Talk:Right to own: Difference between revisions
Add topic →Rename to "Erosion of ownership"?: new section |
|||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
:Particularly, the new classification of ownership issues I established there seems a little blurry on the edges between them, but that seems to be inevitable, since they're kinda related. [[User:D-side|D-side]] ([[User talk:D-side|talk]]) 16:13, 14 March 2026 (UTC) | :Particularly, the new classification of ownership issues I established there seems a little blurry on the edges between them, but that seems to be inevitable, since they're kinda related. [[User:D-side|D-side]] ([[User talk:D-side|talk]]) 16:13, 14 March 2026 (UTC) | ||
== Rename to "Erosion of ownership"? == | ==Rename to "Erosion of ownership"?== | ||
Looking up "right to ownership" and "right to own" seems to commonly bring up the legal concept of "right to property". While absolutely related, it's a little too wide, the subject of the article is more about that ownership being subtly taken away. | Looking up "right to ownership" and "right to own" seems to commonly bring up the legal concept of "right to property". While absolutely related, it's a little too wide, the subject of the article is more about that ownership being subtly taken away. | ||
I've added 3 citations that mention "erosion of ownership" in the same sense, and after fleshing out the "Common issues" section I started wondering if that should actually be the article's title, since that wording in particular seems to be more widespread in association with what's being discussed in the article. [[User:D-side|D-side]] ([[User talk:D-side|talk]]) 16:19, 14 March 2026 (UTC) | I've added 3 citations that mention "erosion of ownership" in the same sense, and after fleshing out the "Common issues" section I started wondering if that should actually be the article's title, since that wording in particular seems to be more widespread in association with what's being discussed in the article. [[User:D-side|D-side]] ([[User talk:D-side|talk]]) 16:19, 14 March 2026 (UTC) | ||
:That could work. I've created it as a redirect. [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson|'''''AnotherConsumerRightsPerson''''']] ([[User talk:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson|talk]]) 17:00, 14 March 2026 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 17:00, 14 March 2026
I'm not finished completing this article and I promise to create the articles I've created Red Links for when I wake next.
If my changes are still here and are considered useful, that is. Webmistress (talk) 05:38, 24 June 2025 (UTC)
- I started expanding on the definition of the problem and got a little carried away, in the end rewriting almost the whole thing, using prior revision as scaffolding. I left the red links in the security section be.
- Would appreciate a review of the new revision to see if I kept the intent and the scope in line with the article's purpose.
- Particularly, the new classification of ownership issues I established there seems a little blurry on the edges between them, but that seems to be inevitable, since they're kinda related. D-side (talk) 16:13, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
Rename to "Erosion of ownership"?
[edit source]Looking up "right to ownership" and "right to own" seems to commonly bring up the legal concept of "right to property". While absolutely related, it's a little too wide, the subject of the article is more about that ownership being subtly taken away.
I've added 3 citations that mention "erosion of ownership" in the same sense, and after fleshing out the "Common issues" section I started wondering if that should actually be the article's title, since that wording in particular seems to be more widespread in association with what's being discussed in the article. D-side (talk) 16:19, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
- That could work. I've created it as a redirect. AnotherConsumerRightsPerson (talk) 17:00, 14 March 2026 (UTC)