Doordash: Difference between revisions

Line 75:

====Data breach lawsuit (2019)====

In early may Doordash had a data breach with over 4.9 million effected individuals. All users who registered past April 5th 2018 were safe from the data that was stolen.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Whittaker |first=Zack |date=2016-09-26 |title=DoorDash confirms data breach affected 4.9 million customers, workers and merchants |url=https://techcrunch.com/2019/09/26/doordash-data-breach/ |url-status=live |access-date=2025-05-16 |website=Tech Crunch}}</ref> This has resulted in a class action in October 2019 against Doordash for not protecting user data.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Shaak |first=Erin |date=2019-08-04 |title=DoorDash Sued Over 2019 Data Breach Affecting More Than 4.9 Million Users |url=https://www.classaction.org/news/doordash-sued-over-2019-data-breach-affecting-more-than-4-9-million-users |url-status=live |access-date=2025-06-16 |website=Class Action Org |archive-url=http://web.archive.org/web/20250825224250/https://www.classaction.org/news/doordash-sued-over-2019-data-breach-affecting-more-than-4-9-million-users |archive-date=25 Aug 2025}}</ref>

In early may Doordash had a data breach with over 4.9 million effected individuals. All users who registered past April 5th 2018 were safe from the data that was stolen.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Whittaker |first=Zack |date=2016-09-26 |title=DoorDash confirms data breach affected 4.9 million customers, workers and merchants |url=https://techcrunch.com/2019/09/26/doordash-data-breach/ |url-status=live |access-date=2025-05-16 |website=Tech Crunch |archive-url=http://web.archive.org/web/20260223040204/https://techcrunch.com/2019/09/26/doordash-data-breach/ |archive-date=23 Feb 2026}}</ref> This has resulted in a class action in October 2019 against Doordash for not protecting user data.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Shaak |first=Erin |date=2019-08-04 |title=DoorDash Sued Over 2019 Data Breach Affecting More Than 4.9 Million Users |url=https://www.classaction.org/news/doordash-sued-over-2019-data-breach-affecting-more-than-4-9-million-users |url-status=live |access-date=2025-06-16 |website=Class Action Org |archive-url=http://web.archive.org/web/20250825224250/https://www.classaction.org/news/doordash-sued-over-2019-data-breach-affecting-more-than-4-9-million-users |archive-date=25 Aug 2025}}</ref>

====Withholding of tips and subsequent class-action lawsuits (2019)====

Line 85:

====Antitrust litigation (2020)====

The Dacitashvili has filed against Grubhub, Doordash, Postmates and Uber Eats for having a majoritive monopoly over the food delivery market because of the way it selectively signed contracts with businesses to list them on the platform. Many of the clauses stated that delivery prices will be identical to dine in prices.<ref name=":15">{{Cite web |last=Allyn |first=Bobby |date=2020-05-14 |title=Restaurants Are Desperate — But You May Not Be Helping When You Use Delivery Apps |url=https://www.npr.org/2020/05/14/856444431/cities-crack-down-on-food-delivery-app-fees-as-restaurants-struggle-to-survive |url-status=live |access-date=2025-08-30 |website=NPR |archive-url=http://web.archive.org/web/20251228185547/https://www.npr.org/2020/05/14/856444431/cities-crack-down-on-food-delivery-app-fees-as-restaurants-struggle-to-survive |archive-date=28 Dec 2025}}</ref><ref name=":16">{{Cite web |last=Stempel |first=Jonathan |date=2020-04-13 |title=Grubhub, DoorDash, Postmates, Uber Eats are sued over restaurant prices amid pandemic |url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-food-delivery-laws-idUSKCN21V2C1/ |url-status=live |access-date=2020-08-30 |website=Reuters}}</ref> Plaintiffs argued that this increased the cost unfairly to dine-in customers because all defendants required the restaurants to cover the delivery fees ranging from 13% - 40% of revenue.<ref name=":15" /><ref name=":16" /> Keep in mind that restaurants like supermarkets runs on slim profit margins with the average being 3% - 9% total. This case seeks treble damages (multiply all damages by 3) for overcharges from the beginning of 2016 of April from the defendants delivery apps.<ref name=":15" /><ref name=":16" /><ref>{{Cite web |date=2020-04-13 |title=Case 1:20-cv-03000-LAK Document |url=https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/6890558/DAVITASHVILI-v-Grubhub-ET-AL.txt |url-status=live |archive-date= |access-date=2025-08-30 |website=S3 Documentcloud |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20260223040552/https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/6890558/DAVITASHVILI-v-Grubhub-ET-AL.txt |archive-date=23 Feb 2026}}</ref> Many preliminaries have happened since then but is unclear when the trial will actually begin.

The Dacitashvili has filed against Grubhub, Doordash, Postmates and Uber Eats for having a majoritive monopoly over the food delivery market because of the way it selectively signed contracts with businesses to list them on the platform. Many of the clauses stated that delivery prices will be identical to dine in prices.<ref name=":15">{{Cite web |last=Allyn |first=Bobby |date=2020-05-14 |title=Restaurants Are Desperate — But You May Not Be Helping When You Use Delivery Apps |url=https://www.npr.org/2020/05/14/856444431/cities-crack-down-on-food-delivery-app-fees-as-restaurants-struggle-to-survive |url-status=live |access-date=2025-08-30 |website=NPR |archive-url=http://web.archive.org/web/20251228185547/https://www.npr.org/2020/05/14/856444431/cities-crack-down-on-food-delivery-app-fees-as-restaurants-struggle-to-survive |archive-date=28 Dec 2025}}</ref><ref name=":16">{{Cite web |last=Stempel |first=Jonathan |date=2020-04-13 |title=Grubhub, DoorDash, Postmates, Uber Eats are sued over restaurant prices amid pandemic |url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-food-delivery-laws-idUSKCN21V2C1/ |url-status=live |access-date=2020-08-30 |website=Reuters |archive-url=http://web.archive.org/web/20230527142554/https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-food-delivery-laws-idUSKCN21V2C1 |archive-date=27 May 2023}}</ref> Plaintiffs argued that this increased the cost unfairly to dine-in customers because all defendants required the restaurants to cover the delivery fees ranging from 13% - 40% of revenue.<ref name=":15" /><ref name=":16" /> Keep in mind that restaurants like supermarkets runs on slim profit margins with the average being 3% - 9% total. This case seeks treble damages (multiply all damages by 3) for overcharges from the beginning of 2016 of April from the defendants delivery apps.<ref name=":15" /><ref name=":16" /><ref>{{Cite web |date=2020-04-13 |title=Case 1:20-cv-03000-LAK Document |url=https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/6890558/DAVITASHVILI-v-Grubhub-ET-AL.txt |url-status=live |archive-date= |access-date=2025-08-30 |website=S3 Documentcloud |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20260223040552/https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/6890558/DAVITASHVILI-v-Grubhub-ET-AL.txt |archive-date=23 Feb 2026}}</ref> Many preliminaries have happened since then but is unclear when the trial will actually begin.

====Litigation for illegal unauthorized restaurant listing (2021)====

@@ Line 75: / Line 75: @@
 ====Data breach lawsuit (2019)====
-In early may Doordash had a data breach with over 4.9 million effected individuals. All users who registered past April 5th 2018 were safe from the data that was stolen.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Whittaker |first=Zack |date=2016-09-26 |title=DoorDash confirms data breach affected 4.9 million customers, workers and merchants |url=https://techcrunch.com/2019/09/26/doordash-data-breach/ |url-status=live |access-date=2025-05-16 |website=Tech Crunch}}</ref> This has resulted in a class action in October 2019 against Doordash for not protecting user data.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Shaak |first=Erin |date=2019-08-04 |title=DoorDash Sued Over 2019 Data Breach Affecting More Than 4.9 Million Users |url=https://www.classaction.org/news/doordash-sued-over-2019-data-breach-affecting-more-than-4-9-million-users |url-status=live |access-date=2025-06-16 |website=Class Action Org |archive-url=http://web.archive.org/web/20250825224250/https://www.classaction.org/news/doordash-sued-over-2019-data-breach-affecting-more-than-4-9-million-users |archive-date=25 Aug 2025}}</ref>
+In early may Doordash had a data breach with over 4.9 million effected individuals. All users who registered past April 5th 2018 were safe from the data that was stolen.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Whittaker |first=Zack |date=2016-09-26 |title=DoorDash confirms data breach affected 4.9 million customers, workers and merchants |url=https://techcrunch.com/2019/09/26/doordash-data-breach/ |url-status=live |access-date=2025-05-16 |website=Tech Crunch |archive-url=http://web.archive.org/web/20260223040204/https://techcrunch.com/2019/09/26/doordash-data-breach/ |archive-date=23 Feb 2026}}</ref> This has resulted in a class action in October 2019 against Doordash for not protecting user data.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Shaak |first=Erin |date=2019-08-04 |title=DoorDash Sued Over 2019 Data Breach Affecting More Than 4.9 Million Users |url=https://www.classaction.org/news/doordash-sued-over-2019-data-breach-affecting-more-than-4-9-million-users |url-status=live |access-date=2025-06-16 |website=Class Action Org |archive-url=http://web.archive.org/web/20250825224250/https://www.classaction.org/news/doordash-sued-over-2019-data-breach-affecting-more-than-4-9-million-users |archive-date=25 Aug 2025}}</ref>
 ====Withholding of tips and subsequent class-action lawsuits (2019)====
@@ Line 85: / Line 85: @@
 ====Antitrust litigation (2020)====
-The Dacitashvili has filed against Grubhub, Doordash, Postmates and Uber Eats for having a majoritive monopoly over the food delivery market because of the way it selectively signed contracts with businesses to list them on the platform. Many of the clauses stated that delivery prices will be identical to dine in prices.<ref name=":15">{{Cite web |last=Allyn |first=Bobby |date=2020-05-14 |title=Restaurants Are Desperate — But You May Not Be Helping When You Use Delivery Apps |url=https://www.npr.org/2020/05/14/856444431/cities-crack-down-on-food-delivery-app-fees-as-restaurants-struggle-to-survive |url-status=live |access-date=2025-08-30 |website=NPR |archive-url=http://web.archive.org/web/20251228185547/https://www.npr.org/2020/05/14/856444431/cities-crack-down-on-food-delivery-app-fees-as-restaurants-struggle-to-survive |archive-date=28 Dec 2025}}</ref><ref name=":16">{{Cite web |last=Stempel |first=Jonathan |date=2020-04-13 |title=Grubhub, DoorDash, Postmates, Uber Eats are sued over restaurant prices amid pandemic |url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-food-delivery-laws-idUSKCN21V2C1/ |url-status=live |access-date=2020-08-30 |website=Reuters}}</ref> Plaintiffs argued that this increased the cost unfairly to dine-in customers because all defendants required the restaurants to cover the delivery fees ranging from 13% - 40% of revenue.<ref name=":15" /><ref name=":16" /> Keep in mind that restaurants like supermarkets runs on slim profit margins with the average being 3% - 9% total. This case seeks treble damages (multiply all damages by 3) for overcharges from the beginning of 2016 of April from the defendants delivery apps.<ref name=":15" /><ref name=":16" /><ref>{{Cite web |date=2020-04-13 |title=Case 1:20-cv-03000-LAK Document |url=https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/6890558/DAVITASHVILI-v-Grubhub-ET-AL.txt |url-status=live |archive-date= |access-date=2025-08-30 |website=S3 Documentcloud |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20260223040552/https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/6890558/DAVITASHVILI-v-Grubhub-ET-AL.txt |archive-date=23 Feb 2026}}</ref> Many preliminaries have happened since then but is unclear when the trial will actually begin.
+The Dacitashvili has filed against Grubhub, Doordash, Postmates and Uber Eats for having a majoritive monopoly over the food delivery market because of the way it selectively signed contracts with businesses to list them on the platform. Many of the clauses stated that delivery prices will be identical to dine in prices.<ref name=":15">{{Cite web |last=Allyn |first=Bobby |date=2020-05-14 |title=Restaurants Are Desperate — But You May Not Be Helping When You Use Delivery Apps |url=https://www.npr.org/2020/05/14/856444431/cities-crack-down-on-food-delivery-app-fees-as-restaurants-struggle-to-survive |url-status=live |access-date=2025-08-30 |website=NPR |archive-url=http://web.archive.org/web/20251228185547/https://www.npr.org/2020/05/14/856444431/cities-crack-down-on-food-delivery-app-fees-as-restaurants-struggle-to-survive |archive-date=28 Dec 2025}}</ref><ref name=":16">{{Cite web |last=Stempel |first=Jonathan |date=2020-04-13 |title=Grubhub, DoorDash, Postmates, Uber Eats are sued over restaurant prices amid pandemic |url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-food-delivery-laws-idUSKCN21V2C1/ |url-status=live |access-date=2020-08-30 |website=Reuters |archive-url=http://web.archive.org/web/20230527142554/https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-food-delivery-laws-idUSKCN21V2C1 |archive-date=27 May 2023}}</ref> Plaintiffs argued that this increased the cost unfairly to dine-in customers because all defendants required the restaurants to cover the delivery fees ranging from 13% - 40% of revenue.<ref name=":15" /><ref name=":16" /> Keep in mind that restaurants like supermarkets runs on slim profit margins with the average being 3% - 9% total. This case seeks treble damages (multiply all damages by 3) for overcharges from the beginning of 2016 of April from the defendants delivery apps.<ref name=":15" /><ref name=":16" /><ref>{{Cite web |date=2020-04-13 |title=Case 1:20-cv-03000-LAK Document |url=https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/6890558/DAVITASHVILI-v-Grubhub-ET-AL.txt |url-status=live |archive-date= |access-date=2025-08-30 |website=S3 Documentcloud |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20260223040552/https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/6890558/DAVITASHVILI-v-Grubhub-ET-AL.txt |archive-date=23 Feb 2026}}</ref> Many preliminaries have happened since then but is unclear when the trial will actually begin.
 ====Litigation for illegal unauthorized restaurant listing (2021)====