Consumer Rights Wiki talk:Moderator guidelines: Difference between revisions
DavidBenJr (talk | contribs) Small typo |
No edit summary |
||
| (10 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Just a few typos | ==Just a few typos== | ||
#* Note: it is permissible for an incident to be positive, as long as it is both noteable <-notable | #*Note: it is permissible for an incident to be positive, as long as it is both noteable <-notable | ||
# The company does not have an existing page, which the artice <- article | #The company does not have an existing page, which the artice <- article | ||
#* The level of managerial independance <- independence | #*The level of managerial independance <- independence | ||
#* The level of managerial independance - how independant <- independent | #*The level of managerial independance - how independant <- independent | ||
* Stub (for an article which is simply underdeveloped: the content currentlyu <- | *Stub (for an article which is simply underdeveloped: the content currentlyu <- | ||
lead to deletion if it's in massive violation of the No Original Reaearch <- | lead to deletion if it's in massive violation of the No Original Reaearch <- | ||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
Basically a limbo to put articles in where their merits can be discussed before a descision <- decision | Basically a limbo to put articles in where their merits can be discussed before a descision <- decision | ||
* Demonstrate (through evidence, and assertion by sources, not thorugh <- through | *Demonstrate (through evidence, and assertion by sources, not thorugh <- through | ||
* If the Incident affected only a small hanfdful <- | *If the Incident affected only a small hanfdful <- | ||
* '''The article should be neutral and factual,''' without unneccesarily -< unnecessarily | *'''The article should be neutral and factual,''' without unneccesarily -< unnecessarily | ||
A user reported that an Amazon delivery driver accessed their garage through their phone without authorization | A user reported that an Amazon delivery driver accessed their garage through their phone without authorization | ||
#* Demonstrate a pattern of similar incidents or systemic flaws in Amazon's delivery authorization <- authorisation? | #*Demonstrate a pattern of similar incidents or systemic flaws in Amazon's delivery authorization <- authorisation? | ||
#* Remove aricle, <- | #*Remove aricle, <- | ||
A person brought a 5-year-old iPhone 11 for battery replacement at official Apple Store in Rio. After a $170 service, both cameras stopped working. Apple blamed previous unauthorized <- unauthorised? | A person brought a 5-year-old iPhone 11 for battery replacement at official Apple Store in Rio. After a $170 service, both cameras stopped working. Apple blamed previous unauthorized <- unauthorised? | ||
-- Preceding unsigned comment by DavidBenJr at 04:21, 15 January 2025 | |||
The spelling of “authorization” and the like depend on regional standards. Americans tend to spell it with a z, and the z spelling is actually also preferred by the Oxford English Dictionary. This is in contrast to analyze/analyse, where the OED prefers the s spelling. There is some etymological reason that I cannot be bothered to remember. [[User:Mingyee|Mingyee]] ([[User talk:Mingyee|talk]]) 11:53, 20 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
------------- | |||
Some additional typos: | |||
2. The company does not have an existing page, which the artice <- article | |||
This should only lead to deletion if it's <- it is | |||
Aritcles <- Articles (inside categorization table) | |||
If a deletion request is determined to be valid, <- (missing comma) | |||
-- Comment by JazzyPizza, 25 April 2025 | |||
Thank you for pointing these out! and apologies for not actioning the earlier ones. I'll get everything done just now! | |||
[[User:Keith|Keith]] ([[User talk:Keith|talk]]) 22:39, 25 April 2025 (UTC) | |||
==Question== | |||
As part of these guidelines, it says this. | |||
<blockquote> If a deletion request is determined to be valid, the linked pages need to be handled and after that the page should be marked with the <code><nowiki>{{Garbage}}</nowiki></code> template and protected from edits, pending final deletion. If a talk page is present before deletion, it is best practice to keep the talk page as its contents usually explain to readers why the page was deleted. | |||
</blockquote> | |||
I have never seen the garbage template used, except for one time when I thought it was an alternative to deletionrequest. Is this still done? [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson|'''''AnotherConsumerRightsPerson''''']] ([[User talk:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson|talk]]) 07:23, 19 November 2025 (UTC) | |||
:thanks, have updated the text to remove reference to the garbage template [[User:Keith|Keith]] ([[User talk:Keith|talk]]) 00:51, 20 November 2025 (UTC) | |||