Consumer Rights Wiki talk:Moderator guidelines: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
== Just a few typos ==
==Just a few typos==


#* Note: it is permissible for an incident to be positive, as long as it is both noteable  <-notable
#*Note: it is permissible for an incident to be positive, as long as it is both noteable  <-notable
          
          
# The company does not have an existing page, which the artice <- article
#The company does not have an existing page, which the artice <- article


#* The level of managerial independance <- independence
#*The level of managerial independance <- independence


#* The level of managerial independance - how independant  <- independent
#*The level of managerial independance - how independant  <- independent


* Stub (for an article which is simply underdeveloped: the content currentlyu <-
*Stub (for an article which is simply underdeveloped: the content currentlyu <-


lead to deletion if it's in massive violation of the No Original Reaearch <-
lead to deletion if it's in massive violation of the No Original Reaearch <-
Line 15: Line 15:
Basically a limbo to put articles in where their merits can be discussed before a descision <- decision
Basically a limbo to put articles in where their merits can be discussed before a descision <- decision


* Demonstrate (through evidence, and assertion by sources, not thorugh <- through
*Demonstrate (through evidence, and assertion by sources, not thorugh <- through


* If the Incident affected only a small hanfdful <-
*If the Incident affected only a small hanfdful <-


* '''The article should be neutral and factual,''' without unneccesarily -< unnecessarily  
*'''The article should be neutral and factual,''' without unneccesarily -< unnecessarily


A user reported that an Amazon delivery driver accessed their garage through their phone without authorization  
A user reported that an Amazon delivery driver accessed their garage through their phone without authorization  
#* Demonstrate a pattern of similar incidents or systemic flaws in Amazon's delivery authorization <- authorisation?
#*Demonstrate a pattern of similar incidents or systemic flaws in Amazon's delivery authorization <- authorisation?


#* Remove aricle, <-
#*Remove aricle, <-


A person brought a 5-year-old iPhone 11 for battery replacement at official Apple Store in Rio. After a $170 service, both cameras stopped working. Apple blamed previous unauthorized <- unauthorised?
A person brought a 5-year-old iPhone 11 for battery replacement at official Apple Store in Rio. After a $170 service, both cameras stopped working. Apple blamed previous unauthorized <- unauthorised?
Line 45: Line 45:


-- Comment by JazzyPizza, 25 April 2025‎
-- Comment by JazzyPizza, 25 April 2025‎
Thank you for pointing these out! and apologies for not actioning the earlier ones. I'll get everything done just now!
[[User:Keith|Keith]] ([[User talk:Keith|talk]]) 22:39, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
==Question==
As part of these guidelines, it says this.
<blockquote> If a deletion request is determined to be valid, the linked pages need to be handled and after that the page should be marked with the <code><nowiki>{{Garbage}}</nowiki></code> template and protected from edits, pending final deletion. If a talk page is present before deletion, it is best practice to keep the talk page as its contents usually explain to readers why the page was deleted.
</blockquote>
I have never seen the garbage template used, except for one time when I thought it was an alternative to deletionrequest. Is this still done? [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson|'''''AnotherConsumerRightsPerson''''']] ([[User talk:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson|talk]]) 07:23, 19 November 2025 (UTC)
:thanks, have updated the text to remove reference to the garbage template [[User:Keith|Keith]] ([[User talk:Keith|talk]]) 00:51, 20 November 2025 (UTC)