relevancy: Reply
mNo edit summary
 
Line 19: Line 19:
::one of the things that really bug me is '''the''' lack of expert review lol. when searching anything medical related Healthline's like the top results in the first page. the site also generates a fuckton of traffic yet nothing holding them accountable than volunteers on Wikipedia and CRW? damn shit fucked af
::one of the things that really bug me is '''the''' lack of expert review lol. when searching anything medical related Healthline's like the top results in the first page. the site also generates a fuckton of traffic yet nothing holding them accountable than volunteers on Wikipedia and CRW? damn shit fucked af
::anyway nothing for us to do than our work [[User:SinexTitan|SinexTitan]] ([[User talk:SinexTitan|talk]]) 09:42, 24 January 2026 (UTC)
::anyway nothing for us to do than our work [[User:SinexTitan|SinexTitan]] ([[User talk:SinexTitan|talk]]) 09:42, 24 January 2026 (UTC)
:::I agree that AI in its current state is increasing becoming an unwanted mainstay in our society and lives among the general public (I myself am getting AI fatigue). Though like what Keith said, the wiki would need sources from experts debunking those Healthline articles and not us being the entity to debunk them. [[User:Mr Pollo|Mr Pollo]] ([[User talk:Mr Pollo|talk]]) 22:36, 24 January 2026 (UTC)
:::I agree that AI in its current state is increasing becoming an unwanted mainstay in our society and lives among the general public (I myself am getting AI fatigue). Though like what Keith said, the wiki would need sources from experts debunking those Healthline articles and not an unqualified entity like the wiki debunking them (only reporting on the debunking by qualified professionals). [[User:Mr Pollo|Mr Pollo]] ([[User talk:Mr Pollo|talk]]) 22:36, 24 January 2026 (UTC)