Deprecated: Use of MediaWiki\Skin\Skin::appendSpecialPagesLinkIfAbsent was deprecated in MediaWiki 1.44. [Called from MediaWiki\Skin\Skin::buildSidebar in /var/www/html/includes/skins/Skin.php at line 1639] in /var/www/html/includes/debug/MWDebug.php on line 386
Jump to content

Talk:JavaScript: Difference between revisions

From Consumer Rights Wiki
 
Rudxain (talk | contribs)
Line 1: Line 1:
== maybe better to move this to 'Forced JavaScript on websites' and narrow the scope or something? ==
==maybe better to move this to 'Forced JavaScript on websites' and narrow the scope or something?==


This article currently reads as an opinionated article about how bad a programming language is. Whether it's valid or not is beyond me, but I'm not sure it really fits the wiki, especially as it's a bit of a stretch to call it a 'product'. An incident/theme page on javascript being forced for tracking etc. could make ore sense instead? [[User:Keith|Keith]] ([[User talk:Keith|talk]]) 08:12, 18 March 2026 (UTC)
This article currently reads as an opinionated article about how bad a programming language is. Whether it's valid or not is beyond me, but I'm not sure it really fits the wiki, especially as it's a bit of a stretch to call it a 'product'. An incident/theme page on javascript being forced for tracking etc. could make ore sense instead? [[User:Keith|Keith]] ([[User talk:Keith|talk]]) 08:12, 18 March 2026 (UTC)
:I agree, it's not a product, it's a web-tech, like [[Web cookie|cookies]]. I think that if there's an article about cookies, there should be one about JS [[User:Rudxain|Rudxain]] ([[User talk:Rudxain|talk]]) 08:28, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

Revision as of 08:28, 18 March 2026

maybe better to move this to 'Forced JavaScript on websites' and narrow the scope or something?

This article currently reads as an opinionated article about how bad a programming language is. Whether it's valid or not is beyond me, but I'm not sure it really fits the wiki, especially as it's a bit of a stretch to call it a 'product'. An incident/theme page on javascript being forced for tracking etc. could make ore sense instead? Keith (talk) 08:12, 18 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

I agree, it's not a product, it's a web-tech, like cookies. I think that if there's an article about cookies, there should be one about JS Rudxain (talk) 08:28, 18 March 2026 (UTC)Reply