt;br /&gt;
| Logo = Disney.png&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Wikipedia:Disney|The Walt Disney Company]]&#039;&#039;&#039;, founded in 1923 by Walt Disney and Roy O. Disney, is one of the most recognizable entertainment companies globally. Known for its movies, theme parks, and television networks, Disney has become a dominant player in the entertainment industry. In 2019, Disney launched the [[Disney+]] streaming service, which makes most of their content library available to viewers as a monthly subscription.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Incidents== &amp;lt;!-- Potential place to find other consumer rights failures of Disney https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_the_Walt_Disney_Company --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
This is a list of all consumer protection incidents this company is involved in. Any incidents not mentioned here can be found in the [[:Category:Disney|Disney]] category. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Disney+ Ad Policy Change]] (2025):  In January 2025, Disney+ updated its Subscriber Agreement to include provisions allowing advertisements in content across all subscription tiers, including those marketed as &amp;quot;no ads&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;ad free.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Disney Wrongful Death Lawsuit| Forced arbitration of a wrongful death lawsuit]] (2023): In October 2023, Kanokporn Tangsuan, after dining at the Raglan Road Irish Pub in Disney Springs, died as a result of an allergic reaction.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.foxandfarleylaw.com/woman-dies-from-eating-at-disney-amusement-park-pub-despite-amusement-park-wait-staff-assurances-of-allergen-free-food-disney-attempts-to-bar-wrongful-death-lawsuit-due-to-disney-s/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; When her husband, Jeffrey Piccolo, sued Walt Disney Parks &amp;amp; Resorts (WDPR) and Great Irish Pubs Florida, Inc, Disney attempted to  have the case dismissed and sent to arbitration citing terms from a trial subscription to Disney+.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://apnews.com/article/disney-allergy-death-lawsuit-nyu-doctor-florida-8a6256b58311a01226d167fa80d37aad&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The public outcry following this attempt prompted Disney to rescind their request for dismissal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.latimes.com/entertainment-arts/business/story/2024-08-20/disney-reverses-course-on-wrongful-death-lawsuit-agrees-let-case-proceed-court&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The case is still ongoing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Disney]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TasmanianRex</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://mirror.consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=IFTTT&amp;diff=11641</id>
		<title>IFTTT</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://mirror.consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=IFTTT&amp;diff=11641"/>
		<updated>2025-03-13T12:24:59Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TasmanianRex: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{InfoboxCompany&lt;br /&gt;
| Name = IFTTT&lt;br /&gt;
| Type = Private&lt;br /&gt;
| Founded = 2010&lt;br /&gt;
| Industry = Web automation&lt;br /&gt;
| Official Website = ifttt.com&lt;br /&gt;
| Logo = IFTTT logo.svg&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[wikipedia:IFTTT|&#039;&#039;&#039;IFTTT&#039;&#039;&#039;]] is a simple automation tool and company founded by Linden Tibbets, Jesse Tane, and Alexander Tibbets in December 2010. &lt;br /&gt;
==Consumer impact summary==&lt;br /&gt;
Initially revenue for IFTTT came platform partnes who wanted their products included to the service.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://uk.finance.yahoo.com/news/ifttt-opens-partner-platform-introduces-160000560.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; however in 2020 the company transitioned to a subscription model limiting the custom applets of non-paying users.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.gearbrain.com/ifttt-pro-subscription-service-explained-2647566439.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; As time went on non-paying users progressively lost features, paying users having to spend more on premium, and valuable features for both types of consumers being gutted.{{citation needed}}&lt;br /&gt;
==Incidents==&lt;br /&gt;
===Discontinued Legacy plan===&lt;br /&gt;
{{Hatnote|Full article:[[IFTTT discontinued Legacy plan]]}}&lt;br /&gt;
In 2023, IFTTT announced changes to its subscription model. Legacy Pro plans were phased out, and users were migrated to a new &amp;quot;Pro+&amp;quot; plan. This change meant higher subscription costs, even for those who had subscribed under the &#039;&#039;&amp;quot;lifetime&amp;quot;&#039;&#039; pricing guarantee.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{Reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:IFTTT]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TasmanianRex</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://mirror.consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=Broadband_choice_reduction_by_Brendan_Carr%27s_FCC&amp;diff=11640</id>
		<title>Broadband choice reduction by Brendan Carr&#039;s FCC</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://mirror.consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=Broadband_choice_reduction_by_Brendan_Carr%27s_FCC&amp;diff=11640"/>
		<updated>2025-03-13T12:24:26Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TasmanianRex: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;=2025 FCC Bulk Billing Decision Impact on Tenant Choice=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In January 2025, the [[Federal Communications Commission]] (FCC) made a sweeping decision affecting consumer choice in broadband internet for residents of multi-tenant buildings. This decision reversed course on a previous proposal that would have given tenants more control over their internet service provider options.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Background==&lt;br /&gt;
In March 2024, then-FCC Chairwoman Jessica Rosenworcel announced a proposal aimed at increasing tenant&#039;s choice at choosing their ISP for internet access in multi-tenant buildings.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;doc-4009&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[:File:DOC-400915A1.pdf|FCC Press Release, &amp;quot;FCC CHAIRWOMAN ANNOUNCES PUSH TO LOWER BROADBAND COSTS &amp;amp; INCREASE CHOICE FOR FAMILIES LIVING IN APARTMENT BUILDINGS&amp;quot;]] &#039;&#039;FCC&#039;&#039;. March 5, 2024&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The proposal followed the Commission&#039;s 2022 rules that had already:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Prohibited broadband providers from entering into certain revenue sharing agreements with building owners&lt;br /&gt;
*Required providers to clearly inform tenants about exclusive marketing arrangements&lt;br /&gt;
*Clarified that FCC rules prohibit &amp;quot;sale-and-leaseback&amp;quot; arrangements that block competitive access&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The March 2024 proposal would have specifically targeted &amp;quot;bulk billing&amp;quot; arrangements - agreements where tenants are required to pay for a specific provider&#039;s internet service as part of their rent or utilities, even if they don&#039;t want that service. The proposed rules would have:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Allowed tenants to opt out of bulk billing arrangements&lt;br /&gt;
*Made it more economically viable for competing providers to serve buildings where tenants were previously required to pay for a specific provider&#039;s service&lt;br /&gt;
*Maintained existing prohibitions on revenue sharing and exclusive access agreements&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rosenworcel argued this change was necessary because &amp;quot;it is not right when your building or apartment complex chooses that service for you, saddling you with unwanted costs, and preventing you from signing up for the plan and provider you really want.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;doc-4009&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Timeline of changes==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Pre-2022 Status Quo===&lt;br /&gt;
Prior to 2022:&lt;br /&gt;
*Building owners couldn&#039;t enter into &amp;quot;exclusive access&amp;quot; agreements (e.g., preventing Verizon from wiring a building that TimeWarner serviced)&lt;br /&gt;
*Building owners could implement &amp;quot;bulk billing&amp;quot; arrangements (requiring all tenants to pay for a specific provider&#039;s service as part of rent)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===2022 FCC Rule Changes===&lt;br /&gt;
In 2022, the FCC modified its rules regarding multi-tenant environments:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2025/01/fcc-chair-nixes-plan-to-boost-broadband-competition-in-apartment-buildings/ &amp;quot;FCC chair helps ISPs and landlords make deals that renters can&#039;t escape&amp;quot;] &#039;&#039;Ars Technica&#039;&#039;, January 27, 2025. Retrieved 2 February, 2025.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*The ban on exclusive access agreements remained&lt;br /&gt;
*Bulk billing arrangements remained permissible&lt;br /&gt;
*The FCC added new rules regarding revenue sharing agreements between landlords and ISPs(this is the process by which the ISP can share revenue from tenants with the landlord after they enter into a &amp;quot;bulk billing&amp;quot; agreement)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===March 2024 Proposed Changes===&lt;br /&gt;
Then-Chairwoman Rosenworcel&#039;s proposal would have:&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;doc-4009&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Maintained the ban on exclusive access agreements&lt;br /&gt;
*Required bulk billing arrangements to include tenant opt-out provisions&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===January 2025 Final Outcome===&lt;br /&gt;
Chairman Carr&#039;s decision specifically addressed the bulk billing proposal:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[:File:DOC-409130A1.pdf|FCC Press Release, &amp;quot;Chairman Carr Stops Costly Regulatory Overreach&amp;quot;]] &#039;&#039;FCC&#039;&#039;, January 27, 2025&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Building owners still cannot enter exclusive access agreements&lt;br /&gt;
*Building owners can continue mandatory bulk billing without opt-out provisions&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Practical Example===&lt;br /&gt;
Here&#039;s how these rules work in practice in an apartment complex in 2025:&lt;br /&gt;
*The landlord can&#039;t prevent Verizon from installing service even if they prefer TimeWarner (exclusive access prohibition)&lt;br /&gt;
*The landlord can require all tenants to pay $50 monthly for TimeWarner service as part of their rent, even if tenants don&#039;t want it (bulk billing permitted)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Chairman Carr&#039;s 2025 announcement specifically addressed bulk billing arrangements without clarifying the status of the 2022 revenue sharing rules.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bulk billing provision is said to negatively affect consumer choice, as it can force tenants into paying for service from a provider they may not want. While multiple providers may have physical access to a building, the economic reality of mandatory bulk billing greatly diminishes the economic viability of another ISP wiring the building. &lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Incidents]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Internet service providers]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Consumer Choice]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:FCC Regulations]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:2025 Consumer Protection Changes]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TasmanianRex</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://mirror.consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=Proton_Mail&amp;diff=11639</id>
		<title>Proton Mail</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://mirror.consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=Proton_Mail&amp;diff=11639"/>
		<updated>2025-03-13T12:22:45Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TasmanianRex: /* False advertising and work with authorities */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Irrelevant}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
ProtonMail is a privacy focused email client based in Switzerland which has partnered with non Swiss content delivery networks like Radware. ProtonMail offers cloud email, calendar, VPN, and cloud storage services. ProtonMail has a marketing focus on privacy over competitors like Google or Microsoft.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== False advertising and work with authorities ==&lt;br /&gt;
Protonmail has advertised itself as a private and secure service, as by their own words &amp;quot;No personal information is required to create your secure email account. By default, we do not keep any IP logs which can be linked to your anonymous email account. Your privacy comes first.&amp;quot;, which was part of the advertising on their official website&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://web.archive.org/web/20210831234120/https://protonmail.com/&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; (www.protonmail.com, now www.proton.me). As it turned out, that statement was false. In 2021, a member of a French activist group had been using Protonmail to communicate with the group, and as an investigation was launched involving them, the email provider has quickly handed over the user&#039;s IP address and other data like the device they were using.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://techcrunch.com/2021/09/06/protonmail-logged-ip-address-of-french-activist-after-order-by-swiss-authorities/&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; After the news reached the public and sparked a controversy, claims about the lack of IP logging were swiftly removed from the website. The company tried to excuse their behavior by stating, that they do not have to comply with authorities such as EUROPOL, and although this may be true, in cases of investigations the bigger organizations from outside simply use the Swiss government as a middleman to get any request through that they wish. Protonmail is not anonymous and any information will be handed over when requested by the Swiss government, which does also cooperate with other investigative authorities, leading to essentially no protection in case of any such event.   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Endorsement of Donald Trump by CEO Andy Yen on Twitter. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://archive.ph/txuJ2 Tweet archive]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.reddit.com/r/ProtonMail/comments/1i2nz9v/on_politics_and_proton_a_message_from_andy/ Proton official response on the Proton subreddit]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Proton announces partnership with Zoom, a non private messaging platform.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://proton.me/support/calendar-zoom How to add Zoom meetings to event invitations]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TasmanianRex</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://mirror.consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=Brother_printers_causing_issues_with_third_party_inks&amp;diff=11631</id>
		<title>Brother printers causing issues with third party inks</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://mirror.consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=Brother_printers_causing_issues_with_third_party_inks&amp;diff=11631"/>
		<updated>2025-03-13T05:17:07Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TasmanianRex: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Brother Industries, Ltd.|Brother]] used to be known for allowing third-party toner use &amp;amp; being less consumer hostile than companies such as [[HP]]. In recent years, they&#039;ve implemented &#039;&#039;&#039;firmware updates that deliberately degrade print quality when using non-OEM toner&#039;&#039;&#039;. These updates disable color registration &amp;amp; other features which coerces consumers into buying expensive genuine Brother toner.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Exploitative practices==&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Post-Sale Function Removal&#039;&#039;&#039; – Firmware updates retroactively remove previously available features, such as automatic color registration, for users using non-OEM toner.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;reddit&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[https://www.reddit.com/r/printers/comments/s9b2eg Brother MFC firmware update - non-genuine toner now disables critical features.]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;reddit-2&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[https://www.reddit.com/r/printers/comments/w60687/brother_mfcl3370cdw_firmware_downgrade_needed/ Brother MFC-L3370CDW Firmware Downgrade needed]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Vendor lock-in via DRM&#039;&#039;&#039; – Printers continue to function with third-party toner but print at degraded quality unless OEM toner is installed.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Anti-consumer software practices&#039;&#039;&#039; – Firmware updates cannot be easily rolled back, preventing consumers from restoring lost functionality.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;github-fwupd&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[https://github.com/sedrubal/brother_printer_fwupd/issues/9 Brother printer firmware downgrade discussion.]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Deceptive practices&#039;&#039;&#039; – Printers do not outright reject third-party toner but instead &#039;&#039;&#039;engineer a failure&#039;&#039;&#039;, misleading users into thinking their toner is defective.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hackernews&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31860131 Tell HN: Brother printers now locking out non-OEM paraphernalia.]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;reddit-2&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==How it works==&lt;br /&gt;
1. Consumers purchase a &#039;&#039;&#039;Brother laser printer&#039;&#039;&#039; that previously accepted third-party toner.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. A &#039;&#039;&#039;firmware update (e.g., W1.56)&#039;&#039;&#039; is pushed, which does not notify users of any major functional changes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. After updating, users notice that:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Color registration &#039;&#039;&#039;fails automatically&#039;&#039;&#039;, misaligning prints.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;cups&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/CUPS/Printer-specific_problems#Updating_the_firmware ArchWiki - Printer-specific problems with Brother.]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Brother support &#039;&#039;&#039;admits&#039;&#039;&#039; that installing OEM toner will resolve the issue instantly.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hackernews&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Older firmware versions are removed from Brother’s servers&#039;&#039;&#039;, preventing downgrades.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;github-ohbrother&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[https://github.com/CauldronDevelopmentLLC/oh-brother/issues/30 Discussion on firmware rollback for Brother printers.]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Real-world impact==&lt;br /&gt;
*Customers who used to save money buying third-party toner are now &#039;&#039;&#039;forced into expensive OEM purchases&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
*Brother’s &#039;&#039;&#039;positive reputation&#039;&#039;&#039; for allowing third-party toner is tarnished.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;No prior warning&#039;&#039;&#039; was given to consumers before these updates were installed.&lt;br /&gt;
*Workarounds involve &#039;&#039;&#039;blocking firmware updates&#039;&#039;&#039; or attempting &#039;&#039;&#039;risky firmware downgrades&#039;&#039;&#039;, both of which Brother actively discourages.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Brother&#039;s response==&lt;br /&gt;
On March 5th 2025, following the publication of a video on the Louis Rossmann youtube channel, Brother addressed the issue, in a response given to Ars Technica, stating the following &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ars-response&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2025/03/brother-denies-using-firmware-updates-to-brick-printers-with-third-party-ink/ Brother denies using firmware updates to brick printers with third-party ink]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
We are aware of the recent false claims suggesting that a Brother firmware update may have restricted the use of third-party ink cartridges. Please be assured that Brother firmware updates do not block the use of third-party ink in our machines.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
They also detailed that&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Brother printers do not intentionally degrade print quality based on whether a Brother Genuine or non-genuine ink/ toner cartridge is used. Brother cannot verify the quality of printing that will result when using a third-party compatible with a Brother printer.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Finally they attributed the confusion from consumers to&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Brother encourages the use of Brother Genuine ink and toner for optimal performance and reliability, and it is standard practice that we perform a Brother [G]enuine check when troubleshooting a Brother printer. Compatible supplies may range in quality, and in order to verify that a printer is working properly, we like to troubleshoot with Brother Genuine supplies. We believe this check in the process may have led to a misunderstanding[,] but as we confirmed, the firmware update would not be responsible for the degradation of quality or removal of printer features.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==User evidence &amp;amp; reports==&lt;br /&gt;
===Hacker News Discussion (2022)===&lt;br /&gt;
*Users noticed that &#039;&#039;&#039;Brother printers accepted third-party toner but deliberately degraded print quality&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
*One user stated:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;Brother seems to be apparently accepting the ink, but then purposefully making the print quality poorer.&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hackernews&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Reddit reports (r/printers)===&lt;br /&gt;
*A &#039;&#039;&#039;firmware update on the Brother MFC-3750&#039;&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;&#039;disabled automatic color registration&#039;&#039;&#039; when third-party toner was detected.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;reddit&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*A Brother support agent confirmed that installing OEM toner would &amp;quot;fix&amp;quot; the issue instantly, proving that the printer was being artificially restricted.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===GitHub developer investigation===&lt;br /&gt;
*A project analyzing &#039;&#039;&#039;Brother firmware updates&#039;&#039;&#039; discovered that &#039;&#039;&#039;older firmware versions were removed from Brother’s servers&#039;&#039;&#039;, making it impossible for users to roll back to a working version.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;github-fwupd&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Another github discussion showed that &#039;&#039;&#039;Brother firmware updates increasingly lock out more non-Brother toner cartridges with each new update!&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;github-ohbrother&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*This is similar to [[HP Dynamic Security]] which block non-OEM cartridges.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Comparison to other industry abuses==&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!Company!!Tactic Used&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;HP&#039;&#039;&#039;||&amp;quot;Dynamic Security&amp;quot; firmware updates blocking non-OEM ink&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Epson&#039;&#039;&#039;||Ink expiration DRM, even when cartridges are full&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Canon&#039;&#039;&#039;||Firmware updates that disable scanning when ink is low&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Brother&#039;&#039;&#039;||Print degradation for non-OEM toner users&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Potential legal implications==&lt;br /&gt;
Deliberate function removal &#039;&#039;&#039;after purchase&#039;&#039;&#039; may qualify as &#039;&#039;&#039;deceptive trade practices&#039;&#039;&#039; in multiple jurisdictions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Mitigations available to users==&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Avoid Firmware Updates&#039;&#039;&#039; – Disable auto-updates to prevent forced function removal. This may, however, lead to security risks.&lt;br /&gt;
#&#039;&#039;&#039;Try to downgrade&#039;&#039;&#039; – Some users have managed to roll back firmware, though this is increasingly difficult.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;github-ohbrother&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Cargo data==&lt;br /&gt;
{{Hatnote|Testing extension to add metadata to pages}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{IncidentCargo|Companies=Brother Industries Ltd.|Categories=Digital restrictions,Firmware lockout|DateOfIncident=2025}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Brother]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Digital Restrictions]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Vendor Lock-in]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Post-Sale Firmware Lockouts]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TasmanianRex</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://mirror.consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=Qantas_sale_of_tickets_for_cancelled_services_(ghost_flights)&amp;diff=11616</id>
		<title>Qantas sale of tickets for cancelled services (ghost flights)</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://mirror.consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=Qantas_sale_of_tickets_for_cancelled_services_(ghost_flights)&amp;diff=11616"/>
		<updated>2025-03-12T08:57:05Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TasmanianRex: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;In August 2023 it was alleged that [[Qantas]] was selling tickets on its website for flights it knew were cancelled. The allegations suggested that 884,000 customers had been sold tickets for cancelled services and were not swiftly notified. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Background==&lt;br /&gt;
Post the COVID pandemic, as Australian airlines recovered (2020 to 2023), the Australian Government directed the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) to monitor the aviaiton market. In this period the ACCC received more complaints about Qantas than any other company, half of all complaints about Qantas related to flight cancellations. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Incident==&lt;br /&gt;
Many customers during this period identified a flights being cancelled for times that they had allocated, often affecting the same customer/trip multiple times. At the time Qantas were citing concerns with staffing levels being unable to keep up with unexpected demand, and directed customers to time limited flight credits, or moved customers to alternative flights. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During this period Qantas had long hold times to talk to representatives in relation to these flights with customers commonly waiting many hours to talk to an agent. This further compounded issues when in some instances customers were being notified of the cancellation at very short notice.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite news |last=Gebicki |first=Michael |date=25 March 2022 |title=Qantas phone call hold times: Customers spend hours waiting |url=https://www.smh.com.au/traveller/travel-news/qantas-phone-call-hold-times-customers-spend-hours-waiting-20220329-h22rf0.html}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |last=Soper |first=Natassia |date=2022 |title=Frustrated Qantas customers wait up to 20 hours on hold |url=https://9now.nine.com.au/a-current-affair/coronavirus-frustrated-qantas-customers-long-phone-wait-times/192d5459-7d12-4ada-a7f3-d3f797ff3720}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The public opinion soured further due to the large number of Australian staff layoffs that Qantas undertook during the COVID pandemic, which a Federal Court decision later determined to be illegal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite news |last=Olaya |first=Kayla |last2=Ireland |first2=Olivia |date=21 October 2024 |title=Qantas faces hefty payout to 1700 sacked workers |url=https://www.smh.com.au/business/companies/qantas-faces-hefty-payout-to-1700-sacked-workers-20241018-p5kjfx.html}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This was further exacerbated by Qantas being the largest JobKeeper recipient of all Australian businesses. (JobKeeper was an Australian Government scheme to support businesses during the COVID pandemic and support them retaining their employees.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Qantas&#039;s response===&lt;br /&gt;
Qantas published a media release stating concerns with resuming services post COVID as a challenge. It claimed that it was impacted with staffing issues and supply chain issues colliding with significant demand for services. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Qantas claimed that the ACCC ignored the key conditions on the sale of a ticket, where whilst an airline endeavours to met the timetable, no airline can guarantee flying on time. Qantas cited weather and operational issues mean cancellations are inevitable and unavoidable. As such they would always endeavour to get a customer to their destination as close as possible to the flight time they booked.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Qantas cliamed that:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;100 per cent&#039;&#039;&#039; of delayed/cancelled domestic passengers were offered same-day flights &#039;&#039;&#039;prior to&#039;&#039;&#039; or &#039;&#039;&#039;within one hour&#039;&#039;&#039; of their booked time.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;98 per cent&#039;&#039;&#039; of impacted international passengers were offered flights &#039;&#039;&#039;within a day&#039;&#039;&#039; of their booked flight.&lt;br /&gt;
*In most cases, customers were rebooked on these alternative flights weeks or months ahead of when they were actually due to travel, allowing them to adjust their plans.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |title=QANTAS UPDATE ON ACCC CLAIMS |url=https://www.qantasnewsroom.com.au/media-releases/qantas-update-on-accc-claims/ |url-status=live}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Qantas denied that communications were delayed it achieve a benefit or commercial gain. (for example to protect slot space at crowded airports)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Lawsuit==&lt;br /&gt;
The ACCC launched court action against Qantas in August 2023 in the Federal Court.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;ACCC takes court action alleging Qantas advertised flights it had already cancelled - https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-takes-court-action-alleging-qantas-advertised-flights-it-had-already-cancelled&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Claims====&lt;br /&gt;
That Qantas was engaging in false, misleading and deceptive conduct. The specific claims lodged with the Federal Court were that Qantas had:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*engaged in conduct that was misleading or deceptive, or likely to mislead or deceive, in contravention of s 18 of the Australian Consumer Law (ACL);&lt;br /&gt;
*made false or misleading representations as to the quality, performance characteristics, uses or benefits of the flights, in contravention of s 29(1)(b) and 29(1)(g) of the ACL; and&lt;br /&gt;
*engaged in conduct that was liable to mislead the public as to the characteristics or suitability for their purposes of particular flights, in contravention of s 34 of the ACL.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, that by accepting payment for the flights, there were reasonable grounds for believing that Qantas would not be able to supply the flights within its specified time, and that Qantas was, or ought reasonably have been, aware of those grounds, so had engaged in conduct in contravention of s 36(3) of the ACL&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;ACCC  v Qantas Airways - https://www.accc.gov.au/system/files/ACCC%20v%20Qantas%20_%20Concise%20Statement%20-%2031%20August%202023.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ACCC&#039;s claim alleged that between May and July 2022 Qantas was advertising tickets for more than 8,000 flights that it had already cancelled but not removed from sale, for some cases up to 47 days after the flight was cancelled. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It was also alleged that for more than 10,000 in the same period, Qantas didn&#039;t notify existing ticket holders that their flights had been cancelled for an average of 18 days, and in some instances up to 48 days. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This conduct affected up to 70% of cancelled flights for the period. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ACCC provided the court a series of impacted flights it had identified in its investigations. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Outcome====&lt;br /&gt;
After the Federal Court decision Qantas accepted responsibility for the incident and stated that they had updated their process and policies to ensure it doesn&#039;t happen again.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{Cite web |title=QANTAS REACHES AGREEMENT WITH ACCC AND COMMENCES CUSTOMER REMEDIATION PROGRAM |url=https://www.qantasnewsroom.com.au/media-releases/qantas-reaches-agreement-with-accc-and-commences-customer-remediation-program/}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Federal Court Ordered Qantas to pay $100 million in penalties for misleading consumers.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Federal Court orders Qantas to pay $100m in penalties for misleading consumers - https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/federal-court-orders-qantas-to-pay-100m-in-penalties-for-misleading-consumers&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Qantas also gave an undertaking to the ACCC that it would pay $20 Million to consumers who were affected.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Qantas agrees to $20m payments to customers and, subject to court approval, a $100m penalty for misleading consumers - https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/qantas-agrees-to-20m-payments-to-customers-and-subject-to-court-approval-a-100m-penalty-for-misleading-consumers&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Placeholder box|[[mw:Help:VisualEditor/User_guide#Editing_categories|Add a category]] with the same name as the product, service, website, software, product line or company that this article is about.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;quot;Incidents&amp;quot; category is not needed.}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Qantas]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Airlines]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Consumer rights]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TasmanianRex</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://mirror.consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=Subaru_Starlink&amp;diff=11563</id>
		<title>Subaru Starlink</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://mirror.consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=Subaru_Starlink&amp;diff=11563"/>
		<updated>2025-03-11T08:41:15Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TasmanianRex: /* Incident */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{InfoboxProductLine&lt;br /&gt;
| Title = Subaru Starlink&lt;br /&gt;
| Release Year = 2013&lt;br /&gt;
| Product Type = Software&lt;br /&gt;
| In Production = Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| Official Website = https://subaru.com/&lt;br /&gt;
| Logo = Subaru-starlink.png&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Overview==&lt;br /&gt;
Starlink is a connectivity service equipped on most modern Subaru vehicles, enabling extensive data collection from the vehicle and its occupants. The service has faced significant criticism and legal challenges over privacy concerns related to its data-collection and -sharing practices.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;MozillaReview&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Incident==&lt;br /&gt;
The exploit was achieved by intercepting the Starlink app&#039;s network requests which revealed the admin portal login screen. Using the &amp;quot;Reset password&amp;quot; feature of the admin portal which was hidden with javascript the hacker found an employee email off linkedin and successfully managed to login to the admin portal. Although implementing 2FA this too was entirely client-side and the modal window blocking further interaction without verification could also be hidden with javascript. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Inside the admin portal any employee had access to a range of personal information, largely comprised of the personal information listed below. Additionally the employee the hacker had login as had level 2 access allowing them to remotely lock, unlock, honk, issue speeding warnings and more which they demonstrated on their own and a friend&#039;s Subaru car. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The incident was initially ethically disclosed to Subaru on 24-20-11 with a blog post detailing the exploit released on 25-23-01.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |last=Curry |first=Sam |date=23 Jan 2025 |title=Hacking Subaru: Tracking and Controlling Cars via the STARLINK Admin Panel |url=https://samcurry.net/hacking-subaru |access-date=2025-02-19 |website=samcurry.net}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Data collection==&lt;br /&gt;
===Types of data collected===&lt;br /&gt;
Subaru’s privacy policy and STARLINK terms of service specify that the following data may be collected:&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;SubaruPrivacy&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{Cite web |date= |title=Subaru Privacy Policy |url=https://www.subaru.com/support/privacy-policies.html |access-date=2025-01-16 |website=subaru.com}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Personal information&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**Names, addresses, and contact details.&lt;br /&gt;
**Phone numbers and email addresses.&lt;br /&gt;
**Social-security numbers (in specific cases).&lt;br /&gt;
**Driver&#039;s license numbers.&lt;br /&gt;
**Vehicle identification numbers (VIN).&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Vehicle data&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**Location and GPS coordinates.&lt;br /&gt;
**Speed, acceleration, and braking patterns.&lt;br /&gt;
**Time and duration of trips.&lt;br /&gt;
**Maintenance and diagnostic information.&lt;br /&gt;
**Sensor data, such as crash severity, tire pressure, and coolant temperature.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Audio and biometric data&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**Audio recordings through onboard microphones.&lt;br /&gt;
**Voice data from STARLINK service-center calls.&lt;br /&gt;
**Biometric data from systems that driver attention.&lt;br /&gt;
**Search content and commands issued by occupants.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Collection methods===&lt;br /&gt;
Data collection is performed through:&lt;br /&gt;
*Vehicle sensors and diagnostic modules.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;MozillaReview&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{Cite web |last=Mozilla Research |first= |date=15 Aug 2023 |title=Mozilla Foundation Privacy Review: Subaru |url=https://foundation.mozilla.org/en/privacynotincluded/subaru/ |access-date=2025-01-16 |website=foundation.mozilla.org}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*GPS tracking systems.&lt;br /&gt;
*Cellular-connectivity modules.&lt;br /&gt;
*STARLINK mobile apps and web portals.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;MozillaReview&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Data sharing and sales==&lt;br /&gt;
===Third-party data sharing===&lt;br /&gt;
Subaru shares data with several entities, including:&lt;br /&gt;
*Data brokers, such as LexisNexis&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;SubaruPrivacy&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; and Verisk.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;TorqueNews&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{Cite web |last=Flierl |first=Denis |date=21 May 2024 |title=Vehicle Data Collection Lawsuit |url=https://www.torquenews.com/1084/subaru-now-involved-vehicle-data-collection-lawsuit-investigation |access-date=2025-01-16 |website=torquenews.com}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;NYT&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{Cite web |last=Hill |first=Kashmir |date=11 March 2024 |title=Automakers Are Sharing Drivers’ Data |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2024/03/11/technology/carmakers-driver-tracking-insurance.html |access-date=2025-01-16 |website=nytimes.com}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Insurance companies for risk assessment and pricing.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;TorqueNews&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Marketing firms.&lt;br /&gt;
*Emergency services and law enforcement (when required by law).&lt;br /&gt;
*Subaru dealerships and distributors.&lt;br /&gt;
*Third-party service providers.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;SubaruPrivacy&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
===Insurance-industry usage===&lt;br /&gt;
Data brokers aggregate and sell this information to insurance companies, who may:&lt;br /&gt;
*Increase insurance premiums based on driving patterns.&lt;br /&gt;
*Monitor driving behaviors to assess risk.&lt;br /&gt;
*Use driving data for personalized coverage offerings.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;NYT&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Privacy concerns==&lt;br /&gt;
===Consent issues===&lt;br /&gt;
Key concerns include:&lt;br /&gt;
*Simply being a passenger in a STARLINK-equipped vehicle constitutes consent.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;MozillaReview&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Lack of active notification during data collection.&lt;br /&gt;
*Limited opt-out options that might impact vehicle functionality.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficulties in opting out===&lt;br /&gt;
Subaru’s opt-out process involves:&lt;br /&gt;
*Submitting detailed personal information.&lt;br /&gt;
*Potentially long response times.&lt;br /&gt;
*No verification mechanism for successful opt-out.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ConsumerForum&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{Cite web |date=26 Jan 2025 |title=Privacy Report Discussion |url=https://www.subaruoutback.org/threads/privacy-not-included-subaru-report-connected-services-etc.556583/ |access-date=2025-01-16 |website=subaruoutback.org}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Legal challenges===&lt;br /&gt;
Subaru faces legal scrutiny for:&lt;br /&gt;
*Allegations of insufficiently disclosing its data-collection policies what it does with data.&lt;br /&gt;
*Potential non-compliance with privacy laws.&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Class-action lawsuit]] investigations over consent practices.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;TorqueNews&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Technical details==&lt;br /&gt;
===System architecture===&lt;br /&gt;
STARLINK is built upon:&lt;br /&gt;
*Embedded telematics devices.&lt;br /&gt;
*4G LTE cellular networks.&lt;br /&gt;
*GPS receivers and cloud-based data-processing systems.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;StarlinkTerms&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{Cite web |title=Subaru STARLINK Terms and Conditions |url=https://www.subaru.com/support/terms-and-conditions/subaru-starlink/subaru-starlink-services.html |access-date=2025-01-16 |website=subaru.com}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Data transmission===&lt;br /&gt;
*Real-time data transmission through LTE networks.&lt;br /&gt;
*Local storage when connectivity is unavailable.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;StarlinkTerms&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Consumer-protection issues==&lt;br /&gt;
===Privacy rights===&lt;br /&gt;
Critics cite:&lt;br /&gt;
*Minimal control over data retention.&lt;br /&gt;
*Broad sharing permissions in privacy policies.&lt;br /&gt;
*Limited transparency about how data is used.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;MozillaReview&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Economic harm===&lt;br /&gt;
*Insurance-rate adjustments based on driving data.&lt;br /&gt;
*Subscription fees for connected services.&lt;br /&gt;
*Potential effects on vehicle resale value.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;NYT&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Automotive privacy]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Data collection]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Consumer rights]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TasmanianRex</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://mirror.consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=Medical_equipment&amp;diff=11562</id>
		<title>Medical equipment</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://mirror.consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=Medical_equipment&amp;diff=11562"/>
		<updated>2025-03-11T08:37:01Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TasmanianRex: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{StubNotice}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Various medical equipment and the companies that produce them have come into scrutiny due to anti-consumer practices. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Examples ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Echographs ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== MRI ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== CT-Scanners ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation ====&lt;br /&gt;
[[Terumo Cardiovascular]] blocks 3rd party repair of the Advanced Perfusion System 1 Heart Lung Machine.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://gizmodo.com/medical-device-company-stops-hospitals-from-fixing-machines-themselves-2000554096&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Ventilators ===&lt;br /&gt;
Ventilators were affected by lack of a right to repair, notably during the Covid 19 pandemic.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.wyden.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/wyden-markey_auto_privacy_letter_to_ftc.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Software ===&lt;br /&gt;
A study was conducted in Cambridge in relation to software-dependent medical devices and how they would benefit from right to repair.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://doi.org/10.1017/jme.2023.28&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Echographs]]&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TasmanianRex</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://mirror.consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=Electronic_Arts&amp;diff=11525</id>
		<title>Electronic Arts</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://mirror.consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=Electronic_Arts&amp;diff=11525"/>
		<updated>2025-03-10T13:06:41Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TasmanianRex: /* Positive incidents */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{InfoboxCompany&lt;br /&gt;
| Name = Electronic Arts&lt;br /&gt;
| Type = Public&lt;br /&gt;
| Founded = 1982&lt;br /&gt;
| Industry = Video Games&lt;br /&gt;
| Official Website = https://ea.com/&lt;br /&gt;
| Logo = Electronic Arts.png&lt;br /&gt;
}}[[wikipedia:Electronic_Arts|&#039;&#039;&#039;Electronic Arts&#039;&#039;&#039;]] (&#039;&#039;&#039;EA&#039;&#039;&#039;) is a former video-game developer and now publisher founded in 1982 by Trip Hawkins. It is well known for its simulator titles under the &#039;&#039;Sim&#039;&#039; series (&#039;&#039;The Sims,&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;SimCity,&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;MySims,&#039;&#039; etc.), titles published under its EA Sports division (&#039;&#039;Madden,&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;FIFA,&#039;&#039; etc.), and its &#039;&#039;Battlefield&#039;&#039; series.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
EA has received criticism for its reliance on microtransactions, its focus on [[downloadable content]] (DLC), and other business practices that some consumers perceive as excessively unfavorable (predatory and anti-consumer). &amp;lt;!--Editor&#039;s note: When we add that ranking system, I&#039;d say they would rank pretty high in consumer unfriendliness.--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Incidents&amp;lt;!--Page to reference: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_Electronic_Arts--&amp;gt;==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Origin shutdown===&lt;br /&gt;
On April 17, 2025, EA will shut down its Origin client,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.pcgamesn.com/the-sims-4/ea-origin-shut-down&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; which was the final option for 32-bit hardware to run EA-published titles. While most consumers have already switched to using 64-bit hardware, the [[end-of-life]] of 32-bit support means that vintage enthusiasts, tech historians, and users who previously did not need to upgrade their 32-bit hardware are unable to either install or run the libraries that they paid for.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Lootboxes===&lt;br /&gt;
{{Hatnote|See also: [[EA lootbox controversies]]}}&lt;br /&gt;
Multiple games published by EA in recent years have garnered significant controversy over what is essentially legal gambling. This is most commonly seen in EA sports titles and their &amp;quot;Ultimate Team&amp;quot; modes, which has players using in-game currency that can be purchased with real-world money to buy card packs, in order to potentially get high-value player cards. This monetization method, considered by many to be &amp;quot;predatory&amp;quot;, most notably introduced controversy within the modern release of &#039;&#039;Star Wars Battlefront 2&#039;&#039;, wherein the most powerful character in-game, Darth Vader, could only be obtained through this lootbox system.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.pcworld.com/article/3231668/gaming/loot-boxes-ruining-gaming.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2017-10-09-star-wars-battlefront-2-has-a-loot-crate-problem&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.gamesindustry.biz/articles/2017-10-12-thinking-outside-the-loot-box&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; It was not until several weeks after the backlash that EA would tone down these lootboxes by changing loot pools.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://arstechnica.com/gaming/2017/10/star-wars-battlefront-ii-changes-its-loot-box-plans-but-is-it-enough/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.vg247.com/2017/10/13/after-beta-controversy-dice-has-better-clarified-the-loot-crate-system-in-the-final-version-of-star-wars-battlefront-2/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Lootboxes remained within the title until [[Disney]] directly instructed EA to stop because of gambling concerns.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.wsj.com/articles/electronic-arts-pulls-microtransactions-from-star-wars-battlefront-ii-after-fan-backlash-1510936871&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;!--Honestly deserving of an article considering the sheer insanity of EA here--&amp;gt;&amp;lt;!--Concept section:&lt;br /&gt;
At the moment, The Sims 4 holds EA&#039;s record for game with the most DLC for sale, with a total of $519.97 for expansion DLC being sold at $40 a pop, and a grand total of $1064.45 for all DLC. Purchase of these DLCs are necessitated since compared to the previous entry in the series, The Sims 3, there is a lower amount of content in TS4&#039;s base game.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sources:&lt;br /&gt;
https://www.pcgamesn.com/the-sims-4/sims-4-dlc-price&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://snootysims.com/wiki/sims-4/sims-3-vs-sims-4-which-one-is-better/--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===DRM===&lt;br /&gt;
EA holds the record for most pirated game with the title &#039;&#039;[[Spore]],&#039;&#039; which was directly because of EA&#039;s use of [[SecuROM]], and was one of the earlier known titles to introduce always-online [[digital rights management]] (DRM).&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u8ltfyqD3lM&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Some releases of &#039;&#039;Mass Effect&#039;&#039; also used SecuROM, and would instill excessive limits, such as a three-install limit that both could not be refunded by uninstalling and could only be increased through customer-service calls, and a recurring-validation system that required that the game have its activation code run every 10 days.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.escapistmagazine.com/news/view/83689-Mass-Effect-Spore-To-Use-Recurring-Validation&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; While its use of SecuROM died off in the mid-2010s, the company merely switched to DRM that has been far worse for consumers, [[Denuvo]]. One significant EA title that has used this DRM is &#039;&#039;Star Wars: Jedi Survivor.&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;!-- Need to add more examples later here --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===&#039;&#039;Spore&#039;&#039;===&lt;br /&gt;
{{Hatnote|Further reading: &#039;&#039;[[Spore]]&#039;&#039;}}&amp;lt;!-- I believe there is far more controversy to document inside a dedicated article. I also recommend mentioning Darkspore and Spore Adventures, since both of these are directly affected by what EA does with Spore itself. --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Spore&#039;&#039; retains a historical 1.7+ million pirated copies,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.ncesc.com/gaming-pedia/how-many-times-was-spore-pirated/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://torrentfreak.com/spore-most-pirated-game-ever-thanks-to-drm-080913/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; directly related to EA&#039;s use of [[SecuROM]].&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; In more recent years, &#039;&#039;Spore&#039;&#039;&#039;s server access was locked down to EA accounts,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:1&amp;quot;&amp;gt;https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=582350678&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; mostly thanks to a free [[Steam]] key exploit. This has led to various problems for legitimate consumers who merely wanted to play the iconic game and its sibling &#039;&#039;Darkspore,&#039;&#039; since according to guides,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:1&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; users could only have a singular install of the game on any device, were required to have an EA account using an alphanumeric password, and needed a CD key to redeem on the user&#039;s EA account.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://support.gog.com/hc/en-us/articles/115002333209-Spore-How-to-get-access-to-online-features?product=gog&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This has brought concern among the community, leading to community-developed tools to circumvent these server problems.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://sporecommunity.com/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===License exclusivity===&lt;br /&gt;
With various [[Intellectual property|intellectual properties]], from &#039;&#039;Star Wars&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://gamerant.com/ea-no-longer-star-wars-exclusive-publisher-lucasfilm-games-ubisoft-bethesda/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; to the NFL, EA has forced its way into holding what is essentially an artificial monopoly over large genres of the industry. Its exclusive licenses with various football organizations, such as the AFL and NFL, has resulted in an antitrust lawsuit against it.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://web.archive.org/web/20110510050257/http://www.aolcdn.com/tmz_documents/0611_nfl_ea_wm.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This lawsuit ended in a $600K settlement, but did not resolve the primary problems caused by EA&#039;s exclusive deals.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080612-lawsuit-flags-ea-for-illegal-procedure-on-football-monopoly.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2016/06/ea-punts-gives-600k-to-former-football-star-in-madden-nfl-rights-flap/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; NCAA players brought additional lawsuits against EA, alleging that it was not authorized to use their likeness in its games. These suits were also settled out of court.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/27/sports/ncaafootball/ea-sports-wont-make-college-video-game-in-2014.html?_r=0&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cbssports.com/collegefootball/writer/dennis-dodd/23859858/ea-sports-settles-likeness-suits-thousands-of-current-former-players-eligible-for-money&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;!--Diminishing quality section here?--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Buyouts and closures===&lt;br /&gt;
In order for EA to hold its high position, it has been known to buy out its competition.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://web.archive.org/web/20191230013406/https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/business/2018/02/01/bad-reputation-americas-top-20-most-hated-companies/1058718001/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Often, this has led to the detriment of the companies they buy out,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.latimes.com/business/la-xpm-2012-apr-04-la-fi-mo-electronic-arts-worst-company-consumerist-20120404-story.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and by extension, the media which they release. A historical example, Westwood Studios, which pioneered the RTS genre with the &#039;&#039;Command &amp;amp; Conquer&#039;&#039; series, was shut down about five years after its purchase by EA, and its notable franchise was left abandoned years later, with entries either delisted or broken after GameSpy-based DRM were broken circa 2014.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.pcgamer.com/reddit-compiles-terrifying-list-of-games-affected-by-gamespy-shutdown/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; While its habit of buying and closing studios has thinned since 2008, it similarly closed Visceral Games, the developer of &#039;&#039;Dead Space,&#039;&#039; in 2017.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.engadget.com/2017/10/17/ea-shuts-down-visceral-games/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Positive incidents==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Release of Command &amp;amp; Conquer source code (2025)===&lt;br /&gt;
{{Hatnote|Main article: [[EA releases source code of classic command and conquer titles]]}}&lt;br /&gt;
In February 2025, EA worked with C&amp;amp;C community members to open source four Command &amp;amp; Conquer games under the GPL license, in a move widely celebrated by the gaming community.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43197131&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://news.itsfoss.com/ea-open-source-cc-games/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:{{PAGENAME}}]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TasmanianRex</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://mirror.consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=Pinterest&amp;diff=11524</id>
		<title>Pinterest</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://mirror.consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=Pinterest&amp;diff=11524"/>
		<updated>2025-03-10T13:05:49Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TasmanianRex: /* Consumer impact summary */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{StubNotice}}{{InfoboxCompany&lt;br /&gt;
| Name = {{PAGENAME}}&lt;br /&gt;
| Type =Public&lt;br /&gt;
| Founded =2009&lt;br /&gt;
| Industry =Social media&lt;br /&gt;
| Official Website =pinterest.com&lt;br /&gt;
| Logo =Pinterest Logo.png&lt;br /&gt;
}}Pinterest is a photo hosting service and company started by Ben Silbermann, Paul Sciarra, and Evan Sharp in December 2009. It was initially intended to function as a digital version of traditional catalogs, however it transitioned to being an image host shortly after.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.fastcompany.com/3001984/pinterest-pivot&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Consumer impact summary==&lt;br /&gt;
User freedom: Absolute; content is rarely taken down unless mass-reported.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
User privacy: Questionable; private boards can be accessed by staff.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Business model: Profits off of affiliate links and advertisements.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Market control: Dominant; overrides original sources in image searches.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://www.dailydot.com/business/print-erest-printerest-pinterest-response/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:1&amp;quot;&amp;gt;https://discover.hubpages.com/technology/Is-Pinterest-a-Haven-for-Copyright-Violations&amp;lt;!-- Note: Source published first in 2012, earliest mention of licensing of pinned content in comments is 2013, and last edit was 2016. --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Incidents==&lt;br /&gt;
This is a list of all consumer protection incidents this company is involved in. Any incidents not mentioned here can be found in the [[:Category:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|{{PAGENAME}} category]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Training of AI based on user-submitted content (2025) ===&lt;br /&gt;
 Further Reading: [[Nonconsensual scraping]]&lt;br /&gt;
In March of 2025, Pinterest updated their TOS&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:2&amp;quot;&amp;gt;https://policy.pinterest.com/en/privacy-policy-preview&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; to include a new clause which states&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;Improve the products and services of our family of companies and offer new features. For example, using information to train, develop and improve our technology such as our machine learning models, regardless of when Pins were posted. This includes, for example, Pinterest’s body type technology, which is trained on images in Pins posted to our Services.&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;The vagueness of this new clause rightfully brings concern,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite news |last=Harrison |first=Maggie |date=Mar 8, 2025 |title=Pinterest Changes User Terms So It Can Train AI on User Data and Photos, Regardless of When They Were Posted |url=https://futurism.com/pinterest-data-photos-train-ai |access-date=Mar 10, 2025 |work=Futurism}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; as Pinterest has been well-known to host stolen content.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.reddit.com/r/Pinterest/comments/vuns1z/people_are_stealing_my_photos_what_can_i_do/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.reddit.com/r/Pinterest/comments/183gceg/help_how_do_i_report_stolen_pins/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://brandingforsmes.com/dealing-with-stolen-pinterest-pins-or-blog-content-a-guide-for-content-creators/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This essentially means that the works any consumer has made can, and likely has been scraped against their request for the sake of training AI, which could train Pinterest&#039;s own AI models, or sell this content as training data to other companies that may wish to train their own AI models. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Exploitation of pinned images (circa 2012) ===&lt;br /&gt;
As content from creators are nonconsensually &amp;quot;pinned&amp;quot; to the platform, since 2012,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:1&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; if not earlier, Pinterest claims rights inside its TOS&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:2&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kalliopi Monoyios (March 19, 2012). &amp;quot;[http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/symbiartic/2012/03/19/pinterests-terms-of-service-word-by-terrifying-word/ Pinterest&#039;s Terms of Service, Word by Terrifying Word]&amp;quot;. &#039;&#039;Scientific American&#039;&#039;. [https://web.archive.org/web/20120523164313/http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/symbiartic/2012/03/19/pinterests-terms-of-service-word-by-terrifying-word/ Archived] from the original on May 23, 2012. Retrieved March 10, 2025.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; to&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;By making available any Member Content through the Site, Application or Services, you hereby grant to Cold Brew Labs a worldwide, irrevocable, perpetual, non-exclusive, transferable, royalty-free license, with the right to sublicense, to use, copy, adapt, *modify, distribute, license, sell, transfer, publicly display, publicly perform, transmit, stream, broadcast, access, view, and otherwise exploit such Member Content only on, through or by means of the Site, Application or Services.&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;In layman&#039;s terms, this means any content uploaded to Pinterest can be freely used in any shape or form by the platform and anyone who happens to aimlessly scroll it.  Connecting back to the nonconsensual posting of this content, this means that creators could and historically have had their content overridden&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; in search feeds and copyrights overridden for malicious purposes by other publishers.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
[[DeviantArt]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:{{PAGENAME}}]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TasmanianRex</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://mirror.consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=Bambu_Lab_Authorization_Control_System&amp;diff=11462</id>
		<title>Bambu Lab Authorization Control System</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://mirror.consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=Bambu_Lab_Authorization_Control_System&amp;diff=11462"/>
		<updated>2025-03-09T03:23:30Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TasmanianRex: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;On January 16, 2025, the 3D-printer manufacturer Bambu Lab announced that future firmwares for their 3D printers would introduce an authorization and authentication protection mechanism for their connection and control, in the name of security. This mechanism restricts the use of third party accessories and slicers, such as Panda Touch and OrcaSlicer. Bambu has stated the following:&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&amp;quot;This change is mitigating any risk of remote hacks or printer exposure issues that have happened in the past and also lower the risk of abnormal traffic or attacks.&amp;quot;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;firmware-update-introducing-new-authorization-control-system-22&amp;quot;&amp;gt;https://blog.bambulab.com/firmware-update-introducing-new-authorization-control-system-2/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://all3dp.com/4/bambu-lab-limits-third-party-printer-control-with-new-security-update/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Controversy regarding firmware updates==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Bambu tos screenshot.png|alt=bambu terms stating print jobs may not function properly if update is not performed to new firmware which is highly limiting. |thumb|Bambu terms regarding printer functionality &amp;amp; potential for disrupted print jobs if users do not update to a new firmware that radically restricts the autonomy of the owner of the printer]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Potential for remote disabling of printers===&lt;br /&gt;
A significant concern raised by the community revolves around the wording in Bambu Lab&#039;s [[Terms of Service]] and firmware update announcements. Critics and users argue that the phrasing leaves open the possibility for the manufacturer to remotely disable printers that are not updated to the latest firmware. Specifically, Bambu Lab&#039;s Terms of Service&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://bambulab.com/en-us/policies/terms&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; states that printers &#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;quot;may block new print jobs&amp;quot;&#039;&#039;&#039; if updates are not applied, which some users interpret as a potential pathway for forced obsolescence.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;firmware-update-introducing-new-authorization-control-system-2&amp;quot;&amp;gt;https://blog.bambulab.com/firmware-update-introducing-new-authorization-control-system-2/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; While defenders of Bambu Lab point out that offline modes such as SD-card printing and LAN-only setups would remain functional, others point out that the Terms of Service do not explicitly limit this restriction to cloud-based printing. This ambiguity has led to speculation that Bambu Lab could enforce broader limitations, effectively rendering printers inoperable for users who choose not to update.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://old.reddit.com/r/BambuLab/comments/1i45iy2/bambu_lab_reserves_the_right_to_brick_your/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Editing of initial announcement====&lt;br /&gt;
Bambu users were concerned they would not be able to utilize their printer if they did not install this update, due to the wording of the blog and the terms of service.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[:File:Bambu tos screenshot.png]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This caused confusion since users report that Bambu&#039;s blog post dated January 16th&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://blog.bambulab.com/firmware-update-introducing-new-authorization-control-system-2/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; specifically says the following:&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
====&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;What happens if I never upgrade to this firmware?&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;====&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;You may continue using an older firmware version that does not include the new security updates; however, this means the printers may miss out on important security fixes or bug patches included in newer versions. We highly encourage updating to the latest firmware version for the best experience and enhanced security.&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;However, &#039;&#039;&#039;this was not present on the day of the announcement.&#039;&#039;&#039; A snapshot of their webpage from archive.is demonstrates this section did not exist on the day of the announcement, when community members voiced their concerns.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://archive.is/ejq3R&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[:File:2024-01-16-Firmware Update Introducing New Authorization Control System.pdf]]￼￼File:2024-01-16-Firmware Update Introducing New Authorization Control System.pdf￼￼&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Bambu&#039;s response to community feedback&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://blog.bambulab.com/updates-and-third-party-integration-with-bambu-connect/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; references &#039;&#039;&amp;quot;social media posts spreading baseless allegations and untrue claims about Bambu Lab&amp;quot;,&#039;&#039; including &#039;&#039;&amp;quot;Firmware updates will block your printer’s ability to print.&amp;quot;,&#039;&#039; without mentioning the context for those allegations. The context for those allegations was the lack of inclusion of the &#039;&#039;&amp;quot;What happens if I never upgrade to this firmware?&amp;quot;&#039;&#039; in Bambu&#039;s initial announcement alongside their stated terms of service.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This announcement, after the edit in question, clearly states in the header - &#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;Updated: January 17, 2025&#039;&#039;&#039; - to include additional details and FAQs where the &#039;&#039;&#039;What happens if I never upgrade to this firmware?&#039;&#039;&#039; among others was added.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As per webpage oldest snapshot from &#039;&#039;&#039;archive.is&#039;&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://archive.is/ejq3R&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; dated 16 Jan 2025 17:31 UTC there are two references if choosing to stay on the old firmware:&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
====&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt; Important Information for End Users &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;====&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2. Old Firmware Option:&lt;br /&gt;
Users who decide to use an older firmware version can still use the previous or new versions of Bambu Studio and Bambu Handy without restrictions.&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Statement reads that user can choose to stay on the previous firmware and will not be punished for their choice by exclusion from access of first party updated software tools.&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
====&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt; Information for OrcaSlicer users &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;====&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt; 1. You can continue using your X Series 3D printer with the older firmware version (which does not include Authorization Features). &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
2. If you choose to upgrade to the firmware version with Authorization Features, you must download and install Bambu Connect (a printer control software)... &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Statement reads that users have the right of choice to upgrade or stay on the older firmware.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While FAQ section was added after the initial blog post publication:&lt;br /&gt;
*It appears to summarize unedited information available in the original article.&lt;br /&gt;
*Addition of the FAQ section, and as a result - editing the initial article, are clearly announced.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Debate over &amp;quot;bricking&amp;quot; terminology===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;The debate has also &amp;quot;&#039;&#039;extended to the definition of &#039;bricking&#039;:&amp;quot; Some community members assert that if a printer is unable to accept new print jobs without an update, it effectively becomes non-functional and qualifies as being &amp;quot;bricked.&amp;quot; Others counter that as long as certain offline functionalities remain (such as SD-card printing) the term does not accurately apply.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://old.reddit.com/r/BambuLab/comments/1i45iy2/bambu_lab_reserves_the_right_to_brick_your/m7sezlg/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Privacy policy issues===&lt;br /&gt;
Bambu Lab&#039;s privacy policy, under &amp;quot;Personal Data that we collect,&amp;quot; explicitly states: &amp;quot;3D Model in each client (&#039;Printing Files&#039;) and other information related to the print job we may store, including start times, finish times, filament consumption and other relevant information.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://bambulab.com/en-us/policies/privacy&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This contradicts their claim that they do not monitor 3D prints. Additionally, the privacy policy webpage is notably excluded from the Wayback Machine, raising concerns about transparency and accountability in their data practices.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://web.archive.org/web/20250000000000*/https://bambulab.com/en-us/policies/privacy&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community strategies to deal with risks===&lt;br /&gt;
Users have discussed strategies to avoid possible disruptions, including:&lt;br /&gt;
*Operating printers exclusively in offline modes.&lt;br /&gt;
*Utilizing LAN connections or VPN setups: this requires an access key from the printer (previously, you could use your cloud credentials over LAN).&lt;br /&gt;
*Exploring alternative firmware or third-party scripts to restore full functionality.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://old.reddit.com/r/BambuLab/comments/1i45iy2/bambu_lab_reserves_the_right_to_brick_your/m7t8i7r/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Bambu Lab&#039;s justification and rebuttal==&lt;br /&gt;
Bambu Lab has stated that the authorization system is in place in order to protect against &amp;quot;remote hacks,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;printer exposure,&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;abnormal traffic or attacks.&amp;quot; There are, however, several ways to mitigate these risks without the loss of user control that their system causes:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;The &amp;quot;remote hacks&amp;quot; that were cited as an example in the article seem to be a direct result of the 3D-printer vendor not responding properly to a reported security vulnerability in their product.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.bitdefender.com/en-au/blog/hotforsecurity/someone-is-hacking-3d-printers-to-warn-owners-of-a-security-flaw?ref=blog.bambulab.com https://www.bitdefender.com/en-au/blog/hotforsecurity/someone-is-hacking-3d-printers-to-warn-owners-of-a-security-flaw]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Therefore, in order to get attention, the researcher decided to infect machines and display a harmless message to spread publicity.&#039;&#039;&#039; Properly responding to security vulnerabilities, working to patch them quickly, and working with the security community (who would be more than happy to help secure products) would be some ways to prevent this.&lt;br /&gt;
*In the article cited about printer exposure, the hack was carried out largely because of user misconfiguration.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.csoonline.com/article/566223/over-3700-exposed-3d-printers-open-to-remote-attackers.html?ref=blog.bambulab.com https://www.csoonline.com/article/566223/over-3700-exposed-3d-printers-open-to-remote-attackers.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Printer exposure can be mitigated by offering more convenient ways to securely expose printers to the internet, so that users are not tempted to allow unauthenticated access over the network.&lt;br /&gt;
*The &amp;quot;abnormal traffic&amp;quot; can be mitigated by steps Bambu has already put in place, as detailed in their own article on the matter.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://wiki.bambulab.com/en/security-incidents-cloud-traffic?ref=blog.bambulab.com https://wiki.bambulab.com/en/security-incidents-cloud-traffic]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;Other malicious devices in the LAN&amp;quot; can be partially mitigated by steps Bambu has already put in place, as detailed in their own article on the matter.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://blog.bambulab.com/answering-network-security-concerns/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Another mitigation is to add stronger authentication mechanisms, rather than using a weak pre-shared LAN access code as is currently the case.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Issues with LAN mode requiring authorization==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Bambu Connect App - Lan Device Discovery without Bambu Login.png|thumb|Bambu Connect App - Lan Device Discovery without Bambu Login]]&lt;br /&gt;
Bambu Lab printers have the ability to be controlled over both cloud and LAN. This allowed users to integrate their printers into private networks and maintain full control without having to rely on the manufacturer&#039;s server while also allowing cloud access. The new authorization system mandates that even LAN-based operations must go through an authentication process using Bambu Connect to retain full control.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;bambu-connect&amp;quot;&amp;gt;https://wiki.bambulab.com/en/software/bambu-connect&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Full local access is still possible and unchanged for those not using the cloud.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This change has drawn criticism for many reasons:&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Privacy concerns&#039;&#039;&#039;: Requiring authentication for LAN mode raises concerns about data being unnecessarily exposed to Bambu Lab&#039;s servers, even for local-only operations, though previously, the printer was also connected and could be controlled by the cloud even when sending prints locally.&lt;br /&gt;
**Confidentiality required by US Law - This is in conflict with those that have to comply with 18 CFR § 3a.61, 32 CFR § 117.15, 32 CFR § 2001.47, and other restrictions.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Loss of offline independence while also using cloud&#039;&#039;&#039;: Before, users could have hybrid offline setups. The requirement for authentication removes this option unless users revert to older firmware versions, which Bambu does not allow people to do once they have updated to the firmware using the new scheme.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Increased complexity&#039;&#039;&#039;: The added authentication layer complicates workflows for users who built custom setups or relied on third-party integrations for LAN control while retaining cloud functionality.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://forum.bambulab.com/t/full-non-cloud-based-network-option-needed/3643&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is worth noting that:&lt;br /&gt;
*LAN-Only mode in Orca Slicer is implemented by passing API Calls to the installed proprietary Bambu Network Plug-In (unlike BTT and other solutions that did indeed communicate with printer directly via MQTT protocol).&lt;br /&gt;
*Plug-In provides controls for Printers &amp;quot;Critical Operations&amp;quot; (as classified by the Firmware Announcement article) and displays these controls within the window of Orca Slicer.&lt;br /&gt;
*Using intermediary Plug-In does not manifest as &amp;quot;direct access through network plugin&amp;quot;. It is still a Proxy communication, even if user experience is presented as direct communication (same slicer window).&lt;br /&gt;
*Bambu Connect moves the Network Plug-In functionality outside of the window of Orca Slicer thus appearing as separate window and presents the appearance of  &amp;quot;indirect&amp;quot; communication channel to the printer.&lt;br /&gt;
*While the user experience is different, the flow remains unchanged Orca Slicer slices model -&amp;gt; Orca Slicer Calls API of Bambu Proprietary Software -&amp;gt; Bambu Proprietary Software controls the printer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Additionally, Bambu Connect software (downloaded and installed on 19.01.2024 (2025?) prior to the backlash response) seems to have functionality of adding LAN-Only printers without the requirement of Bambu Account authentication (Same behavior as Network Plugin used in Orca Slicer)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Precedents and comparisons===&lt;br /&gt;
Critics have likened this potential functionality to similar cases in other industries where manufacturers remotely restrict product features. Notable examples include [[HP]]&#039;s printer firmware updates that [[HP Instant Ink|rendered third-party ink cartridges unusable]] and Tesla&#039;s software locks on second-hand vehicles. These parallels suggest a broader trend of manufacturers [[Retroactively amended purchase|using software to control hardware capabilities post-purchase]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.classaction.org/hp-printer-lawsuit&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.wired.com/story/tesla-remote-disable-used-car-features/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===X1E firmware 01.01.02.00 LAN only connection &amp;quot;BUG&amp;quot;===&lt;br /&gt;
Newly received X1E printers with firmware 01.01.02.00 will not connect to the Bambu Studio using the Lan only method password. Bambu Studio identifies the un-logged printer but will not allow a connection to the printer. Only after connection / account paring is done over the Bambu Handy app by giving internet access to the PC and Printer then utilizing the cloud service connection will Lan only communication and login work.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://forum.bambulab.com/t/connect-x1e-to-stand-alone-computer/101474&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Implementation timeline and requirements==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The authorization system will be rolled out in phases, starting with the X1 series printers. A beta firmware (version 01.08.03.00) was released on January 17, 2025, with the full release scheduled for January 23, 2025. The P &amp;amp; A series printers will get similar updates at an unspecified future date.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To use printers with the new authorization system, users must update multiple pieces of software:&lt;br /&gt;
*Bambu Studio must be updated to version 01.10.02.64 or higher&lt;br /&gt;
*Bambu Handy mobile app must be updated to version 2.17.0 or higher&lt;br /&gt;
*The new Bambu Connect application must be installed for using third-party slicers&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These software updates are mandatory for users who update their firmware. Failing to update all components simultaneously will result in certain printer controls becoming unusable. Users who choose to maintain third-party software compatibility can continue using older firmware versions, or downgrade the firmware for new printers that ship with the authorization system pre-installed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bambu Lab states these coordinated updates are necessary because the new authorization system fundamentally changes how the printer validates and accepts commands. The older versions of Bambu Studio and Bambu Handy lack the authentication mechanisms required to interact with printers running the new firmware. The Bambu Connect application was created specifically to provide a controlled interface for third-party software, replacing the previous direct access through network plugins.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;firmware-update-introducing-new-authorization-control-system-2&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Impact on third-party integration and user choice==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Changes to third-party access===&lt;br /&gt;
The new authorization system replaces direct network API access with a more limited URL-based interface through Bambu Connect. Third-party software can only interact with the printer by sending specific URL commands to Bambu Connect.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;bambu-connect&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; The interface requires three parameters:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;path&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;: The absolute file system path to the 3MF file (e.g., /tmp/cube.gcode.3mf)&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;name&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;: The name of the file (e.g., Cube)&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;version&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;: A fixed value of 1.0.0 for compatibility&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A complete command must be formatted as:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 bambu-connect://import-file?path=%2Ftmp%2Fcube.gcode.3mf&amp;amp;name=Cube&amp;amp;version=1.0.0&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This interface only allows basic file transfer and print initiation. All other printer-control functions previously available to third-party software are now exclusive to Bambu&#039;s own applications. The path and name parameters must be URL-encoded using encodeURIComponent or equivalent functions&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;bambu-connect&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Reduced home-automation capabilities===&lt;br /&gt;
While basic status monitoring remains available (e.g., print-progress updates in Home Assistant), the new firmware removes the ability for home-automation systems to control printer functions. Users can no longer:&lt;br /&gt;
*Start or stop prints remotely using Home Assistant, BTT Panda Touch,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;https://www.facebook.com/BIGTREETECH/posts/pfbid0SNZGxvf7NRdmyVgHf6y9yNedNbU2RrCfdT8gugTSD4AYfr5BHneNF9H1EbwyYiJEl&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; or other third-party accessories or software interfaces&lt;br /&gt;
*Control printer temperatures or cooling&lt;br /&gt;
*Automate printer behaviors based on sensor data or events&lt;br /&gt;
*Access camera feeds through third-party applications&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;bambulab-forum-135400/9&amp;quot;&amp;gt;https://forum.bambulab.com/t/this-new-auth-system-will-make-me-sell-my-printers/135400/9&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Permanent nature of the update===&lt;br /&gt;
Once a printer is updated to the new firmware, users can still revert to previous versions that allows full control of the printer using LAN mode access key while signed into the cloud.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.theverge.com/2025/1/21/24349031/bambu-3d-printer-update-authentication-filament-subscription-lock-answers - theverge.com - accessed 2025-02-15&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The option still exists to disable the cloud service.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The manufacturer states this change is required for security, but community members note that many of the security vulnerabilities being addressed stem from Bambu&#039;s own cloud-centric design choices rather than inherent risks of local network control&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;bambulab-forum-134549/12&amp;quot;&amp;gt;https://forum.bambulab.com/t/bambu-studio-1-10-2-public-beta/134549/12&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. The update forces users into using Bambu Connect middleware if they want to retain limited cloud functionality.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This can be characterised as a significant post-purchase reduction in functionality for existing owners who bought their printers with the understanding they could use third-party software and home-automation tools, but also only affects users actively choosing to use Bambu Cloud at the same time. The nature of the printer update is used to demonstrate how manufacturers can use software updates to unilaterally modify the capabilities of hardware products after purchase, although in this case the changes affect only people already choosing to use the cloud service&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;bambulab-forum-3643/9&amp;quot;&amp;gt;https://forum.bambulab.com/t/full-non-cloud-based-network-option-needed/3643/9&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For users that would want to use a third-party slicer while using their cloud service, Bambu would require those users to download and install Bambu Connect in order to send gcode wirelessly over LAN or over the cloud. While Bambu claims that they were in contact with SoftFever, the developer of OrcaSlicer, as of writing, SoftFever still does not have any keys for Bambu Connect and the new firmware is only available as opt-in beta at the moment.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:1&amp;quot;&amp;gt;https://x.com/fever_soft/status/1880630570809795034?t=qJyh4SGFZFllcYrqexGW-Q&amp;amp;s=19&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Impact on functionality==&lt;br /&gt;
While some functionality remains unauthenticated like in previous firmware versions (sending status information from the printer over the network, starting a print job using SD cards), the most important features now require authentication through a new closed-source client called Bambu Connect&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;bambu-connect&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. These restricted features include:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Initializing prints via LAN or cloud mode&lt;br /&gt;
*Remote video access to monitor prints&lt;br /&gt;
*Controlling motion system, temperature, fans&lt;br /&gt;
*AMS settings and calibrations&lt;br /&gt;
*Home automation integration beyond basic status monitoring&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Previously, third-party software such as OrcaSlicer&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;orca-slicer-issue8063&amp;quot;&amp;gt;https://github.com/SoftFever/OrcaSlicer/issues/8063&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; could interact with Bambu Lab printers via the open-source Bambu Studio and proprietary network plug-ins. While Bambu Connect provides a limited URL-based API to initiate prints, most functionality previously openly available is now restricted to Bambu&#039;s ecosystem&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;bambulab-forum-135400/9&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Previously, third-party accessories such as Panda Touch would allow users to control their printers with a standalone device. Panda Touch was especially popular amongst P series printer owners since P series printers contain a monochromatic screen with a D-pad by default for printer control whereas Panda Touch is a full-color touch screen that had a small battery so that way users could reposition and detach their Panda Touch off their printers if needed. Users would be able to queue up jobs, jog printer motors, and connect to multiple printers at once in order to monitor print jobs. According to Big Tree Tech (BTT), the manufacturer of the Panda Touch, they urge users of Panda Touch not to update firmware any further since doing so would foreseeably permanently break compatibility with users&#039; printers and their Panda Touch. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Communication with Panda Touch developers==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As of writing, no formal communication has happened between Big Tree Tech (BTT), the manufacturer and developer of Panda Touch, and Bambu Labs. Based on their Facebook announcement, BTT stated that they have reached out to Bambu and will update if Bambu responds to their correspondence&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Communication with OrcaSlicer developers==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Before the official announcement of the new authorization and authentication, Bambu Lab engaged with the OrcaSlicer development team regarding the changes. This communication has sparked significant discussion within the 3D-printing community, particularly regarding its timing, tone, and implications.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Pre-announcement contact===&lt;br /&gt;
Reports from OrcaSlicer demonstrate that Bambu Lab provided limited advance notice of the changes that would render their software incompatible with Bambu printers running the new firmware. The communication emphasized:&lt;br /&gt;
*The introduction of Bambu Connect as the only supported method for interacting with third-party slicers.&lt;br /&gt;
*The discontinuation of the network plugin API that OrcaSlicer and other tools relied on for printer control&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;orca-slicer-issue8063&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
*An invitation for OrcaSlicer developers to adapt their software to integrate with the Bambu Connect URL scheme.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The communication lacked the detailed technical documentation that would be necessary for developers to be able to work with the new requirements.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===How the community viewed these actions===&lt;br /&gt;
This approach has been interpreted by many as a calculated move by Bambu Lab to enforce tighter control over its ecosystem. Primary criticisms of Bambu were:&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Lack of transparency&#039;&#039;&#039;: The limited warning to OrcaSlicer devs suggests that Bambu Lab prioritized internal rollout schedules over community engagement with existing customers. Point to the contrary: the new firmware is in beta and Bambu Connect middleware contains temporary compromises to allow third-party slicers to work as before.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Lack of follow-through:&#039;&#039;&#039; As of writing, SoftFever, OrcaSlicer&#039;s lead developer, still does not have API keys for Bambu Connect, a necessary layer of Bambu software that would need to be integrated into OrcaSlicer. Bambu&#039;s original announcement prominently mentioned OrcaSlicer and gave the impression that Bambu is actively providing the necessary assets so that SoftFever would be able to implement the new software architecture so that OrcaSlicer users are able to still use OrcaSlicer to send gcode to their printers without needing Bambu Connect to be installed as a separate program. The lack of active cooperation does not reflect favorably upon Bambu as it seems like their announcement used OrcaSlicer&#039;s name to try to make it seem like Bambu is trying its best to make sure that developers have what they need, but in reality, their inaction seems to show that Bambu is not making a sincere attempt to ensure that OrcaSlicer remains supported&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:1&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Disregard for open-source collaboration&#039;&#039;&#039;: OrcaSlicer is widely used in the community; it is an open-source effort to improve the 3D-printing experience for all customers. By abruptly altering the compatibility landscape, Bambu Lab is seen as undermining good-faith initiatives to improve the ecosystem for everyone. The decision to restrict network APIs in favor of proprietary systems such as Bambu Connect represents a broader industry trend of closing off ecosystems that were once open, removing customer choice, privacy, and freedom.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Token support for third-party tools&#039;&#039;&#039;: While Bambu Connect provides a workaround for third-party slicer use, it significantly restricts functionality and complicates workflows, leading many to question the sincerity of Bambu&#039;s stated support for open-source tools&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;bambu-connect&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Power imbalance&#039;&#039;&#039;: As the hardware manufacturer, Bambu Lab has the ability to dictate how its products can be used; often to the detriment of third-party developers and users.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Community-driven workarounds and technical alternatives==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 3D-printing community has begun exploring potential workarounds to restore functionality and user autonomy. These efforts focus on bypassing or mitigating the limitations imposed by the firmware update.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Custom firmware development===&lt;br /&gt;
Discussions within the community highlight interest in developing custom firmware as an alternative to Bambu&#039;s official updates. One prominent project mentioned in forums is the development of custom firmware for the X1-series printers, such as the &amp;quot;X1Plus Custom Firmware&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;bambulab-forum-134549/12&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. This firmware aims to:&lt;br /&gt;
*Restore direct network control and third-party slicer compatibility.&lt;br /&gt;
*Re-enable previously available features such as motion-system adjustments, temperature control, and AMS settings without requiring proprietary software.&lt;br /&gt;
*Provide users with greater flexibility in integrating printers with home-automation systems and workflows.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, custom firmware development faces significant challenges, including:&lt;br /&gt;
*Limited documentation and proprietary hardware components, which complicate reverse-engineering efforts.&lt;br /&gt;
*The potential voiding of warranties and risks of bricking devices.&lt;br /&gt;
*Legal concerns regarding intellectual property and bypassing manufacturer-imposed restrictions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Backup of current third party access enabled firmware and network plugins==&lt;br /&gt;
This GitHub repository contains a backup of all the latest firmware released by Bambu Labs for their printers and of the network plugin used by slicers such as Orca Slicer to communicate with the printer: https://github.com/Tzeny/bambulabs_plugins_firmware.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==LAN mode and blocked internet access==&lt;br /&gt;
At the time of writing user Tzeny15 on reddit, has authored a five step guide to blocking internet access for the Bambu P1S as a precaution in case the manufacturer attempts to limit functionality for printers without the newest firmware. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; https://www.reddit.com/r/BambuLab/comments/1i4vp5i/lan_mode_with_live_view_remote_monitoringcontrol/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Bambu Lab LAN mode guide|Read the full guide here.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Reverse engineering Bambu Connect==&lt;br /&gt;
{{:Reverse Engineering Bambu Connect}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;[[Reverse Engineering Bambu Connect|Read more about reverse engineering Bambu Connect here.]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Community tools and scripts==&lt;br /&gt;
In addition to firmware alternatives, some users have come up with custom scripts and software tools to interface with Bambu Lab printers indirectly. These tools often rely on:&lt;br /&gt;
*Reverse-engineering the URL-based commands required by Bambu Connect to enable partial functionality with third-party slicers like OrcaSlicer.&lt;br /&gt;
*Creating local server emulations to replicate the network API previously available before the update.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While these tools provide temporary solutions, they don&#039;t fully replace the open ecosystem that existed prior to the authorization update.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Re-engineering printer-control electronics===&lt;br /&gt;
ChazLayyd&#039;s Bambu Lab Klipper Conversion project is currently in an incomplete stage&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://github.com/ChazLayyd/Bambu-Lab-Klipper-Conversion&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;DhazLayyd&#039;s Discord Community&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://discord.gg/W6B5mBejuC&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. While the project was not made in response to Bambu&#039;s announcement, there has been a wave of new public interest in this specific project. ChazLayyd&#039;s documentation instructs P1S owners to non-destructively remove the old control electronics that run Bambu&#039;s proprietary software and instructs P1S owners to install off-the-shelf control components so that the existing motor connectors and other critical electronics can communicate with the newly-installed off-the-shelf control components. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Advocacy for open-ecosystem support===&lt;br /&gt;
Community members have also organized to advocate for open-source support and rollback options. Suggestions include:&lt;br /&gt;
*Allowing an opt-out option for existing users who prefer local network control without cloud dependency.&lt;br /&gt;
**It should be pointed out that this has always been possible and past firmware updates made signing into the cloud at any point completely unnecessary. This information continues to be ignored by some.&lt;br /&gt;
*Providing an official API for third-party slicers under specific licensing agreements that allow secure authorized usage.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;orca-slicer-issue8063&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===&#039;&#039;&#039;Alternative software to prevent auto update(tells the server its version 99+ for now)&#039;&#039;&#039;===&lt;br /&gt;
Currently X1Plus a OPEN SOURCE custom firmware version for Bambu Labs printers(more details on the GitHub page)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*It includes tutorials to install IF you haven&#039;t updated. keep in mind this is third party so will void any warranty&#039;s. PLEASE read all information available on the GitHub to get a full understanding of how it works and if in this situation it will benefit you or your business.&lt;br /&gt;
*https://github.com/X1Plus/X1Plus&lt;br /&gt;
*The Bambu Labs website offers consumers the ability to request a rootable firmware to be sent to their printers. At the time of writing (Jan 26, 2025), the feature (in the EU at least) is broken such that you cannot finalize the process of requesting such a firmware. Ref: https://bambulab.com/en-eu/third-party-firmware/plan&lt;br /&gt;
**The result of accepting the terms of the page titled &amp;quot;Third Party Firmware Plan Guideline&amp;quot; and clicking &amp;quot;Next&amp;quot; takes you to a page titled &amp;quot;Important Notice and Risk Warning&amp;quot; which, when accepting the terms leaves you with an &amp;quot;I got it&amp;quot; button that takes you back to the previous page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Bambu corporate strategy vs maker community values&amp;lt;!-- the framing of this whole section comes across as quite opinionated, and it repeats a lot of factual information from earlier. reccommend cutting most of it, and reducing to a paragraph or two detailing the community response --&amp;gt;==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Impact on professional users and print farms===&lt;br /&gt;
The restrictions imposed by the new authorization system create significant operational challenges for professional users who kept their printers signed into the cloud:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Print farms can no longer use custom automation systems to manage multiple printers&lt;br /&gt;
*Workflows built around third-party software have to be completely redesigned&lt;br /&gt;
*The requirement to manually export and import files through Bambu Connect creates additional labor&lt;br /&gt;
*Integration with existing business systems and workflows becomes more difficult or impossible&lt;br /&gt;
*Professional users with more than 20 printers report the new workflow as &amp;quot;an absolute nightmare&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://forum.bambulab.com/t/this-new-auth-system-will-make-me-sell-my-printers/135400/4&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The solution to the above is not to sign the printer into the cloud. Keeping the printer signed in would be a security oversight in this use case on the part of the print farm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Privacy and data-collection concerns===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The shift toward mandatory use of Bambu&#039;s software ecosystem raises several privacy and data collection concerns:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*All printer operations must now pass through Bambu&#039;s cloud infrastructure when using cloud mode&lt;br /&gt;
*User print data, including file names and print settings, becomes visible to Bambu when cloud is used&lt;br /&gt;
*Operational data is processed through Bambu&#039;s servers while on a different network. The camera feed, on the other hand, is always peer-to-peer.&lt;br /&gt;
*Users have limited visibility into how their data is collected, stored, and used in the cloud&lt;br /&gt;
*The system creates dependence on Bambu&#039;s cloud services availability for basic printer functionality&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;bambulab-forum-3643/9&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While Bambu Lab maintains that cloud processing is necessary for security and functionality, community members argue this represents unnecessary data collection that could be handled locally&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;bambulab-forum-134549/12&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. The company&#039;s cloud infrastructure costs are significant, leading some users to speculate that future monetization of the cloud services may be planned&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;bambulab-forum-3643/5&amp;quot;&amp;gt;https://forum.bambulab.com/t/full-non-cloud-based-network-option-needed/3643/5&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Therefore, people should assess if their use case mandates the use of the cloud service and disable it when it doesn&#039;t.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This shift from local control to cloud-dependent operation is part of a broader trend in consumer devices, where manufacturers use security concerns to justify increased data collection and reduced customer control over devices they bought and paid for. Privacy-conscious users should operate their printers in LAN-only mode to avoid cloud connectivity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Customer reactions==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Customer reactions have been overwhelmingly negative.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://forum.bambulab.com/t/bambu-studio-1-10-2-public-beta/134549/4&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://old.reddit.com/r/BambuLab/comments/1i2psvz/firmware_update_introducing_new_authorization/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Bambu Lab has historically pushed cloud-based printer interaction while offering limited LAN mode functionality&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;bambulab-forum-3643/9&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. Many customers argue that the security issues this locked-down firmware claims to address are actually consequences of the company&#039;s cloud-based design choices rather than inherent risks of local network control,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;bambulab-forum-134549/12&amp;quot; /, which continues to infuriate users who are now told that security is the justification for a loss of freedom. As a result of the announcement of the shift, customer ratings on sites like Trustpilot rapidly dropped,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.trustpilot.com/review/bambulab.com?sort=recency&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; with many reviews citing the restrictions as the reason for the bad reviews.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The shift raises privacy concerns as the restricted LAN mode functionality will now push more users into Bambu&#039;s cloud infrastructure for processing user print data, including file names and print settings. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many community members and customers ask whether the significant costs of maintaining and deploying this cloud infrastructure might lead to future monetization of these now-mandatory services,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;bambulab-forum-3643/5&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; with subscriptions required for features that once worked with local access.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It should be noted, however, that so far &#039;&#039;&#039;no changes have been made or indicated for those not using the cloud service&#039;&#039;&#039;. Past firmware updates made it possible to avoid using the cloud service completely by allowing pairing the slicer via IP address and access key and doing offline firmware updates without having to sign the printer into the service, not even temporarily, keeping local functionality unchanged.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Comparisons to similar practices by other companies==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bambu Lab&#039;s new authorization and authentication requirements have been compared to a number of practices by traditional printer manufacturers, such as [[HP]] or [[Epson]], who have also faced backlash around their handling of [[digital rights management]] (DRM){{Citation needed}}. These comparisons address:&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Forced updates&#039;&#039;&#039;: Firmware updates have rendered third-party ink cartridges incompatible, forcing users to purchase proprietary consumables.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Restricted features&#039;&#039;&#039;: Scanner/printer combos that will not scan if the ink is empty.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Consumer backlash&#039;&#039;&#039;: Users criticized these updates as anti-consumer, with some pursuing [[class action lawsuit|class-action lawsuits]] for deceptive practices.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.classaction.org/hp-printer-ink-firmware-lawsuit&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Like 2D printers, Bambu Lab&#039;s update restricts functionality previously available to users and pushes them toward proprietary software and cloud-based control.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A parallel specific to the 3D-printing industry can also be drawn from the now-defunct 3D-printer manufacturer [[MakerBot]], whose shift from open-source, DIY-focused machines in 2012 to closed-source, proprietary machines (similarly to Bambu Labs), ultimately drove customers to less-expensive, open-source competitors.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://hackaday.com/2016/04/28/the-makerbot-obituary/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; MakerBot was also accused of asserting ownership over publicly available, open-source designs uploaded to its 3D print repository, Thingiverse.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://techcrunch.com/2014/05/28/makerbot-responds-to-critics-who-claim-it-is-stealing-community-ip/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; These factors contributed to MakerBot steadily losing their position and reputation as an industry leader, before getting absorbed by rival Ultimaker in 2022.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==TOS restricting development of third party devices and accessories==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is understood that the following section has been part of the Bambu Lab TOS at least since January 2024,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://archive.is/uVLEG&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; with some users suggesting that the purpose is to restrict development, while others argue that this is a standard clause used by companies around the world&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://archive.is/wip/kKlFU https://archive.is/kKlFU]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“ 3.1 You may not use Bambu Lab technology or Bambu Lab intellectual property to develop software or design, develop, manufacture, sell, or license third-party devices/accessories associated with Bambu Lab Product without Bambu Lab&#039;s prior consent.”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; https://archive.is/KZqib &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Bambu Lab]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Feature Ransom]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TasmanianRex</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://mirror.consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=Microsoft_Office_365&amp;diff=11461</id>
		<title>Microsoft Office 365</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://mirror.consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=Microsoft_Office_365&amp;diff=11461"/>
		<updated>2025-03-09T03:20:23Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TasmanianRex: /* Incidents */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Incomplete|Issue 1= All issues in this article need sources (| Issue 2=  }}&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;[[wikipedia:Microsoft_365|Microsoft 365]]&#039;&#039;&#039; is a family of software, including Microsoft Word, Microsoft PowerPoint, and Microsoft Excel. The branding &#039;&#039;&#039;Office 365&#039;&#039;&#039; was introduced in 2010 to refer to its subscription-based [[software as a service]], including hosted services such as Office on the web. &lt;br /&gt;
==Consumer Impact Summary==&lt;br /&gt;
{{Placeholder box|Overview of concerns that arise from the conduct towards users of the product (if applicable):&lt;br /&gt;
* User Freedom&lt;br /&gt;
* User Privacy&lt;br /&gt;
* Business Model&lt;br /&gt;
* Market Control}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Incidents==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Microsoft Copilot on by default(Word, PowerPoint, Excel)===&lt;br /&gt;
In the current version of Office 365, Microsoft Copilot is turned on by default. It can be turned off in some of the Office applications&#039; options (Word, Excel, but not PowerPoint, though Microsoft say they&#039;ll add the &amp;quot;off&amp;quot; button to PowerPoint in February 2025).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Forced upsell===&lt;br /&gt;
In January 2025, YouTuber Atomic Shrimp reported&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eYVPThx7yss&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; that Microsoft had enacted a &amp;quot;forced upsell&amp;quot; of 365&#039;s new AI Copilot feature. Users with basic accounts (now called &amp;quot;Classic&amp;quot;), such as Shrimp himself, had been informed their subscription fee was going up, but that they would enjoy new features as a result, including Copilot. In his efforts to disable Copilot, Shrimp subsequently discovered that Microsoft now offered &amp;quot;Classic&amp;quot; plans, identical to the old basic plans both in features and in subscription fee. The option to downgrade to Classic, however, was only visible to enterprise users, not to personal users. In essence Microsoft upgraded users&#039; plans without their consent and disabled the option to downgrade, forcing the user to contact Microsoft support in order to opt out of the newly introduced Copilot AI features. The forceful upgrade was at the user&#039;s expense, and the downgrading process through support, according to Shrimp, was very time consuming. It is possible to downgrade a personal account through the website without contacting support. If you go to the first page of the cancellation process, there should be an option to downgrade to the &amp;quot;Classic&amp;quot; plan.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Obfuscation of local saving in favor of OneDrive (Word, PowerPoint, Excel)===&lt;br /&gt;
Because of OneDrive, since the introduction of Office 365, saving files locally has been getting more and more difficult to do. Previously, the user would get the expected saving dialog with a pop-up to browse their computer and choose a file-storage location. This is now multiple clicks away, making it harder to avoid saving the file on OneDrive, Microsoft&#039;s cloud service. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Files on one&#039;s computer are also automatically uploaded to OneDrive by default, causing numerous issues (such as synchronization errors and duplicate files) Turning off this automatic backup is also of considerable difficulty, as one has to navigate a number of settings to get to this option. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To mitigate this somewhat, user can go into Options &amp;gt; Save &amp;gt; Set the check mark on &amp;quot;save locally as default&amp;quot;. It still takes multiple clicks to save a file, but the cloud options are at least a bit less intrusive.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Forced Diagnostic Data Transmission ===&lt;br /&gt;
Versions other than the Enterprise or Education volume licensing editions do not allow turning telemetry off fully. Moreover, the setting is configured to the least private setting by default.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Office transmits data about 23 000 to 25 000 different types of events&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.privacycompany.eu/blog/impact-assessment-shows-privacy-risks-microsoft-office-proplus-enterprise&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; (other reports in context of the German BSI audit speak of 30 000 types of events) to Microsoft. Microsoft can adjust the level of detail transmitted remotely. This can go up to every single keystroke being broadcast live to Microsoft servers in the background. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Given that it is not uncommon in some countries even for hospital to run consumer versions of the software, the privacy implications are tremendous. It cannot reasonably be assumed that any data entered into nor any interaction with a Microsoft Office application will stay private.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Software as a service]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Dark pattern]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Microsoft Office]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Subscription-based services]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Products]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TasmanianRex</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://mirror.consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=Sony&amp;diff=11460</id>
		<title>Sony</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://mirror.consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=Sony&amp;diff=11460"/>
		<updated>2025-03-09T03:18:13Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TasmanianRex: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{StubNotice}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{clear}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{InfoboxCompany&lt;br /&gt;
| Name = SONY&lt;br /&gt;
| Type = Public&lt;br /&gt;
| Founded = 1946&lt;br /&gt;
| Industry = Conglomerate&lt;br /&gt;
| Official Website = https://sony.com/&lt;br /&gt;
| Logo = Sony.svg&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;[[wikipedia:Sony|Sony Group Corporation]]&#039;&#039;&#039; is a Japanese Zaibatsu (or mega corporation) headquartered in Minato, Tokyo, Japan.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;[https://www.sony.com/en/SonyInfo/CorporateInfo/Data/Map/ Access &amp;amp; Map] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210416150015/https://www.sony.com/en/SonyInfo/CorporateInfo/Data/Map/|date=2021-04-16}}.&amp;quot; Sony Global. Retrieved 2 April 2021. &amp;quot;1–7–1 Konan Minato-ku, Tokyo 108-0075, Japan&amp;quot; – [https://web.archive.org/web/20120227050438/http://www.sony.net/SonyInfo/CorporateInfo/Data/Map/map_head_office.pdf Map] – [https://www.sony.jp/CorporateCruise/SMOJ-info/Profile.html Address in Japanese] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230926182046/https://www.sony.jp/CorporateCruise/SMOJ-info/Profile.html|date=2023-09-26}}: &amp;quot;〒108-0075 東京都港区港南1–7–1&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The Sony Group Corporation owns over 100 companies including, but not limited to Sony Semiconductor Solutions, Sony Entertainment (including Sony Pictures and Sony Music Group), Sony Interactive Entertainment, Sony Financial Group, Crunchyroll, and Bungie.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_acquisitions_by_Sony&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sony was established in 1946 as Tokyo Tsushin Kogyo by Masaru Ibuka and Akio Morita.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;https://www.sony.com/en/SonyInfo/CorporateInfo/History/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The young company distinguished itself in the consumer electronics market with transistor radios, home video tape recorders, portable audio players called the Walkman, and compact disk players.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.sony.com/en/SonyInfo/CorporateInfo/History/SonyHistory/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; In 1988, Sony acquired CBS Records.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:1&amp;quot;&amp;gt;https://www.sony.com/en/SonyInfo/CorporateInfo/History/company/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Later, in 1989 it acquired Columbia Pictures.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:1&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; The company also introduced the home video game console [[PlayStation (console)|PlayStation]] in 1994.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:1&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===&#039;&#039;&#039;Different products with systemic problems&#039;&#039;&#039;===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#[[Sony&#039;s WF-1000XM4 earbuds]]&lt;br /&gt;
#[[Sony x900h television]]&lt;br /&gt;
#Sony WH-1000XM5&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Controversies==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- add a preamble here --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+&lt;br /&gt;
!Controversy&lt;br /&gt;
!Year&lt;br /&gt;
!Background Info&lt;br /&gt;
!Aftermath&lt;br /&gt;
!Related Article&lt;br /&gt;
!Related Video(s)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Sony BMG CD copy protection {{wplink|rootkit}}&lt;br /&gt;
|2005&lt;br /&gt;
|Sony BMG distributed about 20 million discs preloaded with copy protection software that tracks the users listening habits (even if the user did not agree to the [[EULA]]), hides itself, and introduces exploitable bugs. As such it has been classified as a rootkit.&lt;br /&gt;
Furthermore, they released an uninstaller tool later that merely un-hides their original rootkit and installs more un-removable software, all while extracting more personal information (e-mail addresses) from users.&lt;br /&gt;
|Class action lawsuits in 2005-2006 forced Sony to recall about 10% of affected CDs. Sony stopped their copy protection attempts in 2007.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://en.m.wikinews.org/wiki/Sony%27s_DRM_protected_CDs_install_Windows_rootkits&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://fsfe.org/activities/drm/sony-rootkit-fiasco.en.html#restrictions-pictures https://fsfe.org/activities/drm/sony-rootkit-fiasco.en.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://web.archive.org/web/20081224153240/http://cp.sonybmg.com/xcp/english/titles.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|PlayStation 3 Blu-Ray AACS License Renewal&lt;br /&gt;
|2006&lt;br /&gt;
|The Advanced Access Content System (AACS) encryption key of Sony PlayStation 3 devices must be renewed every 12 to 18 months via software updates.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://manuals.playstation.net/document/en/ps3/current/video/aacs.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|TBD.  At some point, software updates will no longer be released, which will eventually lock out users from this functionality.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|PlayStation Store Shutdown&lt;br /&gt;
|2021&lt;br /&gt;
|Sony intended to shut down the PlayStation Store on its {{wplink|PlayStation 3|PS3}}, {{wplink|PlayStation Vita|PS Vita}}, and {{wplink|PlayStation Portable|PSP}} consoles, despite many of the content offerings not being available on newer consoles.&lt;br /&gt;
|Sony walked back the decision for the PS3 and PS Vita, citing the negative response from customers.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://blog.playstation.com/2021/04/19/playstation-store-on-ps3-and-ps-vita-will-continue-operations/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Removal of {{wplink|Discovery Channel|Discovery}} titles&lt;br /&gt;
|2023&lt;br /&gt;
|Sony intended to remove customers&#039; access to &amp;quot;purchased&amp;quot; Discovery Channel content at the end of their licensing agreements.&lt;br /&gt;
|Sony reversed the decision, allowing customers to continue accessing the content.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.playstation.com/en-us/legal/psvideocontent/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Sony&#039;s attempted removal of &amp;quot;purchased&amp;quot; content]]&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;ref group=&amp;quot;Video References&amp;quot;&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6bpzyz5kf_A&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref group=&amp;quot;Video References&amp;quot;&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=krXH8jXefqE&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|{{wplink|Helldivers 2}} PSN Account Requirement&lt;br /&gt;
|2024&lt;br /&gt;
|Sony added a {{wplink|PlayStation Network|PSN account}} requirement for Helldivers 2 after the game had become popular, including for countries where you can&#039;t create a PSN account.&lt;br /&gt;
|The requirement was removed,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://store.steampowered.com/news/app/553850/view/4196868529806518741&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; however the game was removed from sale in countries without PSN.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.gamesradar.com/games/third-person-shooter/helldivers-2-gets-delisted-in-more-countries-without-psn-access-blindsided-devs-call-for-it-to-be-available-worldwide/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;ref group=&amp;quot;Video References&amp;quot;&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I2VA0eum6w4&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Revocation of &amp;quot;Forever&amp;quot; licenses to {{wplink|Funimation}} digital content&lt;br /&gt;
|2024&lt;br /&gt;
|After merging Funimation with {{wplink|Crunchyroll, LLC|Crunchyroll}}, Sony revoked all licenses to digital content that had been advertised as &amp;quot;forever&amp;quot; licenses without providing a refund or reimbursement.&lt;br /&gt;
|Some users received free months of service for the new Crunchyroll platform, but only if they submitted a ticket.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.theverge.com/2024/2/26/24080637/funimation-shut-down-crunchyroll-digital-library-compensation?commentID=56ddc90f-8d10-4a23-ac26-16c3557b59b8&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Funimation &amp;quot;Forever&amp;quot; Content License Revocation]]&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Crunchyroll January 2025 Terms of Service Update&lt;br /&gt;
|2025&lt;br /&gt;
|Sony forced users of Crunchyroll into binding arbitration by updating their terms of service and without providing an easy way to opt-out.&lt;br /&gt;
|TBD&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Crunchyroll January 2025 Terms of Service Update]]&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{Reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
===Video references===&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references group=&amp;quot;Video References&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Sony]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TasmanianRex</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://mirror.consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=LG&amp;diff=11459</id>
		<title>LG</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://mirror.consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=LG&amp;diff=11459"/>
		<updated>2025-03-09T03:16:25Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TasmanianRex: /* Implementation */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{InfoboxCompany&lt;br /&gt;
| Name = LG&lt;br /&gt;
| Type = Public&lt;br /&gt;
| Founded = 1947&lt;br /&gt;
| Industry = Electronics&lt;br /&gt;
| Official Website = https://lg.com&lt;br /&gt;
| Logo = LG.png&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[wikipedia:LG|&#039;&#039;&#039;LG Corporation&#039;&#039;&#039;]] is a South Korean electronics and home-appliance chaebol (or mega corporation). They make microwave ovens, ovens, stoves, refrigerators, cell phones (until 2021), TVs, speakers, drives for Blu-ray Disk, CD, and DVD, computer components and peripherals, and other electronics.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Founded in 1947, the company is currently worth over 9.9 billion USD in market cap.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://companiesmarketcap.com/lg-electronics/marketcap/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{Clear}}&lt;br /&gt;
==Controversies==&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+&lt;br /&gt;
!Controversy&lt;br /&gt;
!Year&lt;br /&gt;
!Background Info&lt;br /&gt;
!Aftermath&lt;br /&gt;
!Related Article&lt;br /&gt;
!Related Video(s)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[LG refrigerator warranty scandal|Linear Compressor Reliability]]&lt;br /&gt;
|2001&lt;br /&gt;
|Since its introduction, LG has been the subject of several class action lawsuits stemming from repeated failures of its linear compressor design for most of its refrigerators. There is also widespread criticism of LG&#039;s warranty and service practices related to these compressor failures.&lt;br /&gt;
|Ongoing&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Km-QqU5Pk84&amp;amp;t&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Smart Home Privacy Violations&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|LG&#039;s smart home devices; ranging from its large home appliances, vacuum cleaners, and its TVs have been criticized for their aggressive data collection policies and forced arbitration.&lt;br /&gt;
|Ongoing&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3suztVz8s7s&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Violations of smart-home privacy==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Part of the company&#039;s appliance division is involved with [[smart appliances]], like microwaves. The company also makes smart OLED TVs.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.lg.com/us/promotions&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Implementation===&lt;br /&gt;
The implementation of &amp;quot;smart&amp;quot; LG devices come with the following features:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3suztVz8s7s&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.pcworld.com/article/2490054/smart-tvs-are-spying-on-you-how-much-do-manufacturers-really-know.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://arxiv.org/pdf/2409.06203&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Terms of service]] with the only option being to &amp;quot;accept.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
*A single terms of service that dictates how a multitude of unrelated LG devices can use your personal data. Agreeing on one device means agreement on all.&lt;br /&gt;
*There is only an easily accessible &amp;quot;accept all&amp;quot; button when the service prompts the user with the Terms of Service (ToS).&lt;br /&gt;
*Information gained by smart appliances are used to create a profile on the consumer. This profile is used to give targeted advertisements.&lt;br /&gt;
*Products such as the lines of LG smart vacuum cleaners collect information such as images, floor maps, cleaning history, cleaning diary list, and video feed, which is then sent to LG servers.&lt;br /&gt;
*Products such as LG smart TVs have the &amp;quot;Do not sell my personal data&amp;quot; setting off by default, being opt-out rather than opt-in.&lt;br /&gt;
**In some countries, on some models, (e.g EU and OLED C3) the data collection may become enabled by some firmware updates without the user having accepted the license agreement that entitles LG to collect data. However, the setting to disable the data collection is in a sub-menu that is inaccessible unless the user has agreed to the license agreement. Thus, the user is forced to agree to the license agreement in order to disable data collection.&lt;br /&gt;
*Products such as LG smart TVs aggressively promotes updating the firmware. If there is a newer firmware version, then the user will be prompted to update every time the TV is turned on.&lt;br /&gt;
*Products such as LG smart TV&#039;s collect information on the use of the product, such as what content you watch and when you watch it.&lt;br /&gt;
*LG&#039;s &amp;quot;ThinQ&amp;quot; mobile app to remotely control their line of portable air conditioners have a requirement for users to input their full name, email, and birthday in order to access these remote-control features. Further information fields prompted but not required include phone number, location, and address information.&lt;br /&gt;
*In cases where the OLED TV specifically, not connected to the internet by WiFi or LAN, prompt appears to suggest the user to connect to a network in order to use voice options. This behavior occurs regardless of voice privacy settings set by the user.&lt;br /&gt;
*For smart TVs, sign in to an LG account is now mandatory for functions such as downloading and installing apps. From LG support:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;Regarding the forced sign-in requirement, we apologise for any inconvenience this has caused. The sign-in process is designed to enhance your experience by enabling access to personalised features, app downloads, and updates. It also ensures compatibility with various services and apps available on the LG platform.&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This seems to be a new requirement and is not present on older TVs. It also does not seem to be related to the &amp;quot;Software Version&amp;quot;, but rather the &amp;quot;webOS TV Version&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
:*For unknown reasons, the LG sign in process can present an &amp;quot;Invalid terms type&amp;quot; error message. This seems to have been an issue since at least 2015.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.avforums.com/threads/cant-sign-in-to-lg-account-on-tv.1973633/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In combination with the sign in requirement, this renders the smart functions of the TV inoperable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Broader implications==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:LG ThinQ App Screenshot.png|thumb]]&lt;br /&gt;
This incident represents broader implications:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*A lack of control over one&#039;s own data.&lt;br /&gt;
*A lack of consent before using the customers data to make a profit.&lt;br /&gt;
*Services being &amp;quot;opt-out&amp;quot; instead of being &amp;quot;opt-in.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
*A lack of privacy in one&#039;s own home, because their electronics siphon data to LG, even after the transfer of ownership has been made.&lt;br /&gt;
*A lack of privacy regardless of the user modified settings, as voice recognition, recording, and transmission attempts happen regularly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:LG]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TasmanianRex</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://mirror.consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=ReCAPTCHA&amp;diff=11458</id>
		<title>ReCAPTCHA</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://mirror.consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=ReCAPTCHA&amp;diff=11458"/>
		<updated>2025-03-09T03:14:34Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TasmanianRex: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{InfoboxProductLine&lt;br /&gt;
| Title = reCAPTCHA&lt;br /&gt;
| Release Year = 2007&lt;br /&gt;
| Product Type = CAPTCHA and behavioral analysis&lt;br /&gt;
| In Production = Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| Official Website = https://google.com/recaptcha&lt;br /&gt;
| Logo = ReCAPTCHA.svg&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[wikipedia:ReCAPTCHA|&#039;&#039;&#039;reCAPTCHA&#039;&#039;&#039;]] was acquired by [[Google]] in 2009 and has since been used to protect websites from [[wikipedia:Internet_bot|botting]], crowdsource transcription work, and to mass train Google&#039;s other technical ventures such as artificial intelligence.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://googleblog.blogspot.com/2009/09/teaching-computers-to-read-google.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web |author=&amp;lt;!-- not stated --&amp;gt;|title= Google recaptcha intro on using reCaptcha to improve automation  |url=https://www.google.com/recaptcha/intro/?hl=es/index.html#:~:text=Every%20time%20our%20CAPTCHAs%20are,and%20solve%20hard%20AI%20problems. |website=google.com |access-date=2025-02-15}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Google faced criticism over this crowdsourcing and training for using unpaid labor from millions of daily users around the world, even sparking an ultimately unsuccessful class action lawsuit in Massachusetts in 2015, with the court dismissing the amount of time spent by each user completing a CAPTCHA as &amp;quot;something for which [no] reasonable consumer would expect to receive compensation&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://digitalcommons.law.scu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1904&amp;amp;context=historical&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://casetext.com/case/rojas-lozano-ex-rel-all-other-persons-similarly-situated-v-google-inc&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A video published by YouTube channel CHUPPL sparked renewed controversy with a video released in December 2024. The video cites and details how reCAPTCHA [[wikipedia:Doxing|doxxes]] users and how resulting user data can end up in the hands of the US government for unknown purposes, claiming exploitation of an intentional loophole in Google&#039;s terms of service allowing them to transmit user device and application data under the guise of &amp;quot;general security purposes.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VTsBP21-XpI&amp;amp;t=306s&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; User data allegedly began being collected in 2014, when Google deployed reCAPTCHA v2, specifically the “No CAPTCHA reCAPTCHA” i.e. &amp;quot;the checkbox CAPTCHA,&amp;quot; which primarily uses [[wikipedia:HTTP_cookie|cookies]] to whitelist users who reCAPTCHA identifies as humans. This opens up additional security vulnerabilities as once a user is identified as a human, a bot can take over and be given unrestricted access to all sites using reCAPTCHA without having to fill a CAPTCHA itself.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://homakov.blogspot.com/2014/12/the-no-captcha-problem.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The type of cookies collected includes, but is not limited to:&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;https://www.businessinsider.com/google-no-captcha-adtruth-privacy-research-2015-2&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Screen size and resolution, date, language, browser plug-ins, and all Javascript objects&lt;br /&gt;
*IP address&lt;br /&gt;
*CSS information from the page you are on&lt;br /&gt;
*A count of mouse and touch events&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This digital fingerprinting is nearly inescapable even for privacy focused consumers since, as of November 2024, reCAPTCHA is employed in 84% of all websites.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://trends.builtwith.com/widgets/captcha&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;quot;The implication is that Google isn’t just looking to identify whether you’re a human with its No CAPTCHA, but potentially exactly &#039;&#039;which human&#039;&#039; you are.&amp;quot; - Lara O&#039;Reilly&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;A 2023 study collected data on newly admitted students to UC Irvine&#039;s School of Information &amp;amp; Computer Sciences over 13 months and concludes that reCAPTCHA does not provide real security for Google&#039;s client websites and has, over its 13 years of existence, cost users an estimated 819 million hours equating to nearly $6 billion USD in wages and 134 petabytes of bandwidth corresponding to 7.5 million pounds of CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The study further estimated Google&#039;s direct profits from reCAPTCHA to be &amp;quot;$888 billion USD from cookies and $8.75-32.3 billion USD per each sale of their total labeled data set.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:1&amp;quot;&amp;gt;https://arxiv.org/pdf/2311.10911&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;quot;It can be concluded that the true purpose of reCAPTCHAv2 is as a tracking cookie farm for advertising profit masquerading as a security service.&amp;quot; - Searles, Prapty, and Tsudik&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:1&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;Google has also been accused of allowing reCAPTCHA to accept users running [[Chromium]] web browsers more frequently than alternatives.{{Citation needed}} Users of a Hacker News forum concluded that reCAPTCHA likely attributes a lower reputation score to users with privacy-focused applications and extensions running, thus [[Firefox]] users were assigned CAPTCHAs to solve at a higher rate and difficulty.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20147015&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
reCAPTCHA v3, the &amp;quot;Invisible reCAPTCHA,&amp;quot; launched in 2017 with the goal of never interrupting legitimate human users.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.popsci.com/google-invisible-recaptcha/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This version works completely in the background using cookies to apply a reputation scored on a scale from 0.0 to 1.0, with the latter indicating high confidence a user is human.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://developers.google.com/recaptcha/docs/v3&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://antcpt.com/score_detector/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; A 2019 study on hacking version 3 revealed that reCAPTCHA assigned low scores to simulated users using [[TOR browser]] and that browsers with an active Google account connected received higher scores as compared to browsers without a Google account connected.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://arxiv.org/pdf/1903.01003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Technology consultant Marcos Perona observed similar results and experienced low reputation scores when using a [[VPN]], too. Google recommends implementing reCAPTCHA v3 in the background of all client webpages, so that it collects user data prior to it needing to determine if the user is a bot.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:2&amp;quot;&amp;gt;https://www.fastcompany.com/90369697/googles-new-recaptcha-has-a-dark-side&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Because reCaptcha v3 is likely to be on every page of a website,  if you’re signed into your Google account there’s a chance Google is getting data about every single webpage you go to that is embedded with reCaptcha v3—and there many be no visual indication on the site that it’s happening, beyond a small reCaptcha logo hidden in the corner&amp;quot; - Katharine Schwab&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:2&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;[[File:Invisible-reCaptcha-in-Corner.png|thumb|375px|reCAPTCHA logo in corner of webpage indicating user&#039;s behaviors are being analyzed.]]&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
reCAPTCHA&#039;s shortcomings as summarized by one of their direct competitors, DataDome:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://datadome.co/guides/captcha/recaptchav2-recaptchav3-efficient-bot-protection/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Degrade the user experience.&lt;br /&gt;
*Can lead to high false positives and false negatives.&lt;br /&gt;
*Fail to be privacy compliant with GDPR, the foundational global privacy standard.&lt;br /&gt;
*Leverage [...] users’ data for their organization’s advertising purposes.&lt;br /&gt;
*Are easily bypassed with CAPTCHA farms and advanced bots.&lt;br /&gt;
*Provide no real feedback mechanisms (pass/fail is not enough information to refine your security).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[CAPTCHA]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[DataDome]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[hCAPTCHA]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Privacy Pass]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:CAPTCHA]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Google]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Data Collection]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Articles in need of additional work]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TasmanianRex</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://mirror.consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=General_Data_Protection_Regulation&amp;diff=11457</id>
		<title>General Data Protection Regulation</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://mirror.consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=General_Data_Protection_Regulation&amp;diff=11457"/>
		<updated>2025-03-09T03:13:31Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TasmanianRex: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The &#039;&#039;&#039;[[wikipedia:General_Data_Protection_Regulation|General Data Protection Regulation]]&#039;&#039;&#039; (GDPR) is the European Union&#039;s comprehensive data privacy and security law that went into effect on May 25, 2018.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://gdpr.eu/what-is-gdpr/ &amp;quot;What is GDPR, the EU’s new data protection law?&amp;quot;] - gdpr.eu - 25 May 2018&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The regulation applies to any organization worldwide that processes data related to EU residents, regardless of the organization&#039;s location. It represents the world&#039;s most stringent approach to data protection, with potential fines for violations reaching up to €20 million or 4% of global revenue, whichever is higher.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The regulation mandates several key requirements for organizations processing EU residents&#039; personal data. These include obtaining explicit consent for data collection, ensuring data minimization and purpose limitation, implementing appropriate security measures, and honoring individuals&#039; rights regarding their personal data. Organizations must also maintain detailed documentation of their data processing activities, report data breaches within 72 hours, and in some cases appoint Data Protection Officers. The regulation defines personal data broadly, encompassing everything from basic identifiers like names and email addresses to more complex data like location information, biometric data, and online identifiers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The GDPR has established a new global standard for data protection by codifying several fundamental principles, including transparency, accountability, and privacy by design. Organizations must not only comply with these principles but also be able to demonstrate their compliance through documentation and organizational measures. This comprehensive approach to data protection reflects the EU&#039;s position that privacy is a fundamental human right, building upon the privacy protections first established in the 1950 European Convention on Human Rights and updated for the digital age.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The United Kingdom still enforces the GDPR,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/data-protection-and-the-eu/data-protection-and-the-eu-in-detail/the-uk-gdpr/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; allowing persons physically located within the UK the ability to request data exports and deletions from online services.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.vpaa.uillinois.edu/resources/policies/u_of_i_system_and_international_privacy_laws/the_eu_and_uk_general_data_protection_regulations&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Summary==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Chapter 2: Principles===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Chapter 2 of the GDPR addresses personal data, legal ways to process it, and consent of the user.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://gdpr-info.eu/chapter-2/ &amp;quot;Chapter 2: Principles&amp;quot;] - gdpr-info.eu - 25 May 2018&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Article 5: Principles relating to processing of personal data====&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Main wiki: [https://gdprhub.eu/index.php?title=Article_5_GDPR Article 5 GDPR]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Personal data processing under GDPR mandates that data must be handled lawfully, fairly, and transparently; collected for specific legitimate purposes; kept accurate and up-to-date; minimized to only what&#039;s necessary; stored only as long as required; and protected with appropriate security measures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Article 7: Conditions for consent====&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Main wiki: [https://gdprhub.eu/index.php?title=Article_7_GDPR Article 7 GDPR]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When applicable, data subjects must consent to the processing of his or her personal data. Written requests for consent must use clear and plain language. Any portion of a written request violating the GDPR is not considered binding.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The data subject may also withdraw his or consent at any time and it should &amp;quot;be as easy to withdraw as to give consent.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Consent also must be freely given as defined in Recital 43. Consent is not considered freely given when a power imbalance exists between the data collected and the data subject, when consent for different data operations is improperly bundled together, or when access to services is made conditional on consenting to unnecessary data collection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Chapter 3: Rights of the data subject===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Chapter 3 of the GDPR covers transparency, information and access to personal data, the right to change, erase, or restrict processing of personal data, and the right to object.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://gdpr-info.eu/chapter-3/ &amp;quot;Chapter 3: Rights of the data subject&amp;quot;] - gdpr-info.eu - 25 May 2018&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Article 17: Right to erasure (‘right to be forgotten’)====&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Main wiki: [https://gdprhub.eu/index.php?title=Article_17_GDPR Article 17 GDPR]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Data subjects have the right to request erasure of their personal data by the data processor and the data processor is required to erase said data in a timely manner. This includes unnecessarily stored data, unlawfully processed data, and publically availabe information.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This article does not cover free of expression and information, public interest, archiving purposes, or legally-relevant information.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Article 21: Right to object====&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Main wiki: [https://gdprhub.eu/index.php?title=Article_21_GDPR Article 21 GDPR]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Data subjects have the right to object to processing of their personal data in several key contexts, including when processing is based on public interest or legitimate interests grounds, for direct marketing purposes, or for research purposes - and in the case of direct marketing, this objection must be honored without exception.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When such an objection is made, the controller must cease processing unless they can demonstrate compelling legitimate grounds that override the data subject&#039;s rights and freedoms, with special provisions requiring that this right to object must be explicitly communicated to data subjects and made easily accessible, particularly in digital contexts.&lt;br /&gt;
====Article 22: Automated individual decision-making, including profiling====&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Main wiki: [https://gdprhub.eu/index.php?title=Article_22_GDPR Article 22 GDPR]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Under Article 22, individuals have the right to not be subject to decisions based solely on automated processing or profiling that have legal or similarly significant effects, with three key exceptions: when the automated decision is necessary for a contract, authorized by law, or based on explicit consent. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When automated decisions are made under contractual necessity or explicit consent, the data controller must implement safeguards including human intervention options, allowing individuals to express their views and contest decisions. Automated decisions cannot be based on special categories of personal data (such as race, health data, or political opinions) unless specific conditions are met and appropriate safeguards are in place.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Chapter 4: Controller and processor ===&lt;br /&gt;
Chapter 4 of the GDPR covers general obligations of controllers and processors of data, their security, impact assessments and responsibility.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://gdpr-info.eu/chapter-4/ &amp;quot;Chapter 4: Controller and processor&amp;quot;] - gdpr-info.eu - 25 May 2018&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Article 28: Processor ====&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Main wiki: [https://gdprhub.eu/index.php?title=Article_28_GDPR Article 28 GDPR]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Outsourcing data processing to service providers is no excuse not to comply with GDPR, it is still up to the controller to ensure that the GDPR is complied with.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*https://gdprhub.eu, a wiki summarizing GDPR-related decisions by authorities and courts across Europe&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Common terms]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Legislation]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:EU legislation]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TasmanianRex</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://mirror.consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=Capital_One&amp;diff=11456</id>
		<title>Capital One</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://mirror.consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=Capital_One&amp;diff=11456"/>
		<updated>2025-03-09T03:12:07Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TasmanianRex: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{InfoboxCompany&lt;br /&gt;
| Name = Capital One&lt;br /&gt;
| Type = Public&lt;br /&gt;
| Founded = July 21, 1994&lt;br /&gt;
| Industry = Finance&lt;br /&gt;
| Official Website = https://capitalone.com&lt;br /&gt;
| Logo = Capital One.svg&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Capital One Financial Corporation&#039;&#039;&#039; is an American bank holding company founded on July 21, 1994, and specializing in credit cards, auto loans, banking, and savings accounts, headquartered in McLean, Virginia with operations primarily in the United States.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.sec.gov/ix?doc=/Archives/edgar/data/927628/000092762823000117/cof-20221231.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In May 2018, the company acquired Confyrm, a digital identity and fraud alert service.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://techcrunch.com/2018/05/11/capital-one-acquires-digital-identity-and-fraud-alert-startup-confyrm/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In November 2018, Capital One acquired Wikibuy, a shopping comparison app and browser extension from an Austin, Texas start-up business;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cnbc.com/2018/11/20/capital-one-buys-startup-used-to-price-check-while-shopping-on-amazon.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Controversies==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*In July 2012, Capital One was fined by the [[wikipedia:Office_of_the_Comptroller_of_the_Currency|Office of the Comptroller of the Currency]] and the [[wikipedia:Consumer_Financial_Protection_Bureau|Consumer Financial Protection Bureau]] for misleading millions of its customers, for example by requiring customers to pay extra for payment protection or credit monitoring when they took out a card.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.bbc.com/news/business-18893998&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The company agreed to pay $210 million to settle the legal action and to refund two million customers.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://pdf.secdatabase.com/1492/0001193125-12-305691.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*In September 2018, Capital One sponsored a tutorial on how to build a computer alongside The Verge that had multiple errors titled &amp;quot;How to Build a Custom PC for Editing, Gaming or Coding&amp;quot;, and the video was removed due to backlash from the community.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZDbHnRWSXTk&amp;amp;t=1s https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZDbHnRWSXTk]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In 2019, The Verge filed a DMCA take-down notice to YouTube to remove all reposts of the original video, alleging copyright infringement. YouTube took down two of the videos, uploaded by YouTube channels BitWit and ReviewTechUSA, while applying a copyright &amp;quot;strike&amp;quot; to these two channels.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2019/02/the-verge-briefly-censored-youtubers-who-mocked-its-bad-pc-building-advice/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*In July 2019, Capital One publicly acknowledged a data breach of credit scores, credit limits, balances, payment history, and contact information of around 100 million clients.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.capitalone.com/digital/facts2019/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*In January 2025, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) accused Capital One of cheating savings account holders out of $2 billion in interest payments by &amp;quot;deceptive, abusive and illegal&amp;quot; practices which obscured the difference between the high-interest &amp;quot;360 Performance Savings&amp;quot; accounts vs. low-interest &amp;quot;360 Savings&amp;quot; accounts. Capital One forbade its employees to volunteer information about or marketing 360 Performance Savings to existing customers.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.nytimes.com/2025/01/14/business/capital-one-cfpb-lawsuit.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In February of 2025, the CFPB under the Trump administration dismissed this action with prejudice.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://apnews.com/article/cfpb-drops-capital-one-rocket-lawsuits-e3a4a18ccd9ddd97610ef23fd6b843b2&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Capital One]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TasmanianRex</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://mirror.consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=Mark_Zuckerberg&amp;diff=11452</id>
		<title>Mark Zuckerberg</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://mirror.consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=Mark_Zuckerberg&amp;diff=11452"/>
		<updated>2025-03-08T22:10:48Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TasmanianRex: /* Professional Background */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Incomplete}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Mark Zuckerberg&#039;&#039;&#039; born May 14, 1984 is co-founder, chairman and CEO of social media platform Facebook and its parent company Meta Platforms Inc..&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Professional Background==&lt;br /&gt;
===Facebook===&lt;br /&gt;
Mark Zuckerberg began development on Facebook whilst attending Harvard in 2004.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.businessinsider.com/the-true-story-of-how-mark-zuckerberg-founded-facebook-2016-2 &amp;quot;This is the true story of how Mark Zuckerberg founded Facebook, and it wasn&#039;t to find girls.&amp;quot;] - businessinsider.com - accessed 2025-02-03&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Stance on Consumer Rights==&lt;br /&gt;
This section is incomplete. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Major Consumer Protection Incidents==&lt;br /&gt;
===Cambridge Analytica Data Scandal===&lt;br /&gt;
Former Cambridge Analytica employee, Christopher Wylie, leaked internal documents to journalists demonstrating uninformed consent of personal data collection of up to 87 million Facebook profiles for political advertising purposes through Facebook&#039;s Open Graph Platform and Facebook Application &amp;quot;This is Your Digital Life&amp;quot; developed by data scientist Aleksandr Kogan at Global Science Research.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.cnbc.com/2018/04/10/facebook-cambridge-analytica-a-timeline-of-the-data-hijacking-scandal.html &amp;quot;Facebook-Cambridge Analytica: A timeline of the data hijacking scandal&amp;quot;] - cnbc.com - accessed 2025-02-03&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The appropriated Personal Data was used in the US 2016 Presidency for Ted Cruz&#039;s and Donald Trump&#039;s campaigns.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.businessinsider.com/cambridge-analytica-facebook-scandal-trump-cruz-operatives-2018-3 &amp;quot;There&#039;s an open secret about Cambridge Analytica in the political world: It doesn&#039;t have the &#039;secret sauce&#039; it claims&amp;quot;] - businessinsider.com - accessed 2025-02-03 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Deceptive Marketing&#039;&#039;&#039;: Incomplete. &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Ref&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Data Collection&#039;&#039;&#039;: Incomplete. &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Ref&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Privacy Violations===&lt;br /&gt;
This section is incomplete. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A leaked messenger conversation from the early days of Facebook in Harvard exemplifies his disregard for the privacy of others:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |last=Wong |first=Julia Carrie |date=2018-09-01 |title=I was one of Facebook&#039;s first users. I shouldn&#039;t have trusted Mark Zuckerberg |url=https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/apr/17/facebook-people-first-ever-mark-zuckerberg-harvard |access-date=2025-03-08 |website=The Guardian}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;ZUCK: yea so if you ever need info about anyone at harvard&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
ZUCK: just ask&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
ZUCK: i have over 4000 emails, pictures, addresses, sns&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
FRIEND: what!? how’d you manage that one?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
ZUCK: people just submitted it&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
ZUCK: i don’t know why&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
ZUCK: they “trust me”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
ZUCK: d_u_m_[ignore this]_b f_u_[ignore this]_c_k_s&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;(expletive edited because this Wiki software&#039;s spam protection does not seem to approve of his way of expression)&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Regulatory Response==&lt;br /&gt;
This section is incomplete. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Current Status==&lt;br /&gt;
This section is incomplete. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Impact on Consumer Protection==&lt;br /&gt;
This section is incomplete. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Individuals]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TasmanianRex</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://mirror.consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=PHH_Mortgage_Corporation&amp;diff=11432</id>
		<title>PHH Mortgage Corporation</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://mirror.consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=PHH_Mortgage_Corporation&amp;diff=11432"/>
		<updated>2025-03-08T12:17:47Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TasmanianRex: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{DISPLAYTITLE:PHH Mortgage Corporation (Onity Mortgage)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{InfoboxCompany&lt;br /&gt;
| Name = {{PAGENAME}}&lt;br /&gt;
| Type =Subsidiary&lt;br /&gt;
| Founded =2008&lt;br /&gt;
| Industry =Mortgages&lt;br /&gt;
| Official Website =https://www.phhmortgage.com/&lt;br /&gt;
| Logo =PHH-Mortgage.png&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
PHH Mortgage Corporation is a subsidiary of Onity Group, Inc., a privately held mortgage servicer and lender based in Florida. As of June 10, 2024, Onity Mortgage has been established as a dba (doing business as) of PHH Mortgage.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://business.phhmortgage.com/BusinessPHH/media/BusinessPHH/Pdf/PHH_Onity-FAQs.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:OnityGroupCompanyTree PHHMortgageCorporation V1.png|alt=Tree describing company relationships under the Onity Group, highlighting PHH Mortgage Corporation in light blue|thumb|549x549px|PHH Mortgage Corporation structure according to SEC filings.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |date=27 Nov 2024 |title=ONITY GROUP INC. 8-K |url=https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/873860/000149315224048499/ex10-2.htm |access-date=7 Mar 2024 |website=Securities and Exchange Commission}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Consumer impact summary==&lt;br /&gt;
PHH Mortgage Corporation, a non-bank residential mortgage servicer, has faced multiple allegations related to improper loan servicing practices, impacting borrowers across the United States. The company has been accused of failing to properly apply borrower payments, charging unauthorized fees, and mishandling loan modification requests. In some cases, PHH provided misleading information to homeowners facing foreclosure, and in others, it failed to maintain accurate records or oversee third-party vendors involved in servicing and foreclosure processes.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These practices have led to financial hardship for many homeowners, with some experiencing delays or miscommunications that resulted in foreclosures or loss of modification opportunities.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.nj.gov/oag/newsreleases18/PHH_Complaint-for-filing-v1.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In response to these allegations, PHH has reached settlements, including restitution for affected borrowers and commitments to adopt improved servicing standards.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.nj.gov/oag/newsreleases18/PHH_Consent-Judgment.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Incidents==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===$6.25 Million Consumer Fraud Act Settlement (&#039;&#039;2011&#039;&#039;)===&lt;br /&gt;
In a settlement announced by Acting Attorney General John J. Hoffman,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |last=Hoffman |first=John |date=4 Dec 2013 |title=Acting Attorney General Announces $6.25 Million Settlement Resolving Consumer Fraud Act Allegations Against PHH Mortgage |url=https://nj.gov/oag/newsreleases13/pr20131204a.html |access-date=7 Mar 2025 |website=The State of New Jersey Office of Attorney General}},&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; New Jersey reached a $6.25 million agreement with PHH Mortgage Corporation to resolve allegations that the company misled financially struggling homeowners seeking loan modifications or assistance to avoid foreclosure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===$45 Million Multi-State Settlement (&#039;&#039;2018&#039;&#039;)===&lt;br /&gt;
In a multi-state settlement announced by Attorney General Christopher S. Porrino,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{Cite web |last=Porrino |first=Christopher |date=3 Jan 2018 |title=Attorney General Porrino Announces $45 Million Multi-State Settlement with PHH Mortgage Corporation |url=https://www.nj.gov/oag/newsreleases18/pr20180103b.html |access-date=7 Mar 2025}},&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; New Jersey reached a $45 million agreement with PHH Mortgage Corporation to resolve allegations of improper mortgage loan servicing. The settlement, which includes more than 45 states and the District of Columbia, addresses claims that PHH Mortgage failed to properly service loans over a four-year period.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Between January 1, 2009, and December 31, 2012, PHH Mortgage Corporation was accused of engaging in improper mortgage servicing practices, including: Alleged improper mortgage servicing practices, including:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Misapplying borrower payments and maintaining inaccurate account statements.&lt;br /&gt;
*Charging unauthorized fees for default-related services.&lt;br /&gt;
*Providing conflicting and misleading information to borrowers facing foreclosure.&lt;br /&gt;
*Failing to respond adequately to borrower complaints and loan modification requests.&lt;br /&gt;
*Mishandling loss mitigation applications and documentation.&lt;br /&gt;
*Lacking proper loan servicing records and foreclosure documentation.&lt;br /&gt;
*Inadequately supervising third-party vendors involved in servicing and foreclosure.&lt;br /&gt;
*Submitting foreclosure documents with inaccurate or incomplete information.&lt;br /&gt;
*Using improperly executed affidavits in foreclosure proceedings.&lt;br /&gt;
*Lacking a structured process for document preparation, execution, and notarization in foreclosure cases.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Mortgage Service Center===&lt;br /&gt;
Mortgage Service Center is a registered DBA of PHH Mortgage Corporation,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://mblsportal.sos.state.mn.us/Business/SearchDetails?filingGuid=b9c14d71-c21d-ea11-918b-00155d01b4fc&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://extranet.dfi.in.gov/ConsumerCredit/EntityDetails/2881&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://licensing.coag.gov/s/license-report/a1mcs000001xAl2AAE/sup4000219005&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and engages in direct marketing by utilizing publicly available county records, including property details such as closing dates, loan amounts, lender names, mortgagor names, and addresses, to contact new homeowners with mortgage-related offers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By referencing details related to a homeowner&#039;s recent mortgage, Mortgage Service Center aims to establish credibility and engage potential customers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:{{PAGENAME}}]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Mortgage lenders]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Direct Marketing]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TasmanianRex</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://mirror.consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=PHH_Mortgage_Corporation&amp;diff=11423</id>
		<title>PHH Mortgage Corporation</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://mirror.consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=PHH_Mortgage_Corporation&amp;diff=11423"/>
		<updated>2025-03-08T07:00:13Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TasmanianRex: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{DISPLAYTITLE:PHH Mortgage Corporation (Onity Mortgage)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{InfoboxCompany&lt;br /&gt;
| Name = {{PAGENAME}}&lt;br /&gt;
| Type =Subsidiary&lt;br /&gt;
| Founded =2008&lt;br /&gt;
| Industry =Mortgages&lt;br /&gt;
| Official Website =https://www.phhmortgage.com/&lt;br /&gt;
| Logo =PHH-Mortgage.png&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
PHH Mortgage Corporation is a subsidiary of Onity Group, Inc., a privately held mortgage servicer and lender based in Florida. As of June 10, 2024, Onity Mortgage has been established as a dba (doing business as) of PHH Mortgage.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://business.phhmortgage.com/BusinessPHH/media/BusinessPHH/Pdf/PHH_Onity-FAQs.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:OnityGroupCompanyTree PHHMortgageCorporation V1.png|alt=Tree describing company relationships under the Onity Group, highlighting PHH Mortgage Corporation in light blue|thumb|549x549px|PHH Mortgage Corporation structure according to SEC filings&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |date=27 Nov 2024 |title=ONITY GROUP INC. 8-K |url=https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/873860/000149315224048499/ex10-2.htm |access-date=7 Mar 2024 |website=Securities and Exchange Commission}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Consumer impact summary==&lt;br /&gt;
PHH Mortgage Corporation, a non-bank residential mortgage servicer, has faced multiple allegations related to improper loan servicing practices, impacting borrowers across the United States. The company has been accused of failing to properly apply borrower payments, charging unauthorized fees, and mishandling loan modification requests. In some cases, PHH provided misleading information to homeowners facing foreclosure, and in others, it failed to maintain accurate records or oversee third-party vendors involved in servicing and foreclosure processes.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These practices have led to financial hardship for many homeowners, with some experiencing delays or miscommunications that resulted in foreclosures or loss of modification opportunities.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.nj.gov/oag/newsreleases18/PHH_Complaint-for-filing-v1.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In response to these allegations, PHH has reached settlements, including restitution for affected borrowers and commitments to adopt improved servicing standards.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.nj.gov/oag/newsreleases18/PHH_Consent-Judgment.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Incidents==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===$6.25 Million Consumer Fraud Act Settlement (&#039;&#039;2011&#039;&#039;)===&lt;br /&gt;
In a settlement announced by Acting Attorney General John J. Hoffman,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |last=Hoffman |first=John |date=4 Dec 2013 |title=Acting Attorney General Announces $6.25 Million Settlement Resolving Consumer Fraud Act Allegations Against PHH Mortgage |url=https://nj.gov/oag/newsreleases13/pr20131204a.html |access-date=7 Mar 2025 |website=The State of New Jersey Office of Attorney General}},&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; New Jersey reached a $6.25 million agreement with PHH Mortgage Corporation to resolve allegations that the company misled financially struggling homeowners seeking loan modifications or assistance to avoid foreclosure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===$45 Million Multi-State Settlement (&#039;&#039;2018&#039;&#039;)===&lt;br /&gt;
In a multi-state settlement announced by Attorney General Christopher S. Porrino,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{Cite web |last=Porrino |first=Christopher |date=3 Jan 2018 |title=Attorney General Porrino Announces $45 Million Multi-State Settlement with PHH Mortgage Corporation |url=https://www.nj.gov/oag/newsreleases18/pr20180103b.html |access-date=7 Mar 2025}},&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; New Jersey reached a $45 million agreement with PHH Mortgage Corporation to resolve allegations of improper mortgage loan servicing. The settlement, which includes more than 45 states and the District of Columbia, addresses claims that PHH Mortgage failed to properly service loans over a four-year period.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Between January 1, 2009, and December 31, 2012, PHH Mortgage Corporation was accused of engaging in improper mortgage servicing practices, including: Alleged improper mortgage servicing practices, including:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Misapplying borrower payments and maintaining inaccurate account statements.&lt;br /&gt;
*Charging unauthorized fees for default-related services.&lt;br /&gt;
*Providing conflicting and misleading information to borrowers facing foreclosure.&lt;br /&gt;
*Failing to respond adequately to borrower complaints and loan modification requests.&lt;br /&gt;
*Mishandling loss mitigation applications and documentation.&lt;br /&gt;
*Lacking proper loan servicing records and foreclosure documentation.&lt;br /&gt;
*Inadequately supervising third-party vendors involved in servicing and foreclosure.&lt;br /&gt;
*Submitting foreclosure documents with inaccurate or incomplete information.&lt;br /&gt;
*Using improperly executed affidavits in foreclosure proceedings.&lt;br /&gt;
*Lacking a structured process for document preparation, execution, and notarization in foreclosure cases.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Mortgage Service Center===&lt;br /&gt;
Mortgage Service Center is a registered DBA of PHH Mortgage Corporation,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://mblsportal.sos.state.mn.us/Business/SearchDetails?filingGuid=b9c14d71-c21d-ea11-918b-00155d01b4fc&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://extranet.dfi.in.gov/ConsumerCredit/EntityDetails/2881&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://licensing.coag.gov/s/license-report/a1mcs000001xAl2AAE/sup4000219005&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and engages in direct marketing by utilizing publicly available county records, including property details such as closing dates, loan amounts, lender names, mortgagor names, and addresses, to contact new homeowners with mortgage-related offers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By referencing details related to a homeowner&#039;s recent mortgage, Mortgage Service Center aims to establish credibility and engage potential customers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:{{PAGENAME}}]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Mortgage lenders]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Direct Marketing]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TasmanianRex</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://mirror.consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=Adobe_Creative_Suite_activation&amp;diff=11405</id>
		<title>Adobe Creative Suite activation</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://mirror.consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=Adobe_Creative_Suite_activation&amp;diff=11405"/>
		<updated>2025-03-07T22:03:34Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TasmanianRex: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;=Adobe Creative Suite Activation Server Shutdown=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Adobe Creative Suite support page mentioning the shut down of the activation servers for many of its older versions..png|thumb|The Adobe Creative Suite (CS) Support Page Stating The Shutdown of Activation Servers]]Adobe Creative Suite (CS) was a software collection released from 2003 to 2013, when Adobe replaced it with Creative Cloud (CC). The suite went through several major versions:&lt;br /&gt;
*CS (2003)&lt;br /&gt;
*CS2 (2005)&lt;br /&gt;
*CS3 (2007)&lt;br /&gt;
*CS4 (2008)&lt;br /&gt;
*CS5 (2010)&lt;br /&gt;
*CS5.5 (2011)&lt;br /&gt;
*CS6 (2012)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The Activation System==&lt;br /&gt;
When Adobe introduced the creative suite in 2003, Adobe implemented a new online activation system that wasn&#039;t present in Adobe&#039;s previous products. This system required users to connect to Adobe&#039;s servers to verify their serial number before the software could be used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Server Shutdown and Impact==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Technical Issue===&lt;br /&gt;
When the installer is run from any source, the setup program will try to contact Adobe; either during the installation or post-install when the user tries to run the application for the first time. It will attempt to verify their serial number. The program will fail to contact Adobe, as the server it uses for serial number verification has been shut down. After trying for a few seconds or minutes the setup program will display an error, as it cannot contact the activation servers; and the applications will not be activated, rendering them in an inoperable state.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Non-existant solution:===&lt;br /&gt;
Nancy OShea, a &#039;Community Expert&#039; and Moderator on the Adobe forums, has made the following reference to a method to obtain a new CS3 installer that does not require activation:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://community.adobe.com/t5/download-install-discussions/cs3-activation-branched-from-cs2-activation/td-p/9689902&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;The correct answer below describes how to obtain a new CS3 installer, a new serial number that does not require activation and the procedures necessary to make it work.   Read them carefully.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://community.adobe.com/t5/download-install-discussions/cs3-activation-branched-from-cs2-activation/m-p/9689903#M136927&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;[https://forums.adobe.com/thread/1545413 Re-activating CS3 (Updated)]&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Nancy adobe activation servers.png|thumb|Nancy OShea on adobe forums linking to a method to install software after activation servers have been phased out, that does not work.]]&lt;br /&gt;
However, the link she provided to &#039;&#039;&amp;quot;Re-activating CS3(Updated)&amp;quot;&#039;&#039; does not work as of February 17th, 2025. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Affected Versions===&lt;br /&gt;
As of February 2025, Adobe has shut down the activation servers for:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://helpx.adobe.com/creative-suite.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*CS1&lt;br /&gt;
*CS2&lt;br /&gt;
*CS3&lt;br /&gt;
*CS4&lt;br /&gt;
*CS5&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Impact on License Owners of Adobe Creative Suite===&lt;br /&gt;
The server shutdown creates serious issues for legitimate owners who purchased the software:&lt;br /&gt;
*Unable to install or reinstall the software, even from original media&lt;br /&gt;
*Cannot activate existing installations&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Adobe&#039;s Response===&lt;br /&gt;
Adobe has cited &amp;quot;aging activation servers&amp;quot; as the reason for the shutdown. While the company claims to have:&lt;br /&gt;
*Sent notification emails to registered users&lt;br /&gt;
*Provided modified installers that don&#039;t require activation&lt;br /&gt;
Many users report never receiving this communication, particularly those who didn&#039;t register their products when registration was optional. Without registration, adobe had no way of having the contact information of these customers who did not complete an optional registration.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://community.adobe.com/t5/photoshop-ecosystem-discussions/activation-server-retirement/m-p/11491977&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== &#039;&#039;&#039;Workaround for CS4&#039;&#039;&#039; ===&lt;br /&gt;
If you still have an prior, duly-activated installation :&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Install desired components from CS4. Don&#039;t waste time trying to activate.&lt;br /&gt;
* Copy the amtlib.dll files from each old install subdirectory to the respective subdirectories in the new install. Everything runs without the aggravation of useless reminders.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TasmanianRex</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://mirror.consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=PHH_Mortgage_Corporation&amp;diff=11386</id>
		<title>PHH Mortgage Corporation</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://mirror.consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=PHH_Mortgage_Corporation&amp;diff=11386"/>
		<updated>2025-03-07T11:49:27Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TasmanianRex: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Incomplete|Issue 1=The consumer impact summary need source to back up the claims made. These may overlap with the settlements below but are needed nevertheless.}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{InfoboxCompany&lt;br /&gt;
| Name = {{PAGENAME}}&lt;br /&gt;
| Type =Subsidiary&lt;br /&gt;
| Founded =2008&lt;br /&gt;
| Industry =Mortgages&lt;br /&gt;
| Official Website =https://www.phhmortgage.com/&lt;br /&gt;
| Logo =PHH-Mortgage.png&lt;br /&gt;
}}PHH Mortgage Corporation is a subsidiary of Onity Mortgage, a privately held mortgage servicer and lender based in Florida.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Consumer impact summary==&lt;br /&gt;
PHH Mortgage Corporation, a non-bank residential mortgage servicer, has faced multiple allegations related to improper loan servicing practices, impacting borrowers across the United States. The company has been accused of failing to properly apply borrower payments, charging unauthorized fees, and mishandling loan modification requests. In some cases, PHH provided misleading information to homeowners facing foreclosure, and in others, it failed to maintain accurate records or oversee third-party vendors involved in servicing and foreclosure processes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These practices have led to financial hardship for many homeowners, with some experiencing delays or miscommunications that resulted in foreclosures or loss of modification opportunities. In response to these allegations, PHH has reached settlements, including restitution for affected borrowers and commitments to adopt improved servicing standards. Despite these actions, the company’s practices have raised concerns about transparency, consumer protection, and the treatment of financially struggling homeowners.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Incidents==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===$45 Million Multi-State Settlement (&#039;&#039;2018&#039;&#039;)===&lt;br /&gt;
In a multi-state settlement announced by Attorney General Christopher S. Porrino,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |last=Porrino |first=Christopher |date=3 Jan 2018 |title=Attorney General Porrino Announces $45 Million Multi-State Settlement with PHH Mortgage Corporation |url=https://www.nj.gov/oag/newsreleases18/pr20180103b.html |access-date=7 Mar 2025}},&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; New Jersey reached a $45 million agreement with PHH Mortgage Corporation to resolve allegations of improper mortgage loan servicing. The settlement, which includes more than 45 states and the District of Columbia, addresses claims that PHH Mortgage failed to properly service loans over a four-year period.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Between January 1, 2009, and December 31, 2012, PHH Mortgage Corporation was accused of engaging in improper mortgage servicing practices, including: Alleged improper mortgage servicing practices, including:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Misapplying borrower payments and maintaining inaccurate account statements.&lt;br /&gt;
*Charging unauthorized fees for default-related services.&lt;br /&gt;
*Providing conflicting and misleading information to borrowers facing foreclosure.&lt;br /&gt;
*Failing to respond adequately to borrower complaints and loan modification requests.&lt;br /&gt;
*Mishandling loss mitigation applications and documentation.&lt;br /&gt;
*Lacking proper loan servicing records and foreclosure documentation.&lt;br /&gt;
*Inadequately supervising third-party vendors involved in servicing and foreclosure.&lt;br /&gt;
*Submitting foreclosure documents with inaccurate or incomplete information.&lt;br /&gt;
*Using improperly executed affidavits in foreclosure proceedings.&lt;br /&gt;
*Lacking a structured process for document preparation, execution, and notarization in foreclosure cases.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===$6.25 Million Consumer Fraud Act Settlement (&#039;&#039;2011&#039;&#039;)===&lt;br /&gt;
In a settlement announced by Acting Attorney General John J. Hoffman,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |last=Hoffman |first=John |date=4 Dec 2013 |title=Acting Attorney General Announces $6.25 Million Settlement Resolving Consumer Fraud Act Allegations Against PHH Mortgage |url=https://nj.gov/oag/newsreleases13/pr20131204a.html |access-date=7 Mar 2025 |website=The State of New Jersey Office of Attorney General}},&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; New Jersey reached a $6.25 million agreement with PHH Mortgage Corporation to resolve allegations that the company misled financially struggling homeowners seeking loan modifications or assistance to avoid foreclosure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:{{PAGENAME}}]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TasmanianRex</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://mirror.consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=PHH_Mortgage_Corporation&amp;diff=11385</id>
		<title>PHH Mortgage Corporation</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://mirror.consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=PHH_Mortgage_Corporation&amp;diff=11385"/>
		<updated>2025-03-07T11:48:55Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TasmanianRex: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Incomplete|Issue 1=The consumer impact summary need source to back up the claims made. These may overlap with the settlements below but are needed nevertheless.}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{InfoboxCompany&lt;br /&gt;
| Name = {{PAGENAME}}&lt;br /&gt;
| Type =Subsidiary&lt;br /&gt;
| Founded =2008&lt;br /&gt;
| Industry =Mortgages&lt;br /&gt;
| Official Website =https://www.phhmortgage.com/&lt;br /&gt;
| Logo =PHH-Mortgage.png&lt;br /&gt;
}}PHH Mortgage Corporation is a subsidiary of Onity Mortgage, a privately held mortgage servicer and lender based in Florida.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Consumer impact summary==&lt;br /&gt;
PHH Mortgage Corporation, a non-bank residential mortgage servicer, has faced multiple allegations related to improper loan servicing practices, impacting borrowers across the United States. The company has been accused of failing to properly apply borrower payments, charging unauthorized fees, and mishandling loan modification requests. In some cases, PHH provided misleading information to homeowners facing foreclosure, and in others, it failed to maintain accurate records or oversee third-party vendors involved in servicing and foreclosure processes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These practices have led to financial hardship for many homeowners, with some experiencing delays or miscommunications that resulted in foreclosures or loss of modification opportunities. In response to these allegations, PHH has reached settlements, including restitution for affected borrowers and commitments to adopt improved servicing standards. Despite these actions, the company’s practices have raised concerns about transparency, consumer protection, and the treatment of financially struggling homeowners.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Incidents==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===$45 Million Multi-State Settlement (&#039;&#039;2018&#039;&#039;)===&lt;br /&gt;
In a multi-state settlement announced by Attorney General Christopher S. Porrino&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |last=Porrino |first=Christopher |date=3 Jan 2018 |title=Attorney General Porrino Announces $45 Million Multi-State Settlement with PHH Mortgage Corporation |url=https://www.nj.gov/oag/newsreleases18/pr20180103b.html |access-date=7 Mar 2025}},&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; New Jersey reached a $45 million agreement with PHH Mortgage Corporation to resolve allegations of improper mortgage loan servicing. The settlement, which includes more than 45 states and the District of Columbia, addresses claims that PHH Mortgage failed to properly service loans over a four-year period.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Between January 1, 2009, and December 31, 2012, PHH Mortgage Corporation was accused of engaging in improper mortgage servicing practices, including: Alleged improper mortgage servicing practices, including:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Misapplying borrower payments and maintaining inaccurate account statements.&lt;br /&gt;
*Charging unauthorized fees for default-related services.&lt;br /&gt;
*Providing conflicting and misleading information to borrowers facing foreclosure.&lt;br /&gt;
*Failing to respond adequately to borrower complaints and loan modification requests.&lt;br /&gt;
*Mishandling loss mitigation applications and documentation.&lt;br /&gt;
*Lacking proper loan servicing records and foreclosure documentation.&lt;br /&gt;
*Inadequately supervising third-party vendors involved in servicing and foreclosure.&lt;br /&gt;
*Submitting foreclosure documents with inaccurate or incomplete information.&lt;br /&gt;
*Using improperly executed affidavits in foreclosure proceedings.&lt;br /&gt;
*Lacking a structured process for document preparation, execution, and notarization in foreclosure cases.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===$6.25 Million Consumer Fraud Act Settlement (&#039;&#039;2011&#039;&#039;)===&lt;br /&gt;
In a settlement announced by Acting Attorney General John J. Hoffman&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |last=Hoffman |first=John |date=4 Dec 2013 |title=Acting Attorney General Announces $6.25 Million Settlement Resolving Consumer Fraud Act Allegations Against PHH Mortgage |url=https://nj.gov/oag/newsreleases13/pr20131204a.html |access-date=7 Mar 2025 |website=The State of New Jersey Office of Attorney General}},&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; New Jersey reached a $6.25 million agreement with PHH Mortgage Corporation to resolve allegations that the company misled financially struggling homeowners seeking loan modifications or assistance to avoid foreclosure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:{{PAGENAME}}]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TasmanianRex</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://mirror.consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=Signal_cloud_backups&amp;diff=11369</id>
		<title>Signal cloud backups</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://mirror.consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=Signal_cloud_backups&amp;diff=11369"/>
		<updated>2025-03-07T08:35:23Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TasmanianRex: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{ToneWarning}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Signal is an open source encrypted messaging service that is frequently recommended to highly vulnerable users such as human rights activists, whistleblowers, and journalists whose lives and/or freedom can depend on their ability to maintain private and secure communication. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since 2020 Signal has been collecting and keeping sensitive user data in the cloud while lying to their users about their data collection practices.{{DisputedInline|Tone is inappropriate|reason=tone}} Users and potential users of Signal have a right to know what data is being collected and how it is being stored and secured so that they make informed choices about the risks they are taking when using Signal. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Background==&lt;br /&gt;
Over the years Signal has curated a reputation that they do not collect or keep data on their users.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Signal has publicly disclosed that they have received legal requests for subscriber&#039;s names, telephone numbers, histories, and contacts and Signal has said that they were unable to supply that information because it was never collected by Signal in the first place. These incidents have been reported in the media.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |title=FBI demands Signal user data, but there’s not much to hand over |url=https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2016/10/fbi-demands-signal-user-data-but-theres-not-much-to-hand-over/ |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240401002649/https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2016/10/fbi-demands-signal-user-data-but-theres-not-much-to-hand-over/ |archive-date=1 Apr 2024 |access-date=6 Mar 2025}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Signal&#039;s website states:&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{Cite web |title=Grand jury subpoena for Signal user data, Eastern District of Virginia |url=https://signal.org/bigbrother/eastern-virginia-grand-jury/ |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20250302042109/https://signal.org/bigbrother/eastern-virginia-grand-jury/ |archive-date=2 Mar 2025 |access-date=6 Mar 2025}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&amp;quot;We’ve designed the Signal service to minimize the data we retain about Signal users, so the only information we can produce in response to a request like this is the date and time a user registered with Signal and the last date of a user’s connectivity to the Signal service.&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Notably, things we don’t have stored include anything about a user’s contacts (such as the contacts themselves, a hash of the contacts, any other derivative contact information), anything about a user’s groups (such as how many groups a user is in, which groups a user is in, the membership lists of a user’s groups), or any records of who a user has been communicating with.&amp;quot;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Data collection begins==&lt;br /&gt;
{{DisputedInline|reason=see further notices in this section, section title is misleading|Misleading section title}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Signal&#039;s data collection practices changed in 2019 when Signal previewed a feature they called &amp;quot;secure value recovery&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |title=Technology Preview for secure value recovery |url=https://signal.org/blog/secure-value-recovery/ |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20241228040757/https://signal.org/blog/secure-value-recovery/ |archive-date=28 Dec 2024 |access-date=6 Mar 2025}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This new feature meant that Signal would start collecting the same kinds of information that Signal had been getting legal requests to turn over, and that Signal would permanently keep that data in the cloud.{{DisputedInline|reason=feature does not store user data in the cloud like other messaging apps|Misrepresents the new feature as storing user&#039;s data to cloud servers}} Their stated reason for doing this was so that if a Signal user got a new device they could install the app, enter a pin, and the app would pull down the user&#039;s data from cloud servers. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The data being collecting and stored in could includes: The user&#039;s name, photo, phone number, and a list of every Signal user they have contacted.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |title=What contact info does the Signal PIN functionality actually save |url=https://community.signalusers.org/t/what-contact-info-does-the-signal-pin-functionality-actually-save/16854/4 |access-date=6 Mar 2025}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;{{DisputedInline|reason=contact discovery on Signal is private and does not share the phone number as explained later in the cited sources|Cited source is heavily cherry picked}} &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This was a highly controversial change, and some Signal users objected on philosophical grounds,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |title=Don’t want PIN, don’t want anything stored in cloud |url=https://community.signalusers.org/t/dont-want-pin-dont-want-anything-stored-in-cloud/14057 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240301015109/https://community.signalusers.org/t/dont-want-pin-dont-want-anything-stored-in-cloud/14057 |archive-date=1 Mar 2024 |access-date=6 Mar 2025}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; requesting that Signal instead provide a means to export encrypted backups that could be imported locally eliminating any need to upload data to the cloud. Signal users also raised technical concerns about the security of the system and doubts that it would protect their data.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |title=Proper secure value security: PINs are too easy to brute force, SGX is not reliable enough |url=https://community.signalusers.org/t/proper-secure-value-security-pins-are-too-easy-to-brute-force-sgx-is-not-reliable-enough/15096 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240301015110/https://community.signalusers.org/t/proper-secure-value-security-pins-are-too-easy-to-brute-force-sgx-is-not-reliable-enough/15096 |archive-date=1 Mar 2024 |access-date=6 Mar 2025}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Some of these concerns were also shared by cybersecurity-experts&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |title=Signal’s New PIN Feature Worries Cybersecurity Experts |url=https://www.vice.com/en/article/signal-new-pin-feature-worries-cybersecurity-experts/ |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20250117232443/https://www.vice.com/en/article/signal-new-pin-feature-worries-cybersecurity-experts/ |archive-date=17 Jan 2025 |access-date=6 Mar 2025}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |title=Signal Going to Cloud? A Discussion with Sean O&#039;Brien |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PFi-VI7_T3o}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |title=Does Signal’s “secure value recovery” really work? |url=https://palant.info/2020/06/16/does-signals-secure-value-recovery-really-work/}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and security researchers demonstrated that the system was vulnerable to attacks which allowed them to access the user data being stored.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |title=SGX CacheOut SGAxe attack. Signal’s cloud storage and contact discovery vulnerable |url=https://community.signalusers.org/t/sgx-cacheout-sgaxe-attack-signals-cloud-storage-and-contact-discovery-vulnerable/14892 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230519115856/https://community.signalusers.org/t/sgx-cacheout-sgaxe-attack-signals-cloud-storage-and-contact-discovery-vulnerable/14892 |archive-date=19 May 2023 |access-date=6 Mar 2025}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;{{DisputedInline|reason=&amp;quot;In recent weeks, Signal has introduced more features that make it more user friendly to people who may not have extremely paranoid threat models. For example, it’s now possible to migrate all Signal data, including message history, from one phone to another, using a feature that does not rely on cloud servers and is also encrypted, according to Signal. &amp;quot;|Cited vice article explains more nuance}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Signal&#039;s response===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Signal was not convinced to abandon this data collection and they began to roll out the change in 2020 without clear communication about the new feature.{{DisputedInline|reason=tone|Tone is inappropriate}}{{DisputedInline|Misrepresents PIN feature as it is optional and not properly explained|reason=include the response to the hysteria and a proper explanation of the feature}} It resulted in a lot of confusion for users, many of whom only learned about this feature when they were prompted to create a PIN. There were many social media posts expressing confusion over what the feature was and what it was doing.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |title=What contact info does the Signal PIN functionality actually save? |url=https://community.signalusers.org/t/what-contact-info-does-the-signal-pin-functionality-actually-save/16854}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |title=Following user backlash, Signal lowers one of its drastic PIN measures |url=https://www.androidpolice.com/2020/05/29/many-signal-users-arent-happy-with-new-pin-requirements/}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |title=What exactly is Signal protecting with the mandatory PIN? |url=https://old.reddit.com/r/signal/comments/hymlfd/what_exactly_is_signal_protecting_with_the/}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Even years after the change was made some Signal users were/are still unsure about what data Signal collects or were/are convinced that Signal doesn&#039;t collect any data at all.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |title=What info does Signal store about it&#039;s user? |url=https://old.reddit.com/r/signal/comments/q5tlg1/what_info_does_signal_store_about_its_user/ |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211011111619/https://old.reddit.com/r/signal/comments/q5tlg1/what_info_does_signal_store_about_its_user/ |archive-date=11 Oct 2021 |access-date=6 Mar 2025}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |title=About data collection and data delivery |url=https://old.reddit.com/r/signal/comments/1id3xu8/about_data_collection_and_data_delivery/ |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20250201072439/https://old.reddit.com/r/signal/comments/1id3xu8/about_data_collection_and_data_delivery/?ref=readnext |archive-date=1 Feb 2025 |access-date=6 Mar 2025}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This confusion is understandable,{{DisputedInline|reason=tone|Tone is inappropriate}} since Signal&#039;s own website continues to state that they do not collect the information they are collecting. The first line of their &amp;quot;Terms &amp;amp; Privacy Policy&amp;quot; page reads: &amp;quot;Signal is designed to never collect or store any sensitive information.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |title=Signal Terms &amp;amp; Privacy Policy |url=https://signal.org/legal/ |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20250302122622/https://signal.org/legal/ |archive-date=2 Mar 2025 |access-date=6 Mar 2025}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This lie{{DisputedInline|reason=tone|Tone is inappropriate}} is also repeated on their support page under the heading: How do I know my communication is private&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |title=How do I know my communication is private? |url=https://support.signal.org/hc/en-us/articles/360007318911-How-do-I-know-my-communication-is-private |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20250214030028/https://support.signal.org/hc/en-us/articles/360007318911-How-do-I-know-my-communication-is-private |archive-date=14 Feb 2025 |access-date=6 Mar 2025}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is no indication on Signal&#039;s older pages, which claim they don&#039;t collect this information, that the data collection policy discussed on those pages is now outdated either. Examples include: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&amp;quot;Signal is designed to never collect or store any sensitive information. &amp;quot; - https://support.signal.org/hc/en-us/articles/360007059412-Signal-and-the-General-Data-Protection-Regulation-GDPR&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&amp;quot;The Signal service does not have any knowledge of your contacts. Data is all owned by your phone.&amp;quot; - https://support.signal.org/hc/en-us/articles/360007061452-Does-Signal-send-my-number-to-my-contacts&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&amp;quot;In addition to the end-to-end encryption that protects every Signal message, the Signal service is designed to minimize the data that is retained about Signal users. By design, it does not store a record of your contacts, social graph, conversation list, location, user avatar, user profile name, group memberships, group titles, or group avatars.&amp;quot; - https://signal.org/blog/sealed-sender/&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&amp;quot;Notably, things we don’t have stored include anything about a user’s contacts (such as the contacts themselves, a hash of the contacts, any other derivative contact information), anything about a user’s groups (such as how many groups a user is in, which groups a user is in, the membership lists of a user’s groups), or any records of who a user has been communicating with.&amp;quot; - https://signal.org/bigbrother/eastern-virginia-grand-jury/&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&amp;quot;Because we’ve built Signal to completely avoid storing any sensitive information....&amp;quot; - https://signal.org/blog/looking-back-as-the-world-moves-forward/&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Requests have been mad&#039;&#039;e for Signal to update their policy following the change in data collection.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |title=Can Signal please update its Privacy Policy |url=https://community.signalusers.org/t/can-signal-please-update-its-privacy-policy/15323 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230519120053/https://community.signalusers.org/t/can-signal-please-update-its-privacy-policy/15323 |archive-date=19 May 2023 |access-date=6 Mar 2025}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |title=Signal’s Terms of Use and Privacy Policy are not very user friendly |url=https://community.signalusers.org/t/signals-terms-of-use-and-privacy-policy-are-not-very-user-friendly/11047 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20250306164621/https://community.signalusers.org/t/signals-terms-of-use-and-privacy-policy-are-not-very-user-friendly/11047 |archive-date=6 Mar 2025 |access-date=6 Mar 2025}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Workarounds&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While some social media posts and articles suggested that opting out of setting a pin would prevent a user&#039;s data from being uploaded to the cloud, this is not the case. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |title=A few thoughts about Signal’s Secure Value Recovery |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200712205333/https://blog.cryptographyengineering.com/2020/07/10/a-few-thoughts-about-signals-secure-value-recovery/}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;There is currently no way for a Signal user to prevent their data from being uploaded and stored in the cloud.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |title=PSA: Disabling PINs will now upload nothing to the server |url=https://old.reddit.com/r/signal/comments/htmzrr/psa_disabling_pins_will_now_upload_nothing_to_the/ |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230616082821/https://old.reddit.com/r/signal/comments/htmzrr/psa_disabling_pins_will_now_upload_nothing_to_the/ |archive-date=16 Jun 2023 |access-date=6 Mar 2025}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Signal messenger]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TasmanianRex</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://mirror.consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=Wemo&amp;diff=11354</id>
		<title>Wemo</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://mirror.consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=Wemo&amp;diff=11354"/>
		<updated>2025-03-06T22:12:00Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TasmanianRex: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Incomplete}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{InfoboxCompany&lt;br /&gt;
| Name = {{PAGENAME}}&lt;br /&gt;
| Type = Subsidiary &lt;br /&gt;
| Founded = 2012&lt;br /&gt;
| Industry = Smart home&lt;br /&gt;
| Official Website = [https://web.archive.org/web/20230410053217/wemo.com wemo.com] (https://www.belkin.com/products/wemo-smart-home/)&lt;br /&gt;
| Logo = Wemo.png&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Wikipedia:WEMO|Wemo]] is a subsidiary of Belkin founded in 2012. They are known for smart home devices such as plugs and light switches that use the HomeKit and Thread protocols.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Consumer impact summary==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:WEMO account closure.PNG|thumb|right|alt=|Screenshot of account closure screen.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Through the app, users can delete their account by pressing the &amp;quot;close account&amp;quot; button, which will warn that Wemos cannot be controlled through the app once account data is deleted. The devices can also work by only using the Apple Home app, which does not require a Wemo account to set up.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since late 2023, the [https://www.belkin.com/legal/privacy-policy/ privacy policy] of Belkin and Wemo have merged, sharing the same terms with each other. The data collected on users includes account information such as email and password, device information, first and third-party cookies, age, location, and IP address.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://web.archive.org/web/20230107062703/https://www.wemo.com/privacy-policy/#typesofinformation&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Belkin shares this info with marketing partners unless the user opts-out.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.belkin.com/legal/privacy-policy/#marketing-anchor&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Users are allowed to make requests to access, withdraw consent, object, and delete most of the information Belkin has collected on them.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.belkin.com/legal/privacy-policy/#your-rights-in-relation&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Belkin states they may need to hold onto information to &amp;quot;Defending Belkin against legal claims&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;Needing to respond to customer complaints and queries&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.belkin.com/legal/privacy-policy/#retention-of&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The business model of Wemo is to sell smart home devices without the user paying for a subscription service. Although this may seem like a pro-consumer move, the Wemo experience has been diminished due to the lack of income streams. According to the App Store, the app once had a 3-year window without updates, which lasted between February 23, 2021 and May 28, 2024 (the current version as of February 24, 2025).&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;AAS&amp;quot;&amp;gt;https://apps.apple.com/us/app/wemo/id511376996&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Market control of Wemo has been decreasing over the years, as Wemo is only selling three devices,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://web.archive.org/web/20240225173134/https://www.belkin.com/products/wemo-smart-home/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; down from nine the year prior.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://web.archive.org/web/20230201232551/https://www.belkin.com/products/wemo-smart-home/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Incidents==&lt;br /&gt;
===Security vulnerabilites===&lt;br /&gt;
On November 5, 2013, Wemo updated its API to prevent future XML injection attacks.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.belkin.com/support-article/?articleNum=80322&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On May 16, 2023, multiple websites reported a Sternum study regarding a buffer overflow vulnerability in the Wemo Mini Smart Plug V2.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://sternumiot.com/iot-blog/mini-smart-plug-v2-vulnerability-buffer-overflow/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The study mentions the device could be exploited through a program called pyWemo&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thehackernews.com/2023/05/serious-unpatched-vulnerability.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and potentially through cloud controls.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.theverge.com/2023/5/16/23725290/wemo-smart-plug-v2-smart-home-security-vulnerability&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In their official response, Wemo stated &amp;quot;we believe that bad actors cannot exploit this vulnerability unless they have access to the user’s local network&amp;quot;,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://x.com/WEMOcares/status/1658963426230562819&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and &amp;quot;We discontinued the Wemo Mini Smart Plug v2 (F7C063) in 2020&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://x.com/WEMOcares/status/1658963635882938374&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; despite not making this information publicly available prior. During this report, the Wemo app hadn&#039;t been updated in 2 years, with the most recent update being on February 23, 2021, as previously mentioned.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;AAS&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Connection issues===&lt;br /&gt;
Since 2018, there have been reports of Wemo devices losing connection to networks frequently.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.reddit.com/r/WeMo/comments/8sv90i/the_most_common_problems_and_issues_with_wemo/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This has been the case for dimmers,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.reddit.com/r/WeMo/comments/zwb7wr/comment/j1xqs3h/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; plugs,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.reddit.com/r/WeMo/comments/17ur9b2/comment/k97i0dp/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and switches.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.reddit.com/r/WeMo/comments/18iidjr/comment/m6utdkq/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Device rules created through the Wemo app have also been described as unreliable.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.reddit.com/r/WeMo/comments/18iidjr/comment/kdr6n38/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In some cases, the Wemo cloud becomes offline, with users being led to 404 pages.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.reddit.com/r/WeMo/comments/zkd9xc/belkin_wemo_is_the_worst_the_app_is_full_of_bugs/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some users have mediated these issues by self-hosting a local server for Wemo devices, such as AutomationManager and Home Assistant.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.reddit.com/r/WeMo/comments/18iidjr/comment/kf6plao/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===DNS activity===&lt;br /&gt;
Some users of Wemo have noticed their switches connect to multiple unrelated domains, such as to CNN and Fastly.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.reddit.com/r/WeMo/comments/1auslst/fun_fact_wemo_switches_act_as_a_dns_server/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Other reports mention each Wemo device making 160,000+ DNS requests in a 24 hour timeframe.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.reddit.com/r/WeMo/comments/1auslst/comment/ktxkqx8/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.reddit.com/r/WeMo/comments/1auslst/comment/krb0i1o/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Products==&lt;br /&gt;
*Dimmers&lt;br /&gt;
**Wemo Smart Dimmer&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://web.archive.org/web/20221130043724/https://www.belkin.com/smart-dimmer/P-WDS070.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
**Wemo WiFi Smart Dimmer&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://web.archive.org/web/20221129001529/https://www.belkin.com/wifi-smart-dimmer/P-WDS060.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Doorbells&lt;br /&gt;
**Wemo Smart Video Doorbell&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.belkin.com/p/smart-video-doorbell/WDC010.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Light switches&lt;br /&gt;
**Wemo Smart Light Switch with Thread&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.belkin.com/p/smart-light-switch-with-thread/WLS0503.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
**Wemo WiFi Smart Light Switch&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://web.archive.org/web/20221130045654/https://www.belkin.com/wifi-smart-light-switch/WLS040-CA.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
**Wemo Smart Light Switch 3-Way&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://web.archive.org/web/20221129145512/https://www.belkin.com/smart-light-switch-3-way/P-WLS0403.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Plugs&lt;br /&gt;
**Wemo Smart Plug with Thread&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://web.archive.org/web/20230910113415/https://www.belkin.com/smart-plug-with-thread/WSP100.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; (release date): Short summary of the product&#039;s incidents.&lt;br /&gt;
**Wemo WiFi Smart Outdoor Plug&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://web.archive.org/web/20221201141200/https://www.belkin.com/wifi-smart-outdoor-plug/WSP090.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Scene controller&lt;br /&gt;
**Wemo Scene Controller with Thread&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.belkin.com/p/scene-controller-with-thread/WSC010.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Wemo]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TasmanianRex</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://mirror.consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=Apple_TV%2B&amp;diff=11353</id>
		<title>Apple TV+</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://mirror.consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=Apple_TV%2B&amp;diff=11353"/>
		<updated>2025-03-06T22:10:42Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TasmanianRex: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{InfoboxProductLine&lt;br /&gt;
| Title = {{PAGENAME}}&lt;br /&gt;
| Release Year =2019 &lt;br /&gt;
| Product Type =Streaming Service &lt;br /&gt;
| In Production =Yes &lt;br /&gt;
| Official Website =https://tv.apple.com &lt;br /&gt;
| Logo =Apple_Tv_Plus_Logo.svg &lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;{{PAGENAME}}&#039;&#039;&#039; is a media streaming service launched by Apple Inc. on November 1st, 2019.&amp;lt;ref name&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot;=&amp;quot;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;“Apple TV+ launches November 1, featuring originals from the world’s greatest storytellers,” &#039;&#039;Apple Newsroom&#039;&#039;, 2019. https://web.archive.org/web/20250108192627/https://www.apple.com/newsroom/2019/09/apple-tv-launches-november-1-featuring-originals-from-the-worlds-greatest-storytellers/&amp;lt;nowiki/&amp;gt;(accessed Feb. 06, 2025).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Apple TV+ can be streamed on iOS and iPadOS (version 17.2 or later), supported Android devices, supported smart TVs, and web browsers which support Digital Rights Management (DRM) levels one, two, and, three.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;“Find movies with 4K, HDR, Dolby Vision, or Dolby Atmos in the Apple TV app - Apple Support,” &#039;&#039;Apple Support&#039;&#039;, Jun. 28, 2024. https://web.archive.org/web/20250206231807/https://support.apple.com/en-us/119599 (accessed Feb. 06, 2025).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Consumer impact summary==&lt;br /&gt;
Content downloaded from Apple TV+ is packaged with DRM, making it exclusive to the Apple TV app on Apple devices, as well as devices running Microsoft Windows 10 or later. After, or in some cases, before 30 days, content downloaded will &amp;quot;expire,&amp;quot; and you will be unable to view the content. Content publishers have the ability to restrict the amount of titles a user can have simultaneously downloaded, as well as restrict the number of devices that you can download content on.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;“Download and stream shows, movies, and events from Apple TV+, MLS Season Pass, and Apple TV channels - Apple Support (CA),” &#039;&#039;Apple Support&#039;&#039;, Mar. 21, 2024. https://web.archive.org/web/20250207003958/https://support.apple.com/en-ca/118239 (accessed Feb. 06, 2025).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;“Legal - Apple Media Services - Apple,” &#039;&#039;Apple Legal&#039;&#039;, 2024. https://web.archive.org/web/20250130091449/https://www.apple.com/ca/legal/internet-services/itunes/ca/terms.html&amp;lt;nowiki/&amp;gt;(accessed Feb. 06, 2025).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most shows produced by and for Apple TV+ are made exclusive to Apple TV+, and have no means of archival. Some Apple TV+ series such as Ted Lasso, and Severance have been made available to own on Blu-ray.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;B. Mayo, “Ted Lasso series releasing on Blu-ray disc in July [update: now available to order] - 9to5Mac,” &#039;&#039;9to5Mac&#039;&#039;, May 07, 2024. https://web.archive.org/web/20250207013934/https://9to5mac.com/2024/05/07/ted-lasso-series-blu-ray-edition-july/ (accessed Feb. 06, 2025).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:1&amp;quot;&amp;gt;H. Charlton, “Apple TV+&#039;s ‘Severance’ to Get Rare Blu-Ray Release Ahead of Season 2,” &#039;&#039;MacRumors&#039;&#039;, Oct. 08, 2024. https://web.archive.org/web/20250123130958/https://www.macrumors.com/2024/10/08/severance-to-get-blu-ray/&amp;lt;nowiki/&amp;gt;(accessed Feb. 06, 2025).&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The first season of Severance, which was made available on Blu-Ray in October of 2024, only released in 1080p. Reserving the higher quality 4K version to Apple TV+.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:1&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On devices, operating systems, and browsers with no support for DRM, playback is unavailable. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Despite advertising 4K high dynamic range (HDR) streaming, playback is only supported on Apple and Windows devices. Streaming from other devices will result in a degradation of quality.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:2&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Apple, “Apple TV+,” &#039;&#039;Apple&#039;&#039;. https://web.archive.org/web/20250130131131/https://www.apple.com/apple-tv-plus/ (accessed Feb. 06, 2025).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; On devices that exclusively support level 3 DRM, playback quality is limited to 720p. Android devices that support level 2 DRM are capable of playing back 1080p content in the web browser. The cross-platform Apple TV+ web app does not have a method of changing resolutions, nor does it indicate the current playback quality. On the landing page for Apple TV+, a footnote describing the quality degradation reads:&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Not all content is available in 4K or 4K HDR. 4K resolution requires a 4K‑capable device. Accessing Dolby Atmos features requires a Dolby Atmos‑capable system. Playback quality will depend on hardware and internet connection.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:2&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;The landing page does not specify what a &amp;quot;4K-capable device&amp;quot; is. Instead, the criteria for a &amp;quot;4K-capable&amp;quot; device is listed in a support article titled: &amp;quot;Find movies with 4K, HDR, Dolby Vision, or Dolby Atmos in the Apple TV app,&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; which is not linked to on the Apple TV+ landing page. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:{{PAGENAME}}]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TasmanianRex</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>