Consumer Rights Wiki talk:Moderators' noticeboard: Difference between revisions
→Wikimedia Foundation: Reply |
→Wikimedia Foundation: Reply |
||
| Line 330: | Line 330: | ||
:I'm not out of the loop. I'm the main person you were talking to on Discord, NK. I suggested that you may create a separate Wikipedia page for the incidents that are relevant to consumer rights violations. Meanwhile, the WikiMedia Foundation page that had already been deemed irrelevant before you even added information, would be deleted for lack of relevance. Painting WMF with a broad brush of negativity for issues that pertain to the running of Wikipedia is inaccurate and unfair. As a company, there have yet to be any validity to its inclusion on the Consumer Rights Wiki. [[User:Beanie Bo|Beanie Bo]] ([[User talk:Beanie Bo|talk]]) 14:30, 7 November 2025 (UTC) | :I'm not out of the loop. I'm the main person you were talking to on Discord, NK. I suggested that you may create a separate Wikipedia page for the incidents that are relevant to consumer rights violations. Meanwhile, the WikiMedia Foundation page that had already been deemed irrelevant before you even added information, would be deleted for lack of relevance. Painting WMF with a broad brush of negativity for issues that pertain to the running of Wikipedia is inaccurate and unfair. As a company, there have yet to be any validity to its inclusion on the Consumer Rights Wiki. [[User:Beanie Bo|Beanie Bo]] ([[User talk:Beanie Bo|talk]]) 14:30, 7 November 2025 (UTC) | ||
::Duly noted. @[[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson|AnotherConsumerRightsPerson]] can you make a draft page for the Wikipedia article just like last time you did with the inactive accounts deletion topic? Thanks. [[Special:Contributions/15.181.163.103|15.181.163.103]] 14:32, 7 November 2025 (UTC) | |||