Template:CompanyPreload/Help - Revision history

Mr Pollo: Mr Pollo moved page Consumer Rights Wiki:Sample/Company/Help to Template:CompanyPreload/Help: merging due to having a longer edit history

2025-07-24T21:39:05Z

Mr Pollo moved page Consumer Rights Wiki:Sample/Company/Help to Template:CompanyPreload/Help: merging due to having a longer edit history

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:39, 24 July 2025
(No difference)

Keith at 21:52, 8 February 2025

2025-02-08T21:52:54Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:52, 8 February 2025
Line 5:		Line 5:
	'''Company articles''' should contain:		'''Company articles''' should contain:

	*A brief overview of the relevant company, its size, and what it does.		*A brief overview of the relevant company, its size, and what it does. This should include a link to the company's Wikipedia page.
	*A rough appraisal of their attitude towards consumer protection. The exact form of this is not yet established. Feel free to propose some kind of scale on which a company's attitude towards consumer protection can be measured.		*A rough appraisal of their attitude towards consumer protection. The exact form of this is not yet established. Feel free to propose some kind of scale on which a company's attitude towards consumer protection can be measured.
	*A short paragraph for each of the very largest controversies relevant to that entity.		*A short paragraph for each of the very largest controversies relevant to that entity.

Kostas: Kostas moved page Template:Sample/Company/Help to Consumer Action Taskforce:Sample/Company/Help without leaving a redirect: move to proper namespace

2025-01-30T23:16:59Z

Kostas moved page Template:Sample/Company/Help to Consumer Action Taskforce:Sample/Company/Help without leaving a redirect: move to proper namespace

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:16, 30 January 2025
(No difference)

Kostas: add second example

2025-01-30T20:00:40Z

add second example

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:00, 30 January 2025
Line 1:		Line 1:
	[[Peloton\|Sample company article]]		[[Peloton\|Sample company article 1: Peloton]]

			[[John Deere\|Sample company article 1: John Deere]]

	'''Company articles''' should contain:		'''Company articles''' should contain:

Waldo: Update according to Article types

2025-01-30T19:36:42Z

Update according to Article types

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:36, 30 January 2025
Line 1:		Line 1:
	[[Peloton\|Sample ~~Company Article~~]]		[[Peloton\|Sample company article]]

	'''Company articles''' should contain:		'''Company articles''' should contain:

	*A brief overview of the relevant company, ~~how big it is~~, and what it does.		*A brief overview of the relevant company, its size, and what it does.
	*A rough appraisal of their attitude towards consumer protection. The exact form of this is not yet established. Feel free to ~~make a proposal for~~ some kind of scale on which a company's attitude towards consumer protection can be measured.		*A rough appraisal of their attitude towards consumer protection. The exact form of this is not yet established. Feel free to propose some kind of scale on which a company's attitude towards consumer protection can be measured.
	*A short paragraph for each of the very largest controversies relevant to that entity.		*A short paragraph for each of the very largest controversies relevant to that entity.
	*A list or table directing users to the pages covering ~~their~~ controversies and practices, or to their product line pages ~~in the case of a very large company~~.		*A list or table directing users to the pages covering the controversies and practices that '''do not belong in the product or product line articles'''.
			*A list or table directing users to their product line, service, website and software pages.

	For companies which are very large, such as Apple or Sony, it may make sense to not have a list of everything they’ve ever done all on their home page, instead linking to their various product lines, which then have the controversy lists. Subsidiary companies should have their own pages when they are sufficiently distinct from the main entity (e.g., while Škoda Auto may be a subsidiary of Volkswagen Group, it is sufficiently distinct to warrant its own company page). Such relationships should be documented where they exist.		Subsidiary companies should have their own pages when they are sufficiently distinct from the main entity (e.g., while Škoda Auto may be a subsidiary of Volkswagen Group, it is sufficiently distinct to warrant its own company page). Such relationships should be documented where they exist.

Karar: Created page with "Sample Company Article '''Company articles''' should contain: A brief overview of the relevant company, how big it is, and what it does. A rough appraisal of their attitude towards consumer protection. The exact form of this is not yet established. Feel free to make a proposal for some kind of scale on which a company's attitude towards consumer protection can be measured. *A short paragraph for each of the very largest controversies relevant to that enti..."

2025-01-30T10:06:47Z

Created page with "Sample Company Article '''Company articles''' should contain: *A brief overview of the relevant company, how big it is, and what it does. *A rough appraisal of their attitude towards consumer protection. The exact form of this is not yet established. Feel free to make a proposal for some kind of scale on which a company's attitude towards consumer protection can be measured. *A short paragraph for each of the very largest controversies relevant to that enti..."

New page

[[Peloton|Sample Company Article]]

'''Company articles''' should contain:

*A brief overview of the relevant company, how big it is, and what it does.
*A rough appraisal of their attitude towards consumer protection. The exact form of this is not yet established. Feel free to make a proposal for some kind of scale on which a company's attitude towards consumer protection can be measured.
*A short paragraph for each of the very largest controversies relevant to that entity.
*A list or table directing users to the pages covering their controversies and practices, or to their product line pages in the case of a very large company.

For companies which are very large, such as Apple or Sony, it may make sense to not have a list of everything they’ve ever done all on their home page, instead linking to their various product lines, which then have the controversy lists. Subsidiary companies should have their own pages when they are sufficiently distinct from the main entity (e.g., while Škoda Auto may be a subsidiary of Volkswagen Group, it is sufficiently distinct to warrant its own company page). Such relationships should be documented where they exist.