Jump to content

7-Eleven: Difference between revisions

From Consumer Rights Wiki
Incomplete and relevance notices; article needs SEVERE work
SquidthePlummer (talk | contribs)
added a lot of links (lots of links . . . ) , information, incident, impact summary, lawsuits, and essentially cleaned the article up to be more fitting of the consumer rights wiki policies.
Line 7: Line 7:
|Website=https://www.7-eleven.com/
|Website=https://www.7-eleven.com/
|Description=Founded in 1927, it's an American retailer store that is an subsidiary of Seven-Eleven Japan, which is owned by Seven & I Holdings.
|Description=Founded in 1927, it's an American retailer store that is an subsidiary of Seven-Eleven Japan, which is owned by Seven & I Holdings.
}}7-Eleven is an American retailer store that is an subsidiary of Seven eleven Japan that is owned by Seven  & I Holdings. Founded in 1927 by Joe C. Thompson''', origionally known as Southland Ice Company''', it operated  [[wikipedia:Ice_house_(building)|ice houses]] in Dallas Texas until it became an subsidiary of Southland Corporation. As a result of new ownership, all the retailers were named to  Tote'm Stores, until renamed to 7-eleven in 1947 to reflect their new hours of 7am - 11 pm. <ref>{{Cite web |first=Popular Timelines |date=2026-01-29 |title=7-Eleven |url=https://populartimelines.com/timeline/7-Eleven |url-status=live |access-date=2026-01-29 |website=Popular Timelines}}</ref>  
}}7-Eleven is an American retailer store that is an subsidiary of Seven eleven Japan that is owned by Seven  & I Holdings. Founded in 1927 by Joe C. Thompson''',''' originally known as Southland Ice Company, operated  [[wikipedia:Ice_house_(building)|ice houses]] in Dallas Texas until it became an subsidiary of Southland Corporation. As a result of new ownership, all the retailers were named to  Tote'm Stores, until renamed to 7-eleven in 1947 to reflect their new hours at 7am - 11 pm. <ref>{{Cite web |first=Popular Timelines |date=2026-01-29 |title=7-Eleven |url=https://populartimelines.com/timeline/7-Eleven |url-status=live |access-date=2026-01-29 |website=Popular Timelines}}</ref>  


==Consumer-impact summary==
==Consumer-impact summary==
{{Ph-C-CIS}}
 
* False Advertising
* Privacy Violations
* Security Vulnerabilities


==Incidents==
==Incidents==
This is a list of all consumer-protection incidents this company is involved in. Any incidents not mentioned here can be found in the [[:Category:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|{{PAGENAME}} category]].
This is a list of all consumer-protection incidents this company is involved in. Any incidents not mentioned here can be found in the [[:Category:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|{{PAGENAME}} category]].
===7-Eleven Sold Vape Near Schools===
===7-Eleven Fuel App Security Breach in Australia and Japan===
{{Main|link to the main CR Wiki article}}
{{Main|link to the main CR Wiki article}}
https://www.fox5dc.com/news/7-eleven-pay-1-2-million-settle-lawsuit-over-illegal-vape-sales-near-dc-schools
On July 2, 2019, an customer contacted the company about unauthorized charges, resulting in an investigation that discovered hackers gaining access to some accounts,<ref>{{Cite web |date=2019-07-08 |title=7-Eleven Japan suspends mobile app after data breach |url=https://www.paymentsdive.com/ex/mpt/news/7-eleven-japan-suspends-mobile-app-after-data-breach/? |url-status=live |access-date=2026-01-31 |website=Payments Dive}}</ref> affecting 900 customers and resulting in more than $500,000 lost in fraudulent purchases.<ref name=":0">{{Cite web |last=Coble |first=Sarah |date=2019-10-19 |title=Drivers' Data Exposed in 7-Eleven Fuel App Breach |url=https://www.infosecurity-magazine.com/news/drivers-data-exposed-in-7eleven/ |url-status=live |access-date=2026-01-31 |website=Infosecurity Magazine}}</ref> The company issued an apology for the incident and stated that customers will be compensated for the incident, eventually leading to the creation of the customer support emergency number to help those affected. Two Chinese men were arrested in connection with this incident.   
 
===7-Eleven Recorded people faces from survey responses without consent===
https://7news.com.au/news/7-eleven-investigation-into-facial-recognition-privacy-breaches-closed-by-oaic-c-16201287


===Underpaying It's Employees scandal===
On October 25, 2019, an customer from Australia reported the breach when he was able to access other customers personal information. In response, 7-Eleven temporary shut down the app, describing it as "an maintenance issue", and opening the app at 5:30 pm.<ref name=":0" /> It is unclear how many customer's were affected,<ref>{{Cite web |last=Hudson |first=Kristin |date=2019-11-01 |title=7-Eleven Customer Data Exposed in App Security Breach |url=https://www.identityiq.com/articles/7-eleven-customer-data-exposed-in-app-security-breach |url-status=live |access-date=2026-01-31 |website=Identity IQ}}</ref> however the hacker was never found.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-10-30/7-11-pays-back-$176-million-worth-of-backpay-super-to-staff/12831176


==Lawsuits==
==Lawsuits==
Smt smt
{| class="wikitable"
{| class="wikitable"
|+
|Controversy
!Date
|Date
!Name
|Description
!Result
|Result
!URL
|Related article
|-
|- valign="top"
|
|7-Eleven Collected Facial Imagery of customers in Australia
|
|2020
|
|In June 2020, 7-Eleven introduced an survey called feedback kioskst hat customers voluntary participate in a survey about their experience. Conducted on tablets, it collected facial images of customers without their consent.
|
|7-Eleven was ordered to cease this practice and destroy any collected data.
|-
|<ref>{{Cite web |last=Kwan |first=Campbell |date=2021-10-13 |title=7-Eleven breached customer privacy by collecting facial imagery without consent |url=https://www.zdnet.com/article/7-eleven-collected-customer-facial-imagery-during-in-store-surveys-without-consent/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20260131225830/https://www.zdnet.com/article/7-eleven-collected-customer-facial-imagery-during-in-store-surveys-without-consent/ |archive-date=2026-01-31 |access-date=2026-01-31 |website=ZDnet}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Marzouk |first=Zack |date=2021-10-14 |title=7-Eleven biometric data collection found in breach of Australian privacy laws |url=https://www.itpro.com/security/privacy/361232/7-eleven-biometrics-data-breached-australia-data-laws |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20260131230152/https://www.itpro.com/security/privacy/361232/7-eleven-biometrics-data-breached-australia-data-laws |archive-date=2026-01-31 |access-date=2026-01-31 |website=ITPro}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=2022-02-07 |title=Privacy and biometric information. 7-Eleven breaches customer’s privacy |url=https://kkilawyers.com.au/privacy-and-biometric-information-7-eleven-breaches-customers-privacy/ |url-status=live |access-date=2026-01-31 |website=Kalus Kenny Intelex Lawyers}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Thomas |first=Liisa |last2=Dao |first2=Anne |date=2021-11-17 |title=Australia Objects to 7-Eleven’s In-Store Use of Facial Recognition Technology |url=https://www.eyeonprivacy.com/2021/11/australia-objects-to-store-use-facial-recognition-technology/ |url-status=live |website=Sheppard Mullin}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Chapman |first=Alex |last2=Mitchell |first2=Stefan |date=2021-10-14 |title=7-Eleven told to delete customers’ photos after facial recognition software falls under privacy commissioner’s scope |url=https://7news.com.au/technology/7-eleven-told-to-delete-customers-photos-after-facial-recognition-software-falls-under-privacy-commissioners-scope-c-4236266 |url-status=live |access-date=2026-01-31 |website=7News}}</ref>
|
|- valign="top"
|
|False advertising on JUUL e-cigarettes.
|
|2021
|
|7-Eleven was sued for false advertising of the product, JUUL e-cigarettes, for alleging that it was a safer alternative to traditional cigarettes, which prior to 2018, claimed that it contained no nicotine.
|-
|The lawsuit was settled, with 7-Eleven paying $1.2 million and having the company implement a monitoring program.
|
|<ref>{{Cite web |last=Smith |first=Anna |date=2021-10-18 |title=7-Eleven Hit With Class Action for Allegedly Hiding Harmfulness of JUUL Products |url=https://topclassactions.com/lawsuit-settlements/consumer-products/ecigarette/7-eleven-hit-with-class-action-for-allegedly-hiding-harmfulness-of-juul-products/ |url-status=live |access-date=2026-01-31 |website=Top Class Actions}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=2026-01-31 |title=JUUL E-cigarettes Sold at 7-Eleven |url=https://truthinadvertising.org/class-action/juul-e-cigarettes-sold-at-7-eleven/ |url-status=live |access-date=2026-01-31 |website=Truth in Advertising}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Rizzi |first=Corrado |date=2021-10-18 |title=Class Action Claims 7-Eleven Failed to Warn of Juul E-Cigarette Dangers |url=https://www.classaction.org/news/class-action-claims-7-eleven-failed-to-warn-of-juul-e-cigarette-dangers |url-status=live |access-date=2026-01-31 |website=Class Action}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Thrasher |first=Tyler |date=2025-09-09 |title=7-Eleven to pay $1.2 million to settle lawsuit over illegal vape sales near DC schools |url=https://www.fox5dc.com/news/7-eleven-pay-1-2-million-settle-lawsuit-over-illegal-vape-sales-near-dc-schools |url-status=live |access-date=2026-01-31 |website=Fox5 Washington DC}}</ref>
|
|- valign="top"
|
|7-Eleven False Advertising on Onion Chips
|
|2021
|A class action lawsuit alleges 7-Eleven is misleading customers with their product “Yumions” as an “crunchy onion snack”, while only containing small amounts of onions.
|The case is still ongoing
|<ref>{{Cite web |last=Shaak |first=Erin |date=2021-01-12 |title=7-Eleven ‘Yumions’ Packaging Misleads Consumers About Onion Content, Class Action Says |url=https://www.classaction.org/news/7-eleven-yumions-packaging-misleads-consumers-about-onion-content-class-action-says |access-date=2026-01-31 |website=Class Action}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=2026-01-31 |title=Yumions Crunchy Onion Snacks |url=https://truthinadvertising.org/class-action/yumions-crunchy-onion-snacks/ |url-status=live |access-date=2026-01-31 |website=Truth in Advertising}}</ref>
|- valign="top"
|7-Eleven Collected Biometric Data of customers in Illinois
|2022
|7-Eleven used surveillance system from Clickit to collect biometric data from customers without their knowledge, violating the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act.
|The case was dismissed without prejudice by the plaintiff,  however the reason or behind remains unknown.
|<ref>{{Cite web |last=Rizzi |first=Corrado |date=2022-04-26 |title=7-Eleven Hit with Class Action Over Alleged Collection of Biometric Data in Illinois Stores |url=https://www.classaction.org/news/7-eleven-hit-with-class-action-over-alleged-collection-of-biometric-data-in-illinois-stores |url-status=live |access-date=2026-01-31 |website=Class Action}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=2022-04-27 |title=7-Eleven Class Action Alleges Retailer Violates Customers’ Biometric Privacy |url=https://topclassactions.com/lawsuit-settlements/privacy/7-eleven-class-action-alleges-retailer-violates-customers-biometric-privacy/ |url-status=live |access-date=2026-01-31 |website=Top Class Actions}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=2022-04-28 |title=7-Eleven Faces Class-Action Suit Over Collection of Biometric Customer Data |url=https://csnews.com/7-eleven-faces-class-action-suit-over-collection-biometric-customer-data |url-status=live |access-date=2026-01-31 |website=Convenience Store News}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=2026-01-31 |title=Hess et al v. 7-Eleven, Inc. |url=https://dockets.justia.com/docket/illinois/ilndce/1:2022cv02131/414495 |url-status=live |access-date=2026-01-31 |website=Justia Dockets & Findings}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Shah |first=Manish |date=2022-04-25 |title=Hess v. 7-Eleven, Inc. (1:22-cv-02131) |url=https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/63261889/hess-v-7-eleven-inc/ |url-status=live |access-date=2026-01-31 |website=Court Listener}}</ref>
|- valign="top"
|7-Eleven false advertising Wellness Tonic as better alternative to alcohol
|2023
|7-Eleven and the manufacturer, Botanic Tonics, advertised Feel Free Wellness Tonics, as a safe, sober, and healthy alternative to alcohol despite containing kratom, an addictive opioid.
|The case reached a settlement of $8,750,000, requiring 7-Eleven to add kratom warnings on product labels and advertisements.
|<ref>{{Cite web |last=Mehorter |first=Kelly |date=2025-04-15 |title=$8.75 Million Botanic Tonics Settlement Reached in Feel Free Kratom Lawsuit |url=https://www.classaction.org/news/8.75-million-botanic-tonics-settlement-reached-in-feel-free-kratom-lawsuit |url-status=live |access-date=2026-01-31 |website=Class Action}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Avery |first=Brad |date=2023-04-06 |title=Class Action Alleges Feel Free, 7-Eleven Misled Consumers About Addiction Risk |url=https://www.bevnet.com/news/2023/class-action-alleges-feel-free-7-eleven-misled-consumers-about-addiction-risk/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20260131234902/https://www.bevnet.com/news/2023/class-action-alleges-feel-free-7-eleven-misled-consumers-about-addiction-risk/ |archive-date=2026-01-31 |access-date=2026-01-31 |website=bevnet}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Hanson |first=Natalie |date=2023-12-21 |title=7-Eleven must face liability claims over sales of a drink containing kratom |url=https://www.courthousenews.com/7-eleven-must-face-liability-claims-for-selling-drink-containing-kratom/ |url-status=live |access-date=2026-01-31 |website=Courthouse News Service}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=2026-01-31 |title=Torres v. Botanic Tonics, LLC |url=https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/9610947/torres-v-botanic-tonics-llc/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://cases.justia.com/federal/district-courts/california/candce/3:2023cv01460/410183/82/0.pdf |website=Court Listener}}</ref>
|}
|}
https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2025/12/7-eleven-pay-record-45-million-penalty-settle-ftc-antitrust-order-violation-case
https://evilcorporations.com/7-eleven-worker-misclassification-neoliberalism/
Too much control over franchisees
https://evilcorporations.com/7-eleven-worker-misclassification-neoliberalism/
https://unhappyfranchisee.com/7-eleven-class-action-franchise-lawsuit-brewing/
https://unhappyfranchisee.com/nj-lawsuit-7-eleven-franchise-scam/
https://unhappyfranchisee.com/7-eleven-franchise-lawsuits-vikram-bhalla-vs-7-eleven-inc/
7- eleven Surveilling and Stalking their employees
https://unhappyfranchisee.com/7-eleven-franchise-lawsuit-adnan-khan/
7-Eleven Running Background Checks on individuals without their knowledge 
https://topclassactions.com/lawsuit-settlements/employment-labor/7-eleven-will-pay-2m-settle-background-check-class-action/
Wage Violations (bro wtf is this company bro . . .)
https://www.dol.gov/newsroom/releases/sol/sol20230929
Collected Customer Bio-metric Data Without consent nor clarification
https://www.classaction.org/news/7-eleven-hit-with-class-action-over-alleged-collection-of-biometric-data-in-illinois-stores
https://kkilawyers.com.au/privacy-and-biometric-information-7-eleven-breaches-customers-privacy/
https://www.thelawyermag.com/au/news/general/7-eleven-found-breaching-customer-privacy-with-feedback-form/315839
Collected Facial Images of customers and storing them without consent
https://www.zdnet.com/article/7-eleven-collected-customer-facial-imagery-during-in-store-surveys-without-consent/
7-Eleven Doing an Soda Tax for a Sweeten Tea on an Customer
https://csnews.com/class-action-beverage-tax-lawsuit-against-7-eleven-dismissed
https://headless-stage.courthousenews.com/consumers-accuse-chains-misapplying-illinois-soda-tax/
https://topclassactions.com/lawsuit-settlements/lawsuit-news/7-eleven-mcdonalds-walgreens-face-soda-tax-class-action-lawsuits/
https://www.sun-sentinel.com/2017/10/13/7-eleven-settles-lawsuit-with-customer-over-soda-tax-charge/
False Advertising on Potato Chips
https://topclassactions.com/lawsuit-settlements/lawsuit-news/7-eleven-potato-chips-false-advertising-class-action-lawsuit/
Persuaded consumers into accepting marketing messages for future text advertisements
https://www.classaction.org/news/telemarketing-texts-sent-by-7-eleven-were-illegal-under-the-tcpa-class-action-claims
Racial segregation lawsuit filed by former employee
https://southshorepress.com/stories/671717527-former-7-eleven-employee-alleges-discrimination-and-retaliation
https://www.entrepreneur.com/franchises/franchisees-take-7-eleven-to-court-for-alleged-racial/235895
Workers Not getting paid overtime
https://www.classaction.org/news/new-york-city-7-eleven-franchisee-hit-with-unpaid-overtime-lawsuit
Acquired stores without permission
https://csnews.com/7-eleven-faces-ftc-penalty-over-florida-store-acquisition


Work without meal breaks
==Good things company have done (idk to put this at it owns or what yet)==


https://www.cstoredive.com/news/7-eleven-settles-wage-related-lawsuit-missed-meals/644771/


==See also==
==See also==

Revision as of 01:39, 1 February 2026

⚠️ Article status notice: This article has been marked as incomplete

This article needs additional work for its sourcing and verifiability to meet the wiki's Content Guidelines and be in line with our Mission Statement for comprehensive coverage of consumer protection issues. In particular:

  1. Multiple sections not filled in
  2. Zero sources inserted as references (use ctrl + shift + k)
  3. Multiple incidents/lawsuits are irrelevant to the wiki (coverage should only cover things that directly affect consumers)
  4. No elaboration on article content; section ideas should be kept to comments (best inserted via visual editor) or the discuss tab only.

This notice will be removed once the issue/s highlighted above have been addressed and sufficient documentation has been added to establish the systemic nature of these issues. Once you believe the article is ready to have its notice removed, please visit the Moderator's noticeboard, or the discord and post to the #appeals channel.

Learn more ▼

⚠️ Article status notice: This Article's Relevance Is Under Review

This article has been flagged for questionable relevance. Its connection to the systemic consumer protection issues outlined in the Mission statement and Moderator Guidelines isn't clear.

Learn more ▼

7-Eleven
Basic information
Founded 1927-05-15
Legal Structure Public subsidiary
Industry Retail
Also known as
Official website https://www.7-eleven.com/

7-Eleven is an American retailer store that is an subsidiary of Seven eleven Japan that is owned by Seven & I Holdings. Founded in 1927 by Joe C. Thompson, originally known as Southland Ice Company, operated ice houses in Dallas Texas until it became an subsidiary of Southland Corporation. As a result of new ownership, all the retailers were named to Tote'm Stores, until renamed to 7-eleven in 1947 to reflect their new hours at 7am - 11 pm. [1]

Consumer-impact summary

  • False Advertising
  • Privacy Violations
  • Security Vulnerabilities

Incidents

This is a list of all consumer-protection incidents this company is involved in. Any incidents not mentioned here can be found in the 7-Eleven category.

7-Eleven Fuel App Security Breach in Australia and Japan

Main article: link to the main CR Wiki article

On July 2, 2019, an customer contacted the company about unauthorized charges, resulting in an investigation that discovered hackers gaining access to some accounts,[2] affecting 900 customers and resulting in more than $500,000 lost in fraudulent purchases.[3] The company issued an apology for the incident and stated that customers will be compensated for the incident, eventually leading to the creation of the customer support emergency number to help those affected. Two Chinese men were arrested in connection with this incident.

On October 25, 2019, an customer from Australia reported the breach when he was able to access other customers personal information. In response, 7-Eleven temporary shut down the app, describing it as "an maintenance issue", and opening the app at 5:30 pm.[3] It is unclear how many customer's were affected,[4] however the hacker was never found.

Lawsuits

Controversy Date Description Result Related article
7-Eleven Collected Facial Imagery of customers in Australia 2020 In June 2020, 7-Eleven introduced an survey called feedback kioskst hat customers voluntary participate in a survey about their experience. Conducted on tablets, it collected facial images of customers without their consent. 7-Eleven was ordered to cease this practice and destroy any collected data. [5][6][7][8][9]
False advertising on JUUL e-cigarettes. 2021 7-Eleven was sued for false advertising of the product, JUUL e-cigarettes, for alleging that it was a safer alternative to traditional cigarettes, which prior to 2018, claimed that it contained no nicotine. The lawsuit was settled, with 7-Eleven paying $1.2 million and having the company implement a monitoring program. [10][11][12][13]
7-Eleven False Advertising on Onion Chips 2021 A class action lawsuit alleges 7-Eleven is misleading customers with their product “Yumions” as an “crunchy onion snack”, while only containing small amounts of onions. The case is still ongoing [14][15]
7-Eleven Collected Biometric Data of customers in Illinois 2022 7-Eleven used surveillance system from Clickit to collect biometric data from customers without their knowledge, violating the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act. The case was dismissed without prejudice by the plaintiff, however the reason or behind remains unknown. [16][17][18][19][20]
7-Eleven false advertising Wellness Tonic as better alternative to alcohol 2023 7-Eleven and the manufacturer, Botanic Tonics, advertised Feel Free Wellness Tonics, as a safe, sober, and healthy alternative to alcohol despite containing kratom, an addictive opioid. The case reached a settlement of $8,750,000, requiring 7-Eleven to add kratom warnings on product labels and advertisements. [21][22][23][24]

Good things company have done (idk to put this at it owns or what yet)

See also

  • hey good lookin ;P
  • brian culberston- say What

References

  1. "7-Eleven". Popular Timelines. 2026-01-29. Retrieved 2026-01-29. {{cite web}}: |first= missing |last= (help)CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  2. "7-Eleven Japan suspends mobile app after data breach". Payments Dive. 2019-07-08. Retrieved 2026-01-31.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  3. 3.0 3.1 Coble, Sarah (2019-10-19). "Drivers' Data Exposed in 7-Eleven Fuel App Breach". Infosecurity Magazine. Retrieved 2026-01-31.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  4. Hudson, Kristin (2019-11-01). "7-Eleven Customer Data Exposed in App Security Breach". Identity IQ. Retrieved 2026-01-31.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  5. Kwan, Campbell (2021-10-13). "7-Eleven breached customer privacy by collecting facial imagery without consent". ZDnet. Archived from the original on 2026-01-31. Retrieved 2026-01-31.
  6. Marzouk, Zack (2021-10-14). "7-Eleven biometric data collection found in breach of Australian privacy laws". ITPro. Archived from the original on 2026-01-31. Retrieved 2026-01-31.
  7. "Privacy and biometric information. 7-Eleven breaches customer's privacy". Kalus Kenny Intelex Lawyers. 2022-02-07. Retrieved 2026-01-31.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  8. Thomas, Liisa; Dao, Anne (2021-11-17). "Australia Objects to 7-Eleven's In-Store Use of Facial Recognition Technology". Sheppard Mullin.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  9. Chapman, Alex; Mitchell, Stefan (2021-10-14). "7-Eleven told to delete customers' photos after facial recognition software falls under privacy commissioner's scope". 7News. Retrieved 2026-01-31.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  10. Smith, Anna (2021-10-18). "7-Eleven Hit With Class Action for Allegedly Hiding Harmfulness of JUUL Products". Top Class Actions. Retrieved 2026-01-31.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  11. "JUUL E-cigarettes Sold at 7-Eleven". Truth in Advertising. 2026-01-31. Retrieved 2026-01-31.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  12. Rizzi, Corrado (2021-10-18). "Class Action Claims 7-Eleven Failed to Warn of Juul E-Cigarette Dangers". Class Action. Retrieved 2026-01-31.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  13. Thrasher, Tyler (2025-09-09). "7-Eleven to pay $1.2 million to settle lawsuit over illegal vape sales near DC schools". Fox5 Washington DC. Retrieved 2026-01-31.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  14. Shaak, Erin (2021-01-12). "7-Eleven 'Yumions' Packaging Misleads Consumers About Onion Content, Class Action Says". Class Action. Retrieved 2026-01-31.
  15. "Yumions Crunchy Onion Snacks". Truth in Advertising. 2026-01-31. Retrieved 2026-01-31.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  16. Rizzi, Corrado (2022-04-26). "7-Eleven Hit with Class Action Over Alleged Collection of Biometric Data in Illinois Stores". Class Action. Retrieved 2026-01-31.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  17. "7-Eleven Class Action Alleges Retailer Violates Customers' Biometric Privacy". Top Class Actions. 2022-04-27. Retrieved 2026-01-31.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  18. "7-Eleven Faces Class-Action Suit Over Collection of Biometric Customer Data". Convenience Store News. 2022-04-28. Retrieved 2026-01-31.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  19. "Hess et al v. 7-Eleven, Inc". Justia Dockets & Findings. 2026-01-31. Retrieved 2026-01-31.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  20. Shah, Manish (2022-04-25). "Hess v. 7-Eleven, Inc. (1:22-cv-02131)". Court Listener. Retrieved 2026-01-31.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  21. Mehorter, Kelly (2025-04-15). "$8.75 Million Botanic Tonics Settlement Reached in Feel Free Kratom Lawsuit". Class Action. Retrieved 2026-01-31.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  22. Avery, Brad (2023-04-06). "Class Action Alleges Feel Free, 7-Eleven Misled Consumers About Addiction Risk". bevnet. Archived from the original on 2026-01-31. Retrieved 2026-01-31.
  23. Hanson, Natalie (2023-12-21). "7-Eleven must face liability claims over sales of a drink containing kratom". Courthouse News Service. Retrieved 2026-01-31.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  24. "Torres v. Botanic Tonics, LLC". Court Listener. 2026-01-31 (PDF). {{cite web}}: |archive-url= requires |archive-date= (help)