Capital One Shopping - Revision history

Rudxain: wanted: cookies

2026-03-15T14:39:46Z

wanted: cookies

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:39, 15 March 2026
Line 14:		Line 14:
	==Incidents==		==Incidents==
	===Creators' lawsuit ''(Jan 2025)''===		===Creators' lawsuit ''(Jan 2025)''===
	Online creators filed a class-action lawsuit against Capital One, alleging that the company used cookies to override the commissions that content creators would've earned through affiliate marketing<ref>{{Cite web \|title=Capital One Browser Extension Scam Lawsuit Investigation \|url=https://www.classlawgroup.com/capital-one-shopping-extension-scam-lawsuit \|website=Class Law Group \|url-status=live \|archive-url=http://web.archive.org/web/20251114001429/https://www.classlawgroup.com/capital-one-shopping-extension-scam-lawsuit \|archive-date=14 Nov 2025}}</ref><ref name=":0">{{Cite web \|last=Stempel \|first=Jonathan \|date=18 Sep 2025 \|title=Capital One settles social media creators' lawsuit \|url=https://www.reuters.com/sustainability/boards-policy-regulation/capital-one-settles-social-media-creators-lawsuit-2025-09-18/ \|archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/Tno4r \|archive-date=24 Feb 2026 \|website=Reuters}}</ref>. In their lawsuit, they claimed unjust enrichment by Capital One as well as intentional interference with contractual relations and conversion, among other claims<ref>{{Cite web \|date=16 Jun 2025 \|title=Consumer Protection: Capital One allegedly misappropriated commissions through browser extension \|url=https://valawyersweekly.com/2025/06/16/consumer-protection-capital-one-allegedly-misappropriated-commissions-through-browser-extension/ \|website=Virginia Lawyers Weekly \|url-status=live \|archive-url=http://web.archive.org/web/20250724121728/https://valawyersweekly.com/2025/06/16/consumer-protection-capital-one-allegedly-misappropriated-commissions-through-browser-extension/ \|archive-date=24 Jul 2025}}</ref>. Capital One attempted to dismiss the case in June, then finally settled in September while admitting to no wrongdoing<ref name=":0" />.		Online creators filed a class-action lawsuit against Capital One, alleging that the company used [[Web cookie\|cookies]] to override the commissions that content creators would've earned through affiliate marketing<ref>{{Cite web \|title=Capital One Browser Extension Scam Lawsuit Investigation \|url=https://www.classlawgroup.com/capital-one-shopping-extension-scam-lawsuit \|website=Class Law Group \|url-status=live \|archive-url=http://web.archive.org/web/20251114001429/https://www.classlawgroup.com/capital-one-shopping-extension-scam-lawsuit \|archive-date=14 Nov 2025}}</ref><ref name=":0">{{Cite web \|last=Stempel \|first=Jonathan \|date=18 Sep 2025 \|title=Capital One settles social media creators' lawsuit \|url=https://www.reuters.com/sustainability/boards-policy-regulation/capital-one-settles-social-media-creators-lawsuit-2025-09-18/ \|archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/Tno4r \|archive-date=24 Feb 2026 \|website=Reuters}}</ref>. In their lawsuit, they claimed unjust enrichment by Capital One as well as intentional interference with contractual relations and conversion, among other claims<ref>{{Cite web \|date=16 Jun 2025 \|title=Consumer Protection: Capital One allegedly misappropriated commissions through browser extension \|url=https://valawyersweekly.com/2025/06/16/consumer-protection-capital-one-allegedly-misappropriated-commissions-through-browser-extension/ \|website=Virginia Lawyers Weekly \|url-status=live \|archive-url=http://web.archive.org/web/20250724121728/https://valawyersweekly.com/2025/06/16/consumer-protection-capital-one-allegedly-misappropriated-commissions-through-browser-extension/ \|archive-date=24 Jul 2025}}</ref>. Capital One attempted to dismiss the case in June, then finally settled in September while admitting to no wrongdoing<ref name=":0" />.

	===Alleged fraudulent discounts===		===Alleged fraudulent discounts===

Venture18+: /* References */ added ghost archive URL and updated archive URL for reviews on Trustpilot

2026-02-24T13:04:12Z

References: added ghost archive URL and updated archive URL for reviews on Trustpilot

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:04, 24 February 2026
Line 14:		Line 14:
	==Incidents==		==Incidents==
	===Creators' lawsuit ''(Jan 2025)''===		===Creators' lawsuit ''(Jan 2025)''===
	Online creators filed a class-action lawsuit against Capital One, alleging that the company used cookies to override the commissions that content creators would've earned through affiliate marketing<ref>{{Cite web \|title=Capital One Browser Extension Scam Lawsuit Investigation \|url=https://www.classlawgroup.com/capital-one-shopping-extension-scam-lawsuit \|website=Class Law Group \|url-status=live \|archive-url=http://web.archive.org/web/20251114001429/https://www.classlawgroup.com/capital-one-shopping-extension-scam-lawsuit \|archive-date=14 Nov 2025}}</ref><ref name=":0">{{Cite web \|last=Stempel \|first=Jonathan \|date=18 Sep 2025 \|title=Capital One settles social media creators' lawsuit \|url=https://www.reuters.com/sustainability/boards-policy-regulation/capital-one-settles-social-media-creators-lawsuit-2025-09-18/ \|website=Reuters}}</ref>. In their lawsuit, they claimed unjust enrichment by Capital One as well as intentional interference with contractual relations and conversion, among other claims<ref>{{Cite web \|date=16 Jun 2025 \|title=Consumer Protection: Capital One allegedly misappropriated commissions through browser extension \|url=https://valawyersweekly.com/2025/06/16/consumer-protection-capital-one-allegedly-misappropriated-commissions-through-browser-extension/ \|website=Virginia Lawyers Weekly \|url-status=live \|archive-url=http://web.archive.org/web/20250724121728/https://valawyersweekly.com/2025/06/16/consumer-protection-capital-one-allegedly-misappropriated-commissions-through-browser-extension/ \|archive-date=24 Jul 2025}}</ref>. Capital One attempted to dismiss the case in June, then finally settled in September while admitting to no wrongdoing<ref name=":0" />.		Online creators filed a class-action lawsuit against Capital One, alleging that the company used cookies to override the commissions that content creators would've earned through affiliate marketing<ref>{{Cite web \|title=Capital One Browser Extension Scam Lawsuit Investigation \|url=https://www.classlawgroup.com/capital-one-shopping-extension-scam-lawsuit \|website=Class Law Group \|url-status=live \|archive-url=http://web.archive.org/web/20251114001429/https://www.classlawgroup.com/capital-one-shopping-extension-scam-lawsuit \|archive-date=14 Nov 2025}}</ref><ref name=":0">{{Cite web \|last=Stempel \|first=Jonathan \|date=18 Sep 2025 \|title=Capital One settles social media creators' lawsuit \|url=https://www.reuters.com/sustainability/boards-policy-regulation/capital-one-settles-social-media-creators-lawsuit-2025-09-18/ \|archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/Tno4r \|archive-date=24 Feb 2026 \|website=Reuters}}</ref>. In their lawsuit, they claimed unjust enrichment by Capital One as well as intentional interference with contractual relations and conversion, among other claims<ref>{{Cite web \|date=16 Jun 2025 \|title=Consumer Protection: Capital One allegedly misappropriated commissions through browser extension \|url=https://valawyersweekly.com/2025/06/16/consumer-protection-capital-one-allegedly-misappropriated-commissions-through-browser-extension/ \|website=Virginia Lawyers Weekly \|url-status=live \|archive-url=http://web.archive.org/web/20250724121728/https://valawyersweekly.com/2025/06/16/consumer-protection-capital-one-allegedly-misappropriated-commissions-through-browser-extension/ \|archive-date=24 Jul 2025}}</ref>. Capital One attempted to dismiss the case in June, then finally settled in September while admitting to no wrongdoing<ref name=":0" />.

	===Alleged fraudulent discounts===		===Alleged fraudulent discounts===
	Many users have claimed Capital One Shopping advertises fraudulent discounts that don't actually exist. Capitaloneshopping.com holds a rating of 1.3 stars on Trust Pilot, with many reviewers claiming "fraudulent prices," calling the browser extension a "hoax," and stating how they feel "frustrated" and cheated.<ref>		Many users have claimed Capital One Shopping advertises fraudulent discounts that don't actually exist. Capitaloneshopping.com holds a rating of 1.3 stars on Trust Pilot, with many reviewers claiming "fraudulent prices," calling the browser extension a "hoax," and stating how they feel "frustrated" and cheated.<ref>
	{{cite web		{{cite web \|last= \|first= \|date=24 Feb 2026 \|title=customers reviews on trustpilot as of 24 February 2026 \|url=https://www.trustpilot.com/review/capitaloneshopping.com \|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20260224130004/https://www.trustpilot.com/review/capitaloneshopping.com \|archive-date=24 Feb 2026 \|website=Trustpilot}}</ref>
	\|last=
	\|first=
	\|title= customers reviews on trustpilot as of ~~6 November 2025~~
	\|url= https://web.archive.org/web/~~20251106082625~~/https://www.trustpilot.com/review/capitaloneshopping.com
	\|~~website~~= ~~archive.org~~
	\|~~date~~= ~~6 Nov 2025~~
	}}</ref>

	==See also==		==See also==

Banana at 02:26, 16 February 2026

2026-02-16T02:26:58Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:26, 16 February 2026
Line 24:		Line 24:
	\|url= https://web.archive.org/web/20251106082625/https://www.trustpilot.com/review/capitaloneshopping.com		\|url= https://web.archive.org/web/20251106082625/https://www.trustpilot.com/review/capitaloneshopping.com
	\|website= archive.org		\|website= archive.org
	\|date= 6 ~~November~~ 2025		\|date= 6 Nov 2025
	~~\|access-date= 6 November 2026~~
	}}</ref>		}}</ref>

Banana: Added archive URLs for 2 citation(s) using CRWCitationBot

2026-02-16T02:25:06Z

Added archive URLs for 2 citation(s) using CRWCitationBot

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:25, 16 February 2026
Line 14:		Line 14:
	==Incidents==		==Incidents==
	===Creators' lawsuit ''(Jan 2025)''===		===Creators' lawsuit ''(Jan 2025)''===
	Online creators filed a class-action lawsuit against Capital One, alleging that the company used cookies to override the commissions that content creators would've earned through affiliate marketing<ref>{{Cite web \|title=Capital One Browser Extension Scam Lawsuit Investigation \|url=https://www.classlawgroup.com/capital-one-shopping-extension-scam-lawsuit \|website=Class Law Group}}</ref><ref name=":0">{{Cite web \|last=Stempel \|first=Jonathan \|date=18 Sep 2025 \|title=Capital One settles social media creators' lawsuit \|url=https://www.reuters.com/sustainability/boards-policy-regulation/capital-one-settles-social-media-creators-lawsuit-2025-09-18/ \|website=Reuters}}</ref>. In their lawsuit, they claimed unjust enrichment by Capital One as well as intentional interference with contractual relations and conversion, among other claims<ref>{{Cite web \|date=16 Jun 2025 \|title=Consumer Protection: Capital One allegedly misappropriated commissions through browser extension \|url=https://valawyersweekly.com/2025/06/16/consumer-protection-capital-one-allegedly-misappropriated-commissions-through-browser-extension/ \|website=Virginia Lawyers Weekly}}</ref>. Capital One attempted to dismiss the case in June, then finally settled in September while admitting to no wrongdoing<ref name=":0" />.		Online creators filed a class-action lawsuit against Capital One, alleging that the company used cookies to override the commissions that content creators would've earned through affiliate marketing<ref>{{Cite web \|title=Capital One Browser Extension Scam Lawsuit Investigation \|url=https://www.classlawgroup.com/capital-one-shopping-extension-scam-lawsuit \|website=Class Law Group \|url-status=live \|archive-url=http://web.archive.org/web/20251114001429/https://www.classlawgroup.com/capital-one-shopping-extension-scam-lawsuit \|archive-date=14 Nov 2025}}</ref><ref name=":0">{{Cite web \|last=Stempel \|first=Jonathan \|date=18 Sep 2025 \|title=Capital One settles social media creators' lawsuit \|url=https://www.reuters.com/sustainability/boards-policy-regulation/capital-one-settles-social-media-creators-lawsuit-2025-09-18/ \|website=Reuters}}</ref>. In their lawsuit, they claimed unjust enrichment by Capital One as well as intentional interference with contractual relations and conversion, among other claims<ref>{{Cite web \|date=16 Jun 2025 \|title=Consumer Protection: Capital One allegedly misappropriated commissions through browser extension \|url=https://valawyersweekly.com/2025/06/16/consumer-protection-capital-one-allegedly-misappropriated-commissions-through-browser-extension/ \|website=Virginia Lawyers Weekly \|url-status=live \|archive-url=http://web.archive.org/web/20250724121728/https://valawyersweekly.com/2025/06/16/consumer-protection-capital-one-allegedly-misappropriated-commissions-through-browser-extension/ \|archive-date=24 Jul 2025}}</ref>. Capital One attempted to dismiss the case in June, then finally settled in September while admitting to no wrongdoing<ref name=":0" />.

	===Alleged fraudulent discounts===		===Alleged fraudulent discounts===

Dragotta: /* Alleged fraudulent discounts */

2025-11-06T08:33:42Z

Alleged fraudulent discounts

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:33, 6 November 2025
Line 17:		Line 17:

	===Alleged fraudulent discounts===		===Alleged fraudulent discounts===
	Many users have claimed Capital One Shopping advertises fraudulent discounts that don't actually exist. Capitaloneshopping.com holds a rating of 1.3 stars on Trust Pilot, with many reviewers claiming "fraudulent prices," calling the browser extension a "hoax," and stating how they feel "frustrated" and cheated. {{~~Citation needed~~}}		Many users have claimed Capital One Shopping advertises fraudulent discounts that don't actually exist. Capitaloneshopping.com holds a rating of 1.3 stars on Trust Pilot, with many reviewers claiming "fraudulent prices," calling the browser extension a "hoax," and stating how they feel "frustrated" and cheated.<ref>
			{{cite web
			\|last=
			\|first=
			\|title= customers reviews on trustpilot as of 6 November 2025
			\|url= https://web.archive.org/web/20251106082625/https://www.trustpilot.com/review/capitaloneshopping.com
			\|website= archive.org
			\|date= 6 November 2025
			\|access-date= 6 November 2026
			}}</ref>

	==See also==		==See also==

Zerosugar: /* Incidents */ removal of placeholder notice

2025-10-16T00:01:34Z

Incidents: removal of placeholder notice

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:01, 16 October 2025
Line 13:		Line 13:

	==Incidents==		==Incidents==
	~~{{Ph-C-Inc}}~~

	===Creators' lawsuit ''(Jan 2025)''===		===Creators' lawsuit ''(Jan 2025)''===
	Online creators filed a class-action lawsuit against Capital One, alleging that the company used cookies to override the commissions that content creators would've earned through affiliate marketing<ref>{{Cite web \|title=Capital One Browser Extension Scam Lawsuit Investigation \|url=https://www.classlawgroup.com/capital-one-shopping-extension-scam-lawsuit \|website=Class Law Group}}</ref><ref name=":0">{{Cite web \|last=Stempel \|first=Jonathan \|date=18 Sep 2025 \|title=Capital One settles social media creators' lawsuit \|url=https://www.reuters.com/sustainability/boards-policy-regulation/capital-one-settles-social-media-creators-lawsuit-2025-09-18/ \|website=Reuters}}</ref>. In their lawsuit, they claimed unjust enrichment by Capital One as well as intentional interference with contractual relations and conversion, among other claims<ref>{{Cite web \|date=16 Jun 2025 \|title=Consumer Protection: Capital One allegedly misappropriated commissions through browser extension \|url=https://valawyersweekly.com/2025/06/16/consumer-protection-capital-one-allegedly-misappropriated-commissions-through-browser-extension/ \|website=Virginia Lawyers Weekly}}</ref>. Capital One attempted to dismiss the case in June, then finally settled in September while admitting to no wrongdoing<ref name=":0" />.		Online creators filed a class-action lawsuit against Capital One, alleging that the company used cookies to override the commissions that content creators would've earned through affiliate marketing<ref>{{Cite web \|title=Capital One Browser Extension Scam Lawsuit Investigation \|url=https://www.classlawgroup.com/capital-one-shopping-extension-scam-lawsuit \|website=Class Law Group}}</ref><ref name=":0">{{Cite web \|last=Stempel \|first=Jonathan \|date=18 Sep 2025 \|title=Capital One settles social media creators' lawsuit \|url=https://www.reuters.com/sustainability/boards-policy-regulation/capital-one-settles-social-media-creators-lawsuit-2025-09-18/ \|website=Reuters}}</ref>. In their lawsuit, they claimed unjust enrichment by Capital One as well as intentional interference with contractual relations and conversion, among other claims<ref>{{Cite web \|date=16 Jun 2025 \|title=Consumer Protection: Capital One allegedly misappropriated commissions through browser extension \|url=https://valawyersweekly.com/2025/06/16/consumer-protection-capital-one-allegedly-misappropriated-commissions-through-browser-extension/ \|website=Virginia Lawyers Weekly}}</ref>. Capital One attempted to dismiss the case in June, then finally settled in September while admitting to no wrongdoing<ref name=":0" />.

Beanie Bo: /* Fraudulent discounts */ alleged

2025-10-13T17:46:30Z

Fraudulent discounts: alleged

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:46, 13 October 2025
Line 15:		Line 15:
	{{Ph-C-Inc}}		{{Ph-C-Inc}}

	=== Creators' lawsuit ''(Jan 2025)'' ===		===Creators' lawsuit ''(Jan 2025)''===
	Online creators filed a class-action lawsuit against Capital One, alleging that the company used cookies to override the commissions that content creators would've earned through affiliate marketing<ref>{{Cite web \|title=Capital One Browser Extension Scam Lawsuit Investigation \|url=https://www.classlawgroup.com/capital-one-shopping-extension-scam-lawsuit \|website=Class Law Group}}</ref><ref name=":0">{{Cite web \|last=Stempel \|first=Jonathan \|date=18 Sep 2025 \|title=Capital One settles social media creators' lawsuit \|url=https://www.reuters.com/sustainability/boards-policy-regulation/capital-one-settles-social-media-creators-lawsuit-2025-09-18/ \|website=Reuters}}</ref>. In their lawsuit, they claimed unjust enrichment by Capital One as well as intentional interference with contractual relations and conversion, among other claims<ref>{{Cite web \|date=16 Jun 2025 \|title=Consumer Protection: Capital One allegedly misappropriated commissions through browser extension \|url=https://valawyersweekly.com/2025/06/16/consumer-protection-capital-one-allegedly-misappropriated-commissions-through-browser-extension/ \|website=Virginia Lawyers Weekly}}</ref>. Capital One attempted to dismiss the case in June, then finally settled in September while admitting to no wrongdoing<ref name=":0" />.		Online creators filed a class-action lawsuit against Capital One, alleging that the company used cookies to override the commissions that content creators would've earned through affiliate marketing<ref>{{Cite web \|title=Capital One Browser Extension Scam Lawsuit Investigation \|url=https://www.classlawgroup.com/capital-one-shopping-extension-scam-lawsuit \|website=Class Law Group}}</ref><ref name=":0">{{Cite web \|last=Stempel \|first=Jonathan \|date=18 Sep 2025 \|title=Capital One settles social media creators' lawsuit \|url=https://www.reuters.com/sustainability/boards-policy-regulation/capital-one-settles-social-media-creators-lawsuit-2025-09-18/ \|website=Reuters}}</ref>. In their lawsuit, they claimed unjust enrichment by Capital One as well as intentional interference with contractual relations and conversion, among other claims<ref>{{Cite web \|date=16 Jun 2025 \|title=Consumer Protection: Capital One allegedly misappropriated commissions through browser extension \|url=https://valawyersweekly.com/2025/06/16/consumer-protection-capital-one-allegedly-misappropriated-commissions-through-browser-extension/ \|website=Virginia Lawyers Weekly}}</ref>. Capital One attempted to dismiss the case in June, then finally settled in September while admitting to no wrongdoing<ref name=":0" />.

	=== ~~Fraudulent~~ discounts ===		===Alleged fraudulent discounts===
	Many users have claimed Capital One Shopping advertises fraudulent discounts that don't actually exist. Capitaloneshopping.com holds a rating of 1.3 stars on Trust Pilot, with many reviewers claiming "fraudulent prices," calling the browser extension a "hoax," and stating how they feel "frustrated" and cheated. {{Citation needed}}		Many users have claimed Capital One Shopping advertises fraudulent discounts that don't actually exist. Capitaloneshopping.com holds a rating of 1.3 stars on Trust Pilot, with many reviewers claiming "fraudulent prices," calling the browser extension a "hoax," and stating how they feel "frustrated" and cheated. {{Citation needed}}

Beanie Bo: more info

2025-10-13T17:46:01Z

more info

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:46, 13 October 2025
Line 7:		Line 7:
	\|Website=https://capitaloneshopping.com/		\|Website=https://capitaloneshopping.com/
	\|Description=Capital One browser extension for discounts and cashback		\|Description=Capital One browser extension for discounts and cashback
	}}		}}'''Capital One Shopping''' is a free browser extension from [[Capital One]] that allows users to find discounts from various online retailers.
	~~{{Ph-C-Int}}~~

	==Consumer-impact summary==		==Consumer-impact summary==
	{{Ph-C-CIS}}		{{Ph-C-CIS}}

	~~===Creators' lawsuit (2025)===~~
	Capital One settled a lawsuit by social media creators who said a free browser extension used by millions of people to find discounts stole their sales commissions when shoppers bought their products and services.

	~~https://www.reuters.com/sustainability/boards-policy-regulation/capital-one-settles-social-media-creators-lawsuit-2025-09-18/~~

	==Incidents==		==Incidents==
	{{Ph-C-Inc}}		{{Ph-C-Inc}}
	~~This is a list of all consumer-protection incidents related to this product. Any incidents not mentioned here can be found in the [[:Category:{{PAGENAME}}\|{{PAGENAME}} category]].~~

	===~~Example incident one (~~''~~date~~'')===		=== Creators' lawsuit ''(Jan 2025)'' ===
	{{~~Main~~\|~~link to the main CR Wiki article~~}}		Online creators filed a class-action lawsuit against Capital One, alleging that the company used cookies to override the commissions that content creators would've earned through affiliate marketing<ref>{{Cite web \|title=Capital One Browser Extension Scam Lawsuit Investigation \|url=https://www.classlawgroup.com/capital-one-shopping-extension-scam-lawsuit \|website=Class Law Group}}</ref><ref name=":0">{{Cite web \|last=Stempel \|first=Jonathan \|date=18 Sep 2025 \|title=Capital One settles social media creators' lawsuit \|url=https://www.reuters.com/sustainability/boards-policy-regulation/capital-one-settles-social-media-creators-lawsuit-2025-09-18/ \|website=Reuters}}</ref>. In their lawsuit, they claimed unjust enrichment by Capital One as well as intentional interference with contractual relations and conversion, among other claims<ref>{{Cite web \|date=16 Jun 2025 \|title=Consumer Protection: Capital One allegedly misappropriated commissions through browser extension \|url=https://valawyersweekly.com/2025/06/16/consumer-protection-capital-one-allegedly-misappropriated-commissions-through-browser-extension/ \|website=Virginia Lawyers Weekly}}</ref>. Capital One attempted to dismiss the case in June, then finally settled in September while admitting to no wrongdoing<ref name=":0" />.
	~~Short summary of the incident (could be the same as the summary preceding the article).~~
	===~~Example incident two ('~~'date~~'')~~===
	...

			=== Fraudulent discounts ===
			Many users have claimed Capital One Shopping advertises fraudulent discounts that don't actually exist. Capitaloneshopping.com holds a rating of 1.3 stars on Trust Pilot, with many reviewers claiming "fraudulent prices," calling the browser extension a "hoax," and stating how they feel "frustrated" and cheated. {{Citation needed}}

	==See also==		==See also==
	~~{{Ph-C-SA}}~~


			[[Honey browser plugin controversy]]
	==References==		==References==
	{{reflist}}		{{reflist}}

Beanie Bo: Stub

2025-10-12T21:11:01Z

Stub

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:11, 12 October 2025
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{ProductCargo		{{StubNotice}}{{ProductCargo
	\|Company=Capital One		\|Company=Capital One
	\|ReleaseYear=2020		\|ReleaseYear=2020
Line 13:		Line 13:
	{{Ph-C-CIS}}		{{Ph-C-CIS}}

	=== Creators' lawsuit (2025) ===		===Creators' lawsuit (2025)===
	Capital One settled a lawsuit by social media creators who said a free browser extension used by millions of people to find discounts stole their sales commissions when shoppers bought their products and services.		Capital One settled a lawsuit by social media creators who said a free browser extension used by millions of people to find discounts stole their sales commissions when shoppers bought their products and services.

Beanie Bo at 21:10, 12 October 2025

2025-10-12T21:10:19Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:10, 12 October 2025
Line 4:		Line 4:
	\|InProduction=Yes		\|InProduction=Yes
	\|ArticleType=Product		\|ArticleType=Product
	\|Category=Capital One, Browser extension~~, discounts~~		\|Category=Capital One, Browser extension
	\|Website=https://capitaloneshopping.com/		\|Website=https://capitaloneshopping.com/
	\|Description=Capital One browser extension for discounts and cashback		\|Description=Capital One browser extension for discounts and cashback