AMD - Revision history

Bananabot: Added archive URLs for 1 citation(s) using CRWCitationBot

2026-02-23T12:15:20Z

Added archive URLs for 1 citation(s) using CRWCitationBot

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:15, 23 February 2026
Line 9:		Line 9:
	}}		}}

	'''{{wplink\|AMD\|Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.}}''' or '''AMD''' is an American technology company that designs and sells computer components such as {{wplink\|central processing unit}} (CPUs), {{wplink\|graphics processing unit}} (GPUs) and related products for both commercial and enterprise use. AMD was cofounded in 1969 by Walter Jeremiah “Jerry” Sanders, a former executive at {{wplink\|Fairchild Semiconductor}} Corporation, and seven colleagues.<ref>{{Cite web \|title=Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. {{!}} American Semiconductor Company {{!}} Britannica Money \|url=https://www.britannica.com/money/Advanced-Micro-Devices-Inc \|access-date=2026-02-23 \|website=Britannica}}</ref>		'''{{wplink\|AMD\|Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.}}''' or '''AMD''' is an American technology company that designs and sells computer components such as {{wplink\|central processing unit}} (CPUs), {{wplink\|graphics processing unit}} (GPUs) and related products for both commercial and enterprise use. AMD was cofounded in 1969 by Walter Jeremiah “Jerry” Sanders, a former executive at {{wplink\|Fairchild Semiconductor}} Corporation, and seven colleagues.<ref>{{Cite web \|title=Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. {{!}} American Semiconductor Company {{!}} Britannica Money \|url=https://www.britannica.com/money/Advanced-Micro-Devices-Inc \|access-date=2026-02-23 \|website=Britannica}} ([http://web.archive.org/web/20251225042245/https://www.britannica.com/money/Advanced-Micro-Devices-Inc Archived])</ref>

	==Consumer-impact summary==		==Consumer-impact summary==

FoulerTripod363: Rephrased the "Citation Needed" part and added citation from Britannica

2026-02-23T09:32:20Z

Rephrased the "Citation Needed" part and added citation from Britannica

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:32, 23 February 2026
Line 9:		Line 9:
	}}		}}

	'''{{wplink\|AMD\|Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.}}''' or '''AMD''' is an American technology company that designs and sells computer components such as {{wplink\|central processing unit}} (CPUs), {{wplink\|graphics processing unit}} (GPUs) and related products for both commercial and enterprise use. It was ~~founded on May 01,~~ 1969, by ~~Jerry~~ Sanders ~~and~~ a ~~group of his colleagues from~~ {{wplink\|Fairchild Semiconductor}}.{{~~Citation needed~~\|date=~~2 Dec 2025~~}}		'''{{wplink\|AMD\|Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.}}''' or '''AMD''' is an American technology company that designs and sells computer components such as {{wplink\|central processing unit}} (CPUs), {{wplink\|graphics processing unit}} (GPUs) and related products for both commercial and enterprise use. AMD was cofounded in 1969 by Walter Jeremiah “Jerry” Sanders, a former executive at {{wplink\|Fairchild Semiconductor}} Corporation, and seven colleagues.<ref>{{Cite web \|title=Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. {{!}} American Semiconductor Company {{!}} Britannica Money \|url=https://www.britannica.com/money/Advanced-Micro-Devices-Inc \|access-date=2026-02-23 \|website=Britannica}}</ref>

	==Consumer-impact summary==		==Consumer-impact summary==
Line 43:		Line 43:

	*[https://www.amd.com/en/products/graphics/desktops/radeon.html]{{wplink\|Radeon}} RX		*[https://www.amd.com/en/products/graphics/desktops/radeon.html]{{wplink\|Radeon}} RX
	*[https://www.amd.com/en/products/graphics/workstations.html Radeon PRO]		*[https://www.amd.com/en/products/graphics/workstations.html Radeon PRO]
	*[https://www.amd.com/en/products/graphics/workstations/radeon-ai-pro.html Radeon AI PRO]		*[https://www.amd.com/en/products/graphics/workstations/radeon-ai-pro.html Radeon AI PRO]
	*[https://www.amd.com/en/products/graphics/laptops/radeon.html Radeon RX for Laptops]		*[https://www.amd.com/en/products/graphics/laptops/radeon.html Radeon RX for Laptops]

	=== Networking ===		===Networking===

	* [https://www.amd.com/en/products/ethernet-adapters.html Solarflare Ethernet Adapters]		*[https://www.amd.com/en/products/ethernet-adapters.html Solarflare Ethernet Adapters]
	* [https://www.amd.com/en/solutions/telco-and-networking/telco-accelerators.html Telco and Networking]		*[https://www.amd.com/en/solutions/telco-and-networking/telco-accelerators.html Telco and Networking]
	* [https://www.amd.com/en/products/accelerators/alveo.html Alveo for Data Centers]		*[https://www.amd.com/en/products/accelerators/alveo.html Alveo for Data Centers]
	*[https://www.amd.com/en/products/data-processing-units/pensando.html Pensando DPU]		*[https://www.amd.com/en/products/data-processing-units/pensando.html Pensando DPU]

Biggusbrickus: /* Products */ Added more current product offerings, linked to their website

2026-02-20T20:41:25Z

Products: Added more current product offerings, linked to their website

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:41, 20 February 2026
Line 24:		Line 24:
	AMD settled the lawsuit with a $12.1 million payout, which is estimated to have compensated up to $35 per applicant that could give a proof of purchase. The complaint was about the Bulldozer processors being marketed as the "first native 8-core desktop processor," while this was allegedly false advertising. The CPU has 4 modules with each 2 sub-processors that shared resources instead of 8 independent cores that could perform separately and simultaneously.<ref>{{Cite web \|last=Martin \|first=Dylan \|date=27 Aug 2019 \|title=AMD Reaches $12.1M Settlement In Bulldozer False Advertising Suit \|url=https://www.crn.com/news/components-peripherals/amd-reaches-12-1m-settlement-for-bulldozer-false-advertising-suit \|url-status=live \|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240810172133/https://www.crn.com/news/components-peripherals/amd-reaches-12-1m-settlement-for-bulldozer-false-advertising-suit \|archive-date=10 Aug 2024 \|access-date=2 Dec 2025 \|website=CRN}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web \|last=Hachman \|first=Mark \|date=28 Aug 2019 \|title=AMD settles Bulldozer class-action suit that could pay out up to $35 per chip \|url=https://www.pcworld.com/article/397954/amd-settles-bulldozer-class-action-suit-that-could-pay-out-up-to-35-per-chip.html \|url-status=live \|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20241003044413/https://www.pcworld.com/article/397954/amd-settles-bulldozer-class-action-suit-that-could-pay-out-up-to-35-per-chip.html \|archive-date=3 Oct 2024 \|access-date=2 Dec 2025 \|website=PCWorld}}</ref> And it was demonstrated that the alleged customer damages caused by the allegedly misleading claims can be measured on a class-wide basis.<ref>{{Cite web \|date=22 Jan 2019 \|title=Dickey v. Advanced Micro Devices \|url=https://regmedia.co.uk/2019/01/22/amd-core-class-action.pdf \|url-status=live \|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240217004410/https://regmedia.co.uk/2019/01/22/amd-core-class-action.pdf \|archive-date=17 Feb 2024 \|access-date=2 Dec 2025 \|website=The Register}}</ref>		AMD settled the lawsuit with a $12.1 million payout, which is estimated to have compensated up to $35 per applicant that could give a proof of purchase. The complaint was about the Bulldozer processors being marketed as the "first native 8-core desktop processor," while this was allegedly false advertising. The CPU has 4 modules with each 2 sub-processors that shared resources instead of 8 independent cores that could perform separately and simultaneously.<ref>{{Cite web \|last=Martin \|first=Dylan \|date=27 Aug 2019 \|title=AMD Reaches $12.1M Settlement In Bulldozer False Advertising Suit \|url=https://www.crn.com/news/components-peripherals/amd-reaches-12-1m-settlement-for-bulldozer-false-advertising-suit \|url-status=live \|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240810172133/https://www.crn.com/news/components-peripherals/amd-reaches-12-1m-settlement-for-bulldozer-false-advertising-suit \|archive-date=10 Aug 2024 \|access-date=2 Dec 2025 \|website=CRN}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web \|last=Hachman \|first=Mark \|date=28 Aug 2019 \|title=AMD settles Bulldozer class-action suit that could pay out up to $35 per chip \|url=https://www.pcworld.com/article/397954/amd-settles-bulldozer-class-action-suit-that-could-pay-out-up-to-35-per-chip.html \|url-status=live \|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20241003044413/https://www.pcworld.com/article/397954/amd-settles-bulldozer-class-action-suit-that-could-pay-out-up-to-35-per-chip.html \|archive-date=3 Oct 2024 \|access-date=2 Dec 2025 \|website=PCWorld}}</ref> And it was demonstrated that the alleged customer damages caused by the allegedly misleading claims can be measured on a class-wide basis.<ref>{{Cite web \|date=22 Jan 2019 \|title=Dickey v. Advanced Micro Devices \|url=https://regmedia.co.uk/2019/01/22/amd-core-class-action.pdf \|url-status=live \|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240217004410/https://regmedia.co.uk/2019/01/22/amd-core-class-action.pdf \|archive-date=17 Feb 2024 \|access-date=2 Dec 2025 \|website=The Register}}</ref>

	==Products==		==Current Products==

	===~~CPUs:~~===		===Processors===

	*~~{{wplink\|Epyc}} (~~server ~~lineup)~~		*[https://www.amd.com/en/products/processors/server/epyc.html EPYC Servers]
	*{{wplink\|Ryzen}} ~~(desktop lineup)~~		*[https://www.amd.com/en/products/processors/business-systems/ryzen-ai.html Ryzen AI for Business]
	*~~{{wplink\|~~Threadripper~~}} (HEDT lineup)~~		*[https://www.amd.com/en/products/processors/handhelds/ryzen-z-series.html Ryzen Z for Handhelds]
			*[https://www.amd.com/en/products/processors/desktops/ryzen.html Ryzen for Desktops]
			*[https://www.amd.com/en/products/processors/laptop/ryzen.html]{{wplink\|Ryzen}} for Laptops
			*[https://www.amd.com/en/products/processors/workstations/ryzen-threadripper.html Ryzen Threadripper for Workstations and High End Desktops]

	===~~GPUs:~~===		===Accelerators===

	*{{wplink\|Radeon}} ~~(consumer lineup)~~		*[https://www.amd.com/en/products/accelerators/instinct.html Instinct GPU]
	*~~{{wplink\|~~Radeon ~~Pro}} (workstation lineup)~~		*[https://www.amd.com/en/products/accelerators/radeon-pro.html Radeon PRO V Accelerators]
	*~~{{wplink\|~~Radeon ~~Instinct}} (ML targeted workstation lineup)~~
			===Graphics===

			*[https://www.amd.com/en/products/graphics/desktops/radeon.html]{{wplink\|Radeon}} RX
			*[https://www.amd.com/en/products/graphics/workstations.html Radeon PRO]
			*[https://www.amd.com/en/products/graphics/workstations/radeon-ai-pro.html Radeon AI PRO]
			*[https://www.amd.com/en/products/graphics/laptops/radeon.html Radeon RX for Laptops]

			=== Networking ===

			* [https://www.amd.com/en/products/ethernet-adapters.html Solarflare Ethernet Adapters]
			* [https://www.amd.com/en/solutions/telco-and-networking/telco-accelerators.html Telco and Networking]
			* [https://www.amd.com/en/products/accelerators/alveo.html Alveo for Data Centers]
			*[https://www.amd.com/en/products/data-processing-units/pensando.html Pensando DPU]

	==See also==		==See also==

SinexTitan: _

2026-01-25T14:51:23Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:51, 25 January 2026
Line 9:		Line 9:
	}}		}}

	'''{{wplink\|AMD\|Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.}}''' or '''AMD''' is an American technology company that designs and sells computer components such as {{wplink\|central processing unit}} (CPUs), {{wplink\|~~graphics_processing_unit~~}} (GPUs) and related products for both commercial and enterprise use. It was founded on May 01, 1969, by Jerry Sanders and a group of his colleagues from {{wplink\|Fairchild Semiconductor}}.{{Citation needed\|date=2 Dec 2025}}		'''{{wplink\|AMD\|Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.}}''' or '''AMD''' is an American technology company that designs and sells computer components such as {{wplink\|central processing unit}} (CPUs), {{wplink\|graphics processing unit}} (GPUs) and related products for both commercial and enterprise use. It was founded on May 01, 1969, by Jerry Sanders and a group of his colleagues from {{wplink\|Fairchild Semiconductor}}.{{Citation needed\|date=2 Dec 2025}}

	==Consumer-impact summary==		==Consumer-impact summary==

SinexTitan: link modernisation

2026-01-24T13:18:43Z

link modernisation

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:18, 24 January 2026
Line 9:		Line 9:
	}}		}}

	''~~[https://wikipedia.org/wiki/~~AMD Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.]''' or '''AMD''' is an American technology company that designs and sells computer components such as ~~[https://wikipedia.org/wiki/Central_processing_unit~~ central processing ~~units]~~ (CPUs), ~~[https://wikipedia.org/wiki/Graphics_processing_unit graphics processing units]~~ (GPUs) and related products for both commercial and enterprise use. It was founded on May 01, 1969, by Jerry Sanders and a group of his colleagues from ~~[https://wikipedia.org/wiki/Fairchild_Semiconductor~~ Fairchild Semiconductor].{{Citation needed\|date=2 Dec 2025}}		'''{{wplink\|AMD\|Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.}}''' or '''AMD''' is an American technology company that designs and sells computer components such as {{wplink\|central processing unit}} (CPUs), {{wplink\|graphics_processing_unit}} (GPUs) and related products for both commercial and enterprise use. It was founded on May 01, 1969, by Jerry Sanders and a group of his colleagues from {{wplink\|Fairchild Semiconductor}}.{{Citation needed\|date=2 Dec 2025}}

	==Consumer-impact summary==		==Consumer-impact summary==
Line 19:		Line 19:
	===Abandonment of the sTRX4 platform (2019)===		===Abandonment of the sTRX4 platform (2019)===
	{{Main\|link to the main article}}		{{Main\|link to the main article}}
	On November 25, 2019, AMD released ~~the [https://wikipedia.org/wiki/Socket_sTRX4~~ sTRX4~~] socket~~ alongside their ~~[https://wikipedia.org/wiki/~~Threadripper#Castle_Peak_(Threadripper_3000_series,_Zen_2_based) Threadripper 3000] series of HEDT (high-end desktop) processors with the promise of long term support for the platform.<ref>{{Cite web \|last=AMDOfficial \|title=Performance Preview: 3rd Gen AMD Ryzen Threadripper Processors for Creators \|url=https://old.reddit.com/r/Amd/comments/dsy4kw/performance_preview_3rd_gen_amd_ryzen/ \|url-status=live \|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20250802105206/https://old.reddit.com/r/Amd/comments/dsy4kw/performance_preview_3rd_gen_amd_ryzen/ \|archive-date=2025-08-02 \|access-date=2025-08-02 \|website=Reddit}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web \|last=Jeffrey \|first=Cal \|date=2019-11-12 \|title=AMD commits to 'long-term' support for sTRX4 CPU socket used with third-gen Threadripper \|url=https://www.techspot.com/news/82734-amd-commits-long-term-support-strx4-cpu-socket.html \|url-status=live \|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20250802105138/https://www.techspot.com/news/82734-amd-commits-long-term-support-strx4-cpu-socket.html \|archive-date=2025-08-02 \|access-date=2025-08-02 \|website=TechSpot}}</ref> This along with the strong reputation of ~~[https://wikipedia.org/wiki/Socket_AM4~~ socket AM4] led many people to invest into the platform. Despite the promises made, AMD ultimately fell flat and only supported a total of one generation of CPUs before freezing the regular Ryzen Threadripper lineup till the release of ~~[https://wikipedia.org/wiki/~~List_of_AMD_Ryzen_processors#Storm_Peak_desktop Threadripper 7000] on socket ~~[https://wikipedia.org/wiki/Socket_sTR5~~ sTR5].		On November 25, 2019, AMD released {{wplink\|socket sTRX4}} alongside their {{wplink\|Threadripper#Castle_Peak_(Threadripper_3000_series,_Zen_2_based)\|Threadripper 3000}} series of HEDT (high-end desktop) processors with the promise of long term support for the platform.<ref>{{Cite web \|last=AMDOfficial \|title=Performance Preview: 3rd Gen AMD Ryzen Threadripper Processors for Creators \|url=https://old.reddit.com/r/Amd/comments/dsy4kw/performance_preview_3rd_gen_amd_ryzen/ \|url-status=live \|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20250802105206/https://old.reddit.com/r/Amd/comments/dsy4kw/performance_preview_3rd_gen_amd_ryzen/ \|archive-date=2025-08-02 \|access-date=2025-08-02 \|website=Reddit}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web \|last=Jeffrey \|first=Cal \|date=2019-11-12 \|title=AMD commits to 'long-term' support for sTRX4 CPU socket used with third-gen Threadripper \|url=https://www.techspot.com/news/82734-amd-commits-long-term-support-strx4-cpu-socket.html \|url-status=live \|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20250802105138/https://www.techspot.com/news/82734-amd-commits-long-term-support-strx4-cpu-socket.html \|archive-date=2025-08-02 \|access-date=2025-08-02 \|website=TechSpot}}</ref> This along with the strong reputation of {{wplink\|socket AM4}} led many people to invest into the platform. Despite the promises made, AMD ultimately fell flat and only supported a total of one generation of CPUs before freezing the regular Ryzen Threadripper lineup till the release of {{wplink\|List_of_AMD_Ryzen_processors#Storm_Peak_desktop\|Threadripper 7000}} on {{wplink\|socket sTR5}}.

	==="Bulldozer" CPU false advertisement lawsuit (2015-2019)===		==="Bulldozer" CPU false advertisement lawsuit (2015-2019)===
Line 28:		Line 28:
	===CPUs:===		===CPUs:===

	*~~[https://wikipedia.org/wiki/~~Epyc ~~Epyc]~~ (server lineup)		*{{wplink\|Epyc}} (server lineup)
	*~~[https://wikipedia.org/wiki/Ryzen~~ Ryzen] (desktop lineup)		*{{wplink\|Ryzen}} (desktop lineup)
	*~~[https://wikipedia.org/wiki/Threadripper Ryzen~~ Threadripper] (HEDT lineup)		*{{wplink\|Threadripper}} (HEDT lineup)

	===GPUs:===		===GPUs:===

	*~~[https://wikipedia.org/wiki/~~Radeon ~~Radeon]~~ (consumer lineup)		*{{wplink\|Radeon}} (consumer lineup)
	*~~[https://wikipedia.org/wiki/Radeon_Pro~~ Radeon Pro] (workstation lineup)		*{{wplink\|Radeon Pro}} (workstation lineup)
	*~~[https://wikipedia.org/wiki/AMD_Instinct~~ Radeon Instinct] (ML targeted workstation lineup)		*{{wplink\|Radeon Instinct}} (ML targeted workstation lineup)

	==See also==		==See also==

	* [[Intel]]		*[[Intel]]
	* [[Nvidia]]		*[[Nvidia]]
	* [[Qualcomm]]		*[[Qualcomm]]

	==References==		==References==

SinexTitan: /* See also */ list is now bullet pointed

2025-12-05T18:51:47Z

Reform: A dot has been moved in front of a citation

2025-12-02T18:51:14Z

A dot has been moved in front of a citation

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:51, 2 December 2025
Line 22:		Line 22:

	==="Bulldozer" CPU false advertisement lawsuit (2015-2019)===		==="Bulldozer" CPU false advertisement lawsuit (2015-2019)===
	AMD settled the lawsuit with a $12.1 million payout, which is estimated to have compensated up to $35 per applicant that could give a proof of purchase. The complaint was about the Bulldozer processors being marketed as the "first native 8-core desktop processor," while this was allegedly false advertising. The CPU has 4 modules with each 2 sub-processors that shared resources instead of 8 independent cores that could perform separately and simultaneously<ref>{{Cite web \|last=Martin \|first=Dylan \|date=27 Aug 2019 \|title=AMD Reaches $12.1M Settlement In Bulldozer False Advertising Suit \|url=https://www.crn.com/news/components-peripherals/amd-reaches-12-1m-settlement-for-bulldozer-false-advertising-suit \|url-status=live \|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240810172133/https://www.crn.com/news/components-peripherals/amd-reaches-12-1m-settlement-for-bulldozer-false-advertising-suit \|archive-date=10 Aug 2024 \|access-date=2 Dec 2025 \|website=CRN}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web \|last=Hachman \|first=Mark \|date=28 Aug 2019 \|title=AMD settles Bulldozer class-action suit that could pay out up to $35 per chip \|url=https://www.pcworld.com/article/397954/amd-settles-bulldozer-class-action-suit-that-could-pay-out-up-to-35-per-chip.html \|url-status=live \|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20241003044413/https://www.pcworld.com/article/397954/amd-settles-bulldozer-class-action-suit-that-could-pay-out-up-to-35-per-chip.html \|archive-date=3 Oct 2024 \|access-date=2 Dec 2025 \|website=PCWorld}}</ref>. And it was demonstrated that the alleged customer damages caused by the allegedly misleading claims can be measured on a class-wide basis.<ref>{{Cite web \|date=22 Jan 2019 \|title=Dickey v. Advanced Micro Devices \|url=https://regmedia.co.uk/2019/01/22/amd-core-class-action.pdf \|url-status=live \|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240217004410/https://regmedia.co.uk/2019/01/22/amd-core-class-action.pdf \|archive-date=17 Feb 2024 \|access-date=2 Dec 2025 \|website=The Register}}</ref>		AMD settled the lawsuit with a $12.1 million payout, which is estimated to have compensated up to $35 per applicant that could give a proof of purchase. The complaint was about the Bulldozer processors being marketed as the "first native 8-core desktop processor," while this was allegedly false advertising. The CPU has 4 modules with each 2 sub-processors that shared resources instead of 8 independent cores that could perform separately and simultaneously.<ref>{{Cite web \|last=Martin \|first=Dylan \|date=27 Aug 2019 \|title=AMD Reaches $12.1M Settlement In Bulldozer False Advertising Suit \|url=https://www.crn.com/news/components-peripherals/amd-reaches-12-1m-settlement-for-bulldozer-false-advertising-suit \|url-status=live \|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240810172133/https://www.crn.com/news/components-peripherals/amd-reaches-12-1m-settlement-for-bulldozer-false-advertising-suit \|archive-date=10 Aug 2024 \|access-date=2 Dec 2025 \|website=CRN}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web \|last=Hachman \|first=Mark \|date=28 Aug 2019 \|title=AMD settles Bulldozer class-action suit that could pay out up to $35 per chip \|url=https://www.pcworld.com/article/397954/amd-settles-bulldozer-class-action-suit-that-could-pay-out-up-to-35-per-chip.html \|url-status=live \|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20241003044413/https://www.pcworld.com/article/397954/amd-settles-bulldozer-class-action-suit-that-could-pay-out-up-to-35-per-chip.html \|archive-date=3 Oct 2024 \|access-date=2 Dec 2025 \|website=PCWorld}}</ref> And it was demonstrated that the alleged customer damages caused by the allegedly misleading claims can be measured on a class-wide basis.<ref>{{Cite web \|date=22 Jan 2019 \|title=Dickey v. Advanced Micro Devices \|url=https://regmedia.co.uk/2019/01/22/amd-core-class-action.pdf \|url-status=live \|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240217004410/https://regmedia.co.uk/2019/01/22/amd-core-class-action.pdf \|archive-date=17 Feb 2024 \|access-date=2 Dec 2025 \|website=The Register}}</ref>

	==Products==		==Products==

Reform: Okay last minor edit, changed the wordchoice "cores" (within the Buldozer CPU) to sub-processors which is how CRN described them

2025-12-02T18:48:01Z

Okay last minor edit, changed the wordchoice "cores" (within the Buldozer CPU) to sub-processors which is how CRN described them

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:48, 2 December 2025
Line 22:		Line 22:

	==="Bulldozer" CPU false advertisement lawsuit (2015-2019)===		==="Bulldozer" CPU false advertisement lawsuit (2015-2019)===
	AMD settled the lawsuit with a $12.1 million payout, which is estimated to have compensated up to $35 per applicant that could give a proof of purchase. The complaint was about the Bulldozer processors being marketed as the "first native 8-core desktop processor," while this was allegedly false advertising. The CPU has 4 modules with each 2 ~~cores~~ that shared resources instead of 8 independent cores that could perform separately and simultaneously<ref>{{Cite web \|last=Martin \|first=Dylan \|date=27 Aug 2019 \|title=AMD Reaches $12.1M Settlement In Bulldozer False Advertising Suit \|url=https://www.crn.com/news/components-peripherals/amd-reaches-12-1m-settlement-for-bulldozer-false-advertising-suit \|url-status=live \|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240810172133/https://www.crn.com/news/components-peripherals/amd-reaches-12-1m-settlement-for-bulldozer-false-advertising-suit \|archive-date=10 Aug 2024 \|access-date=2 Dec 2025 \|website=CRN}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web \|last=Hachman \|first=Mark \|date=28 Aug 2019 \|title=AMD settles Bulldozer class-action suit that could pay out up to $35 per chip \|url=https://www.pcworld.com/article/397954/amd-settles-bulldozer-class-action-suit-that-could-pay-out-up-to-35-per-chip.html \|url-status=live \|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20241003044413/https://www.pcworld.com/article/397954/amd-settles-bulldozer-class-action-suit-that-could-pay-out-up-to-35-per-chip.html \|archive-date=3 Oct 2024 \|access-date=2 Dec 2025 \|website=PCWorld}}</ref> And it was demonstrated that the alleged customer damages caused by the allegedly misleading claims can be measured on a class-wide basis.<ref>{{Cite web \|date=22 Jan 2019 \|title=Dickey v. Advanced Micro Devices \|url=https://regmedia.co.uk/2019/01/22/amd-core-class-action.pdf \|url-status=live \|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240217004410/https://regmedia.co.uk/2019/01/22/amd-core-class-action.pdf \|archive-date=17 Feb 2024 \|access-date=2 Dec 2025 \|website=The Register}}</ref>		AMD settled the lawsuit with a $12.1 million payout, which is estimated to have compensated up to $35 per applicant that could give a proof of purchase. The complaint was about the Bulldozer processors being marketed as the "first native 8-core desktop processor," while this was allegedly false advertising. The CPU has 4 modules with each 2 sub-processors that shared resources instead of 8 independent cores that could perform separately and simultaneously<ref>{{Cite web \|last=Martin \|first=Dylan \|date=27 Aug 2019 \|title=AMD Reaches $12.1M Settlement In Bulldozer False Advertising Suit \|url=https://www.crn.com/news/components-peripherals/amd-reaches-12-1m-settlement-for-bulldozer-false-advertising-suit \|url-status=live \|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240810172133/https://www.crn.com/news/components-peripherals/amd-reaches-12-1m-settlement-for-bulldozer-false-advertising-suit \|archive-date=10 Aug 2024 \|access-date=2 Dec 2025 \|website=CRN}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web \|last=Hachman \|first=Mark \|date=28 Aug 2019 \|title=AMD settles Bulldozer class-action suit that could pay out up to $35 per chip \|url=https://www.pcworld.com/article/397954/amd-settles-bulldozer-class-action-suit-that-could-pay-out-up-to-35-per-chip.html \|url-status=live \|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20241003044413/https://www.pcworld.com/article/397954/amd-settles-bulldozer-class-action-suit-that-could-pay-out-up-to-35-per-chip.html \|archive-date=3 Oct 2024 \|access-date=2 Dec 2025 \|website=PCWorld}}</ref>. And it was demonstrated that the alleged customer damages caused by the allegedly misleading claims can be measured on a class-wide basis.<ref>{{Cite web \|date=22 Jan 2019 \|title=Dickey v. Advanced Micro Devices \|url=https://regmedia.co.uk/2019/01/22/amd-core-class-action.pdf \|url-status=live \|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240217004410/https://regmedia.co.uk/2019/01/22/amd-core-class-action.pdf \|archive-date=17 Feb 2024 \|access-date=2 Dec 2025 \|website=The Register}}</ref>

	==Products==		==Products==

Reform: Removed redundant phrasing for clarity

2025-12-02T18:44:42Z

Removed redundant phrasing for clarity

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:44, 2 December 2025
Line 22:		Line 22:

	==="Bulldozer" CPU false advertisement lawsuit (2015-2019)===		==="Bulldozer" CPU false advertisement lawsuit (2015-2019)===
	AMD settled the lawsuit with a $12.1 million payout ~~to customers with a Bulldozer CPU~~, which is estimated to have compensated up to $35 per applicant that could give a proof of purchase. The complaint was about the Bulldozer processors being marketed as the "first native 8-core desktop processor," while this was allegedly false advertising. The CPU has 4 modules with each 2 cores that shared resources instead of 8 independent cores that could perform separately and simultaneously<ref>{{Cite web \|last=Martin \|first=Dylan \|date=27 Aug 2019 \|title=AMD Reaches $12.1M Settlement In Bulldozer False Advertising Suit \|url=https://www.crn.com/news/components-peripherals/amd-reaches-12-1m-settlement-for-bulldozer-false-advertising-suit \|url-status=live \|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240810172133/https://www.crn.com/news/components-peripherals/amd-reaches-12-1m-settlement-for-bulldozer-false-advertising-suit \|archive-date=10 Aug 2024 \|access-date=2 Dec 2025 \|website=CRN}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web \|last=Hachman \|first=Mark \|date=28 Aug 2019 \|title=AMD settles Bulldozer class-action suit that could pay out up to $35 per chip \|url=https://www.pcworld.com/article/397954/amd-settles-bulldozer-class-action-suit-that-could-pay-out-up-to-35-per-chip.html \|url-status=live \|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20241003044413/https://www.pcworld.com/article/397954/amd-settles-bulldozer-class-action-suit-that-could-pay-out-up-to-35-per-chip.html \|archive-date=3 Oct 2024 \|access-date=2 Dec 2025 \|website=PCWorld}}</ref> And it was demonstrated that the alleged customer damages caused by the allegedly misleading claims can be measured on a class-wide basis.<ref>{{Cite web \|date=22 Jan 2019 \|title=Dickey v. Advanced Micro Devices \|url=https://regmedia.co.uk/2019/01/22/amd-core-class-action.pdf \|url-status=live \|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240217004410/https://regmedia.co.uk/2019/01/22/amd-core-class-action.pdf \|archive-date=17 Feb 2024 \|access-date=2 Dec 2025 \|website=The Register}}</ref>		AMD settled the lawsuit with a $12.1 million payout, which is estimated to have compensated up to $35 per applicant that could give a proof of purchase. The complaint was about the Bulldozer processors being marketed as the "first native 8-core desktop processor," while this was allegedly false advertising. The CPU has 4 modules with each 2 cores that shared resources instead of 8 independent cores that could perform separately and simultaneously<ref>{{Cite web \|last=Martin \|first=Dylan \|date=27 Aug 2019 \|title=AMD Reaches $12.1M Settlement In Bulldozer False Advertising Suit \|url=https://www.crn.com/news/components-peripherals/amd-reaches-12-1m-settlement-for-bulldozer-false-advertising-suit \|url-status=live \|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240810172133/https://www.crn.com/news/components-peripherals/amd-reaches-12-1m-settlement-for-bulldozer-false-advertising-suit \|archive-date=10 Aug 2024 \|access-date=2 Dec 2025 \|website=CRN}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web \|last=Hachman \|first=Mark \|date=28 Aug 2019 \|title=AMD settles Bulldozer class-action suit that could pay out up to $35 per chip \|url=https://www.pcworld.com/article/397954/amd-settles-bulldozer-class-action-suit-that-could-pay-out-up-to-35-per-chip.html \|url-status=live \|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20241003044413/https://www.pcworld.com/article/397954/amd-settles-bulldozer-class-action-suit-that-could-pay-out-up-to-35-per-chip.html \|archive-date=3 Oct 2024 \|access-date=2 Dec 2025 \|website=PCWorld}}</ref> And it was demonstrated that the alleged customer damages caused by the allegedly misleading claims can be measured on a class-wide basis.<ref>{{Cite web \|date=22 Jan 2019 \|title=Dickey v. Advanced Micro Devices \|url=https://regmedia.co.uk/2019/01/22/amd-core-class-action.pdf \|url-status=live \|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240217004410/https://regmedia.co.uk/2019/01/22/amd-core-class-action.pdf \|archive-date=17 Feb 2024 \|access-date=2 Dec 2025 \|website=The Register}}</ref>

	==Products==		==Products==

Reform: Minor style adjustment

2025-12-02T18:43:37Z

Minor style adjustment

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:43, 2 December 2025
Line 22:		Line 22:

	==="Bulldozer" CPU false advertisement lawsuit (2015-2019)===		==="Bulldozer" CPU false advertisement lawsuit (2015-2019)===
	AMD settled the lawsuit with a $12.1 million ~~fine paid~~ to customers ~~who bought~~ a Bulldozer CPU, which is estimated to have compensated up to $35 per ~~proven~~ applicant. The complaint was about the Bulldozer processors being marketed as the "first native 8-core desktop processor", while this was allegedly false advertising. The CPU has 4 modules with each 2 cores that shared resources instead of 8 independent cores that could perform separately and simultaneously<ref>{{Cite web \|last=Martin \|first=Dylan \|date=27 Aug 2019 \|title=AMD Reaches $12.1M Settlement In Bulldozer False Advertising Suit \|url=https://www.crn.com/news/components-peripherals/amd-reaches-12-1m-settlement-for-bulldozer-false-advertising-suit \|url-status=live \|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240810172133/https://www.crn.com/news/components-peripherals/amd-reaches-12-1m-settlement-for-bulldozer-false-advertising-suit \|archive-date=10 Aug 2024 \|access-date=2 Dec 2025 \|website=CRN}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web \|last=Hachman \|first=Mark \|date=28 Aug 2019 \|title=AMD settles Bulldozer class-action suit that could pay out up to $35 per chip \|url=https://www.pcworld.com/article/397954/amd-settles-bulldozer-class-action-suit-that-could-pay-out-up-to-35-per-chip.html \|url-status=live \|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20241003044413/https://www.pcworld.com/article/397954/amd-settles-bulldozer-class-action-suit-that-could-pay-out-up-to-35-per-chip.html \|archive-date=3 Oct 2024 \|access-date=2 Dec 2025 \|website=PCWorld}}</ref> And it was demonstrated that the alleged customer damages caused by the allegedly misleading claims can be measured on a class-wide basis.<ref>{{Cite web \|date=22 Jan 2019 \|title=Dickey v. Advanced Micro Devices \|url=https://regmedia.co.uk/2019/01/22/amd-core-class-action.pdf \|url-status=live \|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240217004410/https://regmedia.co.uk/2019/01/22/amd-core-class-action.pdf \|archive-date=17 Feb 2024 \|access-date=2 Dec 2025 \|website=The Register}}</ref>		AMD settled the lawsuit with a $12.1 million payout to customers with a Bulldozer CPU, which is estimated to have compensated up to $35 per applicant that could give a proof of purchase. The complaint was about the Bulldozer processors being marketed as the "first native 8-core desktop processor," while this was allegedly false advertising. The CPU has 4 modules with each 2 cores that shared resources instead of 8 independent cores that could perform separately and simultaneously<ref>{{Cite web \|last=Martin \|first=Dylan \|date=27 Aug 2019 \|title=AMD Reaches $12.1M Settlement In Bulldozer False Advertising Suit \|url=https://www.crn.com/news/components-peripherals/amd-reaches-12-1m-settlement-for-bulldozer-false-advertising-suit \|url-status=live \|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240810172133/https://www.crn.com/news/components-peripherals/amd-reaches-12-1m-settlement-for-bulldozer-false-advertising-suit \|archive-date=10 Aug 2024 \|access-date=2 Dec 2025 \|website=CRN}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web \|last=Hachman \|first=Mark \|date=28 Aug 2019 \|title=AMD settles Bulldozer class-action suit that could pay out up to $35 per chip \|url=https://www.pcworld.com/article/397954/amd-settles-bulldozer-class-action-suit-that-could-pay-out-up-to-35-per-chip.html \|url-status=live \|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20241003044413/https://www.pcworld.com/article/397954/amd-settles-bulldozer-class-action-suit-that-could-pay-out-up-to-35-per-chip.html \|archive-date=3 Oct 2024 \|access-date=2 Dec 2025 \|website=PCWorld}}</ref> And it was demonstrated that the alleged customer damages caused by the allegedly misleading claims can be measured on a class-wide basis.<ref>{{Cite web \|date=22 Jan 2019 \|title=Dickey v. Advanced Micro Devices \|url=https://regmedia.co.uk/2019/01/22/amd-core-class-action.pdf \|url-status=live \|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240217004410/https://regmedia.co.uk/2019/01/22/amd-core-class-action.pdf \|archive-date=17 Feb 2024 \|access-date=2 Dec 2025 \|website=The Register}}</ref>

	==Products==		==Products==

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:51, 5 December 2025
Line 39:		Line 39:

	==See also==		==See also==
	~~[[Intel]]~~

	[[Nvidia]]		* [[Intel]]
			* [[Nvidia]]
	[[Qualcomm]]		* [[Qualcomm]]

	==References==		==References==