User talk:CrookKilla: Difference between revisions

(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)

Line 13:

Nope, not yet.

== Welcome! (and sorry about the CAPTCHAs) ==

==Welcome! (and sorry about the CAPTCHAs)==

Hi, I've just been catching up on your post history and you've raised some good points.

Line 27:

Keith (wiki manager) [[User:Keith|Keith]] ([[User talk:Keith|talk]]) 14:47, 3 July 2025 (UTC)

:Cool. Glad to hear that my (unvoiced) optimistic assumption that the CAPTCHAs would not stymie contributions long term was valid. [[User:CrookKilla|CrookKilla]] ([[User talk:CrookKilla|talk]]) 21:33, 5 July 2025 (UTC)

:Should we publicize the workaround I noted in the summary visible at https://consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=Consumer_Rights_Wiki_talk:Inclusion_guidelines&action=history? [[User:CrookKilla|CrookKilla]] ([[User talk:CrookKilla|talk]]) 21:42, 5 July 2025 (UTC)

::I think for now we'll just try and make sure people know to come to a mod/admin for confirmation (especially as the create page workaround only works once per talk page) [[User:Keith|Keith]] ([[User talk:Keith|talk]]) 15:45, 9 July 2025 (UTC)

== AI LULZ ==

Result when I asked Gemini,

: draft an article for consumerrights.wiki based on archive.is/kZCot :

Documentation shows [Company Name] employs anti-repair and anti-ownership tactics, utilizing proprietary design constraints and software locks that turn product ownership into a revocable license [Source: archive.is/munged]. These practices, which prioritize corporate control over user autonomy, are part of a broader trend toward subscription-based, non-repairable hardware [Source: archive.is/munged]. For a full analysis of these practices, visit the Consumer Rights Wiki page for this case [[User:CrookKilla|CrookKilla]] ([[User talk:CrookKilla|talk]]) 07:02, 19 February 2026 (UTC)

@@ Line 13: / Line 13: @@
 Nope, not yet.
-== Welcome! (and sorry about the CAPTCHAs) ==
+==Welcome! (and sorry about the CAPTCHAs)==
 Hi, I've just been catching up on your post history and you've raised some good points.
@@ Line 27: / Line 27: @@
 Keith (wiki manager) [[User:Keith|Keith]] ([[User talk:Keith|talk]]) 14:47, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
+:Cool.  Glad to hear that my (unvoiced) optimistic assumption that the CAPTCHAs would not stymie contributions long term was valid.  [[User:CrookKilla|CrookKilla]] ([[User talk:CrookKilla|talk]]) 21:33, 5 July 2025 (UTC)
+:Should we publicize the workaround I noted in the summary visible at https://consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=Consumer_Rights_Wiki_talk:Inclusion_guidelines&action=history? [[User:CrookKilla|CrookKilla]] ([[User talk:CrookKilla|talk]]) 21:42, 5 July 2025 (UTC)
+::I think for now we'll just try and make sure people know to come to a mod/admin for confirmation (especially as the create page workaround only works once per talk page) [[User:Keith|Keith]] ([[User talk:Keith|talk]]) 15:45, 9 July 2025 (UTC)
+== AI LULZ ==
+Result when I asked Gemini,
+: draft an article for consumerrights.wiki based on archive.is/kZCot :
+Documentation shows [Company Name] employs anti-repair and anti-ownership tactics, utilizing proprietary design constraints and software locks that turn product ownership into a revocable license [Source: archive.is/munged]. These practices, which prioritize corporate control over user autonomy, are part of a broader trend toward subscription-based, non-repairable hardware [Source: archive.is/munged]. For a full analysis of these practices, visit the Consumer Rights Wiki page for this case [[User:CrookKilla|CrookKilla]] ([[User talk:CrookKilla|talk]]) 07:02, 19 February 2026 (UTC)