Jump to content

Wikipedia: Difference between revisions

From Consumer Rights Wiki
← Older editNewer edit →
VisualWikitext
Line 20: Line 20:
==Incidents==
==Incidents==
This is a list of all incidents, especially those related to consumer protection, that this platform is involved in. Any incidents not mentioned here can be found in the [[:Category:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|{{PAGENAME}} category]].
This is a list of all incidents, especially those related to consumer protection, that this platform is involved in. Any incidents not mentioned here can be found in the [[:Category:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|{{PAGENAME}} category]].


==="Name and shame" pages===
==="Name and shame" pages===

Revision as of 13:53, 2 December 2025

Wikipedia
Basic information
Founded 2001
Legal structure Private
Industry Web encyclopedia
Official website https://wikipedia.org/


Wikipedia is a digital encyclopedic platform which was founded in 2001 and is currently operated by American non-profit organization Wikimedia Foundation.

Consumer-impact summary

The encyclopedia is a major destination for consumers/readers to access information about any given topics, ranging from natural sciences to political fields. Theoretically, the encyclopedia is open for editing by anyone, meaning that consumers/readers can become producers/editors at any time.[1]

Monopoly

Although Wikipedia formally enshrines the right to fork contents from them in order to start a new encyclopedia, it has been reported that Wikipedia effectively operated as a de facto monopoly among online encyclopedias for a long time, and Wikipedia had received privileged positions by various search engines such as Google on their search results. Social media service TikTok included similar information from Wikipedia in their search results. Besides that, Wikipedia is one of the top sources for AI chatbots.[2][3][4][5]

Consequently, Wikipedia's monopoly had generated significant downstream effects where Wikipedia had played crucial roles in shaping medical decisions, economic outcomes, scientific publications, and perhaps judicial rulings.[6][7][8][9] Wikipedia is even included among longtermist knowledge preservation initiatives such as the Arch Mission's The LEO (Low Earth Orbit) library, The Lunar Library I on the failed Beresheet lunar lander, The Lunar Library II on the failed Astrobotic Peregrine lander, The Galactic Legacy Archive on a successful Intuitive Machines moon lander mission, and The Pyramid Library on the successful Firefly Aerospace’s Blue Ghost lander mission.[10][11][12][13][14]

Incidents

This is a list of all incidents, especially those related to consumer protection, that this platform is involved in. Any incidents not mentioned here can be found in the Wikipedia category.

"Name and shame" pages

On Wikipedia, there are publicly-visible "name and shame" pages such as "Sockpuppet investigation" casepages (SPI) and Long-term abuse pages (LTA) whose ostensible aims are for assisting anti-vandalism purposes.[15][16] Pages in the latter category often contain personally-identifiable attributes of users who're branded as "long term abusers" (LTA) for supposedly engaging in disruptions against the Wikipedia over a long period, including IP addresses, full legal names.[17][18][19][20] In at least one case where a user accused of being an LTA is an apparent juvenile, no special measures to consider their privacy rights (i.e. hiding LTA pages to only audiences with Wikipedia accounts) are apparently observed. [21][22][23][24] Such practices may risk violating GDPR as there's also a case where scientific researchers based in Czech Republic and Slovakia were doxxed that way due to accusations that they had engaged in self-promoting edits on Wikipedia. At a glance, little to no fact-checking and quality checking processes were observed in the LTA page creation process, which may mean that some or all accusations in some if not all of LTA pages may be inaccurate and could therefore constitute defamation/libel.[25][26]

Orangemoody scandal

On September 2015, Wikipedia was hit by the Orangemoody blackmail scandal, as it came to light that hundreds of businesses and minor celebrities had faced demands for payment from rogue editors to publish, protect or update Wikipedia articles on them.[27]

Scots Wikipedia scandal

On August 2020, a Reddit user publicized that a prolific Scots Wikipedia administrator did not speak the Scots language; tens of thousands of articles were in fact English with eye dialect spellings to suggest a Scottish accent, or word-by-word machine translations of articles from English Wikipedia. Wikimedia users debated recruiting fluent speakers of Scots to repair the articles, reverting all edits from the administrator in question, or – as the latter would entail removing nearly half the articles in the encyclopedia – even deleting and restarting Scots Wikipedia afresh. The Guardian attributed the problem to systemic issues in Wikipedia culture, suggesting that some administrators are afforded effectively unchecked power based on sheer volume of edits (rather than the quality of their work). Robyn Speer, chief scientist at Luminoso, expressed concern that artificial intelligence corpora which used Wikipedia for language-training data had been corrupted by the pseudo-Scots.[28][29][30]

References

  1. ↑ McGrady, Ryan (14 May 2025). "What Attacks on Wikipedia Reveal about Free Expression | TechPolicy.Press". Tech Policy Press. Retrieved 21 November 2025.
  2. ↑ "Wikipedia:Content forks". Wikipedia. 16 October 2025. Retrieved 21 November 2025.
  3. ↑ "Introducing Justapedia". Quillette. 11 December 2023. Retrieved 21 November 2025.
  4. ↑ Sato, Mia (13 September 2023). "TikTok has quietly been inserting Wikipedia snippets into search results". The Verge. Retrieved 21 November 2025.
  5. ↑ Schaul, Kevin; Chen, Szu Yu; Tiku, Nitasha. "Inside the secret list of websites that make AI like ChatGPT sound smart". Washington Post. Retrieved 21 November 2025.
  6. ↑ Beck, Julie (5 March 2014). "Doctors' #1 Source for Healthcare Information: Wikipedia". The Atlantic. Retrieved 21 November 2025.
  7. ↑ Hinnosaar, Marit; Hinnosaar, Toomas; Kummer, Michael; Slivko, Olga (2023). "Wikipedia matters". Journal of Economics & Management Strategy. pp. 657–669. doi:10.1111/jems.12421. Retrieved 21 November 2025.
  8. ↑ Neil, Thompson,; Douglas, Hanley, (13 February 2018). "Science Is Shaped by Wikipedia: Evidence From a Randomized Control Trial". doi:10.2139/. Retrieved 21 November 2025. {{cite web}}: Check |doi= value (help)CS1 maint: extra punctuation (link) CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  9. ↑ "Trial by Internet: A Randomized Field Experiment on Wikipedia's Influence on Judges' Legal Reasoning". Cambridge University Press. Retrieved 21 November 2025.
  10. ↑ "The LEO Library: Constellation 1". Arch Mission Foundation - Preserving humanity forever, in space and on Earth. Retrieved 21 November 2025.
  11. ↑ "The Lunar Library: Genesis". Arch Mission Foundation - Preserving humanity forever, in space and on Earth.
  12. ↑ "Lunar Library II". Arch Mission Foundation - Preserving humanity forever, in space and on Earth.
  13. ↑ "Galactic Legacy Archive". Arch Mission Foundation - Preserving humanity forever, in space and on Earth.
  14. ↑ "Galactic Legacy Archive". Arch Mission Foundation - Preserving humanity forever, in space and on Earth. Retrieved 21 November 2025.
  15. ↑ "Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations". Wikipedia. 7 November 2025. Retrieved 21 November 2025.
  16. ↑ "Wikipedia:Long-term abuse". Wikipedia. 20 October 2025. Retrieved 21 November 2025.
  17. ↑ "Wikipedia talk:Long-term abuse/Archive 6". Wikipedia. 15 September 2025.
  18. ↑ "Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Ananny". Wikipedia. 3 October 2025. Retrieved 21 November 2025.
  19. ↑ "Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Bambifan101". Wikipedia. 21 November 2024.
  20. ↑ "Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Tirgil34". Wikipedia. 23 September 2024. Retrieved 21 November 2025.
  21. ↑ "Wikipedia talk:Long-term abuse/Archive 6". Wikipedia. 15 September 2025.
  22. ↑ "Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Ananny". Wikipedia. 3 October 2025. Retrieved 21 November 2025.
  23. ↑ "Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Bambifan101". Wikipedia. 21 November 2024.
  24. ↑ "Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Tirgil34". Wikipedia. 23 September 2024. Retrieved 21 November 2025.
  25. ↑ "Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Europeanhematology". Wikipedia. 24 March 2020. Retrieved 21 November 2025.
  26. ↑ "Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/DEATH TO COVID". Wikipedia. 4 May 2024. Retrieved 21 November 2025.
  27. ↑ Merrill, Jamie (September 2, 2015). "Wikipedia rocked by 'rogue editors' blackmail scam targeting small businesses and celebrities". The Independent. Archived from the original on September 13, 2015. Retrieved September 3, 2017.
  28. ↑ McDonald, Karl (August 26, 2020). "Scots Wikipedia taken over by American teenager who wrote thousands of 'very odd' articles without learning language". inews.co.uk. Archived from the original on August 26, 2020. Retrieved August 26, 2020.
  29. ↑ Brooks, Libby; Hern, Alex (August 26, 2020). "Shock an aw: US teenager wrote huge slice of Scots Wikipedia". The Guardian. Retrieved August 26, 2020.
  30. ↑ McCarthy, Kieren (August 26, 2020). "Um, almost the entire Scots Wikipedia was written by someone with no idea of the language – 10,000s of articles". The Register. Retrieved August 26, 2020.
Retrieved from "https://mirror.consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=Wikipedia&oldid=31485"