QuikTrip: Difference between revisions
added additional information regarding their products |
Added archive URLs for 2 citation(s) using CRWCitationBot |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
This is a list of all consumer-protection incidents this company is involved in. Any incidents not mentioned here can be found in the [[:Category:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|{{PAGENAME}} category]]. | This is a list of all consumer-protection incidents this company is involved in. Any incidents not mentioned here can be found in the [[:Category:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|{{PAGENAME}} category]]. | ||
===QuikTrip Discrimination=== | ===QuikTrip Discrimination=== | ||
On April 2, 2010, [[wikipedia:United_States_Department_of_Justice|U.S Department of Justice]] filed a lawsuit against QuikTrip after complaints about inaccessible parking from two disabled individuals, violating the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). The case was resolved in April 13, 2011 with a $55,000 civil penalty fee and a $1.5 million settlement agreement that requires QuikTrip;<ref>{{Cite web |date=2010-07-16 |title=QuikTrip Settles With DOJ |url=https://www.cspdailynews.com/company-news/quiktrip-settles-doj |url-status=live |access-date=2026-02-22 |website=CSP}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=2010-07-15 |title=Justice Department Reaches Comprehensive Settlement with National Owner of Gas Stations Resolving ADA Claims |url=https://www.justice.gov/archives/opa/pr/justice-department-reaches-comprehensive-settlement-national-owner-gas-stations-resolving-ada |url-status=live |archive-url=https://archive.ada.gov/quiktrip_factsht.htm |access-date=2026-02-21 |website=U.S. Department of Justice}}</ref> | On April 2, 2010, [[wikipedia:United_States_Department_of_Justice|U.S Department of Justice]] filed a lawsuit against QuikTrip after complaints about inaccessible parking from two disabled individuals, violating the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). The case was resolved in April 13, 2011 with a $55,000 civil penalty fee and a $1.5 million settlement agreement that requires QuikTrip;<ref>{{Cite web |date=2010-07-16 |title=QuikTrip Settles With DOJ |url=https://www.cspdailynews.com/company-news/quiktrip-settles-doj |url-status=live |access-date=2026-02-22 |website=CSP |archive-url=http://web.archive.org/web/20201027184201/https://www.cspdailynews.com/company-news/quiktrip-settles-doj |archive-date=27 Oct 2020}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=2010-07-15 |title=Justice Department Reaches Comprehensive Settlement with National Owner of Gas Stations Resolving ADA Claims |url=https://www.justice.gov/archives/opa/pr/justice-department-reaches-comprehensive-settlement-national-owner-gas-stations-resolving-ada |url-status=live |archive-url=https://archive.ada.gov/quiktrip_factsht.htm |access-date=2026-02-21 |website=U.S. Department of Justice}}</ref> | ||
*Achieve and maintain compliance with ADA accessibility requirements | *Achieve and maintain compliance with ADA accessibility requirements | ||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
===Rogers v. QuikTrip Corp Lawsuit=== | ===Rogers v. QuikTrip Corp Lawsuit=== | ||
On May 2008, Mark Rogers, Terry O'Rorke, and William Wilson filed a case against QuikTrip, Love's Travel Stops & Country Stores, and 7-Eleven for failing to disclose ethanol contents inside gas to customers. The case was dismissed on January 19, 2010,<ref>{{Cite web |title=Rogers v. QuikTrip Corp. |url=https://law.justia.com/cases/oklahoma/supreme-court/2010/457990.html |url-status=live |access-date=2026-02-21 |website=Justia US Law}}</ref> ruling that companies don't have to disclose ethanol contents to customers. | On May 2008, Mark Rogers, Terry O'Rorke, and William Wilson filed a case against QuikTrip, Love's Travel Stops & Country Stores, and 7-Eleven for failing to disclose ethanol contents inside gas to customers. The case was dismissed on January 19, 2010,<ref>{{Cite web |title=Rogers v. QuikTrip Corp. |url=https://law.justia.com/cases/oklahoma/supreme-court/2010/457990.html |url-status=live |access-date=2026-02-21 |website=Justia US Law |archive-url=http://web.archive.org/web/20170419051409/http://law.justia.com:80/cases/oklahoma/supreme-court/2010/457990.html |archive-date=19 Apr 2017}}</ref> ruling that companies don't have to disclose ethanol contents to customers. | ||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||