Talk:Apple's anti-repair and anti-refurbishment practices: Difference between revisions

@@ Line 22: / Line 22: @@
 ::::::Just looking at your contribution on this page, I think you might be better off putting the greenwashing stuff on apple's main page, and then linking to this page when you discuss how apple's anti-repair practices undermine its claims of being eco-friendly. (and also there's some question about how anti-consumer greenwashing is in the first place. I think it does fix the wiki, but should be approached from a 'misleading marketing' angle rather than an 'environmental damage' angle) [[User:Keith|Keith]] ([[User talk:Keith|talk]]) 21:23, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
 :::::::Fit*, not fix.  [[User:Keith|Keith]] ([[User talk:Keith|talk]]) 22:46, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
+:::::::I thought about the same thing. Maybe at some point a dedicated page might even make sense.
+:::::::I'll move those parts over to the Apple page for now.
+:::::::How relevant ecological aspects are with regards to consumer rights is indeed an interesting question. I'd say disposable an non-repairable design of electronic devices, greenwashing, emissions and pollution are ultimately part of the same problem. It's just that the ecological problems simply affect a larger range of people than just the buyer of a particular model or product. [[User:MrTuttle|MrTuttle]] ([[User talk:MrTuttle|talk]]) 15:34, 16 September 2025 (UTC)