ADDW car systems legislated in the EU - Revision history

Bananabot: Re-archived 1 citation(s) from archive.today to web.archive.org using CRWCitationBot

2026-02-22T20:25:34Z

Re-archived 1 citation(s) from archive.today to web.archive.org using CRWCitationBot

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:25, 22 February 2026
Line 25:		Line 25:
	Although the data falls under the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and the EU has established strong rules, the question remains how effectively the EU can enforce GDPR in the automotive sector, especially as these technologies become more widespread and are used on a daily basis.		Although the data falls under the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and the EU has established strong rules, the question remains how effectively the EU can enforce GDPR in the automotive sector, especially as these technologies become more widespread and are used on a daily basis.

	Based on past incidents, these concerns are well-founded. For example, in the case of Tesla, employees were found sharing sensitive content from consumer vehicle cameras in private group chats<ref>{{Cite news \|last=Stecklow \|first=Steve \|last2=Cunningham \|first2=Waylon \|last3=Jin \|first3=Hyunjoo \|date=7 Apr 2023 \|editor-last=Hirschberg \|editor-first=Peter \|title=Tesla workers shared sensitive images recorded by customer cars \|url=https://www.reuters.com/technology/tesla-workers-shared-sensitive-images-recorded-by-customer-cars-2023-04-06/ \|url-status=live \|archive-url=https://~~archive~~.ph/~~0L5zE~~ \|archive-date=~~2025-02-15~~ \|access-date=28 Jul 2025 \|work=Reuters}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news \|last= \|date=8 Apr 2023 \|title=Tesla workers shared sensitive images recorded by customer cars \|url=https://www.dawn.com/news/1746491 \|url-status=live \|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20260104124032/https://www.dawn.com/news/1746491 \|archive-date=2026-01-04 \|access-date=28 Jul 2025 \|work=Dawn}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news \|last=Brodkin \|first=John \|date=6 Apr 2023 \|title=Tesla workers shared images from car cameras, including “scenes of intimacy” \|url=https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2023/04/tesla-workers-shared-images-from-car-cameras-including-scenes-of-intimacy/ \|url-status=live \|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20250830115126/https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2023/04/tesla-workers-shared-images-from-car-cameras-including-scenes-of-intimacy/ \|archive-date=2025-08-30 \|access-date=28 Jul 2025 \|work=ArsTechnica}}</ref>.		Based on past incidents, these concerns are well-founded. For example, in the case of Tesla, employees were found sharing sensitive content from consumer vehicle cameras in private group chats<ref>{{Cite news \|last=Stecklow \|first=Steve \|last2=Cunningham \|first2=Waylon \|last3=Jin \|first3=Hyunjoo \|date=7 Apr 2023 \|editor-last=Hirschberg \|editor-first=Peter \|title=Tesla workers shared sensitive images recorded by customer cars \|url=https://www.reuters.com/technology/tesla-workers-shared-sensitive-images-recorded-by-customer-cars-2023-04-06/ \|url-status=live \|archive-url=http://web.archive.org/web/20260129003744/https://www.reuters.com/technology/tesla-workers-shared-sensitive-images-recorded-by-customer-cars-2023-04-06/ \|archive-date=29 Jan 2026\|access-date=28 Jul 2025 \|work=Reuters}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news \|last= \|date=8 Apr 2023 \|title=Tesla workers shared sensitive images recorded by customer cars \|url=https://www.dawn.com/news/1746491 \|url-status=live \|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20260104124032/https://www.dawn.com/news/1746491 \|archive-date=2026-01-04 \|access-date=28 Jul 2025 \|work=Dawn}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news \|last=Brodkin \|first=John \|date=6 Apr 2023 \|title=Tesla workers shared images from car cameras, including “scenes of intimacy” \|url=https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2023/04/tesla-workers-shared-images-from-car-cameras-including-scenes-of-intimacy/ \|url-status=live \|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20250830115126/https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2023/04/tesla-workers-shared-images-from-car-cameras-including-scenes-of-intimacy/ \|archive-date=2025-08-30 \|access-date=28 Jul 2025 \|work=ArsTechnica}}</ref>.

	Moreover, cars are already regarded as privacy hazards, with manufacturers often selling user information and exhibiting questionable security practices<ref>{{Cite news \|last=Caltrider \|first=Jen \|last2=Rykov \|first2=Misha \|last3=MacDonald \|first3=Zoë \|date=6 Sep 2023 \|title=It’s Official: Cars Are the Worst Product Category We Have Ever Reviewed for Privacy \|url=https://www.mozillafoundation.org/en/privacynotincluded/articles/its-official-cars-are-the-worst-product-category-we-have-ever-reviewed-for-privacy/ \|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20250804133419/https://www.mozillafoundation.org/en/privacynotincluded/articles/its-official-cars-are-the-worst-product-category-we-have-ever-reviewed-for-privacy/ \|archive-date=2025-08-04 \|access-date=28 Jul 2025 \|work=Mozilla Foundation}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news \|last=Katharine \|first=Kemp \|date=20 Nov 2024 \|title=Modern cars are surveillance devices on wheels with major privacy risks – new report \|url=https://www.unsw.edu.au/newsroom/news/2024/11/modern-cars-surveillance-devices-privacy-risks \|url-status=live \|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20250713111557/https://www.unsw.edu.au/newsroom/news/2024/11/modern-cars-surveillance-devices-privacy-risks \|archive-date=2025-07-13 \|access-date=28 Jul 2025 \|work=unsw.edu.au}}</ref>.		Moreover, cars are already regarded as privacy hazards, with manufacturers often selling user information and exhibiting questionable security practices<ref>{{Cite news \|last=Caltrider \|first=Jen \|last2=Rykov \|first2=Misha \|last3=MacDonald \|first3=Zoë \|date=6 Sep 2023 \|title=It’s Official: Cars Are the Worst Product Category We Have Ever Reviewed for Privacy \|url=https://www.mozillafoundation.org/en/privacynotincluded/articles/its-official-cars-are-the-worst-product-category-we-have-ever-reviewed-for-privacy/ \|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20250804133419/https://www.mozillafoundation.org/en/privacynotincluded/articles/its-official-cars-are-the-worst-product-category-we-have-ever-reviewed-for-privacy/ \|archive-date=2025-08-04 \|access-date=28 Jul 2025 \|work=Mozilla Foundation}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news \|last=Katharine \|first=Kemp \|date=20 Nov 2024 \|title=Modern cars are surveillance devices on wheels with major privacy risks – new report \|url=https://www.unsw.edu.au/newsroom/news/2024/11/modern-cars-surveillance-devices-privacy-risks \|url-status=live \|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20250713111557/https://www.unsw.edu.au/newsroom/news/2024/11/modern-cars-surveillance-devices-privacy-risks \|archive-date=2025-07-13 \|access-date=28 Jul 2025 \|work=unsw.edu.au}}</ref>.

Lionvilds: Added type and description

2026-02-04T17:02:49Z

Added type and description

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:02, 4 February 2026
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{StubNotice}}		{{StubNotice}}
	{{IncidentCargo		{{IncidentCargo
	\|Company=		\|Company= European Union
	\|StartDate=		\|StartDate= 7 July 2026
	\|EndDate=		\|EndDate=
	\|Status=		\|Status= yet to start
	\|ProductLine=		\|ProductLine=
	\|Product=		\|Product=
	\|ArticleType=		\|ArticleType=
	\|Type=		\|Type= Privacy Concern
	\|Description=		\|Description= EU passed legislation that mandates installation of cameras monitoring driver behaviour in its plan to reduce road accidents, it is supposed to warn drivers if distracted, while it is stated that this data should be contained within a loop, it is limited to EU's ability of its enforcement
	}}		}}
	The European Union (EU) has passed legislation that mandates Advanced Driver Distraction Warning (ADDW) systems for new cars produced for sale within the EU<ref>{{Cite web \|last= \|first= \|date=16 Dec 2019 \|title=Regulation (EU) 2019/2144 \|url=https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32019R2144 \|url-status=live \|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20260105005359/https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32019R2144 \|archive-date=2026-01-05 \|access-date=28 Jul 2025 \|website=EUR-Lex}}</ref> (Article 6 clause D).		The European Union (EU) has passed legislation that mandates Advanced Driver Distraction Warning (ADDW) systems for new cars produced for sale within the EU<ref>{{Cite web \|last= \|first= \|date=16 Dec 2019 \|title=Regulation (EU) 2019/2144 \|url=https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32019R2144 \|url-status=live \|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20260105005359/https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32019R2144 \|archive-date=2026-01-05 \|access-date=28 Jul 2025 \|website=EUR-Lex}}</ref> (Article 6 clause D).

Bythmusters: added cargo

2026-01-31T19:20:13Z

added cargo

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 {{StubNotice}}
+{{IncidentCargo
 The European Union (EU) has passed legislation that mandates Advanced Driver Distraction Warning (ADDW) systems for new cars produced for sale within the EU<ref>{{Cite web |last= |first= |date=16 Dec 2019 |title=Regulation (EU) 2019/2144 |url=https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32019R2144 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20260105005359/https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32019R2144 |archive-date=2026-01-05 |access-date=28 Jul 2025 |website=EUR-Lex}}</ref> (Article 6 clause D).

Matt78: Added archive URL to ref

2026-01-26T19:14:14Z

Added archive URL to ref

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:14, 26 January 2026
Line 15:		Line 15:
	Although the data falls under the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and the EU has established strong rules, the question remains how effectively the EU can enforce GDPR in the automotive sector, especially as these technologies become more widespread and are used on a daily basis.		Although the data falls under the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and the EU has established strong rules, the question remains how effectively the EU can enforce GDPR in the automotive sector, especially as these technologies become more widespread and are used on a daily basis.

	Based on past incidents, these concerns are well-founded. For example, in the case of Tesla, employees were found sharing sensitive content from consumer vehicle cameras in private group chats<ref>{{Cite news \|last=Stecklow \|first=Steve \|last2=Cunningham \|first2=Waylon \|last3=Jin \|first3=Hyunjoo \|date=7 Apr 2023 \|title=Tesla workers shared sensitive images recorded by customer cars \|url=https://www.reuters.com/technology/tesla-workers-shared-sensitive-images-recorded-by-customer-cars-2023-04-06/ \|url-status=live \|access-date=28 Jul 2025 \|work=Reuters}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news \|last= \|date=8 Apr 2023 \|title=Tesla workers shared sensitive images recorded by customer cars \|url=https://www.dawn.com/news/1746491 \|url-status=live \|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20260104124032/https://www.dawn.com/news/1746491 \|archive-date=2026-01-04 \|access-date=28 Jul 2025 \|work=Dawn}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news \|last=Brodkin \|first=John \|date=6 Apr 2023 \|title=Tesla workers shared images from car cameras, including “scenes of intimacy” \|url=https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2023/04/tesla-workers-shared-images-from-car-cameras-including-scenes-of-intimacy/ \|url-status=live \|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20250830115126/https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2023/04/tesla-workers-shared-images-from-car-cameras-including-scenes-of-intimacy/ \|archive-date=2025-08-30 \|access-date=28 Jul 2025 \|work=ArsTechnica}}</ref>.		Based on past incidents, these concerns are well-founded. For example, in the case of Tesla, employees were found sharing sensitive content from consumer vehicle cameras in private group chats<ref>{{Cite news \|last=Stecklow \|first=Steve \|last2=Cunningham \|first2=Waylon \|last3=Jin \|first3=Hyunjoo \|date=7 Apr 2023 \|editor-last=Hirschberg \|editor-first=Peter \|title=Tesla workers shared sensitive images recorded by customer cars \|url=https://www.reuters.com/technology/tesla-workers-shared-sensitive-images-recorded-by-customer-cars-2023-04-06/ \|url-status=live \|archive-url=https://archive.ph/0L5zE \|archive-date=2025-02-15 \|access-date=28 Jul 2025 \|work=Reuters}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news \|last= \|date=8 Apr 2023 \|title=Tesla workers shared sensitive images recorded by customer cars \|url=https://www.dawn.com/news/1746491 \|url-status=live \|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20260104124032/https://www.dawn.com/news/1746491 \|archive-date=2026-01-04 \|access-date=28 Jul 2025 \|work=Dawn}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news \|last=Brodkin \|first=John \|date=6 Apr 2023 \|title=Tesla workers shared images from car cameras, including “scenes of intimacy” \|url=https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2023/04/tesla-workers-shared-images-from-car-cameras-including-scenes-of-intimacy/ \|url-status=live \|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20250830115126/https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2023/04/tesla-workers-shared-images-from-car-cameras-including-scenes-of-intimacy/ \|archive-date=2025-08-30 \|access-date=28 Jul 2025 \|work=ArsTechnica}}</ref>.

	Moreover, cars are already regarded as privacy hazards, with manufacturers often selling user information and exhibiting questionable security practices<ref>{{Cite news \|last=Caltrider \|first=Jen \|last2=Rykov \|first2=Misha \|last3=MacDonald \|first3=Zoë \|date=6 Sep 2023 \|title=It’s Official: Cars Are the Worst Product Category We Have Ever Reviewed for Privacy \|url=https://www.mozillafoundation.org/en/privacynotincluded/articles/its-official-cars-are-the-worst-product-category-we-have-ever-reviewed-for-privacy/ \|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20250804133419/https://www.mozillafoundation.org/en/privacynotincluded/articles/its-official-cars-are-the-worst-product-category-we-have-ever-reviewed-for-privacy/ \|archive-date=2025-08-04 \|access-date=28 Jul 2025 \|work=Mozilla Foundation}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news \|last=Katharine \|first=Kemp \|date=20 Nov 2024 \|title=Modern cars are surveillance devices on wheels with major privacy risks – new report \|url=https://www.unsw.edu.au/newsroom/news/2024/11/modern-cars-surveillance-devices-privacy-risks \|url-status=live \|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20250713111557/https://www.unsw.edu.au/newsroom/news/2024/11/modern-cars-surveillance-devices-privacy-risks \|archive-date=2025-07-13 \|access-date=28 Jul 2025 \|work=unsw.edu.au}}</ref>.		Moreover, cars are already regarded as privacy hazards, with manufacturers often selling user information and exhibiting questionable security practices<ref>{{Cite news \|last=Caltrider \|first=Jen \|last2=Rykov \|first2=Misha \|last3=MacDonald \|first3=Zoë \|date=6 Sep 2023 \|title=It’s Official: Cars Are the Worst Product Category We Have Ever Reviewed for Privacy \|url=https://www.mozillafoundation.org/en/privacynotincluded/articles/its-official-cars-are-the-worst-product-category-we-have-ever-reviewed-for-privacy/ \|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20250804133419/https://www.mozillafoundation.org/en/privacynotincluded/articles/its-official-cars-are-the-worst-product-category-we-have-ever-reviewed-for-privacy/ \|archive-date=2025-08-04 \|access-date=28 Jul 2025 \|work=Mozilla Foundation}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news \|last=Katharine \|first=Kemp \|date=20 Nov 2024 \|title=Modern cars are surveillance devices on wheels with major privacy risks – new report \|url=https://www.unsw.edu.au/newsroom/news/2024/11/modern-cars-surveillance-devices-privacy-risks \|url-status=live \|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20250713111557/https://www.unsw.edu.au/newsroom/news/2024/11/modern-cars-surveillance-devices-privacy-risks \|archive-date=2025-07-13 \|access-date=28 Jul 2025 \|work=unsw.edu.au}}</ref>.

158.173.21.69: Improve readability

2026-01-22T23:10:34Z

Improve readability

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:10, 22 January 2026
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{StubNotice}}		{{StubNotice}}

	The European Union has passed legislation that mandates Advanced Driver Distraction Warning (ADDW) systems for new cars produced ~~and meant to sell~~ within the EU<ref>{{Cite web \|last= \|first= \|date=16 Dec 2019 \|title=Regulation (EU) 2019/2144 \|url=https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32019R2144 \|url-status=live \|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20260105005359/https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32019R2144 \|archive-date=2026-01-05 \|access-date=28 Jul 2025 \|website=EUR-Lex}}</ref> (Article 6 clause D).		The European Union (EU) has passed legislation that mandates Advanced Driver Distraction Warning (ADDW) systems for new cars produced for sale within the EU<ref>{{Cite web \|last= \|first= \|date=16 Dec 2019 \|title=Regulation (EU) 2019/2144 \|url=https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32019R2144 \|url-status=live \|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20260105005359/https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32019R2144 \|archive-date=2026-01-05 \|access-date=28 Jul 2025 \|website=EUR-Lex}}</ref> (Article 6 clause D).

	==How it works==		==How it works==
	~~Coming~~ 7 July 2026 all new vehicles within the ~~European Union have to~~ contain cameras that monitor driver behavior and notify ~~the driver~~ accordingly in ~~cases~~ of improper driving conduct, something that had already taken place with M and N type vehicles from July ~~7th~~ 2024<ref name=":0">{{Cite web \|last= \|first= \|title=ADDW specifications \|url=https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=PI_COM:C(2023)4523 \|url-status=live \|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20260104122145/https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=PI_COM:C(2023)4523 \|archive-date=2026-01-04 \|access-date=28 Jul 2025 \|website=EUR-Lex}}</ref>. This is on par with the goal EU had set to cut down on road accidents by half compared to 2019<ref>{{Cite web \|last= \|first= \|date=28 Oct 2021 \|title=European Commission welcomes launch of Global Plan for the UN Decade of Action on Road Safety 2021-2030 \|url=https://transport.ec.europa.eu/news-events/news/european-commission-welcomes-launch-global-plan-un-decade-action-road-safety-2021-2030-2021-10-28_en \|url-status=live \|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20260104122509/https://transport.ec.europa.eu/news-events/news/european-commission-welcomes-launch-global-plan-un-decade-action-road-safety-2021-2030-2021-10-28_en \|archive-date=2026-01-04 \|access-date=28 Jul 2025 \|website=European Commission}}</ref>. The cameras are meant to monitor the drivers gaze, causing a case for a warning if it is not directed at the specified areas that are defined in.<ref name=":0" /> (Specifically points 3.3.1.1., 3.3.1.2., 3.3.1.3).		From 7 July 2026 onward, all new vehicles sold within the EU must contain cameras that monitor driver behavior and notify them accordingly in case of improper driving conduct - something that had already taken place with M and N type vehicles from 7 July 2024<ref name=":0">{{Cite web \|last= \|first= \|title=ADDW specifications \|url=https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=PI_COM:C(2023)4523 \|url-status=live \|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20260104122145/https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=PI_COM:C(2023)4523 \|archive-date=2026-01-04 \|access-date=28 Jul 2025 \|website=EUR-Lex}}</ref>. This is on par with the goal that the EU had set to cut down on road accidents by half, compared to 2019<ref>{{Cite web \|last= \|first= \|date=28 Oct 2021 \|title=European Commission welcomes launch of Global Plan for the UN Decade of Action on Road Safety 2021-2030 \|url=https://transport.ec.europa.eu/news-events/news/european-commission-welcomes-launch-global-plan-un-decade-action-road-safety-2021-2030-2021-10-28_en \|url-status=live \|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20260104122509/https://transport.ec.europa.eu/news-events/news/european-commission-welcomes-launch-global-plan-un-decade-action-road-safety-2021-2030-2021-10-28_en \|archive-date=2026-01-04 \|access-date=28 Jul 2025 \|website=European Commission}}</ref>.

	The legislation asserts that the data generated by the ADDW system, should be contained within a closed loop and not be made available to 3rd parties, ~~in addition~~ no data should be collected except that which is ~~needed~~ to perform the task, and ~~the~~ data must be deleted after processing.<ref name=":0" /> (Article 6 clause 3).		The cameras are meant to monitor the driver's gaze, which could result in a warning if it is not directed at the areas that are specified in<ref name=":0" /> (Specifically points 3.3.1.1., 3.3.1.2., 3.3.1.3).

			The legislation asserts that the data generated by the ADDW system should be contained within a closed loop and may not be made available to 3rd parties. In addition, no data should be collected except that which is necessary to perform the task, and all collected data must be deleted after processing<ref name=":0" /> (Article 6 clause 3).

	==Why it is a problem==		==Why it is a problem==
	'''~~Privacy~~ concerns''' are a major issue ~~with such legislation~~. Although the data falls under GDPR and the EU has established strong rules, ~~serious questions remain~~. For ~~instance~~, in the case of Tesla, employees were found sharing sensitive content from consumer vehicle cameras in private group chats.<ref>{{Cite news \|last=Stecklow \|first=Steve \|last2=Cunningham \|first2=Waylon \|last3=Jin \|first3=Hyunjoo \|date=7 Apr 2023 \|title=Tesla workers shared sensitive images recorded by customer cars \|url=https://www.reuters.com/technology/tesla-workers-shared-sensitive-images-recorded-by-customer-cars-2023-04-06/ \|url-status=live \|access-date=28 Jul 2025 \|work=Reuters}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news \|last= \|date=8 Apr 2023 \|title=Tesla workers shared sensitive images recorded by customer cars \|url=https://www.dawn.com/news/1746491 \|url-status=live \|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20260104124032/https://www.dawn.com/news/1746491 \|archive-date=2026-01-04 \|access-date=28 Jul 2025 \|work=Dawn}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news \|last=Brodkin \|first=John \|date=6 Apr 2023 \|title=Tesla workers shared images from car cameras, including “scenes of intimacy” \|url=https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2023/04/tesla-workers-shared-images-from-car-cameras-including-scenes-of-intimacy/ \|url-status=live \|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20250830115126/https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2023/04/tesla-workers-shared-images-from-car-cameras-including-scenes-of-intimacy/ \|archive-date=2025-08-30 \|access-date=28 Jul 2025 \|work=ArsTechnica}}</ref> Moreover, cars are already regarded as privacy hazards, with manufacturers often selling user information and exhibiting questionable security practices.<ref>{{Cite news \|last=Caltrider \|first=Jen \|last2=Rykov \|first2=Misha \|last3=MacDonald \|first3=Zoë \|date=6 Sep 2023 \|title=It’s Official: Cars Are the Worst Product Category We Have Ever Reviewed for Privacy \|url=https://www.mozillafoundation.org/en/privacynotincluded/articles/its-official-cars-are-the-worst-product-category-we-have-ever-reviewed-for-privacy/ \|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20250804133419/https://www.mozillafoundation.org/en/privacynotincluded/articles/its-official-cars-are-the-worst-product-category-we-have-ever-reviewed-for-privacy/ \|archive-date=2025-08-04 \|access-date=28 Jul 2025 \|work=Mozilla Foundation}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news \|last=Katharine \|first=Kemp \|date=20 Nov 2024 \|title=Modern cars are surveillance devices on wheels with major privacy risks – new report \|url=https://www.unsw.edu.au/newsroom/news/2024/11/modern-cars-surveillance-devices-privacy-risks \|url-status=live \|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20250713111557/https://www.unsw.edu.au/newsroom/news/2024/11/modern-cars-surveillance-devices-privacy-risks \|archive-date=2025-07-13 \|access-date=28 Jul 2025 \|work=unsw.edu.au}}</ref> Adding to this, [[NOYB]], which is a "European Center for Digital Rights", conducted a survey with more than 1,000 privacy professionals, and 74.4% of them ~~assume~~ that the average company ~~fails to comply properly with~~ GDPR ~~guidelines.~~<ref>{{Cite web \|title=GDPR a culture of non-compliance? \|url=https://noyb.eu/sites/default/files/2024-01/GDPR_a%20culture%20of%20non-compliance.pdf \|url-status=live \|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20250801172545/https://noyb.eu/sites/default/files/2024-01/GDPR_a%20culture%20of%20non-compliance.pdf \|archive-date=2025-08-01 \|access-date=28 Jul 2025 \|website=noyb}}</ref> This raises doubts about how effectively the EU can enforce GDPR in the automotive sector, especially as the adoption of such technologies becomes widespread and affects citizens daily lives in the coming years.		With such legislation, '''privacy concerns''' are a major issue.

			Although the data falls under the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and the EU has established strong rules, the question remains how effectively the EU can enforce GDPR in the automotive sector, especially as these technologies become more widespread and are used on a daily basis.

			Based on past incidents, these concerns are well-founded. For example, in the case of Tesla, employees were found sharing sensitive content from consumer vehicle cameras in private group chats<ref>{{Cite news \|last=Stecklow \|first=Steve \|last2=Cunningham \|first2=Waylon \|last3=Jin \|first3=Hyunjoo \|date=7 Apr 2023 \|title=Tesla workers shared sensitive images recorded by customer cars \|url=https://www.reuters.com/technology/tesla-workers-shared-sensitive-images-recorded-by-customer-cars-2023-04-06/ \|url-status=live \|access-date=28 Jul 2025 \|work=Reuters}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news \|last= \|date=8 Apr 2023 \|title=Tesla workers shared sensitive images recorded by customer cars \|url=https://www.dawn.com/news/1746491 \|url-status=live \|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20260104124032/https://www.dawn.com/news/1746491 \|archive-date=2026-01-04 \|access-date=28 Jul 2025 \|work=Dawn}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news \|last=Brodkin \|first=John \|date=6 Apr 2023 \|title=Tesla workers shared images from car cameras, including “scenes of intimacy” \|url=https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2023/04/tesla-workers-shared-images-from-car-cameras-including-scenes-of-intimacy/ \|url-status=live \|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20250830115126/https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2023/04/tesla-workers-shared-images-from-car-cameras-including-scenes-of-intimacy/ \|archive-date=2025-08-30 \|access-date=28 Jul 2025 \|work=ArsTechnica}}</ref>.

			Moreover, cars are already regarded as privacy hazards, with manufacturers often selling user information and exhibiting questionable security practices<ref>{{Cite news \|last=Caltrider \|first=Jen \|last2=Rykov \|first2=Misha \|last3=MacDonald \|first3=Zoë \|date=6 Sep 2023 \|title=It’s Official: Cars Are the Worst Product Category We Have Ever Reviewed for Privacy \|url=https://www.mozillafoundation.org/en/privacynotincluded/articles/its-official-cars-are-the-worst-product-category-we-have-ever-reviewed-for-privacy/ \|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20250804133419/https://www.mozillafoundation.org/en/privacynotincluded/articles/its-official-cars-are-the-worst-product-category-we-have-ever-reviewed-for-privacy/ \|archive-date=2025-08-04 \|access-date=28 Jul 2025 \|work=Mozilla Foundation}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news \|last=Katharine \|first=Kemp \|date=20 Nov 2024 \|title=Modern cars are surveillance devices on wheels with major privacy risks – new report \|url=https://www.unsw.edu.au/newsroom/news/2024/11/modern-cars-surveillance-devices-privacy-risks \|url-status=live \|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20250713111557/https://www.unsw.edu.au/newsroom/news/2024/11/modern-cars-surveillance-devices-privacy-risks \|archive-date=2025-07-13 \|access-date=28 Jul 2025 \|work=unsw.edu.au}}</ref>.

			Adding to this, [[NOYB]], which is a "European Center for Digital Rights", conducted a survey with more than 1,000 privacy professionals, and 74.4% of them agree that the average company has relevant GDPR violations<ref>{{Cite web \|title=GDPR a culture of non-compliance? \|url=https://noyb.eu/sites/default/files/2024-01/GDPR_a%20culture%20of%20non-compliance.pdf \|url-status=live \|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20250801172545/https://noyb.eu/sites/default/files/2024-01/GDPR_a%20culture%20of%20non-compliance.pdf \|archive-date=2025-08-01 \|access-date=28 Jul 2025 \|website=noyb}}</ref>.

	==References==		==References==
	{{reflist}}		{{reflist}}

BobSagetFan1212: added archive link with archive date

2026-01-05T00:55:29Z

added archive link with archive date

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:55, 5 January 2026
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{StubNotice}}		{{StubNotice}}

	The European Union has passed legislation that mandates Advanced Driver Distraction Warning (ADDW) systems for new cars produced and meant to sell within the EU<ref>{{Cite web \|last= \|first= \|date=16 Dec 2019 \|title=Regulation (EU) 2019/2144 \|url=https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32019R2144 \|url-status=live \|access-date=28 Jul 2025 \|website=EUR-Lex}}</ref> (Article 6 clause D).		The European Union has passed legislation that mandates Advanced Driver Distraction Warning (ADDW) systems for new cars produced and meant to sell within the EU<ref>{{Cite web \|last= \|first= \|date=16 Dec 2019 \|title=Regulation (EU) 2019/2144 \|url=https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32019R2144 \|url-status=live \|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20260105005359/https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32019R2144 \|archive-date=2026-01-05 \|access-date=28 Jul 2025 \|website=EUR-Lex}}</ref> (Article 6 clause D).

	==How it works==		==How it works==

Shrimple: Added archive links to citations 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9.

2026-01-04T12:53:03Z

Added archive links to citations 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9.

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:53, 4 January 2026
Line 4:		Line 4:

	==How it works==		==How it works==
	Coming 7 July 2026 all new vehicles within the European Union have to contain cameras that monitor driver behavior and notify the driver accordingly in cases of improper driving conduct, something that had already taken place with M and N type vehicles from July 7th 2024<ref name=":0">{{Cite web \|last= \|first= \|title=ADDW specifications \|url=https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=PI_COM:C(2023)4523 \|url-status=live \|access-date=28 Jul 2025 \|website=EUR-Lex}}</ref>. This is on par with the goal EU had set to cut down on road accidents by half compared to 2019<ref>{{Cite web \|last= \|first= \|date=28 Oct 2021 \|title=European Commission welcomes launch of Global Plan for the UN Decade of Action on Road Safety 2021-2030 \|url=https://transport.ec.europa.eu/news-events/news/european-commission-welcomes-launch-global-plan-un-decade-action-road-safety-2021-2030-2021-10-28_en \|url-status=live \|access-date=28 Jul 2025 \|website=European Commission}}</ref>. The cameras are meant to monitor the drivers gaze, causing a case for a warning if it is not directed at the specified areas that are defined in.<ref name=":0" /> (Specifically points 3.3.1.1., 3.3.1.2., 3.3.1.3).		Coming 7 July 2026 all new vehicles within the European Union have to contain cameras that monitor driver behavior and notify the driver accordingly in cases of improper driving conduct, something that had already taken place with M and N type vehicles from July 7th 2024<ref name=":0">{{Cite web \|last= \|first= \|title=ADDW specifications \|url=https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=PI_COM:C(2023)4523 \|url-status=live \|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20260104122145/https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=PI_COM:C(2023)4523 \|archive-date=2026-01-04 \|access-date=28 Jul 2025 \|website=EUR-Lex}}</ref>. This is on par with the goal EU had set to cut down on road accidents by half compared to 2019<ref>{{Cite web \|last= \|first= \|date=28 Oct 2021 \|title=European Commission welcomes launch of Global Plan for the UN Decade of Action on Road Safety 2021-2030 \|url=https://transport.ec.europa.eu/news-events/news/european-commission-welcomes-launch-global-plan-un-decade-action-road-safety-2021-2030-2021-10-28_en \|url-status=live \|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20260104122509/https://transport.ec.europa.eu/news-events/news/european-commission-welcomes-launch-global-plan-un-decade-action-road-safety-2021-2030-2021-10-28_en \|archive-date=2026-01-04 \|access-date=28 Jul 2025 \|website=European Commission}}</ref>. The cameras are meant to monitor the drivers gaze, causing a case for a warning if it is not directed at the specified areas that are defined in.<ref name=":0" /> (Specifically points 3.3.1.1., 3.3.1.2., 3.3.1.3).

	The legislation asserts that the data generated by the ADDW system, should be contained within a closed loop and not be made available to 3rd parties, in addition no data should be collected except that which is needed to perform the task, and the data must be deleted after processing.<ref name=":0" /> (Article 6 clause 3).		The legislation asserts that the data generated by the ADDW system, should be contained within a closed loop and not be made available to 3rd parties, in addition no data should be collected except that which is needed to perform the task, and the data must be deleted after processing.<ref name=":0" /> (Article 6 clause 3).

	==Why it is a problem==		==Why it is a problem==
	'''Privacy concerns''' are a major issue with such legislation. Although the data falls under GDPR and the EU has established strong rules, serious questions remain. For instance, in the case of Tesla, employees were found sharing sensitive content from consumer vehicle cameras in private group chats.<ref>{{Cite news \|last=Stecklow \|first=Steve \|last2=Cunningham \|first2=Waylon \|last3=Jin \|first3=Hyunjoo \|date=7 Apr 2023 \|title=Tesla workers shared sensitive images recorded by customer cars \|url=https://www.reuters.com/technology/tesla-workers-shared-sensitive-images-recorded-by-customer-cars-2023-04-06/ \|url-status=live \|access-date=28 Jul 2025 \|work=Reuters}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news \|last= \|date=8 Apr 2023 \|title=Tesla workers shared sensitive images recorded by customer cars \|url=https://www.dawn.com/news/1746491 \|url-status=live \|access-date=28 Jul 2025 \|work=Dawn}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news \|last=Brodkin \|first=John \|date=6 Apr 2023 \|title=Tesla workers shared images from car cameras, including “scenes of intimacy” \|url=https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2023/04/tesla-workers-shared-images-from-car-cameras-including-scenes-of-intimacy/ \|url-status=live \|access-date=28 Jul 2025 \|work=ArsTechnica}}</ref> Moreover, cars are already regarded as privacy hazards, with manufacturers often selling user information and exhibiting questionable security practices.<ref>{{Cite news \|last=Caltrider \|first=Jen \|last2=Rykov \|first2=Misha \|last3=MacDonald \|first3=Zoë \|date=6 Sep 2023 \|title=It’s Official: Cars Are the Worst Product Category We Have Ever Reviewed for Privacy \|url=https://www.mozillafoundation.org/en/privacynotincluded/articles/its-official-cars-are-the-worst-product-category-we-have-ever-reviewed-for-privacy/ \|access-date=28 Jul 2025 \|work=Mozilla Foundation}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news \|last=Katharine \|first=Kemp \|date=20 Nov 2024 \|title=Modern cars are surveillance devices on wheels with major privacy risks – new report \|url=https://www.unsw.edu.au/newsroom/news/2024/11/modern-cars-surveillance-devices-privacy-risks \|url-status=live \|access-date=28 Jul 2025 \|work=unsw.edu.au}}</ref> Adding to this, [[NOYB]], which is a "European Center for Digital Rights", conducted a survey with more than 1,000 privacy professionals, and 74.4% of them assume that the average company fails to comply properly with GDPR guidelines.<ref>{{Cite web \|title=GDPR a culture of non-compliance? \|url=https://noyb.eu/sites/default/files/2024-01/GDPR_a%20culture%20of%20non-compliance.pdf \|url-status=live \|access-date=28 Jul 2025 \|website=noyb}}</ref> This raises doubts about how effectively the EU can enforce GDPR in the automotive sector, especially as the adoption of such technologies becomes widespread and affects citizens daily lives in the coming years.		'''Privacy concerns''' are a major issue with such legislation. Although the data falls under GDPR and the EU has established strong rules, serious questions remain. For instance, in the case of Tesla, employees were found sharing sensitive content from consumer vehicle cameras in private group chats.<ref>{{Cite news \|last=Stecklow \|first=Steve \|last2=Cunningham \|first2=Waylon \|last3=Jin \|first3=Hyunjoo \|date=7 Apr 2023 \|title=Tesla workers shared sensitive images recorded by customer cars \|url=https://www.reuters.com/technology/tesla-workers-shared-sensitive-images-recorded-by-customer-cars-2023-04-06/ \|url-status=live \|access-date=28 Jul 2025 \|work=Reuters}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news \|last= \|date=8 Apr 2023 \|title=Tesla workers shared sensitive images recorded by customer cars \|url=https://www.dawn.com/news/1746491 \|url-status=live \|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20260104124032/https://www.dawn.com/news/1746491 \|archive-date=2026-01-04 \|access-date=28 Jul 2025 \|work=Dawn}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news \|last=Brodkin \|first=John \|date=6 Apr 2023 \|title=Tesla workers shared images from car cameras, including “scenes of intimacy” \|url=https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2023/04/tesla-workers-shared-images-from-car-cameras-including-scenes-of-intimacy/ \|url-status=live \|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20250830115126/https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2023/04/tesla-workers-shared-images-from-car-cameras-including-scenes-of-intimacy/ \|archive-date=2025-08-30 \|access-date=28 Jul 2025 \|work=ArsTechnica}}</ref> Moreover, cars are already regarded as privacy hazards, with manufacturers often selling user information and exhibiting questionable security practices.<ref>{{Cite news \|last=Caltrider \|first=Jen \|last2=Rykov \|first2=Misha \|last3=MacDonald \|first3=Zoë \|date=6 Sep 2023 \|title=It’s Official: Cars Are the Worst Product Category We Have Ever Reviewed for Privacy \|url=https://www.mozillafoundation.org/en/privacynotincluded/articles/its-official-cars-are-the-worst-product-category-we-have-ever-reviewed-for-privacy/ \|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20250804133419/https://www.mozillafoundation.org/en/privacynotincluded/articles/its-official-cars-are-the-worst-product-category-we-have-ever-reviewed-for-privacy/ \|archive-date=2025-08-04 \|access-date=28 Jul 2025 \|work=Mozilla Foundation}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news \|last=Katharine \|first=Kemp \|date=20 Nov 2024 \|title=Modern cars are surveillance devices on wheels with major privacy risks – new report \|url=https://www.unsw.edu.au/newsroom/news/2024/11/modern-cars-surveillance-devices-privacy-risks \|url-status=live \|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20250713111557/https://www.unsw.edu.au/newsroom/news/2024/11/modern-cars-surveillance-devices-privacy-risks \|archive-date=2025-07-13 \|access-date=28 Jul 2025 \|work=unsw.edu.au}}</ref> Adding to this, [[NOYB]], which is a "European Center for Digital Rights", conducted a survey with more than 1,000 privacy professionals, and 74.4% of them assume that the average company fails to comply properly with GDPR guidelines.<ref>{{Cite web \|title=GDPR a culture of non-compliance? \|url=https://noyb.eu/sites/default/files/2024-01/GDPR_a%20culture%20of%20non-compliance.pdf \|url-status=live \|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20250801172545/https://noyb.eu/sites/default/files/2024-01/GDPR_a%20culture%20of%20non-compliance.pdf \|archive-date=2025-08-01 \|access-date=28 Jul 2025 \|website=noyb}}</ref> This raises doubts about how effectively the EU can enforce GDPR in the automotive sector, especially as the adoption of such technologies becomes widespread and affects citizens daily lives in the coming years.

	==References==		==References==
	{{reflist}}		{{reflist}}

AnotherConsumerRightsPerson: Huge copyedit (wow this was big)

2025-11-04T17:06:17Z

Huge copyedit (wow this was big)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:06, 4 November 2025
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{StubNotice}}		{{StubNotice}}

	The European Union has passed legislation that mandates Advanced Driver Distraction Warning (ADDW) systems for new ~~car~~ produced and meant to sell within the EU.<ref>{{Cite web \|last= \|first= \|date=16 Dec 2019 \|title=Regulation (EU) 2019/2144 \|url=https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32019R2144 \|url-status=live \|access-date=28 Jul 2025 \|website=EUR-Lex}}</ref> (Article 6 clause d)		The European Union has passed legislation that mandates Advanced Driver Distraction Warning (ADDW) systems for new cars produced and meant to sell within the EU<ref>{{Cite web \|last= \|first= \|date=16 Dec 2019 \|title=Regulation (EU) 2019/2144 \|url=https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32019R2144 \|url-status=live \|access-date=28 Jul 2025 \|website=EUR-Lex}}</ref> (Article 6 clause D).

	==How it works==		==How it works==
	Coming 7 July 2026 all new vehicles within the European Union have to contain cameras that monitor driver behavior and notify the driver accordingly in cases of improper driving conduct, something that had already taken place with M and N type vehicles from July 7th 2024<ref name=":0">{{Cite web \|last= \|first= \|title=ADDW specifications \|url=https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=PI_COM:C(2023)4523 \|url-status=live \|access-date=28 Jul 2025 \|website=EUR-Lex}}</ref>. This is on par with the goal EU had set to cut down on road accidents by half compared to 2019<ref>{{Cite web \|last= \|first= \|date=28 Oct 2021 \|title=European Commission welcomes launch of Global Plan for the UN Decade of Action on Road Safety 2021-2030 \|url=https://transport.ec.europa.eu/news-events/news/european-commission-welcomes-launch-global-plan-un-decade-action-road-safety-2021-2030-2021-10-28_en \|url-status=live \|access-date=28 Jul 2025 \|website=European Commission}}</ref>. The cameras are ~~ought~~ to monitor the drivers gaze, causing a case for a warning if ~~its~~ not directed at the specified areas that are defined in.<ref name=":0" /> (Specifically points 3.3.1.1., 3.3.1.2., 3.3.1.3).		Coming 7 July 2026 all new vehicles within the European Union have to contain cameras that monitor driver behavior and notify the driver accordingly in cases of improper driving conduct, something that had already taken place with M and N type vehicles from July 7th 2024<ref name=":0">{{Cite web \|last= \|first= \|title=ADDW specifications \|url=https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=PI_COM:C(2023)4523 \|url-status=live \|access-date=28 Jul 2025 \|website=EUR-Lex}}</ref>. This is on par with the goal EU had set to cut down on road accidents by half compared to 2019<ref>{{Cite web \|last= \|first= \|date=28 Oct 2021 \|title=European Commission welcomes launch of Global Plan for the UN Decade of Action on Road Safety 2021-2030 \|url=https://transport.ec.europa.eu/news-events/news/european-commission-welcomes-launch-global-plan-un-decade-action-road-safety-2021-2030-2021-10-28_en \|url-status=live \|access-date=28 Jul 2025 \|website=European Commission}}</ref>. The cameras are meant to monitor the drivers gaze, causing a case for a warning if it is not directed at the specified areas that are defined in.<ref name=":0" /> (Specifically points 3.3.1.1., 3.3.1.2., 3.3.1.3).

	The legislation asserts that the data generated by the ADDW system, should be contained within a closed loop and not be made available to 3rd parties, in addition no data should be collected except that which is needed to perform the task, and the data must be deleted after processing.<ref name=":0" /> (Article 6 clause 3)		The legislation asserts that the data generated by the ADDW system, should be contained within a closed loop and not be made available to 3rd parties, in addition no data should be collected except that which is needed to perform the task, and the data must be deleted after processing.<ref name=":0" /> (Article 6 clause 3).

	==Why it is a problem==		==Why it is a problem==
	'''Privacy concerns''' are a major issue with such legislation. Although the data falls under GDPR and the EU has established strong rules, serious questions remain. For instance, in the case of Tesla, employees were found sharing sensitive content from consumer vehicle cameras in private group chats.<ref>{{Cite news \|last=Stecklow \|first=Steve \|last2=Cunningham \|first2=Waylon \|last3=Jin \|first3=Hyunjoo \|date=7 Apr 2023 \|title=Tesla workers shared sensitive images recorded by customer cars \|url=https://www.reuters.com/technology/tesla-workers-shared-sensitive-images-recorded-by-customer-cars-2023-04-06/ \|url-status=live \|access-date=28 Jul 2025 \|work=Reuters}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news \|last= \|date=8 Apr 2023 \|title=Tesla workers shared sensitive images recorded by customer cars \|url=https://www.dawn.com/news/1746491 \|url-status=live \|access-date=28 Jul 2025 \|work=Dawn}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news \|last=Brodkin \|first=John \|date=6 Apr 2023 \|title=Tesla workers shared images from car cameras, including “scenes of intimacy” \|url=https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2023/04/tesla-workers-shared-images-from-car-cameras-including-scenes-of-intimacy/ \|url-status=live \|access-date=28 Jul 2025 \|work=ArsTechnica}}</ref> Moreover, cars are already regarded as privacy hazards, with manufacturers often selling user information and exhibiting questionable security practices.<ref>{{Cite news \|last=Caltrider \|first=Jen \|last2=Rykov \|first2=Misha \|last3=MacDonald \|first3=Zoë \|date=6 Sep 2023 \|title=It’s Official: Cars Are the Worst Product Category We Have Ever Reviewed for Privacy \|url=https://www.mozillafoundation.org/en/privacynotincluded/articles/its-official-cars-are-the-worst-product-category-we-have-ever-reviewed-for-privacy/ \|access-date=28 Jul 2025 \|work=Mozilla Foundation}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news \|last=Katharine \|first=Kemp \|date=20 Nov 2024 \|title=Modern cars are surveillance devices on wheels with major privacy risks – new report \|url=https://www.unsw.edu.au/newsroom/news/2024/11/modern-cars-surveillance-devices-privacy-risks \|url-status=live \|access-date=28 Jul 2025 \|work=unsw.edu.au}}</ref> Adding to this, [~~https://noyb.eu/en/about-us noyb~~], which is a "European Center for Digital Rights", conducted a survey with more than 1,000 privacy professionals, and ~~'''~~74.4% of them assume that the average company~~'''~~ fails to comply properly with GDPR guidelines.<ref>{{Cite web \|title=GDPR a culture of non-compliance? \|url=https://noyb.eu/sites/default/files/2024-01/GDPR_a%20culture%20of%20non-compliance.pdf \|url-status=live \|access-date=28 Jul 2025 \|website=noyb}}</ref> This raises doubts about how effectively the EU can enforce GDPR in the automotive sector, especially as the adoption of such technologies becomes widespread and affects citizens daily lives in the coming years.		'''Privacy concerns''' are a major issue with such legislation. Although the data falls under GDPR and the EU has established strong rules, serious questions remain. For instance, in the case of Tesla, employees were found sharing sensitive content from consumer vehicle cameras in private group chats.<ref>{{Cite news \|last=Stecklow \|first=Steve \|last2=Cunningham \|first2=Waylon \|last3=Jin \|first3=Hyunjoo \|date=7 Apr 2023 \|title=Tesla workers shared sensitive images recorded by customer cars \|url=https://www.reuters.com/technology/tesla-workers-shared-sensitive-images-recorded-by-customer-cars-2023-04-06/ \|url-status=live \|access-date=28 Jul 2025 \|work=Reuters}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news \|last= \|date=8 Apr 2023 \|title=Tesla workers shared sensitive images recorded by customer cars \|url=https://www.dawn.com/news/1746491 \|url-status=live \|access-date=28 Jul 2025 \|work=Dawn}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news \|last=Brodkin \|first=John \|date=6 Apr 2023 \|title=Tesla workers shared images from car cameras, including “scenes of intimacy” \|url=https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2023/04/tesla-workers-shared-images-from-car-cameras-including-scenes-of-intimacy/ \|url-status=live \|access-date=28 Jul 2025 \|work=ArsTechnica}}</ref> Moreover, cars are already regarded as privacy hazards, with manufacturers often selling user information and exhibiting questionable security practices.<ref>{{Cite news \|last=Caltrider \|first=Jen \|last2=Rykov \|first2=Misha \|last3=MacDonald \|first3=Zoë \|date=6 Sep 2023 \|title=It’s Official: Cars Are the Worst Product Category We Have Ever Reviewed for Privacy \|url=https://www.mozillafoundation.org/en/privacynotincluded/articles/its-official-cars-are-the-worst-product-category-we-have-ever-reviewed-for-privacy/ \|access-date=28 Jul 2025 \|work=Mozilla Foundation}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news \|last=Katharine \|first=Kemp \|date=20 Nov 2024 \|title=Modern cars are surveillance devices on wheels with major privacy risks – new report \|url=https://www.unsw.edu.au/newsroom/news/2024/11/modern-cars-surveillance-devices-privacy-risks \|url-status=live \|access-date=28 Jul 2025 \|work=unsw.edu.au}}</ref> Adding to this, [[NOYB]], which is a "European Center for Digital Rights", conducted a survey with more than 1,000 privacy professionals, and 74.4% of them assume that the average company fails to comply properly with GDPR guidelines.<ref>{{Cite web \|title=GDPR a culture of non-compliance? \|url=https://noyb.eu/sites/default/files/2024-01/GDPR_a%20culture%20of%20non-compliance.pdf \|url-status=live \|access-date=28 Jul 2025 \|website=noyb}}</ref> This raises doubts about how effectively the EU can enforce GDPR in the automotive sector, especially as the adoption of such technologies becomes widespread and affects citizens daily lives in the coming years.

	==References==		==References==
	{{reflist}}		{{reflist}}

Mingyee: Removed “Common terms” category

2025-08-27T12:00:21Z

Removed “Common terms” category

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:00, 27 August 2025
Line 13:		Line 13:
	==References==		==References==
	{{reflist}}		{{reflist}}

	~~[[Category:Common terms]]~~

Emanuele: some minor fixes

2025-07-28T20:13:21Z

some minor fixes

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:13, 28 July 2025
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{StubNotice}}		{{StubNotice}}

	The European ~~union~~ has passed legislation that mandates Advanced Driver Distraction Warning(ADDW) systems for new car produced and meant to sell within the EU.<ref>{{Cite web \|last=~~european~~ \|first=~~parliment~~ \|date=2019~~-12-16~~ \|title=Regulation (EU) 2019/2144 \|url=https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32019R2144 \|url-status=live \|website=EUR-Lex}}</ref>(~~article~~ 6 clause d)		The European Union has passed legislation that mandates Advanced Driver Distraction Warning (ADDW) systems for new car produced and meant to sell within the EU.<ref>{{Cite web \|last= \|first= \|date=16 Dec 2019 \|title=Regulation (EU) 2019/2144 \|url=https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32019R2144 \|url-status=live \|access-date=28 Jul 2025 \|website=EUR-Lex}}</ref> (Article 6 clause d)

	==How it works==		==How it works==
	Coming 7 July 2026 all new vehicles within the European Union have to contain cameras that monitor driver behavior and notify the driver accordingly in cases of improper driving conduct, something that had already taken place with M and N type vehicles from July 7th 2024 <ref name=":0">{{Cite web \|last=~~European~~ \|first=~~Union~~ \|title=ADDW specifications \|url=https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=PI_COM:C(2023)4523 \|url-status=live}}</ref> . This is on par with the goal EU had set to cut down on road accidents by ~~halve~~ compared to 2019<ref>{{Cite web \|last=~~european~~ \|first=~~union~~ \|date=28 Oct 2021 \|title=European Commission welcomes launch of Global Plan for the UN Decade of Action on Road Safety 2021-2030 \|url=https://transport.ec.europa.eu/news-events/news/european-commission-welcomes-launch-global-plan-un-decade-action-road-safety-2021-2030-2021-10-28_en \|url-status=live}}</ref>. The cameras are ought to monitor the drivers gaze, causing a case for a warning if its not directed at the specified areas that are defined in<ref name=":0" />(~~specifically~~ points 3.3.1.1., 3.3.1.2., 3.3.1.3).		Coming 7 July 2026 all new vehicles within the European Union have to contain cameras that monitor driver behavior and notify the driver accordingly in cases of improper driving conduct, something that had already taken place with M and N type vehicles from July 7th 2024<ref name=":0">{{Cite web \|last= \|first= \|title=ADDW specifications \|url=https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=PI_COM:C(2023)4523 \|url-status=live \|access-date=28 Jul 2025 \|website=EUR-Lex}}</ref>. This is on par with the goal EU had set to cut down on road accidents by half compared to 2019<ref>{{Cite web \|last= \|first= \|date=28 Oct 2021 \|title=European Commission welcomes launch of Global Plan for the UN Decade of Action on Road Safety 2021-2030 \|url=https://transport.ec.europa.eu/news-events/news/european-commission-welcomes-launch-global-plan-un-decade-action-road-safety-2021-2030-2021-10-28_en \|url-status=live \|access-date=28 Jul 2025 \|website=European Commission}}</ref>. The cameras are ought to monitor the drivers gaze, causing a case for a warning if its not directed at the specified areas that are defined in.<ref name=":0" /> (Specifically points 3.3.1.1., 3.3.1.2., 3.3.1.3).

	The legislation asserts that the data generated by the ADDW system, should be contained within a closed loop and not be made available to 3rd parties, in addition no data should be collected except that which is needed to perform the task, and the data must be deleted after processing<ref name=":0" />(~~article~~ 6 clause 3).		The legislation asserts that the data generated by the ADDW system, should be contained within a closed loop and not be made available to 3rd parties, in addition no data should be collected except that which is needed to perform the task, and the data must be deleted after processing.<ref name=":0" /> (Article 6 clause 3)

	==Why it is a problem==		==Why it is a problem==
	'''Privacy concerns''' are a major issue with such legislation. Although the data falls under GDPR and the EU has established strong rules, serious questions remain. For instance, in the case of Tesla, employees were found sharing sensitive content from consumer vehicle cameras in private group chats <ref>{{Cite news \|first= \|date=7 Apr 2023 \|title=Tesla workers shared sensitive images recorded by customer cars \|url=https://www.reuters.com/technology/tesla-workers-shared-sensitive-images-recorded-by-customer-cars-2023-04-06/ \|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news \|date=~~April~~ 8, 2023 \|title=Tesla workers shared sensitive images recorded by customer cars \|url=https://www.dawn.com/news/1746491 \|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news \|date=Apr 6, 2023 \|title=Tesla workers shared images from car cameras, including “scenes of intimacy” \|url=https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2023/04/tesla-workers-shared-images-from-car-cameras-including-scenes-of-intimacy/ \|url-status=live}}</ref>. Moreover, cars are already regarded as privacy hazards, with manufacturers often selling user information and exhibiting questionable security practices <ref>{{Cite news \|date=Sep 6, 2023 \|title=It’s Official: Cars Are the Worst Product Category We Have Ever Reviewed for Privacy \|url=https://www.mozillafoundation.org/en/privacynotincluded/articles/its-official-cars-are-the-worst-product-category-we-have-ever-reviewed-for-privacy/ \|work=~~mozilla foundation~~}}</ref> <ref>{{Cite news \|last=Katharine \|first=Kemp \|date=20 ~~November~~ 2024 \|title=Modern cars are surveillance devices on wheels with major privacy risks – new report \|url=https://www.unsw.edu.au/newsroom/news/2024/11/modern-cars-surveillance-devices-privacy-risks \|url-status=live}}</ref>. Adding to this, [https://noyb.eu/en/about-us noyb] which is a "European Center for Digital Rights" ~~reported that~~ '''74.4% of ~~avarage companies~~''' ~~fail~~ to comply properly with GDPR guidelines<ref>{{Cite web \|title=GDPR a culture of non-compliance? \|url=https://noyb.eu/sites/default/files/2024-01/GDPR_a%20culture%20of%20non-compliance.pdf \|url-status=live}}</ref>. This raises doubts about how effectively the EU can enforce GDPR in the automotive sector, especially as the adoption of such technologies becomes widespread and affects citizens daily lives in the coming years.		'''Privacy concerns''' are a major issue with such legislation. Although the data falls under GDPR and the EU has established strong rules, serious questions remain. For instance, in the case of Tesla, employees were found sharing sensitive content from consumer vehicle cameras in private group chats.<ref>{{Cite news \|last=Stecklow \|first=Steve \|last2=Cunningham \|first2=Waylon \|last3=Jin \|first3=Hyunjoo \|date=7 Apr 2023 \|title=Tesla workers shared sensitive images recorded by customer cars \|url=https://www.reuters.com/technology/tesla-workers-shared-sensitive-images-recorded-by-customer-cars-2023-04-06/ \|url-status=live \|access-date=28 Jul 2025 \|work=Reuters}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news \|last= \|date=8 Apr 2023 \|title=Tesla workers shared sensitive images recorded by customer cars \|url=https://www.dawn.com/news/1746491 \|url-status=live \|access-date=28 Jul 2025 \|work=Dawn}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news \|last=Brodkin \|first=John \|date=6 Apr 2023 \|title=Tesla workers shared images from car cameras, including “scenes of intimacy” \|url=https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2023/04/tesla-workers-shared-images-from-car-cameras-including-scenes-of-intimacy/ \|url-status=live \|access-date=28 Jul 2025 \|work=ArsTechnica}}</ref> Moreover, cars are already regarded as privacy hazards, with manufacturers often selling user information and exhibiting questionable security practices.<ref>{{Cite news \|last=Caltrider \|first=Jen \|last2=Rykov \|first2=Misha \|last3=MacDonald \|first3=Zoë \|date=6 Sep 2023 \|title=It’s Official: Cars Are the Worst Product Category We Have Ever Reviewed for Privacy \|url=https://www.mozillafoundation.org/en/privacynotincluded/articles/its-official-cars-are-the-worst-product-category-we-have-ever-reviewed-for-privacy/ \|access-date=28 Jul 2025 \|work=Mozilla Foundation}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news \|last=Katharine \|first=Kemp \|date=20 Nov 2024 \|title=Modern cars are surveillance devices on wheels with major privacy risks – new report \|url=https://www.unsw.edu.au/newsroom/news/2024/11/modern-cars-surveillance-devices-privacy-risks \|url-status=live \|access-date=28 Jul 2025 \|work=unsw.edu.au}}</ref> Adding to this, [https://noyb.eu/en/about-us noyb], which is a "European Center for Digital Rights", conducted a survey with more than 1,000 privacy professionals, and '''74.4% of them assume that the average company''' fails to comply properly with GDPR guidelines.<ref>{{Cite web \|title=GDPR a culture of non-compliance? \|url=https://noyb.eu/sites/default/files/2024-01/GDPR_a%20culture%20of%20non-compliance.pdf \|url-status=live \|access-date=28 Jul 2025 \|website=noyb}}</ref> This raises doubts about how effectively the EU can enforce GDPR in the automotive sector, especially as the adoption of such technologies becomes widespread and affects citizens daily lives in the coming years.

	==References==		==References==