Talk:Apple's anti-repair and anti-refurbishment practices: Difference between revisions
→Question: new section |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
:I wonder whether this might be better reframed - as the practices that lead to e-waste are often anti-consumer, we should be framing them from an anti-consumer perspective rather than an environmental one. maybe 'Apple's anti-repair and anti-refurbishment practices', or something similar? [[User:Keith|Keith]] ([[User talk:Keith|talk]]) 15:58, 11 September 2025 (UTC) | :I wonder whether this might be better reframed - as the practices that lead to e-waste are often anti-consumer, we should be framing them from an anti-consumer perspective rather than an environmental one. maybe 'Apple's anti-repair and anti-refurbishment practices', or something similar? [[User:Keith|Keith]] ([[User talk:Keith|talk]]) 15:58, 11 September 2025 (UTC) | ||
::Its focus from the start has been from a consumer perspective, but it was just difficult coming up with a good name for the article lol [[User:JamesTDG|JamesTDG]] ([[User talk:JamesTDG|talk]]) 08:32, 12 September 2025 (UTC) | ::Its focus from the start has been from a consumer perspective, but it was just difficult coming up with a good name for the article lol [[User:JamesTDG|JamesTDG]] ([[User talk:JamesTDG|talk]]) 08:32, 12 September 2025 (UTC) | ||
== Question == | |||
I am unable to see how "Blocking 3rd-party apps" falls under anti-repair and anti-refurbishment (if we are talking about general Jailbreaking/Cydia or alternative app stores). I feel like it should stay on the main Apple article. [[User:Mr Pollo|Mr Pollo]] ([[User talk:Mr Pollo|talk]]) 16:25, 12 September 2025 (UTC) | |||