JavaScript: Difference between revisions
m JS is still JS even if it weren't a Standard |
bsky JS is just questionable. "at best" implies they're deliberately lying |
||
| Line 59: | Line 59: | ||
*[[X Corp|Twitter]]. It also used to work without it, but some time after being bought by [[Elon Musk]], it became mandatory.{{Citation needed}} | *[[X Corp|Twitter]]. It also used to work without it, but some time after being bought by [[Elon Musk]], it became mandatory.{{Citation needed}} | ||
*[[wikipedia:Bluesky|Bluesky]]: | *[[wikipedia:Bluesky|Bluesky]]: | ||
**The web app (<code>bsky.app</code>) shows this message if JS is disabled<blockquote>This is a heavily interactive web application, and JavaScript is required. Simple HTML interfaces are possible, but that is not what this is.</blockquote>which is questionable | **The web app (<code>bsky.app</code>) shows this message if JS is disabled<blockquote>This is a heavily interactive web application, and JavaScript is required. Simple HTML interfaces are possible, but that is not what this is.</blockquote>which is questionable | ||
**Its legal docs ([https://bsky.social/about/support/tos ToS], [https://bsky.social/about/support/privacy-policy PP], [https://bsky.social/about/support/community-guidelines CG]) need JS to be viewed by humans, however this seems more of an oversight than deliberate | **Its legal docs ([https://bsky.social/about/support/tos ToS], [https://bsky.social/about/support/privacy-policy PP], [https://bsky.social/about/support/community-guidelines CG]) need JS to be viewed by humans, however this seems more of an oversight than deliberate | ||
*[[Discord]]. While its instant-messaging functionality legitimately requires JS, they refuse to let the user change their account settings (including security and privacy ones) unless JS is enabled. | *[[Discord]]. While its instant-messaging functionality legitimately requires JS, they refuse to let the user change their account settings (including security and privacy ones) unless JS is enabled. | ||