ATSC 3.0 - Revision history

Sojourna at 02:41, 4 March 2026

2026-03-04T02:41:46Z

Charlie 6: /* Incidents */ rephrased the last sentence

2026-03-03T15:03:30Z

Incidents: rephrased the last sentence

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:03, 3 March 2026
Line 33:		Line 33:
	SiliconDust of HDHomeRun has engaged in official correspondence with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in response to Pearl TV (ATSC 3.0) with regards to "Authorizing the Permissive Use of the “Next Generation” Broadcast Television Standard (GN Docket No. 16-142)"<ref name=":1">{{Cite web \|date=2025-07-18 \|title=Pearl Ex Parte Letter re HD HomeRun (7-18-25) \|url=https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/107180407509394/1 \|url-status=live \|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20260104093516/https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/107180407509394/1 \|archive-date=2026-01-04 \|website=FCC.gov}}</ref> pointing out Pearl TV is acting as a '''gatekeeper''' by deciding which tuners to allow and not allow even after being "certified" for NextGenTV ATSC 3.0 as well as making mention that strict '''exclusive use of (google) widevine''' prevents popular devices such as Roku, Xbox, Apple TV, iPhone, iPad, Windows, or Mac from ever accessing the encrypted channels.<ref>{{Cite web \|date=2025-07-22 \|title=Silicondust Response to Pearl Ex Parte Letter (7-22-25) \|url=https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/10722712322683/1 \|url-status=live \|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20251019215257/https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/10722712322683/1 \|archive-date=2025-10-19 \|website=FCC.gov}}</ref> The two responded back and forth, and Pearl TV attempted to claim that SiliconDust was using a black-listed chip. Pearl also claimed that SiliconDust must have a Widevine CDM license.<ref>{{Cite web \|date=2025-07-25 \|title=Pearl Ex Parte Letter re HD HomeRun (Reply 7-25-25) \|url=https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/1072583827524/1 \|url-status=live \|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20260104094613/https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/1072583827524/1 \|archive-date=2026-01-04 \|website=FCC.gov}}</ref> SiliconDust responded by claiming Pearl continues to push false narratives. They point out they are "not required or expected to have the Level 1 CDM license described by Pearl," as well as stating that the "SoC part used in a video gateway device [the blacklisted chip], is not relevant in any way to viewers accessing ATSC 3.0 content."<ref>{{Cite web \|date=2025-07-29 \|title=SiliconDust Reply to 2nd Pearl \|url=https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/107301849911610/1 \|url-status=live \|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20260104094355/https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/107301849911610/1 \|archive-date=2026-01-04 \|website=FCC.gov}}</ref> In follow-up to this incident, Nicholas J Kelsey – President of Silicondust met with the FCC where he goes over in detail how the broadcast industry is attempting to use ATSC 3.0 DRM to limit access to public airwaves illegally, "The TV receiver market is being regulated by the private broadcast industry (a different industry)" by acting as gatekeeper, Stifling innovation, having "secret A3SA rules" as well as many other key points in relation to these issues.<ref>{{Cite web \|date=2025-08-01 \|title=SiliconDust Ex Parte Letter re FCC meeting (7-31-25) \|url=https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/1080140138248/1 \|url-status=live \|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20260104094159/https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/1080140138248/1 \|archive-date=2026-01-04 \|website=FCC.gov}}</ref> ''(*'''It should be noted that discussions regarding the A3SA specifications and rules are forbidden from being referenced in filings due to NDAs'''.)''		SiliconDust of HDHomeRun has engaged in official correspondence with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in response to Pearl TV (ATSC 3.0) with regards to "Authorizing the Permissive Use of the “Next Generation” Broadcast Television Standard (GN Docket No. 16-142)"<ref name=":1">{{Cite web \|date=2025-07-18 \|title=Pearl Ex Parte Letter re HD HomeRun (7-18-25) \|url=https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/107180407509394/1 \|url-status=live \|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20260104093516/https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/107180407509394/1 \|archive-date=2026-01-04 \|website=FCC.gov}}</ref> pointing out Pearl TV is acting as a '''gatekeeper''' by deciding which tuners to allow and not allow even after being "certified" for NextGenTV ATSC 3.0 as well as making mention that strict '''exclusive use of (google) widevine''' prevents popular devices such as Roku, Xbox, Apple TV, iPhone, iPad, Windows, or Mac from ever accessing the encrypted channels.<ref>{{Cite web \|date=2025-07-22 \|title=Silicondust Response to Pearl Ex Parte Letter (7-22-25) \|url=https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/10722712322683/1 \|url-status=live \|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20251019215257/https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/10722712322683/1 \|archive-date=2025-10-19 \|website=FCC.gov}}</ref> The two responded back and forth, and Pearl TV attempted to claim that SiliconDust was using a black-listed chip. Pearl also claimed that SiliconDust must have a Widevine CDM license.<ref>{{Cite web \|date=2025-07-25 \|title=Pearl Ex Parte Letter re HD HomeRun (Reply 7-25-25) \|url=https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/1072583827524/1 \|url-status=live \|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20260104094613/https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/1072583827524/1 \|archive-date=2026-01-04 \|website=FCC.gov}}</ref> SiliconDust responded by claiming Pearl continues to push false narratives. They point out they are "not required or expected to have the Level 1 CDM license described by Pearl," as well as stating that the "SoC part used in a video gateway device [the blacklisted chip], is not relevant in any way to viewers accessing ATSC 3.0 content."<ref>{{Cite web \|date=2025-07-29 \|title=SiliconDust Reply to 2nd Pearl \|url=https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/107301849911610/1 \|url-status=live \|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20260104094355/https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/107301849911610/1 \|archive-date=2026-01-04 \|website=FCC.gov}}</ref> In follow-up to this incident, Nicholas J Kelsey – President of Silicondust met with the FCC where he goes over in detail how the broadcast industry is attempting to use ATSC 3.0 DRM to limit access to public airwaves illegally, "The TV receiver market is being regulated by the private broadcast industry (a different industry)" by acting as gatekeeper, Stifling innovation, having "secret A3SA rules" as well as many other key points in relation to these issues.<ref>{{Cite web \|date=2025-08-01 \|title=SiliconDust Ex Parte Letter re FCC meeting (7-31-25) \|url=https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/1080140138248/1 \|url-status=live \|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20260104094159/https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/1080140138248/1 \|archive-date=2026-01-04 \|website=FCC.gov}}</ref> ''(*'''It should be noted that discussions regarding the A3SA specifications and rules are forbidden from being referenced in filings due to NDAs'''.)''

	Pearl TV accuses SiliconDust HDHomeRun devices of using a chip manufactured by Chinese HiSilicon, which is black-listed by the US government. It uses their reasoning to not approve SiliconDust HDHomeRun for DRM certification. This suggests that any component from a black-listed company violates the industry’s secret, non-disclosable rules concerning decryption<ref name=":1" />. However, the SiliconDust devices have FCC certification & approval for sale in the USA, indicating broadcast networks are trying to regulate tuner devices despite private industry having no authority. It is also worth noting that A3SA & Pearl's use of "Selectively enforcing this rule" is based on the fact that their own DRM-certified device (Converter X1 by GTMedia (''A Chinese company'')) contains a similar chip that the US government also blacklists. Moreover, GTMedia devices ran an outdated Android OS with known security vulnerabilities. ~~They required side-loading of~~ all apps ~~due~~ to ~~the absence of the Google Play Store, further compromising user safety~~.<ref>{{Cite web \|last=Seidman \|first=Lon \|date=2025-07-22 \|title=Did TV Broadcasters Just Admit to Selectively Enforcing Their Own Encryption Rules? \|url=https://blog.lon.tv/2025/07/22/did-tv-broadcasters-just-admit-to-selectively-enforcing-their-own-encryption-rules/ \|url-status=live \|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20250927172546/https://blog.lon.tv/2025/07/22/did-tv-broadcasters-just-admit-to-selectively-enforcing-their-own-encryption-rules/ \|archive-date=2025-09-27 \|website=Lon.TV Blog}}</ref>		Pearl TV accuses SiliconDust HDHomeRun devices of using a chip manufactured by Chinese HiSilicon, which is black-listed by the US government. It uses their reasoning to not approve SiliconDust HDHomeRun for DRM certification. This suggests that any component from a black-listed company violates the industry’s secret, non-disclosable rules concerning decryption<ref name=":1" />. However, the SiliconDust devices have FCC certification & approval for sale in the USA, indicating broadcast networks are trying to regulate tuner devices despite private industry having no authority. It is also worth noting that A3SA & Pearl's use of "Selectively enforcing this rule" is based on the fact that their own DRM-certified device (Converter X1 by GTMedia (''A Chinese company'')) contains a similar chip that the US government also blacklists. Moreover, GTMedia devices ran an outdated Android OS with known security vulnerabilities. This also caused a requirement for all apps to be side-loaded.<ref>{{Cite web \|last=Seidman \|first=Lon \|date=2025-07-22 \|title=Did TV Broadcasters Just Admit to Selectively Enforcing Their Own Encryption Rules? \|url=https://blog.lon.tv/2025/07/22/did-tv-broadcasters-just-admit-to-selectively-enforcing-their-own-encryption-rules/ \|url-status=live \|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20250927172546/https://blog.lon.tv/2025/07/22/did-tv-broadcasters-just-admit-to-selectively-enforcing-their-own-encryption-rules/ \|archive-date=2025-09-27 \|website=Lon.TV Blog}}</ref>

	==See also==		==See also==

185.135.77.63: Added Archive links for references

2026-01-04T09:47:30Z

Added Archive links for references

ClippyFellow47: Minor grammar edits.

2025-09-10T21:14:01Z

Minor grammar edits.

ZanderKeen: /* Incidents */

2025-08-06T01:14:46Z

Incidents

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:14, 6 August 2025
Line 33:		Line 33:
	SiliconDust of HDHomeRun has engaged in official correspondence with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in response to Pearl TV (ATSC 3.0) with regards to "Authorizing the Permissive Use of the “Next Generation” Broadcast Television Standard (GN Docket No. 16-142)"<ref name=":1">{{Cite web \|date=2025-07-18 \|title=Pearl Ex Parte Letter re HD HomeRun (7-18-25) \|url=https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/107180407509394/1 \|url-status=live \|website=FCC.gov}}</ref> pointing out Pearl TV is acting as a '''gatekeeper''' by deciding which tuners to allow and not allow even after being "certified" for NextGenTV ATSC 3.0 as well as making mention that strict '''exclusive use of (google) widevine''' prevents popular devices such as Roku, Xbox, Apple TV, iPhone, iPad, Windows, or Mac from ever accessing the encrypted channels.<ref>{{Cite web \|date=2025-07-22 \|title=Silicondust Response to Pearl Ex Parte Letter (7-22-25) \|url=https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/10722712322683/1 \|url-status=live \|website=FCC.gov}}</ref> At which the two responded back and forth where Pearl TV attempted to make claim that SiliconDust is using a blacklisted chip. Pearl also made claim that SiliconDust must have a Widevine CDM license.<ref>{{Cite web \|date=2025-07-25 \|title=Pearl Ex Parte Letter re HD HomeRun (Reply 7-25-25) \|url=https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/1072583827524/1 \|url-status=live \|website=FCC.gov}}</ref> To which SiliconDust responded claiming Pearl continues to push false narratives. They point out they are "not required or expected to have the Level 1 CDM license described by Pearl" as well as stating that the "SoC part used in a video gateway device [the blacklisted chip], is not relevant in any way to viewers accessing ATSC 3.0 content."<ref>{{Cite web \|date=2025-07-29 \|title=SiliconDust Reply to 2nd Pearl \|url=https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/107301849911610/1 \|url-status=live \|website=FCC.gov}}</ref> In follow-up to this incident, Nicholas J Kelsey – President of Silicondust met with the FCC where he goes over in detail how the broadcast industry is attempting to use ATSC 3.0 DRM to illegally limit access to public airwaves, "The TV receiver market is being regulated by the private broadcast industry (a different industry)" by acting as gatekeeper, Stifling innovation, having "secret A3SA rules" as well as many other key points in relation to these issues.<ref>{{Cite web \|date=2025-08-01 \|title=SiliconDust Ex Parte Letter re FCC meeting (7-31-25) \|url=https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/1080140138248/1 \|url-status=live \|website=FCC.gov}}</ref> ''(*'''It should be noted that discussion in regards to the A3SA specifications and rules are forbidden from being referenced in the filings due to NDAs''').''		SiliconDust of HDHomeRun has engaged in official correspondence with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in response to Pearl TV (ATSC 3.0) with regards to "Authorizing the Permissive Use of the “Next Generation” Broadcast Television Standard (GN Docket No. 16-142)"<ref name=":1">{{Cite web \|date=2025-07-18 \|title=Pearl Ex Parte Letter re HD HomeRun (7-18-25) \|url=https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/107180407509394/1 \|url-status=live \|website=FCC.gov}}</ref> pointing out Pearl TV is acting as a '''gatekeeper''' by deciding which tuners to allow and not allow even after being "certified" for NextGenTV ATSC 3.0 as well as making mention that strict '''exclusive use of (google) widevine''' prevents popular devices such as Roku, Xbox, Apple TV, iPhone, iPad, Windows, or Mac from ever accessing the encrypted channels.<ref>{{Cite web \|date=2025-07-22 \|title=Silicondust Response to Pearl Ex Parte Letter (7-22-25) \|url=https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/10722712322683/1 \|url-status=live \|website=FCC.gov}}</ref> At which the two responded back and forth where Pearl TV attempted to make claim that SiliconDust is using a blacklisted chip. Pearl also made claim that SiliconDust must have a Widevine CDM license.<ref>{{Cite web \|date=2025-07-25 \|title=Pearl Ex Parte Letter re HD HomeRun (Reply 7-25-25) \|url=https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/1072583827524/1 \|url-status=live \|website=FCC.gov}}</ref> To which SiliconDust responded claiming Pearl continues to push false narratives. They point out they are "not required or expected to have the Level 1 CDM license described by Pearl" as well as stating that the "SoC part used in a video gateway device [the blacklisted chip], is not relevant in any way to viewers accessing ATSC 3.0 content."<ref>{{Cite web \|date=2025-07-29 \|title=SiliconDust Reply to 2nd Pearl \|url=https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/107301849911610/1 \|url-status=live \|website=FCC.gov}}</ref> In follow-up to this incident, Nicholas J Kelsey – President of Silicondust met with the FCC where he goes over in detail how the broadcast industry is attempting to use ATSC 3.0 DRM to illegally limit access to public airwaves, "The TV receiver market is being regulated by the private broadcast industry (a different industry)" by acting as gatekeeper, Stifling innovation, having "secret A3SA rules" as well as many other key points in relation to these issues.<ref>{{Cite web \|date=2025-08-01 \|title=SiliconDust Ex Parte Letter re FCC meeting (7-31-25) \|url=https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/1080140138248/1 \|url-status=live \|website=FCC.gov}}</ref> ''(*'''It should be noted that discussion in regards to the A3SA specifications and rules are forbidden from being referenced in the filings due to NDAs''').''

	Pearl TV accuses SiliconDust HDHomeRun devices of using a chip manufactured by Chinese HiSilicon, which is blacklisted by the US government and uses that as their reasoning to not approve SiliconDust HDHomeRun for DRM certification suggests that any component from a blacklisted company violates the industry’s secret, non-disclosable rules concerning decryption<ref name=":1" />. However, the SiliconDust devices have FCC certification & approval for sale in the USA. It is also worth noting, A3SA & Pearl's use of "Selectively enforcing this rule" is based on the fact that their own DRM certified device (Converter X1 by GTMedia (''A Chinese company'')) contains a similar chip that is also blacklisted by the US government. Moreover, GTMedia devices were shipped running an outdated Android OS with known security vulnerabilities and required side-loading of all apps due to the absence of the Google Play Store, further compromising user safety.<ref>{{Cite web \|last=Seidman \|first=Lon \|date=2025-07-22 \|title=Did TV Broadcasters Just Admit to Selectively Enforcing Their Own Encryption Rules? \|url=https://blog.lon.tv/2025/07/22/did-tv-broadcasters-just-admit-to-selectively-enforcing-their-own-encryption-rules/ \|url-status=live \|website=Lon.TV Blog}}</ref>		Pearl TV accuses SiliconDust HDHomeRun devices of using a chip manufactured by Chinese HiSilicon, which is blacklisted by the US government and uses that as their reasoning to not approve SiliconDust HDHomeRun for DRM certification suggests that any component from a blacklisted company violates the industry’s secret, non-disclosable rules concerning decryption<ref name=":1" />. However, the SiliconDust devices have FCC certification & approval for sale in the USA indicating broadcast networks are trying to regulate tuner devices despite private industry having no authority to do so. It is also worth noting, A3SA & Pearl's use of "Selectively enforcing this rule" is based on the fact that their own DRM certified device (Converter X1 by GTMedia (''A Chinese company'')) contains a similar chip that is also blacklisted by the US government. Moreover, GTMedia devices were shipped running an outdated Android OS with known security vulnerabilities and required side-loading of all apps due to the absence of the Google Play Store, further compromising user safety.<ref>{{Cite web \|last=Seidman \|first=Lon \|date=2025-07-22 \|title=Did TV Broadcasters Just Admit to Selectively Enforcing Their Own Encryption Rules? \|url=https://blog.lon.tv/2025/07/22/did-tv-broadcasters-just-admit-to-selectively-enforcing-their-own-encryption-rules/ \|url-status=live \|website=Lon.TV Blog}}</ref>

	==See also==		==See also==

ZanderKeen: Grammar improvements

2025-08-06T01:10:47Z

Grammar improvements

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:10, 6 August 2025
Line 31:		Line 31:
	LG has also encountered patent issues trying to incorporate tuners into their TVs, which resulted in a dispute with Constellation Design Inc. that ended ATSC 3.0 tuner support in new LG televisions as of September 2023.<ref>{{Cite web \|last=Seidman \|first=Lon \|date=26 Sep 2023 \|title=New LG Televisions Will Not Have ATSC 3 Tuners Due to Patent Dispute \|url=https://blog.lon.tv/2023/09/26/new-lg-televisions-will-not-have-atsc-3-tuners-due-to-patent-dispute/ \|url-status=live \|access-date=28 Mar 2025 \|website=Lon.tv}}</ref>		LG has also encountered patent issues trying to incorporate tuners into their TVs, which resulted in a dispute with Constellation Design Inc. that ended ATSC 3.0 tuner support in new LG televisions as of September 2023.<ref>{{Cite web \|last=Seidman \|first=Lon \|date=26 Sep 2023 \|title=New LG Televisions Will Not Have ATSC 3 Tuners Due to Patent Dispute \|url=https://blog.lon.tv/2023/09/26/new-lg-televisions-will-not-have-atsc-3-tuners-due-to-patent-dispute/ \|url-status=live \|access-date=28 Mar 2025 \|website=Lon.tv}}</ref>

	SiliconDust of HDHomeRun has engaged in official correspondence with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in response to Pearl TV (ATSC 3.0) with regards to "Authorizing the Permissive Use of the “Next Generation” Broadcast Television Standard (GN Docket No. 16-142)"<ref>{{Cite web \|date=2025-07-18 \|title=Pearl Ex Parte Letter re HD HomeRun (7-18-25) \|url=https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/107180407509394/1 \|url-status=live \|website=FCC.gov}}</ref> pointing out Pearl TV is acting as a '''gatekeeper''' by deciding which tuners to allow and not allow even after being "certified" for NextGenTV ATSC 3.0 as well as making mention that strict '''exclusive use of (google) widevine''' prevents popular devices such as Roku, Xbox, Apple TV, iPhone, iPad, Windows, or Mac from ever accessing the encrypted channels.<ref>{{Cite web \|date=2025-07-22 \|title=Silicondust Response to Pearl Ex Parte Letter (7-22-25) \|url=https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/10722712322683/1 \|url-status=live \|website=FCC.gov}}</ref> At which the two responded back and forth where Pearl TV attempted to make claim that SiliconDust is using a blacklisted chip. Pearl also made claim that SiliconDust must have a Widevine CDM license.<ref>{{Cite web \|date=2025-07-25 \|title=Pearl Ex Parte Letter re HD HomeRun (Reply 7-25-25) \|url=https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/1072583827524/1 \|url-status=live \|website=FCC.gov}}</ref> To which SiliconDust responded claiming Pearl continues to push false narratives. They point out they are "not required or expected to have the Level 1 CDM license described by Pearl" as well as stating that the "SoC part used in a video gateway device [the blacklisted chip], is not relevant in any way to viewers accessing ATSC 3.0 content."<ref>{{Cite web \|date=2025-07-29 \|title=SiliconDust Reply to 2nd Pearl \|url=https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/107301849911610/1 \|url-status=live \|website=FCC.gov}}</ref> In follow-up to this incident, Nicholas J Kelsey – President of Silicondust met with the FCC where he goes over in detail how the broadcast industry is attempting to use ATSC 3.0 DRM to illegally limit access to public airwaves, "The TV receiver market is being regulated by the private broadcast industry (a different industry)" by acting as gatekeeper, Stifling innovation, having "secret A3SA rules" as well as many other key points in relation to these issues.<ref>{{Cite web \|date=2025-08-01 \|title=SiliconDust Ex Parte Letter re FCC meeting (7-31-25) \|url=https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/1080140138248/1 \|url-status=live \|website=FCC.gov}}</ref> ''(*'''It should be noted that discussion in regards to the A3SA specifications and rules are forbidden from being referenced in the filings due to NDAs''').''		SiliconDust of HDHomeRun has engaged in official correspondence with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in response to Pearl TV (ATSC 3.0) with regards to "Authorizing the Permissive Use of the “Next Generation” Broadcast Television Standard (GN Docket No. 16-142)"<ref name=":1">{{Cite web \|date=2025-07-18 \|title=Pearl Ex Parte Letter re HD HomeRun (7-18-25) \|url=https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/107180407509394/1 \|url-status=live \|website=FCC.gov}}</ref> pointing out Pearl TV is acting as a '''gatekeeper''' by deciding which tuners to allow and not allow even after being "certified" for NextGenTV ATSC 3.0 as well as making mention that strict '''exclusive use of (google) widevine''' prevents popular devices such as Roku, Xbox, Apple TV, iPhone, iPad, Windows, or Mac from ever accessing the encrypted channels.<ref>{{Cite web \|date=2025-07-22 \|title=Silicondust Response to Pearl Ex Parte Letter (7-22-25) \|url=https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/10722712322683/1 \|url-status=live \|website=FCC.gov}}</ref> At which the two responded back and forth where Pearl TV attempted to make claim that SiliconDust is using a blacklisted chip. Pearl also made claim that SiliconDust must have a Widevine CDM license.<ref>{{Cite web \|date=2025-07-25 \|title=Pearl Ex Parte Letter re HD HomeRun (Reply 7-25-25) \|url=https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/1072583827524/1 \|url-status=live \|website=FCC.gov}}</ref> To which SiliconDust responded claiming Pearl continues to push false narratives. They point out they are "not required or expected to have the Level 1 CDM license described by Pearl" as well as stating that the "SoC part used in a video gateway device [the blacklisted chip], is not relevant in any way to viewers accessing ATSC 3.0 content."<ref>{{Cite web \|date=2025-07-29 \|title=SiliconDust Reply to 2nd Pearl \|url=https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/107301849911610/1 \|url-status=live \|website=FCC.gov}}</ref> In follow-up to this incident, Nicholas J Kelsey – President of Silicondust met with the FCC where he goes over in detail how the broadcast industry is attempting to use ATSC 3.0 DRM to illegally limit access to public airwaves, "The TV receiver market is being regulated by the private broadcast industry (a different industry)" by acting as gatekeeper, Stifling innovation, having "secret A3SA rules" as well as many other key points in relation to these issues.<ref>{{Cite web \|date=2025-08-01 \|title=SiliconDust Ex Parte Letter re FCC meeting (7-31-25) \|url=https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/1080140138248/1 \|url-status=live \|website=FCC.gov}}</ref> ''(*'''It should be noted that discussion in regards to the A3SA specifications and rules are forbidden from being referenced in the filings due to NDAs''').''

	Pearl TV accuses SiliconDust HDHomeRun devices of using a chip manufactured by HiSilicon which is blacklisted by the US government and uses that as their reasoning to not approve SiliconDust HDHomeRun for DRM certification ~~suggesting~~ that any component from a blacklisted company violates the industry’s secret, non-disclosable rules concerning decryption. However, the SiliconDust devices have FCC certification & approval for sale in the USA. It is also worth noting, A3SA & Pearl's use of "Selectively enforcing this rule" is based on the fact that their own DRM certified device (Converter X1 by GTMedia (''A Chinese company'')) contains a similar chip that is also blacklisted by the US government. ~~On top of that~~, ~~those~~ devices were shipped running ~~the "~~Android ~~operating system that was four years out of date containing many~~ known security vulnerabilities ~~that puts consumers at risk", as well as the requirement of~~ side-loading of all apps ~~because it did not have~~ the Google Play Store ~~which opens the door to additional vulnerabilities~~.<ref>{{Cite web \|last=Seidman \|first=Lon \|date=2025-07-22 \|title=Did TV Broadcasters Just Admit to Selectively Enforcing Their Own Encryption Rules? \|url=https://blog.lon.tv/2025/07/22/did-tv-broadcasters-just-admit-to-selectively-enforcing-their-own-encryption-rules/ \|url-status=live \|website=Lon.TV Blog}}</ref>		Pearl TV accuses SiliconDust HDHomeRun devices of using a chip manufactured by Chinese HiSilicon, which is blacklisted by the US government and uses that as their reasoning to not approve SiliconDust HDHomeRun for DRM certification suggests that any component from a blacklisted company violates the industry’s secret, non-disclosable rules concerning decryption<ref name=":1" />. However, the SiliconDust devices have FCC certification & approval for sale in the USA. It is also worth noting, A3SA & Pearl's use of "Selectively enforcing this rule" is based on the fact that their own DRM certified device (Converter X1 by GTMedia (''A Chinese company'')) contains a similar chip that is also blacklisted by the US government. Moreover, GTMedia devices were shipped running an outdated Android OS with known security vulnerabilities and required side-loading of all apps due to the absence of the Google Play Store, further compromising user safety.<ref>{{Cite web \|last=Seidman \|first=Lon \|date=2025-07-22 \|title=Did TV Broadcasters Just Admit to Selectively Enforcing Their Own Encryption Rules? \|url=https://blog.lon.tv/2025/07/22/did-tv-broadcasters-just-admit-to-selectively-enforcing-their-own-encryption-rules/ \|url-status=live \|website=Lon.TV Blog}}</ref>

	==See also==		==See also==

ZanderKeen at 22:37, 5 August 2025

2025-08-05T22:37:05Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:37, 5 August 2025
Line 31:		Line 31:
	LG has also encountered patent issues trying to incorporate tuners into their TVs, which resulted in a dispute with Constellation Design Inc. that ended ATSC 3.0 tuner support in new LG televisions as of September 2023.<ref>{{Cite web \|last=Seidman \|first=Lon \|date=26 Sep 2023 \|title=New LG Televisions Will Not Have ATSC 3 Tuners Due to Patent Dispute \|url=https://blog.lon.tv/2023/09/26/new-lg-televisions-will-not-have-atsc-3-tuners-due-to-patent-dispute/ \|url-status=live \|access-date=28 Mar 2025 \|website=Lon.tv}}</ref>		LG has also encountered patent issues trying to incorporate tuners into their TVs, which resulted in a dispute with Constellation Design Inc. that ended ATSC 3.0 tuner support in new LG televisions as of September 2023.<ref>{{Cite web \|last=Seidman \|first=Lon \|date=26 Sep 2023 \|title=New LG Televisions Will Not Have ATSC 3 Tuners Due to Patent Dispute \|url=https://blog.lon.tv/2023/09/26/new-lg-televisions-will-not-have-atsc-3-tuners-due-to-patent-dispute/ \|url-status=live \|access-date=28 Mar 2025 \|website=Lon.tv}}</ref>

	SiliconDust of HDHomeRun has ~~conversed~~ in official ~~letters~~ with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in response to Pearl TV (ATSC 3.0) with regards to "Authorizing the Permissive Use of the “Next Generation” Broadcast Television Standard (GN Docket No. 16-142)"<ref>{{Cite web \|date=2025-07-18 \|title=Pearl Ex Parte Letter re HD HomeRun (7-18-25) \|url=https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/107180407509394/1 \|url-status=live \|website=FCC.gov}}</ref> pointing out Pearl TV is acting as a '''gatekeeper''' by deciding which tuners to allow and not allow even after being "certified" for NextGenTV ATSC 3.0 as well as making mention that strict '''exclusive use of (google) widevine''' prevents popular devices such as Roku, Xbox, Apple TV, iPhone, iPad, Windows, or Mac from ever accessing the encrypted channels.<ref>{{Cite web \|date=2025-07-22 \|title=Silicondust Response to Pearl Ex Parte Letter (7-22-25) \|url=https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/10722712322683/1 \|url-status=live \|website=FCC.gov}}</ref> At which the two responded back and forth where Pearl TV attempted to make claim that SiliconDust is using a blacklisted chip. Pearl also made claim that SiliconDust must have a Widevine CDM license.<ref>{{Cite web \|date=2025-07-25 \|title=Pearl Ex Parte Letter re HD HomeRun (Reply 7-25-25) \|url=https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/1072583827524/1 \|url-status=live \|website=FCC.gov}}</ref> To which SiliconDust responded claiming Pearl continues to push false narratives. They point out they are "not required or expected to have the Level 1 CDM license described by Pearl" as well as stating that the "SoC part used in a video gateway device [the blacklisted chip], is not relevant in any way to viewers accessing ATSC 3.0 content."<ref>{{Cite web \|date=2025-07-29 \|title=SiliconDust Reply to 2nd Pearl \|url=https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/107301849911610/1 \|url-status=live \|website=FCC.gov}}</ref> In follow-up to this incident, Nicholas J Kelsey – President of Silicondust met with the FCC where he goes over in detail how the broadcast industry is attempting to use ATSC 3.0 DRM to illegally limit access to public airwaves, "The TV receiver market is being regulated by the private broadcast industry (a different industry)" by acting as gatekeeper, Stifling innovation, having "secret A3SA rules" as well as many other key points in relation to these issues.<ref>{{Cite web \|date=2025-08-01 \|title=SiliconDust Ex Parte Letter re FCC meeting (7-31-25) \|url=https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/1080140138248/1 \|url-status=live \|website=FCC.gov}}</ref> ''(*'''It should be noted that discussion in regards to the A3SA specifications and rules are forbidden from being referenced in the filings due to NDAs''').''		SiliconDust of HDHomeRun has engaged in official correspondence with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in response to Pearl TV (ATSC 3.0) with regards to "Authorizing the Permissive Use of the “Next Generation” Broadcast Television Standard (GN Docket No. 16-142)"<ref>{{Cite web \|date=2025-07-18 \|title=Pearl Ex Parte Letter re HD HomeRun (7-18-25) \|url=https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/107180407509394/1 \|url-status=live \|website=FCC.gov}}</ref> pointing out Pearl TV is acting as a '''gatekeeper''' by deciding which tuners to allow and not allow even after being "certified" for NextGenTV ATSC 3.0 as well as making mention that strict '''exclusive use of (google) widevine''' prevents popular devices such as Roku, Xbox, Apple TV, iPhone, iPad, Windows, or Mac from ever accessing the encrypted channels.<ref>{{Cite web \|date=2025-07-22 \|title=Silicondust Response to Pearl Ex Parte Letter (7-22-25) \|url=https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/10722712322683/1 \|url-status=live \|website=FCC.gov}}</ref> At which the two responded back and forth where Pearl TV attempted to make claim that SiliconDust is using a blacklisted chip. Pearl also made claim that SiliconDust must have a Widevine CDM license.<ref>{{Cite web \|date=2025-07-25 \|title=Pearl Ex Parte Letter re HD HomeRun (Reply 7-25-25) \|url=https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/1072583827524/1 \|url-status=live \|website=FCC.gov}}</ref> To which SiliconDust responded claiming Pearl continues to push false narratives. They point out they are "not required or expected to have the Level 1 CDM license described by Pearl" as well as stating that the "SoC part used in a video gateway device [the blacklisted chip], is not relevant in any way to viewers accessing ATSC 3.0 content."<ref>{{Cite web \|date=2025-07-29 \|title=SiliconDust Reply to 2nd Pearl \|url=https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/107301849911610/1 \|url-status=live \|website=FCC.gov}}</ref> In follow-up to this incident, Nicholas J Kelsey – President of Silicondust met with the FCC where he goes over in detail how the broadcast industry is attempting to use ATSC 3.0 DRM to illegally limit access to public airwaves, "The TV receiver market is being regulated by the private broadcast industry (a different industry)" by acting as gatekeeper, Stifling innovation, having "secret A3SA rules" as well as many other key points in relation to these issues.<ref>{{Cite web \|date=2025-08-01 \|title=SiliconDust Ex Parte Letter re FCC meeting (7-31-25) \|url=https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/1080140138248/1 \|url-status=live \|website=FCC.gov}}</ref> ''(*'''It should be noted that discussion in regards to the A3SA specifications and rules are forbidden from being referenced in the filings due to NDAs''').''

	Pearl TV accuses SiliconDust HDHomeRun devices of using a chip manufactured by HiSilicon which is blacklisted by the US government and uses that as their reasoning to not approve SiliconDust HDHomeRun for DRM certification suggesting that any component from a blacklisted company violates the industry’s secret, non-disclosable rules concerning decryption. However, the SiliconDust devices have FCC certification & approval for sale in the USA. It is also worth noting, A3SA & Pearl's use of "Selectively enforcing this rule" is based on the fact that their own DRM certified device (Converter X1 by GTMedia (''A Chinese company'')) contains a similar chip that is also blacklisted by the US government. On top of that, those devices were shipped running the "Android operating system that was four years out of date containing many known security vulnerabilities that puts consumers at risk", as well as the requirement of side-loading of all apps because it did not have the Google Play Store which opens the door to additional vulnerabilities.<ref>{{Cite web \|last=Seidman \|first=Lon \|date=2025-07-22 \|title=Did TV Broadcasters Just Admit to Selectively Enforcing Their Own Encryption Rules? \|url=https://blog.lon.tv/2025/07/22/did-tv-broadcasters-just-admit-to-selectively-enforcing-their-own-encryption-rules/ \|url-status=live \|website=Lon.TV Blog}}</ref>		Pearl TV accuses SiliconDust HDHomeRun devices of using a chip manufactured by HiSilicon which is blacklisted by the US government and uses that as their reasoning to not approve SiliconDust HDHomeRun for DRM certification suggesting that any component from a blacklisted company violates the industry’s secret, non-disclosable rules concerning decryption. However, the SiliconDust devices have FCC certification & approval for sale in the USA. It is also worth noting, A3SA & Pearl's use of "Selectively enforcing this rule" is based on the fact that their own DRM certified device (Converter X1 by GTMedia (''A Chinese company'')) contains a similar chip that is also blacklisted by the US government. On top of that, those devices were shipped running the "Android operating system that was four years out of date containing many known security vulnerabilities that puts consumers at risk", as well as the requirement of side-loading of all apps because it did not have the Google Play Store which opens the door to additional vulnerabilities.<ref>{{Cite web \|last=Seidman \|first=Lon \|date=2025-07-22 \|title=Did TV Broadcasters Just Admit to Selectively Enforcing Their Own Encryption Rules? \|url=https://blog.lon.tv/2025/07/22/did-tv-broadcasters-just-admit-to-selectively-enforcing-their-own-encryption-rules/ \|url-status=live \|website=Lon.TV Blog}}</ref>

ZanderKeen: /* Incidents */

2025-08-05T22:09:19Z

Incidents

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:09, 5 August 2025
Line 31:		Line 31:
	LG has also encountered patent issues trying to incorporate tuners into their TVs, which resulted in a dispute with Constellation Design Inc. that ended ATSC 3.0 tuner support in new LG televisions as of September 2023.<ref>{{Cite web \|last=Seidman \|first=Lon \|date=26 Sep 2023 \|title=New LG Televisions Will Not Have ATSC 3 Tuners Due to Patent Dispute \|url=https://blog.lon.tv/2023/09/26/new-lg-televisions-will-not-have-atsc-3-tuners-due-to-patent-dispute/ \|url-status=live \|access-date=28 Mar 2025 \|website=Lon.tv}}</ref>		LG has also encountered patent issues trying to incorporate tuners into their TVs, which resulted in a dispute with Constellation Design Inc. that ended ATSC 3.0 tuner support in new LG televisions as of September 2023.<ref>{{Cite web \|last=Seidman \|first=Lon \|date=26 Sep 2023 \|title=New LG Televisions Will Not Have ATSC 3 Tuners Due to Patent Dispute \|url=https://blog.lon.tv/2023/09/26/new-lg-televisions-will-not-have-atsc-3-tuners-due-to-patent-dispute/ \|url-status=live \|access-date=28 Mar 2025 \|website=Lon.tv}}</ref>

	SiliconDust of HDHomeRun has conversed in official letters with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in response to Pearl TV (ATSC 3.0) with regards to "Authorizing the Permissive Use of the “Next Generation” Broadcast Television Standard (GN Docket No. 16-142)"<ref>{{Cite web \|date=2025-07-18 \|title=Pearl Ex Parte Letter re HD HomeRun (7-18-25) \|url=https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/107180407509394/1 \|url-status=live \|website=FCC.gov}}</ref> pointing out Pearl TV is acting as a '''gatekeeper''' by deciding which tuners to allow and not allow even after being "certified" for NextGenTV ATSC 3.0 as well as making mention that strict '''exclusive use of (google) widevine''' prevents popular devices such as Roku, Xbox, Apple TV, iPhone, iPad, Windows, or Mac from ever accessing the encrypted channels.<ref>{{Cite web \|date=2025-07-22 \|title=Silicondust Response to Pearl Ex Parte Letter (7-22-25) \|url=https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/10722712322683/1 \|url-status=live \|website=FCC.gov}}</ref> At which the two responded back and forth where Pearl TV attempted to make claim that SiliconDust is using a ~~banned~~ chip ~~by US law in their devices as their new reasoning to not approving the HDHomeRun tuners (even though the SiliconDust devices have FCC certification & approval for sale in the USA)~~. Pearl also made claim that SiliconDust must have a Widevine CDM license.<ref>{{Cite web \|date=2025-07-25 \|title=Pearl Ex Parte Letter re HD HomeRun (Reply 7-25-25) \|url=https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/1072583827524/1 \|url-status=live \|website=FCC.gov}}</ref> To which SiliconDust responded claiming Pearl continues to push false narratives. They point out they are "not required or expected to have the Level 1 CDM license described by Pearl" as well as stating that the "SoC part used in a video gateway device [the ~~banned~~ chip], is not relevant in any way to viewers accessing ATSC 3.0 content."<ref>{{Cite web \|date=2025-07-29 \|title=SiliconDust Reply to 2nd Pearl \|url=https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/107301849911610/1 \|url-status=live \|website=FCC.gov}}</ref> In follow-up to this incident, Nicholas J Kelsey – President of Silicondust met with the FCC where he goes over in detail how the broadcast industry is attempting to use ATSC 3.0 DRM to illegally limit access to public airwaves, "The TV receiver market is being regulated by the private broadcast industry (a different industry)" by acting as gatekeeper, Stifling innovation, having "secret A3SA rules" as well as many other key points in relation to these issues.<ref>{{Cite web \|date=2025-08-01 \|title=SiliconDust Ex Parte Letter re FCC meeting (7-31-25) \|url=https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/1080140138248/1 \|url-status=live \|website=FCC.gov}}</ref> ''(*'''It should be noted that discussion in regards to the A3SA specifications and rules are forbidden from being referenced in the filings due to NDAs''').''		SiliconDust of HDHomeRun has conversed in official letters with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in response to Pearl TV (ATSC 3.0) with regards to "Authorizing the Permissive Use of the “Next Generation” Broadcast Television Standard (GN Docket No. 16-142)"<ref>{{Cite web \|date=2025-07-18 \|title=Pearl Ex Parte Letter re HD HomeRun (7-18-25) \|url=https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/107180407509394/1 \|url-status=live \|website=FCC.gov}}</ref> pointing out Pearl TV is acting as a '''gatekeeper''' by deciding which tuners to allow and not allow even after being "certified" for NextGenTV ATSC 3.0 as well as making mention that strict '''exclusive use of (google) widevine''' prevents popular devices such as Roku, Xbox, Apple TV, iPhone, iPad, Windows, or Mac from ever accessing the encrypted channels.<ref>{{Cite web \|date=2025-07-22 \|title=Silicondust Response to Pearl Ex Parte Letter (7-22-25) \|url=https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/10722712322683/1 \|url-status=live \|website=FCC.gov}}</ref> At which the two responded back and forth where Pearl TV attempted to make claim that SiliconDust is using a blacklisted chip. Pearl also made claim that SiliconDust must have a Widevine CDM license.<ref>{{Cite web \|date=2025-07-25 \|title=Pearl Ex Parte Letter re HD HomeRun (Reply 7-25-25) \|url=https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/1072583827524/1 \|url-status=live \|website=FCC.gov}}</ref> To which SiliconDust responded claiming Pearl continues to push false narratives. They point out they are "not required or expected to have the Level 1 CDM license described by Pearl" as well as stating that the "SoC part used in a video gateway device [the blacklisted chip], is not relevant in any way to viewers accessing ATSC 3.0 content."<ref>{{Cite web \|date=2025-07-29 \|title=SiliconDust Reply to 2nd Pearl \|url=https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/107301849911610/1 \|url-status=live \|website=FCC.gov}}</ref> In follow-up to this incident, Nicholas J Kelsey – President of Silicondust met with the FCC where he goes over in detail how the broadcast industry is attempting to use ATSC 3.0 DRM to illegally limit access to public airwaves, "The TV receiver market is being regulated by the private broadcast industry (a different industry)" by acting as gatekeeper, Stifling innovation, having "secret A3SA rules" as well as many other key points in relation to these issues.<ref>{{Cite web \|date=2025-08-01 \|title=SiliconDust Ex Parte Letter re FCC meeting (7-31-25) \|url=https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/1080140138248/1 \|url-status=live \|website=FCC.gov}}</ref> ''(*'''It should be noted that discussion in regards to the A3SA specifications and rules are forbidden from being referenced in the filings due to NDAs''').''

	Pearl TV accuses SiliconDust HDHomeRun devices of using a chip manufactured by HiSilicon which is blacklisted by the US government and uses that as their reasoning to not approve SiliconDust HDHomeRun for DRM certification suggesting that any component from a blacklisted company violates the industry’s secret, non-disclosable rules concerning decryption. However, the SiliconDust devices have FCC certification & approval for sale in the USA. It is also worth noting, A3SA & Pearl's use of "Selectively enforcing this rule" is based on the fact that their own DRM certified device (Converter X1 by GTMedia (''A Chinese company'')) contains a similar chip that is also blacklisted by the US government. On top of that, those devices were shipped running the "Android operating system that was four years out of date containing many known security vulnerabilities that puts consumers at risk", as well as the requirement of side-loading of all apps because it did not have the Google Play Store which opens the door to additional vulnerabilities.<ref>{{Cite web \|last=Seidman \|first=Lon \|date=2025-07-22 \|title=Did TV Broadcasters Just Admit to Selectively Enforcing Their Own Encryption Rules? \|url=https://blog.lon.tv/2025/07/22/did-tv-broadcasters-just-admit-to-selectively-enforcing-their-own-encryption-rules/ \|url-status=live \|website=Lon.TV Blog}}</ref>		Pearl TV accuses SiliconDust HDHomeRun devices of using a chip manufactured by HiSilicon which is blacklisted by the US government and uses that as their reasoning to not approve SiliconDust HDHomeRun for DRM certification suggesting that any component from a blacklisted company violates the industry’s secret, non-disclosable rules concerning decryption. However, the SiliconDust devices have FCC certification & approval for sale in the USA. It is also worth noting, A3SA & Pearl's use of "Selectively enforcing this rule" is based on the fact that their own DRM certified device (Converter X1 by GTMedia (''A Chinese company'')) contains a similar chip that is also blacklisted by the US government. On top of that, those devices were shipped running the "Android operating system that was four years out of date containing many known security vulnerabilities that puts consumers at risk", as well as the requirement of side-loading of all apps because it did not have the Google Play Store which opens the door to additional vulnerabilities.<ref>{{Cite web \|last=Seidman \|first=Lon \|date=2025-07-22 \|title=Did TV Broadcasters Just Admit to Selectively Enforcing Their Own Encryption Rules? \|url=https://blog.lon.tv/2025/07/22/did-tv-broadcasters-just-admit-to-selectively-enforcing-their-own-encryption-rules/ \|url-status=live \|website=Lon.TV Blog}}</ref>

ZanderKeen: /* Incidents */

2025-08-05T21:39:04Z

Incidents

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:39, 5 August 2025
Line 30:		Line 30:

	LG has also encountered patent issues trying to incorporate tuners into their TVs, which resulted in a dispute with Constellation Design Inc. that ended ATSC 3.0 tuner support in new LG televisions as of September 2023.<ref>{{Cite web \|last=Seidman \|first=Lon \|date=26 Sep 2023 \|title=New LG Televisions Will Not Have ATSC 3 Tuners Due to Patent Dispute \|url=https://blog.lon.tv/2023/09/26/new-lg-televisions-will-not-have-atsc-3-tuners-due-to-patent-dispute/ \|url-status=live \|access-date=28 Mar 2025 \|website=Lon.tv}}</ref>		LG has also encountered patent issues trying to incorporate tuners into their TVs, which resulted in a dispute with Constellation Design Inc. that ended ATSC 3.0 tuner support in new LG televisions as of September 2023.<ref>{{Cite web \|last=Seidman \|first=Lon \|date=26 Sep 2023 \|title=New LG Televisions Will Not Have ATSC 3 Tuners Due to Patent Dispute \|url=https://blog.lon.tv/2023/09/26/new-lg-televisions-will-not-have-atsc-3-tuners-due-to-patent-dispute/ \|url-status=live \|access-date=28 Mar 2025 \|website=Lon.tv}}</ref>

			SiliconDust of HDHomeRun has conversed in official letters with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in response to Pearl TV (ATSC 3.0) with regards to "Authorizing the Permissive Use of the “Next Generation” Broadcast Television Standard (GN Docket No. 16-142)"<ref>{{Cite web \|date=2025-07-18 \|title=Pearl Ex Parte Letter re HD HomeRun (7-18-25) \|url=https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/107180407509394/1 \|url-status=live \|website=FCC.gov}}</ref> pointing out Pearl TV is acting as a '''gatekeeper''' by deciding which tuners to allow and not allow even after being "certified" for NextGenTV ATSC 3.0 as well as making mention that strict '''exclusive use of (google) widevine''' prevents popular devices such as Roku, Xbox, Apple TV, iPhone, iPad, Windows, or Mac from ever accessing the encrypted channels.<ref>{{Cite web \|date=2025-07-22 \|title=Silicondust Response to Pearl Ex Parte Letter (7-22-25) \|url=https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/10722712322683/1 \|url-status=live \|website=FCC.gov}}</ref> At which the two responded back and forth where Pearl TV attempted to make claim that SiliconDust is using a banned chip by US law in their devices as their new reasoning to not approving the HDHomeRun tuners (even though the SiliconDust devices have FCC certification & approval for sale in the USA). Pearl also made claim that SiliconDust must have a Widevine CDM license.<ref>{{Cite web \|date=2025-07-25 \|title=Pearl Ex Parte Letter re HD HomeRun (Reply 7-25-25) \|url=https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/1072583827524/1 \|url-status=live \|website=FCC.gov}}</ref> To which SiliconDust responded claiming Pearl continues to push false narratives. They point out they are "not required or expected to have the Level 1 CDM license described by Pearl" as well as stating that the "SoC part used in a video gateway device [the banned chip], is not relevant in any way to viewers accessing ATSC 3.0 content."<ref>{{Cite web \|date=2025-07-29 \|title=SiliconDust Reply to 2nd Pearl \|url=https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/107301849911610/1 \|url-status=live \|website=FCC.gov}}</ref> In follow-up to this incident, Nicholas J Kelsey – President of Silicondust met with the FCC where he goes over in detail how the broadcast industry is attempting to use ATSC 3.0 DRM to illegally limit access to public airwaves, "The TV receiver market is being regulated by the private broadcast industry (a different industry)" by acting as gatekeeper, Stifling innovation, having "secret A3SA rules" as well as many other key points in relation to these issues.<ref>{{Cite web \|date=2025-08-01 \|title=SiliconDust Ex Parte Letter re FCC meeting (7-31-25) \|url=https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/1080140138248/1 \|url-status=live \|website=FCC.gov}}</ref> ''(*'''It should be noted that discussion in regards to the A3SA specifications and rules are forbidden from being referenced in the filings due to NDAs''').''

			Pearl TV accuses SiliconDust HDHomeRun devices of using a chip manufactured by HiSilicon which is blacklisted by the US government and uses that as their reasoning to not approve SiliconDust HDHomeRun for DRM certification suggesting that any component from a blacklisted company violates the industry’s secret, non-disclosable rules concerning decryption. However, the SiliconDust devices have FCC certification & approval for sale in the USA. It is also worth noting, A3SA & Pearl's use of "Selectively enforcing this rule" is based on the fact that their own DRM certified device (Converter X1 by GTMedia (''A Chinese company'')) contains a similar chip that is also blacklisted by the US government. On top of that, those devices were shipped running the "Android operating system that was four years out of date containing many known security vulnerabilities that puts consumers at risk", as well as the requirement of side-loading of all apps because it did not have the Google Play Store which opens the door to additional vulnerabilities.<ref>{{Cite web \|last=Seidman \|first=Lon \|date=2025-07-22 \|title=Did TV Broadcasters Just Admit to Selectively Enforcing Their Own Encryption Rules? \|url=https://blog.lon.tv/2025/07/22/did-tv-broadcasters-just-admit-to-selectively-enforcing-their-own-encryption-rules/ \|url-status=live \|website=Lon.TV Blog}}</ref>

	==See also==		==See also==

TestSamurai: ATSC will be usedd in Brazil as tv.3.0

2025-06-27T04:44:17Z

ATSC will be usedd in Brazil as tv.3.0

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:44, 27 June 2025
Line 8:		Line 8:
	}}		}}

	'''[[wikipedia:ATSC_3.0\|ATSC 3.0]]''', also known as '''NextGenTV,''' is a television protocol for terrestrial (over the air) broadcasting. It promises to deliver 4K resolution broadcast television using modern standards like HEVC, HDR, Dolby AC-4 and MPEG-H 3D audio.		'''[[wikipedia:ATSC_3.0\|ATSC 3.0]]''', also known as '''NextGenTV (in US) or TV 3.0 DTV+ (in Brazil)'''<ref>{{Cite web \|title=Decreto vai confirmar padrão ATSC e faixa de 300 MHz para a TV 3.0 \|trans-title=Decree will confirm ATSC standard and 300 MHz band for TV 3.0 \|url=https://telesintese.com.br/decreto-vai-confirmar-padrao-atsc-e-faixa-de-300-mhz-para-a-tv-3-0/ \|website=Telesintese \|language=pt-br}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web \|title=Globo inaugura primeira estação de TV 3.0 do Brasil e inicia testes com DTV+ \|trans-title=Globo inaugurates Brazil's first TV 3.0 station and begins DTV+ tests \|url=https://www.minhaoperadora.com.br/2025/06/globo-inaugura-primeira-estacao-de-tv-3-0-do-brasil-e-inicia-testes-com-dtv.html \|website=Minha Operadora \|language=pt-br}}</ref>''',''' is a television protocol for terrestrial (over the air) broadcasting. It promises to deliver over 4K resolution and 120 FPS broadcast television using modern standards like HEVC, HDR, Dolby AC-4 and MPEG-H 3D audio, alongside better "interaction among the broadcasters and the users".

	==Consumer impact summary==		==Consumer impact summary==

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:37, 5 August 2025
Line 31:		Line 31:
	LG has also encountered patent issues trying to incorporate tuners into their TVs, which resulted in a dispute with Constellation Design Inc. that ended ATSC 3.0 tuner support in new LG televisions as of September 2023.<ref>{{Cite web \|last=Seidman \|first=Lon \|date=26 Sep 2023 \|title=New LG Televisions Will Not Have ATSC 3 Tuners Due to Patent Dispute \|url=https://blog.lon.tv/2023/09/26/new-lg-televisions-will-not-have-atsc-3-tuners-due-to-patent-dispute/ \|url-status=live \|access-date=28 Mar 2025 \|website=Lon.tv}}</ref>		LG has also encountered patent issues trying to incorporate tuners into their TVs, which resulted in a dispute with Constellation Design Inc. that ended ATSC 3.0 tuner support in new LG televisions as of September 2023.<ref>{{Cite web \|last=Seidman \|first=Lon \|date=26 Sep 2023 \|title=New LG Televisions Will Not Have ATSC 3 Tuners Due to Patent Dispute \|url=https://blog.lon.tv/2023/09/26/new-lg-televisions-will-not-have-atsc-3-tuners-due-to-patent-dispute/ \|url-status=live \|access-date=28 Mar 2025 \|website=Lon.tv}}</ref>

	SiliconDust of HDHomeRun has ~~conversed~~ in official ~~letters~~ with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in response to Pearl TV (ATSC 3.0) with regards to "Authorizing the Permissive Use of the “Next Generation” Broadcast Television Standard (GN Docket No. 16-142)"<ref>{{Cite web \|date=2025-07-18 \|title=Pearl Ex Parte Letter re HD HomeRun (7-18-25) \|url=https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/107180407509394/1 \|url-status=live \|website=FCC.gov}}</ref> pointing out Pearl TV is acting as a '''gatekeeper''' by deciding which tuners to allow and not allow even after being "certified" for NextGenTV ATSC 3.0 as well as making mention that strict '''exclusive use of (google) widevine''' prevents popular devices such as Roku, Xbox, Apple TV, iPhone, iPad, Windows, or Mac from ever accessing the encrypted channels.<ref>{{Cite web \|date=2025-07-22 \|title=Silicondust Response to Pearl Ex Parte Letter (7-22-25) \|url=https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/10722712322683/1 \|url-status=live \|website=FCC.gov}}</ref> At which the two responded back and forth where Pearl TV attempted to make claim that SiliconDust is using a blacklisted chip. Pearl also made claim that SiliconDust must have a Widevine CDM license.<ref>{{Cite web \|date=2025-07-25 \|title=Pearl Ex Parte Letter re HD HomeRun (Reply 7-25-25) \|url=https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/1072583827524/1 \|url-status=live \|website=FCC.gov}}</ref> To which SiliconDust responded claiming Pearl continues to push false narratives. They point out they are "not required or expected to have the Level 1 CDM license described by Pearl" as well as stating that the "SoC part used in a video gateway device [the blacklisted chip], is not relevant in any way to viewers accessing ATSC 3.0 content."<ref>{{Cite web \|date=2025-07-29 \|title=SiliconDust Reply to 2nd Pearl \|url=https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/107301849911610/1 \|url-status=live \|website=FCC.gov}}</ref> In follow-up to this incident, Nicholas J Kelsey – President of Silicondust met with the FCC where he goes over in detail how the broadcast industry is attempting to use ATSC 3.0 DRM to illegally limit access to public airwaves, "The TV receiver market is being regulated by the private broadcast industry (a different industry)" by acting as gatekeeper, Stifling innovation, having "secret A3SA rules" as well as many other key points in relation to these issues.<ref>{{Cite web \|date=2025-08-01 \|title=SiliconDust Ex Parte Letter re FCC meeting (7-31-25) \|url=https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/1080140138248/1 \|url-status=live \|website=FCC.gov}}</ref> ''(*'''It should be noted that discussion in regards to the A3SA specifications and rules are forbidden from being referenced in the filings due to NDAs''').''		SiliconDust of HDHomeRun has engaged in official correspondence with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in response to Pearl TV (ATSC 3.0) with regards to "Authorizing the Permissive Use of the “Next Generation” Broadcast Television Standard (GN Docket No. 16-142)"<ref>{{Cite web \|date=2025-07-18 \|title=Pearl Ex Parte Letter re HD HomeRun (7-18-25) \|url=https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/107180407509394/1 \|url-status=live \|website=FCC.gov}}</ref> pointing out Pearl TV is acting as a '''gatekeeper''' by deciding which tuners to allow and not allow even after being "certified" for NextGenTV ATSC 3.0 as well as making mention that strict '''exclusive use of (google) widevine''' prevents popular devices such as Roku, Xbox, Apple TV, iPhone, iPad, Windows, or Mac from ever accessing the encrypted channels.<ref>{{Cite web \|date=2025-07-22 \|title=Silicondust Response to Pearl Ex Parte Letter (7-22-25) \|url=https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/10722712322683/1 \|url-status=live \|website=FCC.gov}}</ref> At which the two responded back and forth where Pearl TV attempted to make claim that SiliconDust is using a blacklisted chip. Pearl also made claim that SiliconDust must have a Widevine CDM license.<ref>{{Cite web \|date=2025-07-25 \|title=Pearl Ex Parte Letter re HD HomeRun (Reply 7-25-25) \|url=https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/1072583827524/1 \|url-status=live \|website=FCC.gov}}</ref> To which SiliconDust responded claiming Pearl continues to push false narratives. They point out they are "not required or expected to have the Level 1 CDM license described by Pearl" as well as stating that the "SoC part used in a video gateway device [the blacklisted chip], is not relevant in any way to viewers accessing ATSC 3.0 content."<ref>{{Cite web \|date=2025-07-29 \|title=SiliconDust Reply to 2nd Pearl \|url=https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/107301849911610/1 \|url-status=live \|website=FCC.gov}}</ref> In follow-up to this incident, Nicholas J Kelsey – President of Silicondust met with the FCC where he goes over in detail how the broadcast industry is attempting to use ATSC 3.0 DRM to illegally limit access to public airwaves, "The TV receiver market is being regulated by the private broadcast industry (a different industry)" by acting as gatekeeper, Stifling innovation, having "secret A3SA rules" as well as many other key points in relation to these issues.<ref>{{Cite web \|date=2025-08-01 \|title=SiliconDust Ex Parte Letter re FCC meeting (7-31-25) \|url=https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/1080140138248/1 \|url-status=live \|website=FCC.gov}}</ref> ''(*'''It should be noted that discussion in regards to the A3SA specifications and rules are forbidden from being referenced in the filings due to NDAs''').''

	Pearl TV accuses SiliconDust HDHomeRun devices of using a chip manufactured by HiSilicon which is blacklisted by the US government and uses that as their reasoning to not approve SiliconDust HDHomeRun for DRM certification suggesting that any component from a blacklisted company violates the industry’s secret, non-disclosable rules concerning decryption. However, the SiliconDust devices have FCC certification & approval for sale in the USA. It is also worth noting, A3SA & Pearl's use of "Selectively enforcing this rule" is based on the fact that their own DRM certified device (Converter X1 by GTMedia (''A Chinese company'')) contains a similar chip that is also blacklisted by the US government. On top of that, those devices were shipped running the "Android operating system that was four years out of date containing many known security vulnerabilities that puts consumers at risk", as well as the requirement of side-loading of all apps because it did not have the Google Play Store which opens the door to additional vulnerabilities.<ref>{{Cite web \|last=Seidman \|first=Lon \|date=2025-07-22 \|title=Did TV Broadcasters Just Admit to Selectively Enforcing Their Own Encryption Rules? \|url=https://blog.lon.tv/2025/07/22/did-tv-broadcasters-just-admit-to-selectively-enforcing-their-own-encryption-rules/ \|url-status=live \|website=Lon.TV Blog}}</ref>		Pearl TV accuses SiliconDust HDHomeRun devices of using a chip manufactured by HiSilicon which is blacklisted by the US government and uses that as their reasoning to not approve SiliconDust HDHomeRun for DRM certification suggesting that any component from a blacklisted company violates the industry’s secret, non-disclosable rules concerning decryption. However, the SiliconDust devices have FCC certification & approval for sale in the USA. It is also worth noting, A3SA & Pearl's use of "Selectively enforcing this rule" is based on the fact that their own DRM certified device (Converter X1 by GTMedia (''A Chinese company'')) contains a similar chip that is also blacklisted by the US government. On top of that, those devices were shipped running the "Android operating system that was four years out of date containing many known security vulnerabilities that puts consumers at risk", as well as the requirement of side-loading of all apps because it did not have the Google Play Store which opens the door to additional vulnerabilities.<ref>{{Cite web \|last=Seidman \|first=Lon \|date=2025-07-22 \|title=Did TV Broadcasters Just Admit to Selectively Enforcing Their Own Encryption Rules? \|url=https://blog.lon.tv/2025/07/22/did-tv-broadcasters-just-admit-to-selectively-enforcing-their-own-encryption-rules/ \|url-status=live \|website=Lon.TV Blog}}</ref>

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:09, 5 August 2025
Line 31:		Line 31:
	LG has also encountered patent issues trying to incorporate tuners into their TVs, which resulted in a dispute with Constellation Design Inc. that ended ATSC 3.0 tuner support in new LG televisions as of September 2023.<ref>{{Cite web \|last=Seidman \|first=Lon \|date=26 Sep 2023 \|title=New LG Televisions Will Not Have ATSC 3 Tuners Due to Patent Dispute \|url=https://blog.lon.tv/2023/09/26/new-lg-televisions-will-not-have-atsc-3-tuners-due-to-patent-dispute/ \|url-status=live \|access-date=28 Mar 2025 \|website=Lon.tv}}</ref>		LG has also encountered patent issues trying to incorporate tuners into their TVs, which resulted in a dispute with Constellation Design Inc. that ended ATSC 3.0 tuner support in new LG televisions as of September 2023.<ref>{{Cite web \|last=Seidman \|first=Lon \|date=26 Sep 2023 \|title=New LG Televisions Will Not Have ATSC 3 Tuners Due to Patent Dispute \|url=https://blog.lon.tv/2023/09/26/new-lg-televisions-will-not-have-atsc-3-tuners-due-to-patent-dispute/ \|url-status=live \|access-date=28 Mar 2025 \|website=Lon.tv}}</ref>

	SiliconDust of HDHomeRun has conversed in official letters with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in response to Pearl TV (ATSC 3.0) with regards to "Authorizing the Permissive Use of the “Next Generation” Broadcast Television Standard (GN Docket No. 16-142)"<ref>{{Cite web \|date=2025-07-18 \|title=Pearl Ex Parte Letter re HD HomeRun (7-18-25) \|url=https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/107180407509394/1 \|url-status=live \|website=FCC.gov}}</ref> pointing out Pearl TV is acting as a '''gatekeeper''' by deciding which tuners to allow and not allow even after being "certified" for NextGenTV ATSC 3.0 as well as making mention that strict '''exclusive use of (google) widevine''' prevents popular devices such as Roku, Xbox, Apple TV, iPhone, iPad, Windows, or Mac from ever accessing the encrypted channels.<ref>{{Cite web \|date=2025-07-22 \|title=Silicondust Response to Pearl Ex Parte Letter (7-22-25) \|url=https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/10722712322683/1 \|url-status=live \|website=FCC.gov}}</ref> At which the two responded back and forth where Pearl TV attempted to make claim that SiliconDust is using a ~~banned~~ chip ~~by US law in their devices as their new reasoning to not approving the HDHomeRun tuners (even though the SiliconDust devices have FCC certification & approval for sale in the USA)~~. Pearl also made claim that SiliconDust must have a Widevine CDM license.<ref>{{Cite web \|date=2025-07-25 \|title=Pearl Ex Parte Letter re HD HomeRun (Reply 7-25-25) \|url=https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/1072583827524/1 \|url-status=live \|website=FCC.gov}}</ref> To which SiliconDust responded claiming Pearl continues to push false narratives. They point out they are "not required or expected to have the Level 1 CDM license described by Pearl" as well as stating that the "SoC part used in a video gateway device [the ~~banned~~ chip], is not relevant in any way to viewers accessing ATSC 3.0 content."<ref>{{Cite web \|date=2025-07-29 \|title=SiliconDust Reply to 2nd Pearl \|url=https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/107301849911610/1 \|url-status=live \|website=FCC.gov}}</ref> In follow-up to this incident, Nicholas J Kelsey – President of Silicondust met with the FCC where he goes over in detail how the broadcast industry is attempting to use ATSC 3.0 DRM to illegally limit access to public airwaves, "The TV receiver market is being regulated by the private broadcast industry (a different industry)" by acting as gatekeeper, Stifling innovation, having "secret A3SA rules" as well as many other key points in relation to these issues.<ref>{{Cite web \|date=2025-08-01 \|title=SiliconDust Ex Parte Letter re FCC meeting (7-31-25) \|url=https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/1080140138248/1 \|url-status=live \|website=FCC.gov}}</ref> ''(*'''It should be noted that discussion in regards to the A3SA specifications and rules are forbidden from being referenced in the filings due to NDAs''').''		SiliconDust of HDHomeRun has conversed in official letters with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in response to Pearl TV (ATSC 3.0) with regards to "Authorizing the Permissive Use of the “Next Generation” Broadcast Television Standard (GN Docket No. 16-142)"<ref>{{Cite web \|date=2025-07-18 \|title=Pearl Ex Parte Letter re HD HomeRun (7-18-25) \|url=https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/107180407509394/1 \|url-status=live \|website=FCC.gov}}</ref> pointing out Pearl TV is acting as a '''gatekeeper''' by deciding which tuners to allow and not allow even after being "certified" for NextGenTV ATSC 3.0 as well as making mention that strict '''exclusive use of (google) widevine''' prevents popular devices such as Roku, Xbox, Apple TV, iPhone, iPad, Windows, or Mac from ever accessing the encrypted channels.<ref>{{Cite web \|date=2025-07-22 \|title=Silicondust Response to Pearl Ex Parte Letter (7-22-25) \|url=https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/10722712322683/1 \|url-status=live \|website=FCC.gov}}</ref> At which the two responded back and forth where Pearl TV attempted to make claim that SiliconDust is using a blacklisted chip. Pearl also made claim that SiliconDust must have a Widevine CDM license.<ref>{{Cite web \|date=2025-07-25 \|title=Pearl Ex Parte Letter re HD HomeRun (Reply 7-25-25) \|url=https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/1072583827524/1 \|url-status=live \|website=FCC.gov}}</ref> To which SiliconDust responded claiming Pearl continues to push false narratives. They point out they are "not required or expected to have the Level 1 CDM license described by Pearl" as well as stating that the "SoC part used in a video gateway device [the blacklisted chip], is not relevant in any way to viewers accessing ATSC 3.0 content."<ref>{{Cite web \|date=2025-07-29 \|title=SiliconDust Reply to 2nd Pearl \|url=https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/107301849911610/1 \|url-status=live \|website=FCC.gov}}</ref> In follow-up to this incident, Nicholas J Kelsey – President of Silicondust met with the FCC where he goes over in detail how the broadcast industry is attempting to use ATSC 3.0 DRM to illegally limit access to public airwaves, "The TV receiver market is being regulated by the private broadcast industry (a different industry)" by acting as gatekeeper, Stifling innovation, having "secret A3SA rules" as well as many other key points in relation to these issues.<ref>{{Cite web \|date=2025-08-01 \|title=SiliconDust Ex Parte Letter re FCC meeting (7-31-25) \|url=https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/1080140138248/1 \|url-status=live \|website=FCC.gov}}</ref> ''(*'''It should be noted that discussion in regards to the A3SA specifications and rules are forbidden from being referenced in the filings due to NDAs''').''

	Pearl TV accuses SiliconDust HDHomeRun devices of using a chip manufactured by HiSilicon which is blacklisted by the US government and uses that as their reasoning to not approve SiliconDust HDHomeRun for DRM certification suggesting that any component from a blacklisted company violates the industry’s secret, non-disclosable rules concerning decryption. However, the SiliconDust devices have FCC certification & approval for sale in the USA. It is also worth noting, A3SA & Pearl's use of "Selectively enforcing this rule" is based on the fact that their own DRM certified device (Converter X1 by GTMedia (''A Chinese company'')) contains a similar chip that is also blacklisted by the US government. On top of that, those devices were shipped running the "Android operating system that was four years out of date containing many known security vulnerabilities that puts consumers at risk", as well as the requirement of side-loading of all apps because it did not have the Google Play Store which opens the door to additional vulnerabilities.<ref>{{Cite web \|last=Seidman \|first=Lon \|date=2025-07-22 \|title=Did TV Broadcasters Just Admit to Selectively Enforcing Their Own Encryption Rules? \|url=https://blog.lon.tv/2025/07/22/did-tv-broadcasters-just-admit-to-selectively-enforcing-their-own-encryption-rules/ \|url-status=live \|website=Lon.TV Blog}}</ref>		Pearl TV accuses SiliconDust HDHomeRun devices of using a chip manufactured by HiSilicon which is blacklisted by the US government and uses that as their reasoning to not approve SiliconDust HDHomeRun for DRM certification suggesting that any component from a blacklisted company violates the industry’s secret, non-disclosable rules concerning decryption. However, the SiliconDust devices have FCC certification & approval for sale in the USA. It is also worth noting, A3SA & Pearl's use of "Selectively enforcing this rule" is based on the fact that their own DRM certified device (Converter X1 by GTMedia (''A Chinese company'')) contains a similar chip that is also blacklisted by the US government. On top of that, those devices were shipped running the "Android operating system that was four years out of date containing many known security vulnerabilities that puts consumers at risk", as well as the requirement of side-loading of all apps because it did not have the Google Play Store which opens the door to additional vulnerabilities.<ref>{{Cite web \|last=Seidman \|first=Lon \|date=2025-07-22 \|title=Did TV Broadcasters Just Admit to Selectively Enforcing Their Own Encryption Rules? \|url=https://blog.lon.tv/2025/07/22/did-tv-broadcasters-just-admit-to-selectively-enforcing-their-own-encryption-rules/ \|url-status=live \|website=Lon.TV Blog}}</ref>

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:14, 10 September 2025
Line 8:		Line 8:
	}}		}}

	'''[[wikipedia:ATSC_3.0\|ATSC 3.0]]''', also known as '''NextGenTV (in US) or TV 3.0 DTV+ (in Brazil)'''<ref>{{Cite web \|title=Decreto vai confirmar padrão ATSC e faixa de 300 MHz para a TV 3.0 \|trans-title=Decree will confirm ATSC standard and 300 MHz band for TV 3.0 \|url=https://telesintese.com.br/decreto-vai-confirmar-padrao-atsc-e-faixa-de-300-mhz-para-a-tv-3-0/ \|website=Telesintese \|language=pt-br}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web \|title=Globo inaugura primeira estação de TV 3.0 do Brasil e inicia testes com DTV+ \|trans-title=Globo inaugurates Brazil's first TV 3.0 station and begins DTV+ tests \|url=https://www.minhaoperadora.com.br/2025/06/globo-inaugura-primeira-estacao-de-tv-3-0-do-brasil-e-inicia-testes-com-dtv.html \|website=Minha Operadora \|language=pt-br}}</ref>''',''' is a television protocol for terrestrial (over the air) broadcasting. It promises to deliver over 4K resolution and 120 FPS broadcast television using modern standards like HEVC, HDR, Dolby AC-4 and MPEG-H 3D audio, alongside better "interaction among the broadcasters and the users".		'''[[wikipedia:ATSC_3.0\|ATSC 3.0]]''', also known as '''NextGenTV (in the US) or TV 3.0 DTV+ (in Brazil)'''<ref>{{Cite web \|title=Decreto vai confirmar padrão ATSC e faixa de 300 MHz para a TV 3.0 \|trans-title=Decree will confirm ATSC standard and 300 MHz band for TV 3.0 \|url=https://telesintese.com.br/decreto-vai-confirmar-padrao-atsc-e-faixa-de-300-mhz-para-a-tv-3-0/ \|website=Telesintese \|language=pt-br}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web \|title=Globo inaugura primeira estação de TV 3.0 do Brasil e inicia testes com DTV+ \|trans-title=Globo inaugurates Brazil's first TV 3.0 station and begins DTV+ tests \|url=https://www.minhaoperadora.com.br/2025/06/globo-inaugura-primeira-estacao-de-tv-3-0-do-brasil-e-inicia-testes-com-dtv.html \|website=Minha Operadora \|language=pt-br}}</ref>''',''' is a television protocol for terrestrial (over-the-air) broadcasting. It promises to deliver over 4K resolution and 120 FPS broadcast television using modern standards like HEVC, HDR, Dolby AC-4, and MPEG-H 3D audio, alongside better "interaction among the broadcasters and the users".

	==Consumer impact summary==		==Consumer impact summary==
	NextGenTV has had privacy concerns over internet based viewer metrics/analytics and targeted advertising, voiced by FCC commissioner Geoffrey Starks in 2020.<ref>{{Cite web \|last=Balderston \|first=Michael \|date=29 Jan 2020 \|title=Starks Warns of Potential Privacy, Data Issues With ATSC 3.0 \|url=https://www.tvtechnology.com/atsc3/starks-warns-of-potential-privacy-data-issues-with-atsc-3-0 \|url-status=live \|access-date=28 Mar 2025 \|website=tvtech}}</ref> More importantly, NextGenTV ~~marked the introduction of~~ [[Digital rights management]] and encryption to freely available television airwaves.		NextGenTV has had privacy concerns over internet-based viewer metrics/analytics and targeted advertising, voiced by FCC commissioner Geoffrey Starks in 2020.<ref>{{Cite web \|last=Balderston \|first=Michael \|date=29 Jan 2020 \|title=Starks Warns of Potential Privacy, Data Issues With ATSC 3.0 \|url=https://www.tvtechnology.com/atsc3/starks-warns-of-potential-privacy-data-issues-with-atsc-3-0 \|url-status=live \|access-date=28 Mar 2025 \|website=tvtech}}</ref> More importantly, NextGenTV introduced [[Digital rights management]] and encryption to freely available television airwaves.

	The authority for encryption in ATSC 3.0 is called A3SA.<ref>{{Cite web \|title=Paving the Way for Enhanced Security \|url=https://a3sa.com/ \|url-status=live \|access-date=28 Mar 2025 \|website=A3SA}}</ref> According to a article on Techhive,<ref name=":0">{{Cite web \|last=Newman \|first=Jared \|date=28 Jul 2023 \|title=NextGen TV’s DRM puts future of the over-the-air DVR in doubt \|url=https://www.techhive.com/article/2009693/nextgen-tv-drm-puts-future-of-the-over-the-air-dvr-in-doubt.html \|url-status=live \|access-date=28 Mar 2025 \|website=TechHive}}</ref> restrictions that could be imposed by A3SA's DRM might include:		The authority for encryption in ATSC 3.0 is called A3SA.<ref>{{Cite web \|title=Paving the Way for Enhanced Security \|url=https://a3sa.com/ \|url-status=live \|access-date=28 Mar 2025 \|website=A3SA}}</ref> According to a article on Techhive,<ref name=":0">{{Cite web \|last=Newman \|first=Jared \|date=28 Jul 2023 \|title=NextGen TV’s DRM puts future of the over-the-air DVR in doubt \|url=https://www.techhive.com/article/2009693/nextgen-tv-drm-puts-future-of-the-over-the-air-dvr-in-doubt.html \|url-status=live \|access-date=28 Mar 2025 \|website=TechHive}}</ref> restrictions that could be imposed by A3SA's DRM might include:

	*Blocking or setting expiry dates on recordings		*Blocking or setting expiry dates on recordings
	*Blocking remote access of tuners		*Blocking the remote access of tuners
	*Always-on internet ~~being~~ required for viewing/streaming/playback		*Always-on internet is required for viewing/streaming/playback.
	*Pairing recordings to the tuner it was recorded ~~from~~		*Pairing recordings to the tuner from which it was recorded
	*"Blessing" devices that pass the A3SA's DRM certification and licensing program		*"Blessing" devices that pass the A3SA's DRM certification and licensing program
	The Techhive article also describes that ~~implementation of~~ DRM could increase the cost of tuners due to the required licensing and certification programs on vendors.		The Techhive article also describes that implementing DRM could increase the cost of tuners due to the required licensing and certification programs for vendors.

	~~On certified devices, it was~~ also discovered ~~by Lon Seidman~~ that tuner decryption certificates can expire after 10 to 30 years.<ref>{{Cite web \|last=Seidman \|first=Lon \|date=30 Jan 2024 \|title=ATSC 3 TV Tuners Have an Expiration Date, Slow Progress on Gateway Devices and More.. \|url=https://blog.lon.tv/2024/01/30/atsc-3-tv-tuners-have-an-expiration-date-slow-progress-on-gateway-devices-and-more/ \|url-status=live \|access-date=28 Mar 2025 \|website=Lon.tv}}</ref>		Lon Seidman also discovered that tuner decryption certificates can expire after 10 to 30 years on certified devices.<ref>{{Cite web \|last=Seidman \|first=Lon \|date=30 Jan 2024 \|title=ATSC 3 TV Tuners Have an Expiration Date, Slow Progress on Gateway Devices and More.. \|url=https://blog.lon.tv/2024/01/30/atsc-3-tv-tuners-have-an-expiration-date-slow-progress-on-gateway-devices-and-more/ \|url-status=live \|access-date=28 Mar 2025 \|website=Lon.tv}}</ref>

	==Incidents==		==Incidents==
	Many major US ATSC 3.0 pilot stations started encrypting their broadcasts in 2023,<ref name=":0" /><ref>{{Cite web \|last=Seidman \|first=Lon \|date=15 May 2023 \|title=Broadcasters Roll Out Restrictive DRM Encryption on ATSC 3.0 Broadcasts \|url=https://blog.lon.tv/2023/05/15/broadcasters-roll-out-restrictive-drm-encryption-on-atsc-3-0-broadcasts/ \|url-status=live \|access-date=28 Mar 2025 \|website=Lon.tv}}</ref> locking out users of all pre-certification ATSC 3.0 tuners without decryption support. This has led to some resource websites like [https://www.rabbitears.info/ rabbitears.info] to become concerned about their future providing information on channels due to encryption becoming more widespread. They warn the site may be unable to operate as the tools for analysis of channels become inoperable on encrypted channels.<ref>{{Cite web \|title=ATSC 3.0 Encryption \|url=https://www.rabbitears.info/static.php?name=atsc3_encryption \|url-status=live \|access-date=28 Mar 2025 \|website=RabbitEars}}</ref>		Many major US ATSC 3.0 pilot stations started encrypting their broadcasts in 2023,<ref name=":0" /><ref>{{Cite web \|last=Seidman \|first=Lon \|date=15 May 2023 \|title=Broadcasters Roll Out Restrictive DRM Encryption on ATSC 3.0 Broadcasts \|url=https://blog.lon.tv/2023/05/15/broadcasters-roll-out-restrictive-drm-encryption-on-atsc-3-0-broadcasts/ \|url-status=live \|access-date=28 Mar 2025 \|website=Lon.tv}}</ref> locking out users of all pre-certification ATSC 3.0 tuners without decryption support. This has led to some resource websites like [https://www.rabbitears.info/ rabbitears.info] to become concerned about their future providing information on channels due to encryption becoming more widespread. They warn that the site may be unable to operate as the tools for analysis of channels become inoperable on encrypted channels.<ref>{{Cite web \|title=ATSC 3.0 Encryption \|url=https://www.rabbitears.info/static.php?name=atsc3_encryption \|url-status=live \|access-date=28 Mar 2025 \|website=RabbitEars}}</ref>

	In cases where encrypted channels ~~were able to~~ be decrypted using certified tuners, it has been reported an active internet connection is required to tune or switch between encrypted channels.<ref>{{Cite web \|last=Seidman \|first=Lon \|date=3 Sep 2023 \|title=The ADTH Nextgen TV Box Shows Us Just How Bad ATSC 3.0 Encryption Will Be.. \|url=https://blog.lon.tv/2023/09/03/the-adth-nextgen-tv-box-shows-us-just-how-bad-atsc-3-0-encrpytion-will-be/ \|url-status=live \|access-date=28 Mar 2025 \|website=Lon.tv}}</ref>		In cases where encrypted channels could be decrypted using certified tuners, it has been reported that an active internet connection is required to tune or switch between encrypted channels.<ref>{{Cite web \|last=Seidman \|first=Lon \|date=3 Sep 2023 \|title=The ADTH Nextgen TV Box Shows Us Just How Bad ATSC 3.0 Encryption Will Be.. \|url=https://blog.lon.tv/2023/09/03/the-adth-nextgen-tv-box-shows-us-just-how-bad-atsc-3-0-encrpytion-will-be/ \|url-status=live \|access-date=28 Mar 2025 \|website=Lon.tv}}</ref>

	LG has also encountered patent issues trying to incorporate tuners into ~~their~~ TVs, which resulted in a dispute with Constellation Design Inc. that ended ATSC 3.0 tuner support in new LG televisions as of September 2023.<ref>{{Cite web \|last=Seidman \|first=Lon \|date=26 Sep 2023 \|title=New LG Televisions Will Not Have ATSC 3 Tuners Due to Patent Dispute \|url=https://blog.lon.tv/2023/09/26/new-lg-televisions-will-not-have-atsc-3-tuners-due-to-patent-dispute/ \|url-status=live \|access-date=28 Mar 2025 \|website=Lon.tv}}</ref>		LG has also encountered patent issues trying to incorporate tuners into its TVs, which resulted in a dispute with Constellation Design Inc. that ended ATSC 3.0 tuner support in new LG televisions as of September 2023.<ref>{{Cite web \|last=Seidman \|first=Lon \|date=26 Sep 2023 \|title=New LG Televisions Will Not Have ATSC 3 Tuners Due to Patent Dispute \|url=https://blog.lon.tv/2023/09/26/new-lg-televisions-will-not-have-atsc-3-tuners-due-to-patent-dispute/ \|url-status=live \|access-date=28 Mar 2025 \|website=Lon.tv}}</ref>

	SiliconDust of HDHomeRun has engaged in official correspondence with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in response to Pearl TV (ATSC 3.0) with regards to "Authorizing the Permissive Use of the “Next Generation” Broadcast Television Standard (GN Docket No. 16-142)"<ref name=":1">{{Cite web \|date=2025-07-18 \|title=Pearl Ex Parte Letter re HD HomeRun (7-18-25) \|url=https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/107180407509394/1 \|url-status=live \|website=FCC.gov}}</ref> pointing out Pearl TV is acting as a '''gatekeeper''' by deciding which tuners to allow and not allow even after being "certified" for NextGenTV ATSC 3.0 as well as making mention that strict '''exclusive use of (google) widevine''' prevents popular devices such as Roku, Xbox, Apple TV, iPhone, iPad, Windows, or Mac from ever accessing the encrypted channels.<ref>{{Cite web \|date=2025-07-22 \|title=Silicondust Response to Pearl Ex Parte Letter (7-22-25) \|url=https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/10722712322683/1 \|url-status=live \|website=FCC.gov}}</ref> ~~At which the~~ two responded back and forth ~~where~~ Pearl TV attempted to ~~make~~ claim that SiliconDust is using a ~~blacklisted~~ chip. Pearl also ~~made claim~~ that SiliconDust must have a Widevine CDM license.<ref>{{Cite web \|date=2025-07-25 \|title=Pearl Ex Parte Letter re HD HomeRun (Reply 7-25-25) \|url=https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/1072583827524/1 \|url-status=live \|website=FCC.gov}}</ref> ~~To which~~ SiliconDust responded claiming Pearl continues to push false narratives. They point out they are "not required or expected to have the Level 1 CDM license described by Pearl" as well as stating that the "SoC part used in a video gateway device [the blacklisted chip], is not relevant in any way to viewers accessing ATSC 3.0 content."<ref>{{Cite web \|date=2025-07-29 \|title=SiliconDust Reply to 2nd Pearl \|url=https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/107301849911610/1 \|url-status=live \|website=FCC.gov}}</ref> In follow-up to this incident, Nicholas J Kelsey – President of Silicondust met with the FCC where he goes over in detail how the broadcast industry is attempting to use ATSC 3.0 DRM to ~~illegally~~ limit access to public airwaves, "The TV receiver market is being regulated by the private broadcast industry (a different industry)" by acting as gatekeeper, Stifling innovation, having "secret A3SA rules" as well as many other key points in relation to these issues.<ref>{{Cite web \|date=2025-08-01 \|title=SiliconDust Ex Parte Letter re FCC meeting (7-31-25) \|url=https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/1080140138248/1 \|url-status=live \|website=FCC.gov}}</ref> ''(*'''It should be noted that ~~discussion in regards to~~ the A3SA specifications and rules are forbidden from being referenced in ~~the~~ filings due to NDAs''').''		SiliconDust of HDHomeRun has engaged in official correspondence with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in response to Pearl TV (ATSC 3.0) with regards to "Authorizing the Permissive Use of the “Next Generation” Broadcast Television Standard (GN Docket No. 16-142)"<ref name=":1">{{Cite web \|date=2025-07-18 \|title=Pearl Ex Parte Letter re HD HomeRun (7-18-25) \|url=https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/107180407509394/1 \|url-status=live \|website=FCC.gov}}</ref> pointing out Pearl TV is acting as a '''gatekeeper''' by deciding which tuners to allow and not allow even after being "certified" for NextGenTV ATSC 3.0 as well as making mention that strict '''exclusive use of (google) widevine''' prevents popular devices such as Roku, Xbox, Apple TV, iPhone, iPad, Windows, or Mac from ever accessing the encrypted channels.<ref>{{Cite web \|date=2025-07-22 \|title=Silicondust Response to Pearl Ex Parte Letter (7-22-25) \|url=https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/10722712322683/1 \|url-status=live \|website=FCC.gov}}</ref> The two responded back and forth, and Pearl TV attempted to claim that SiliconDust was using a black-listed chip. Pearl also claimed that SiliconDust must have a Widevine CDM license.<ref>{{Cite web \|date=2025-07-25 \|title=Pearl Ex Parte Letter re HD HomeRun (Reply 7-25-25) \|url=https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/1072583827524/1 \|url-status=live \|website=FCC.gov}}</ref> SiliconDust responded by claiming Pearl continues to push false narratives. They point out they are "not required or expected to have the Level 1 CDM license described by Pearl," as well as stating that the "SoC part used in a video gateway device [the blacklisted chip], is not relevant in any way to viewers accessing ATSC 3.0 content."<ref>{{Cite web \|date=2025-07-29 \|title=SiliconDust Reply to 2nd Pearl \|url=https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/107301849911610/1 \|url-status=live \|website=FCC.gov}}</ref> In follow-up to this incident, Nicholas J Kelsey – President of Silicondust met with the FCC where he goes over in detail how the broadcast industry is attempting to use ATSC 3.0 DRM to limit access to public airwaves illegally, "The TV receiver market is being regulated by the private broadcast industry (a different industry)" by acting as gatekeeper, Stifling innovation, having "secret A3SA rules" as well as many other key points in relation to these issues.<ref>{{Cite web \|date=2025-08-01 \|title=SiliconDust Ex Parte Letter re FCC meeting (7-31-25) \|url=https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/1080140138248/1 \|url-status=live \|website=FCC.gov}}</ref> ''(*'''It should be noted that discussions regarding the A3SA specifications and rules are forbidden from being referenced in filings due to NDAs'''.)''

	Pearl TV accuses SiliconDust HDHomeRun devices of using a chip manufactured by Chinese HiSilicon, which is ~~blacklisted~~ by the US government ~~and~~ uses ~~that as~~ their reasoning to not approve SiliconDust HDHomeRun for DRM certification suggests that any component from a ~~blacklisted~~ company violates the industry’s secret, non-disclosable rules concerning decryption<ref name=":1" />. However, the SiliconDust devices have FCC certification & approval for sale in the USA indicating broadcast networks are trying to regulate tuner devices despite private industry having no authority ~~to do so~~. It is also worth noting, A3SA & Pearl's use of "Selectively enforcing this rule" is based on the fact that their own DRM certified device (Converter X1 by GTMedia (''A Chinese company'')) contains a similar chip that ~~is also blacklisted by~~ the US government. Moreover, GTMedia devices ~~were shipped running~~ an outdated Android OS with known security vulnerabilities ~~and~~ required side-loading of all apps due to the absence of the Google Play Store, further compromising user safety.<ref>{{Cite web \|last=Seidman \|first=Lon \|date=2025-07-22 \|title=Did TV Broadcasters Just Admit to Selectively Enforcing Their Own Encryption Rules? \|url=https://blog.lon.tv/2025/07/22/did-tv-broadcasters-just-admit-to-selectively-enforcing-their-own-encryption-rules/ \|url-status=live \|website=Lon.TV Blog}}</ref>		Pearl TV accuses SiliconDust HDHomeRun devices of using a chip manufactured by Chinese HiSilicon, which is black-listed by the US government. It uses their reasoning to not approve SiliconDust HDHomeRun for DRM certification. This suggests that any component from a black-listed company violates the industry’s secret, non-disclosable rules concerning decryption<ref name=":1" />. However, the SiliconDust devices have FCC certification & approval for sale in the USA, indicating broadcast networks are trying to regulate tuner devices despite private industry having no authority. It is also worth noting that A3SA & Pearl's use of "Selectively enforcing this rule" is based on the fact that their own DRM-certified device (Converter X1 by GTMedia (''A Chinese company'')) contains a similar chip that the US government also blacklists. Moreover, GTMedia devices ran an outdated Android OS with known security vulnerabilities. They required side-loading of all apps due to the absence of the Google Play Store, further compromising user safety.<ref>{{Cite web \|last=Seidman \|first=Lon \|date=2025-07-22 \|title=Did TV Broadcasters Just Admit to Selectively Enforcing Their Own Encryption Rules? \|url=https://blog.lon.tv/2025/07/22/did-tv-broadcasters-just-admit-to-selectively-enforcing-their-own-encryption-rules/ \|url-status=live \|website=Lon.TV Blog}}</ref>

	==See also==		==See also==